PC 88-64'r' -'t'
''s
~
~
.R~'~~T~'.~N_~.. ~'~$.$~ ~
A RI:SOLLJT:CON UF THE ANAHEIM CITY nLANNING C~MMTSSION
'.CHA'r PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 375$ B~ aRANTED
;' WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Alanning Commi.s3ion d:td rev~:vo n
;~? vorif.ied Pet3.~ion ~or Variance from LOUTS p. SMAL~llINO, (i252 N. Rosemead
. Boulevard, Tomp1R City, CA 91;90, owner, and ~ agent, of cer.tain real
property situated in th~ f;ity oP Anaheim, Caun~y of Or~ngQ, State of
Cal3fornia descri.bed as:
LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 OF SO[1TH ~TRERT TRACT, AS SIiOWN ON
; MAP RECORD~D IN IIOOK 8, PI~GF $~ OF M:CSCELLANEOUS
MAPS, RECOAQS OE ORANGE COUNT'Y.
WHEREAS, Lhe C3.~y ~lanning Commission did hold a pubiia hear.ing
at the Civic CQntRr in tFie City of Anaheim on F6br.uary 29, 1988, at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said public hearing havinq beeii duly given as reg;iirect b,y law and in
accordancc~ with Che pr•ovisions of the Anaheim Mun.i.cipal Corle, Ctiapt~r 18.03,
to tiear and consider evid~nce for and agains* ~aicl proposed variance and to
investigate anc~ make findings and recommQndat.ions in connection therewith; and
WFIEREAS, said Commission, aEter due inspection, investigation
and study made by ir.self ~nd ir. its behalf, Hnd afker due con3i.deration of al'l
evideace and reports offered. at said hearing, does £ind c~nd detprmine t;h3
following facts:
1. That tlie p~titioner propo~es waivers of. the :o~lowinq to
construct a donut fihop in con;unction with an exi~ting liquor stores
SEC~zON$.~-_~,2b_L4.54~2? - Minimum_num or ~.~_p$rkii9~.~.~.~•
1-$-t-4~-~.4~4~9Z'~.~ (~~2 rr•.quired: 27 proposed?
~~~_St~O~Q
"~?- ~,~_,.9_k.~.,9~4
2. That ~he above mentioned waivor is herehy granted on ttie
~ basis that the parkinq wniver wi11 not causQ an .increase in traffic congestion
~ in the immediate vicinity nor adveraely affect any adjoining land uses and
granting of the parking waiver under Y.he condi~ions impoaed, if any, wf21 iiot
be detrimental to the peace, health, safety anc? genoral welfare of Che
citizens of ttie City, ~i l~naheim.
~ 3. That therc~ are axceptional or extraordinnry circumstance~
or conditions ~pp;icable to tha pro~~erty i:volved or to ~he intended use of
j the ~roperty that do noL• apply genor~lly to the properCy ar class oE use in
th~ same vicinity and aone.
;
f
'' nza.~x
~ PC88-64
, i ~ ~~'~'i~~r~!'~i~.'Mr~
~~6i~~
; i,
.:f
.; ~~~
;'~a
!~'
;,;;
, >,~
:l
~~
t','`+
s
;•i
,I
;;~
_.~. ,.~~~
~2~"~ier, r r i ..~ .!.v-s~v?e ~n.~:,.,, . ... .._ ._ , ._'"cY71' ea~~r,,..~~`1x1 biF,
y~ ;~§~~~ Vi }~i 'Vt4]~° =.ct i .. y ,u
.. ~i': 7.l r~tr 7J~{yl
,
. .. . , . ' ~ ~ ~
k~7~!Q~
~
~
~
~
,
7~
rl.j
~~
'~ . - ~~
t~j~4
~,~
!. .~i~
'
,~ iyp~,.a
M`
^'
R1 ~
~~~
~,. ~
,;~ .`
:
•M . „a
~ : rl
!~i:~.
~'
~~~ ~ -
~%~
% ~: :li
~
~
4. ThaL• khe
pr~servation and enjoyment of
r~queste~ variance ie ner,essaiy Eor tha
b ~'i
~
proper.ty in the samc~ vicinit ~ su
s~an~ial proper~y right possessed by other.
a
d "
y n
zone, an3 3enied Co th~ property in quostion. '`~
,
,,, 5. That ths requesr_ed vnr.iance will not be materially
detrimental Lo the public welfare or injurio
t `
'`
in such vicinity and zone in w us
o the proparty or improvemc~nts
hicti the property is located.
