PC 88-69(t~~~. ~ _ . .~~~ f~v~~T~<~l'y4~W~1p~~{,N~iht1?~~.~hi~~d~{v(t?{~r~YY+~iJ~~ !;L
',qd+hw.. ~ ~. . , -, . . . . ,~ , . „~ , ,~ , ~ , . .., ... ~'~ ~ .
~
~ ~
rsa:~
RESOL~J_T_IQN N0._P(''88-t~~
~
n : 'e^ '~,i
A R~~OLUTION OF THE ANAHE'[M CTTY PLANNING COh4~SISSSON
THAT PETZTIQTI F.'OR RECLASSIFIC.~TION N0. 87-88-40 II~ GRANTED
WHE~tEAS, the Anal-ieim Ci~:y P].anning Commission d.i~. receive a
veriEied petitzon for Re~lassification from AT.BERT COHEN, 33C1 Barryde].1, Los
Angeles, California 9U064, owner, and HUGO A. VASQTJrZ, 2240 W. ~,incoln
Avenue, Anaheim, Calitornia 92a05, aqent, ~f certain real ~ropert~~ situated
i.n the City of Anahei.m, County of Orange, State of Calif~zi~ia, ciescribed as
Pollows:
PARCGL 1: TIiE SOUTH 198.00 FCET, M~ASURED FROM T~IE
C~;NTER L'lPIL; OP' LA PAI,MA AVEtNE, OF THE EAST 44.00
FEET QF I~OT 11 OF THE MIL~S RA47CH~, ~N 1rt~ CI~TY OF
ANAHEIM, AS ~`ER MAP RECOT2DED TN BOOK 4, PAGE 7 UF
MISCEI,LAN~OUS MAPS, IN TFIE OPFIC~ OE THE i:OUNTY
R~COF~DEF OF SAIi~ COUNIY.
EXCEPT AN UNDIV:[Di,D ONE-HALF INTER~ST IN' AND TO A'LL
OIL, GAS: MINF.RA~,S AND OT:iER I•TYDROCARBOZI SUHSTANi,ES
7N AND UNDER SAID LF.ND, BU7' WTTHOL'T TH3 RTGFiT TO
EITTER THE SURFACE TFiEkEON ABQVE DEPTH OI' 500 FEET, A.~i
RF~~ER'VED BY JERRY C. DULAN, et ux., IN DEED TO LT~SLTE
E. ~3UCt:, e*_ ux. RECORDED S~PTEMB~R 28, 1955, i.n BOOK
3226, PAGE 149, OF OFFICIAL ~ECORDS.
SAID L~'~ND :IS INCLUDSD WITFi7Iv TFiE AREA SHOWN ON A MAP
FLLED 1N BOQK 6 PAGE 43 G~ REC:ORD 5URZIEYS, xN THE
OI'FICE Ql TFIE COliNTY R~CORDER OF SAID COUNT'.~.
PAHCET., 2: TFIE SdUTI~ 308.21 F'Ei.T OF TFIAT PORTIAN OF
LOT 11 OF .T.FT~ MILES RANCHO, TN TkiE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
.AS SFIOWN ON i1. MAP ~HEREOF R~CORACD IN IIOOK 4, PAGP; 7,
MISCELLANGOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF S~'~ID OH.Ia.NGE COUNTY,
DrSCRIBED AS FQLLOWS:
REGINTIZNG A~ A PUINT ON THE GASTERL~X .T.,I13E OF LOT 11,
652.8 FEET S~UTH OP' THE NORTHEAST CORN:•~R OF SAID LOT
11, AND RtJNNING T.H~:NCE WFST~RLY P~ARALi~E'L WITTi THE
NUI2THERLY LINE; OF SAID LOT Za., 106 iEET; THENCE
SOUTHE;RLY PARALLSL WITI~ THE EAST~RLY LINE OF SAID LnT
ii TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE THEKFOF; T.HFNC~ E7~STERLY
ALONG SAID SGUT:iERLX L7:NE TO THE SOUTHEAST~RLY CORNER
AF SAID LOT 11; TH~I~CE NORT~FRLY ALONG TH~ ~ASTERI~Y
LINE Oc^ SAIA LOT 11 TO THE POINT OF BEGINN~NG.
EXCEP7'TNG THEREFROM THE ~AS1' ~:4 FE~T THEREOF.