`.~
~1
~
5. That no one
in opposih.ion; an~ tYiat
indzcated theix presQnco ~t said public hearang ~
no
subjecL peCition. correspondence was received in opposition to
+ .(,'1~LIFORNIA ~rTVIR DtME f~,i, OU~~mX A T FIND f;
`••~ ~_ zN, That tk~p Anahoim
>, City Planning Commissaon has reviewed th~ propoaal to consrruct a donur_ Qhop
~ in conjunction with an ~xisting liquor store wikh a waiver of minim~un number
; of p~-rking ~paces on ~ rectangularly-shapad parcel of '.and consiating ~f
,~ a~proximately 0.47 acre located at thc~ southeas•t corner ~~ South Streer and
~: Anaheim Soulevard ancl f_urther described as 804 ro+.~th Anaheim F3oulevard; and
~~ d~os horoby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that ft has
~ considered th~ Negative Aeclaration together with any comments received
, d-xxinq the publ.ic review process and ~urkher fi:zding on the basis oE the
~
f' ini~ial study a.n~ any ccmrnents ro~eived that there i~ no substantial evide;ice
~hat the project wi7.l havc~ a significant eFfect on the en/ironment,
NOW, THER~FORE, EE IT RESO~VED that the AnahQim City Planning
Commission does hereby gr:~r~t subject Petition for Variar.ce, upoii the
~ollowzng conditions which are hereby found to be a nece~sary prerequisite to
th~- p:oposed use oE thz ;:ubject prop~rty in order to pres~rve the s~iety and
g~neral wtifare of the Citizens of ~he City oE Anaheim:
1. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate ~raffic
s.ignal assessment fQe shall be paid to ~he City oF Anaheim in an amount
as determined hy Che Cit.y Council.
z• 1'hat the owner of subject property sha11 frrevocably offer to ded.icate
ro ~he City of Anaheim a strip of: land 32 feot in w~dth from tihc~
cenkerline of the streel: along 5outh Sl-reat f~r gtrost wideninq purposas.
3. That all drivew~ys sha11 be recanstructo3 to accommodaCe ten (lp) toot
radius curb returns. Exir~ti;~q broken or cracked arivQways sha11 bo
removeQ and replaced as re~uirscl by the City Engineer.
'1. Thafi all air conditioni.ng facilities and other roof and ground mUUnted
aquipnent shall bo pr.o~eriy shielc3od from view, and the sound buffered
fram adjacent residentiai prupertfes.
S. That rho pxo~osal shall comply with all siyning roquirements of the CL
"Commercial, Gimited Zone, unloss a variance allowiiig sign waivers is
app:oved by the Czty Co~.~ncil, Plat,ning Commission or Zoning
Administrator.
-2~ PG88-64
,,,~
~,~Y;
r
: i 7.S ~~T'! }~;~
~
~ 6.
I
~.
' 8.
~ ~
a , ~,
- ~~,~,s
~+~f
'i
+~ ~,i~~
;,b
~1'';r~
"',%i
That the nc~w construction authorized by this r.oaoluL•ioiz sha11 be served ~~
by undorground utilitios. ,4?;
~
That trash storage areas shal~ bQ proviQed and rnai,ntained in accordancR `+j~
with ~pprov~d plans on fi16 wit2a the SL•rr,et M.aintenance and 5anita~ion `.,y~
Di.vi.sion.
;; r
, ' ;; ~.
'rht-L a six (6)-foot high m3sonry blaak wa11 shal? be constructod and ~'~~
maintain~d alany the south pr•ogQrty line excepting the front setback
~:liere ~he wa11 hei
ht
h
ll `.~~t~
~~
g
s
a
be ~hree (3) feet. r
9.
That any proposed parking aroa lighting tixtures adjacent to ~he
residenL•ial ;
r~,
~
property sk~al.l be dawn-lighted wi~h a maximwn height o£ 12
feet. Said li,yhting F
iutur
h ,
~'
.
es s
al). be direated aw~y from adjacent
residential prop~rty lines I:o prGtcct tkze residential zntegrit
oE th
`"'~
~
e
areu. `;~i
;
1a.
That subject prc~Perty sha).1 be dPVeloped subs~anhially in accordancs
~rith plans and ,~i~r
;1
i
specifications on f5.1e with the City o•~ Anaheim mark~+d
F:xhibit Nos. 1 and 2. ,
';i'
Y.
t
'`~i
l.l. Tha't prior to Che commencement of the activity authorizec3 by th3s
re~olution, or
ri
or t
i '~~~
p
.
o
ssuance oP a building permit, or wi~hin a
~~+riod of or.e year from the date of thi ,~~
s resolution, whichever occurs
iirst, Conditi~n Nos. 3. and 2, abovo-mentioner]
shail b ~
,
e complied with.
Extensions for fur.ther scime t;o complete snid conditions ma
h '~
''r
4r
y
e granted
in accurdence with Sc±ct3on 18.p3.09~1 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. ,~
'
~'~
12, That prior Co final buildinq and zonin ins ections,
4
3
6
7
~ion Nos
8 i~'
'
~
.
•
,
.
.
. 9 And 10, above-mentioned, shall be corn
~tg
lied ,
~
W
p
'x' 13. 1'hat approval oE r_hi~ ~pPlication constitutes apprpval of the propoaed
request only to tho Qxkent thr~t it complies with the Anahe.im Municipol
~; Zoning Code,and any othor applicable City regulaL•ions. Appr4val doea
~, not ii-clude ~ny action or findiny~ as to compl3anae or appiov~l of ~he
;~ reguest regarding any ~ther applicable orclinance, regulatfon or
requirement.