;i
,t
~~';
*.,
~;'
l_
3..' I
:•,i . l
1..~ .
r~ ~
~~:~~_~~
Oa21~
PC88-69 _ _ .... :.~i'_~i
,:'i:
. . ~. ,~{i..
Y:IY
'~~(~
'S!F;
i
`i~
~ 'rV ~
,~i ~ ~'>7'r;
~ i~~r i'~1
, ._ , .~.. .. , .. .. , ..~~,b .tr~,7v)aF$u~
f`
. ~ '
r~,y
i ~
*~''~
ALSO EXCEPTTNG TFiEREFROM TI3E N08TH 1a0.21 FEET
TH~REOF.
I~OTE 1: SAID LA2dD IS SHOWN OI~ A MAP GF SUhVEY
RECO~iDED IN BUOK 6, PAGE 43, RECQRD OF SURVEY.
~1i"y!«'~
~ r!ln~
;
' ;t~`a
'~,i~
;~,`,:~
f r,`
';,,~~;zr
~`:~~
;~;4i
?~;
,'`;%;
:`r;:,
~,~~
~~'HEREAS, ~,he City Planning Cammission did ho:l.d a public hearing at
tlie Civic C~3ntor in the City oE Anaheim on idarch Y4, 198Fi a~ I:30 p.m., notice
o~ said pub:tic hearing having been duly ~ivan as req~iired by law and in
accordanr.e wii.h the provisioa~s of the Anzheim Munic3pal Code. Chapter 18.03,
ko hear. and consider evidence for and ~gainst saicl proposed rer.lassiEication
a:id to inves~igate anci make Eindings and rECOrnmendations .in connection
therevrith; and
97HEREAS, said Commission, aL-ter dus inspection, investigation ancl
~ study made by itself and in its behalF, and after due consideration of a11
? evidence ar~d reports offored at said hear.ing, does find und determzne ~he
;; fo~.lowing fac~s;
1. That; the petitioner proposes reclassifi~,ation Portion B(the
westerly 62 feet) of subject propexty from the CG (CGmmerCxaY, General) Zone
to RM-12UC (&~sit~ential, Multiple-Familyj 2one.
;,, ~ ~
'h.~.:~~.:~. ~ . .
~`~'k~~ ` . .
~i ~.:. , . . . . .
2• That the Anafieim Gener~7. ~l~n designates subject prop~rty for
General Commer~ial land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification o:[ subject property is
necossary and/or desirable far tlie orderly and proper develcpment of ~he
community.
4. That tlie proposecl reclassificatior~ o~ subject property does
properly relate to the zones and their per,mitted uses locally astablished iii
close proximity to subjecL- property and ~o the ~on~s and their p~rmitteci uses
generall~~ established throuc~hout the c:ommunity.
.ri. That the pr~pased rQC].assifica~ion of subjac~ property requires
the dedication and improvemenk of abut~ing stree~s in ar,cordance with the
Circulati~n E~ement oE tha General Plan, due to the anticipat~d increase in
traffic wh~ch wili be gQnera~ed by ~ho zntensificAtion oL• land use.
6. `Pht~c one per5on _ndicated hc~r presence at said pu~7ir. hearing in ~i
oppasiti.on; and tha~ no c.arras~ondence was received in Q~position to subject ~'`,!
petiLion.
-z-
_ ~, . ..
~;
,n~o~
. . . . . ' ~ ~ Yt ^ 1 Y
' ~. . . ~ ~~~1{ ~,~
~ ~r~
~ ~~I
';a~
,.~
~: i
, :;"r'
;~1;
~ALIFORNTA ENV R~ONM~NmAL OU~LITY A T FINnING: That the Anaheim ~:'
City P_anning Commission has reviewed the proposal to re:classify Portion A of
subjoct property from the CG (Commercial, General) zone ~o tho Rbf-1200
(Residen~ial, Multiple-Family) zone and to construct a 12-unit, 3-stor,y
"affordak~le" ~partment bux.J.ding xinder authuraty oi Government Code 5ection
659].5 on the entire praperty (Portion A) with waivers of rAquire~i co~~erage of
parking spaces, r,.inimum builc3ing site area pPr dwalling unit,. maximum
strucL-ural height, maximtuti site coverage and required sic~Q yarcl setba.^.k on ~n
irregularly~shaped parcel ~E laaid consisting oE a~proximately 0.29 acre .`':~,~
having a frontage of approximately 106 teQt on the nor~h side of La Qa1ma
Aveiiue anci being located approximai:ely 7.110 teet wast o£ th~ cezztsrline af
Harbor Fiou].evarcl and fur~her desaribec] as 719 and 723 West La P~lm~s ,~v~nue;
with ~ortion B being a~ortion oF Portion A. consisting of approximately Q.7.5
acre de:..:sca.bed as 723 West La Pa1ma Av~nue; and does hereby ap~rove the
Nec~ative Aeclaration upon fi.nding that it has considored the Negati~~e
Declaration rogether with aiiy comments xeceivcd during thp public review
process an~ further finding on the ~asis of the initial stufly and any
comments receivecl that there i.s no substaz~tial evi.dence thak tih~ project wi11
have ~s signitican~ ef.fect: on ~he envir~nment.