~~ BE J.T FURTHEFt RESOLVED th~s~ the Anaheim City Planning Commission c1oe~
herebv find anc3 deL•ermi.iie that adnption aE this Re~o7ution is e.xpress;.y
~' prec3icated upon applicant's compliancQ wit~ oaCh and all of the con.litions
i herein~bove seti forth. Shrauld any sucki conditions, or an
w dec:lareci invalid or unenforcoable by the final judgmenty oFa~any h court/ o£
; competont jurisdiction, Chen this Resolution, and any approvals hc~rein
. cant~ined, she]x be doc~mod null nnd void.
,.,
,,
'i
-3-
,, '~„ ,: ,.
PC~8-6~1
_~`
;;s
`°~
;ti
;'t
~ :s'~i,'.'~`•t;!-id
~it'~.~' ~ 'lj J e • ~ i.`~ ~~~ '., l .~-~ 4 .,; _. ,. ..~.~ y . ~ _
~'.~! ~~b~,V' fM1 nr.._
~
~~ J
y ~ IY~
~~'~ 1e~ k.SYrf.~
~~
N~~
~tr
I
~
' S 4
~h ~
ik
'
~
~
p 1 ~, ~ ~
I
I
~'
w
tt
l~
~
.
y kr.'
.
a
r 11
~"' . ~,. r ,~ y v
At
A 9~
,
Y
.{
~ _.. ,. `;!.C~ i'S~ i~' ~.i i.. r :~ '~ll_ hr~, ~ , ~ J~ !1 ~t p a i~. F ~ ,. i ~ f ti~~ } ,n1 i. 1
. .
~
I, ~
ti
~f
~
~ '
~
,
~
~} ~
, ~ . . .h
, ! 1 4l ~:• ) ~ !~ ~' ~~ 1
~ ~i; t
S ~
._1;..'.
. .. .
~
. .
~~~ . /
, ~5 5~~
t
~ `~] ~'hi
a
.,a
!; J irS
, . ~. . :,I.:~f;~
~ ~~~,
~
.'L
f
_ i~i
TIiE FOREGOING RESOLLITION is sig
d ~n~ ~r
~
of Februsry, 1ggg.
~ppraved by me this 29th day
`•;
~
/
~,:~/ ~_
/~
7~ J/~ ~
L~4^~V C~ V ~
.~,
v ~ ~
A
s:~
CHAIRMAPI, AN'AFIEIM CI
$LANNING COMMISSION ~t~~
~'`~~
t~
~
ax~r~sr : ~
,
':~~!.~
~ ` ~
SECRETARX, AN,AFiE~ TY. __
PL ING COhtN1ISSI0t7
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
CQUNTY Or ORANG~. ) Ss,
CITY OF ANAHEIM }
r;
;~
, f,r,
~~,r.S, ~
7
~~;
~,
!~r~,
",~~;
~~~:
-`
'
Commissio I, Edith L.
n,
do hereby ce Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
rtit
tY~at
h
~;
J'
~~
~
adopted
nt a meeting y
t
a Eoregoxng reso.luL-ion was passed and
of ~he Ax~aheim Cit
Pl
i
!
~
` February 2g, 198g, by thc~ y
~nn.
ng Commission
he.7.d on
followinr voto of th ~_:
;~ e members thereof;
~
k: AI E S :
CQMMTSSIOZI~RS:
BOUAS, BOYDS~UN~ CARUSTLLO, FELDFIAUS, MC BURNEY ~`~
~~
t~
~~~s~
COt~fISuTONERS: .,
MESSE
NONE ,=/~,
:;d
f
;; ; AHSENT: COI~IIrlI~SIONERS: HERHST ;9~
~ ~ ,
~~ ,.~
?~
'j
r
February, IN WITNESS WH~RBOF, I hat~e hereunto s~t m,y hand this 2•
~ggg
~th
i
~
'
. ~ c
ay of ,~
~
.,j .a
y~
~~~ ~
~J`dief~
~
~ . 7~'
J.
~ .
,~~~ .!
~ir'
SECRETARY, ANAHFIM CITY PLANNING COMMIS5 pI N , ?,yi
'y~~
)
~i:*
(
:~
,
~S1
`~
}'
f . ~{...~,~1,
~ i!~
!~
1 r5y
. . ',~..',~k
f
rf
1 r+;
`i,
,
`,.i
` ,,
; ~i.
'
~4~ PCfiB-64 ,
~r
, ~~~
;~t3
y7'
~f
~.;r
''
<'
Y
F F ~ ..,'. . .
f~lY ':
~i
.
. ~
~
. . . . . _ 1 '.r :e
~ r~,r~~
y'~~
~ _ . . _ . . .. . ~. ~ ., .. ..~, .. . . .. . .. ... ~ ... ~f.M~4,?~;.