NOW, 1HERGFOR~, HE I7' RESOLVED that the A,naheim Ci.ty Planning
Commission does hareby qrant subj~ct Petitiion fur Reclasszf.ic~tiori and, by so
doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anahein, Municipal Code be amendsc~ to
exclude the abov~-described propar.ty Erom the CG (Commercial, Ganeral) zorie
and to incorp~rate said described pr~perty into the RM-1200 (12esidential,
Multiplo-Family) zone ixpon the Lollowing conditions which are liereby found to
be a necessary prerequiszte to the proposed use uf sub~ect. pro~erty in ordar
to preserv~ the safety and gener~:l welfare of t~ie CiL-izpns of. the City oP
Anaheim:
f~'.
S ;
~ Y
~ ~ `
j,y , ~'
}
~ A~ t ~~ y '.
r~}' ,~~ ;
d :`- / ~
}~ ~ I ~p~} ~65f~~ ! G7' ~ f ... , .
aTaiSi! F~~eS ~
1. That the owr,er of subject proporty :hall irrevocably of.fer to
dedic~te to i:he City nF Anaheirn ~ strip of land fif ty three
(53) feet in wid;:h from the centerlin~ of the stroet alang La
Palttiz Avenue for street widening purposes.
2, That thc~ owner of subject~ propQrty shall submit a letter
reque3ting terminatian of Variance No. 611 to the zonzn5
D.l.V1S].011.
3. ~hat prior to inkraUuchion of an 8rdinar.ce rQZOniiig subject
property, the pr.operty owner shall pr~spare and record an
unsubor.dinar_ed covenant limiting occupanay of each apartment
unit _o no more than two (2) persons (other t2ian childr~n undQr
th~: age of twu ( 2) years ) per b~+dra~m. ;;aid limitataon sha7.1
bo included in each ~.easQ/rental ~greement. A r_opy of the
covenant shal.l b~ :,ubmitted ti~ siid ap~ro~ed by the City
Attornay prior to reaor:~ation. ~ copy of the recoxded covenant
sha11 be furY~ished ~o thQ Zoni.ng L~ivision.
:;
'r,
~ ~~ ~~:;;i
;'i
;. ;,,
' ~y
~
,,'-a
?.`,'
~;~
r`sr
<`r~
.,'~
~
:,.
;,
' ~F.
~ ;iu
'34
l';~
y}~
~ J r' ~M
'ii,
;'~I
~~7,
.jY~
^irl
-3- PC88-69
:
,
~
, . . ~ . ~ .. , ' .. ~ .:,
, ,... .... , .... . .,...w
, .. . . ,.„ .~ . .~..:h~~er,•..~ .1 ~R.,..r N..:'•bq~p . _2,, v .~., , ., Y t ,J!:~;: ~1 tt E .Jd~4.jC 11/~ r
' ,.. . , ., .. a ,~'~:~te E»~~~~ar~WA$'.~
~~•~~
....,,,`
~ . , ~ . . ~ ~ ~~ r{,~zC+
4~ t : ~:`'l,
- ~ ~ .~~. ~~~
. , ' .
T
f
~~
. . .~~.:1
4~ That pr~or to the introduction ot an ordir,ancp rezoning subjec~
r `I
p
oporty, Condition Nos. 1,
2 and 3, above-mentioned
shall b ~~
,
e
campleted. The provisions or rights gran~ed by this resolution
sha11 beco
l ;~
~''
me nu
l ar~d void bp 2chion of the Planning Commission
unl~ss said condition ~~4~
~
~
s are complie~ with w,ithin one yoar from
the date of this res~lu~
ion ~
~
.
, or such further time a~ tho
Planning Commission ~~
'`
may gra:iC. ~~
5
.
5. That appraval nf this applicatzon consti~utes a
a ~
f
~
progosed request only tu the extent that it compliQS
with.the
An~hei,m Munici
al Z
i ~~~
p
on
ng Code and any nther applicable City'
regulations. Approval does r
ot includ ~
_
e any action or findings
a~ to compliarsce or appr~val o~ the request regardin
an
th ;;;~
,.
~J
g
y o
er
applicable ardinance, regulation or req•u%remQZ~te .
:`~
BE TT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anahe.im City Planning Commission ~
' .t
does hereby Find and determine tha.t ac:option of this RQSOlu~ion is expressly `~~'
predicated upon applicant's compliance with eac.h and a11 0£ khe cont~it.ions r
hereinabove set iorth. Should an~ such condition,, or ant part thereof, be
declared invalid ur unenPprceable by the final judgment of any court of }
competent jkrisr,tiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals lierein ;t
aQata9.n~d, sha11 be deemed null and void.
;,`;~
,,;
~;
THE E'OFEGQING RESOLUTrON is signed and approved by me ~his 14th clay r
or March, Iggg, , ~ ~
~,e,,,~' ~~ ~_ ,.
_ ~'~~-- ~.,,
CHAxFtMAN, ANAHE!(M CTTX PLAAINING CCIMMISSIdN '~~
~
~ r~:
ATTEST;
~~ - ,/~ ' ~
' ~_1~ ~` ,.~ ~,:
SECF~1ARY, ANAHETtQ CITY PLANNIISG COMMISSTON "
;;
~ ;~; x
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ti;
~ t;
,,
!:`~
sf
;`~
3'
, ,! ~
'~
~~~
,; '~'.
~ '; ~~
P ~a ,
t ~; '
~~,~~~rl~/ ~'S ~t ~~ i,
.t.r?'. n ~ ,
, y~~„~ ~
~' iSZ~r~~ r,l~+ ~
C t+~i,~~r • ,
~~ (~J f1i
U~ r'} ~ i i,
. ~~"~'1~~.i~Ya vi l Y r
~~-
PC88-69
~k ema:• . .. . , . . .
~ ~ c~'~
1. ~
~, Y
STATE OF CALTFORNIA
~
,. , y`.~ a,ay ~a.i:fJ P rf ".hn~~a~4 ~~ '~ ~
,~
1 1 ! I "> 7
r '` i '-`.:af~r ~ 4~ ~ i
~ a~
t Ji t1t; ny_.
t ~7f;~t~ 4 .
~ ~ `~ . . . . ~~ ,. i ,...~.t
. .~4~~4~•.
. , ~ . . . .. . ~: t~
GOUNTY Or pRANGE ) 53. ;.~
t;ITY OF ANAE~F.IM )
I, EdiCh L. Harris, S~:cralary of the Anaheim City Planning 1'~
Commission, c]a IiorFby certify that tihe forogoing resolution was p~ssed and
adoptec; at a meeting af tYio Anaheim C~ty Planning Commiss3on ho7d on :,i
.,j
March lA, 1988, by the fol~owinc~ vote of the members f:horoofs ,
i
,~
AXES: COMMISSIONER~: BOUAS, BOYUSTUN, CARL'3'[LLO, F~LDHAUS, HERBST, %`i
MFSSC
NOES: COt~tISSIONFRS: NnNE
AHSENTt CC)MMISSIOPTERS: MC BURNEY
I!1 W7TNES5 WH~REOF, I have hr,reunt^~ s~t my hand this 1~1th Uay ~f
March, 1989.
„
~
_ ____ ~~~~ _..._~~~~~,
SECRETAI2Y, ANAHBIM CYTY PLAl~NING COI~4(ISSION
r;.
,,
ii
:i
~ ''~
c
~
~
„.
i
i~
,
~ P~~'
2
i~
;
,•e
.~
ry~
~
:~~~
,~b
;..~s
:~
Y,S
___ _. ,;~
;:~
_5_ PC~38-69 ,~;~
a
~,~
~ N~~
~} ti H Y ..1"..n . . .~ . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . 1`n. +~~I~~,