PC 88-78~
. ~ ' . ~ , . , ~,, r"';7;
;t
~
r
~ FSHK~L.4-'~L~ ~sl` .+._i'Y.l.~'!_Y~Y
, A RESOLTJ~JON OI' T'.iiF ANAHEIM CI'TY PLADrNING COh4rfI ~SZON
DENYTNG G~NEI:AL PLAN AN,FN~MEr"T N0. 235
;; WH~REAS, the City Cuuncil of L•he Ciry o~ Anaheim diQ adopt the
~~ Anaheim Geno.ral Pl~n by Itesolution No. 69fi-64A, showing the ~Jenaral
N~~ description and extt~nt oi p~ssiblc~ ftaL•ure iievelopment within ths city~ and
~,
«iEREAS, pur.suant to a property owner rQguest for su amendment
to the Land Use Elem~nt of thQ Ganer.al P1an, stafF prepared a General Plan
Iamendment for the stud~ area cnnsisting of approa:imatQly 1 acro of land
locatod on thQ south side o.f North Skreet approx.imd~eT.g ?.g0 feet weat of ~asL
i; StreeG and fur~her ~Iesc:ibG;r3 as 1U14, 1020 ,~nd 1028 ~ast North S~reet; and
G.;
~;
~ WHCRFAS, the Planning DQpartment deemod it appropriate,
`~ ursuant to the
; P provisic~ns of- the Cal,ifornia Environmental Quality Act, that
there ar~ no significant environmental impaets anc~ rQCOmmondocl that a Negative
j Aoclaration be approvrd; and
.~ WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did hold a publia
.~
3 hearix~g at tho Anaheim Civic Center, Council Chamber, 200 South Anaheim
F3r~ulevard, in the Ci~y of Anaheim ~n January 4, 198~, at 1:30 p.m., notice o£
, said ptiblic hearir.q having been duly given as requirad by law ~nd in
~
'
' accordance with the provisions ot ~h~ Ana'~eim blunicxpal Code, Chapter 7.8.03,
-
<i to hear and consider ~vidence for and a ainsr.
9 said
proposed
variance anrl to
invostigata and make findinys and recammenda~ions in connection therewi~h; an~l
r;'
`' subject petition was continued to the mee~ing~ of February 1, February 7.7,
i, FQhruary 24 and March 14, 7.g88; and
r~
;:';, `r
WHEitEAS, s~id Commissioz~, uftQr due consideration, inspection,
k .invQStigation and study made by itself, and after duo c~nsideration of all
+ ovidence and rQports offered at said hearing, GOCS HERGnY FINB:
; l. That evidence present~:d does noC substantiate th~ need for
au amoi.dmQnt to t2ie Anahnim GQr~qr~'1 Plan would bR prQm~tur«~ aC this time.
~.
' 2. That apprc.~ximately 10 pers~ns werQ pre~ont at thQ
~`' Mar~h 14th public hearing; 27 persons at the Januery 9 hearing; 3 persons a.t
f-' f.he ~ebruary 17 hearir-g; 3 person;~ at tho February 2y, 1988 public hearing fu
oppo3itior~; and that petitions and l~ttars conra~ining approximately 180
signatures were received in opposit.io~i to subject request. ,
~
3. That the redesignar_ic~n at this time to Low-Medium Density
Re~idential wouJ.d adr~ to an already hn~svily travelQd 3treet.
:~
'~
r~ 0230r.
PC88-7~
;}
~'
;~
:~ ,
F~ . ~ . ~ . . ~ ~. . . - • ~~~~~ 7~
4~ ~.
~~:.
~`
~ M `
,~ ~ . ~
~
~ 1~
s
~
7
+
9~,! ~ ~
~ ~.,'i~0
' ~~,~'
,+
?
~ . !
+kl
'
i'~
~5
. ~
. I'.'t.
! Y,
;
~~k=~Q~tNTA E~V.I~2~N~.~._Q 1~.~.~ AC7' FxNt~I.~: Thr~t the Anaheim
C3ty Planning Comrnissi
h
~`;
. on
as reviewed the proposa1 to amend th~ Lar~d Use
Element of tho General P1an to change the c
rr
~
'
~ u.
en
dosigna
cion oE J~ow Density
kesidential to Low-Modium L-ensity R~sidenCial lan
1
~
uses and to rEClassiEy
sub;ject property Eram tne FtS-7200 (Resfdant:ial, Single-F'amily) 7
one t ;
'`~
,
o the
RM-2400 (R~sidenti~l, Multii~le-Femily) Zono to canstruct a 19-unft, 1-story
"aEfordable" ~,'
,
~<< apartment complox under aut:hority o~ Gova~:nment Code ~ection
65918 wi~h waivers ot (a) minimum buildin
it i
~
',`"' g s
e area per Ciwalling uni~, (»)
maximum site coverage and (c) maximum fence height on a
t
i
~r
'~' r.c~c
~
anqularly-sha ed
parcel of l~nd consi,stin of a
g ~proximately 1.0? acres locuted npprox3mat31
190 t ,~n
p
eet west of the centerl:ine of. East Strest and describ~d at 1014, 1020,
102$ E~s~ 2~Torth Street
d
7 ;
; an
c
oes hereby npprove the, Negative Dc,claration upon
tinding that it has considai•ed ~he Negative Decla
ti
'
~~ ra
oa together with any
comments received during the publ.ic review process and fur.ther Einding on the
basi ;';
;'; .s of the initial stucly eind any comments received th~~ there ig no
substantia2 evidence that ~h ~'
'~
.:~ e project will have a siynificant efPect on the
environment.
,
tJOW, THEREE'Ok~, IIE IT Ft~:SOLVED,. that ~ursuant to the above
find.:ngs, ttie Anahsim City Pl~nning C~mmi.ssion does herc~bx deny Genoral Flan
Amendment N~~. 235 - T~and Use ElEmp:at.
THE F'OREGOTNG RESOLU7'ION is signed and approved by me this 14th
day ~f M~rch, 1968.
,'7
~" I
___ ~ °~'-~ ~ ~ 1 u-~-_
CI~AYR:~lAN, ANAHEIM CIT PLANNING COhA~SISSION
7~TTES.~ ;
~.~-~~, ~ ~ a
SECRETARY, ANAH~TM CITY P,ANN.T.NC COMMISSIGI3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) J~
~'ITY OF' ANAIiCIM )
w
;` T, Fciith I~. H~3rri~, Secre~~ry o£ the Anaheim City Plannin~
Commis~ion, clo heroby certify that the for~
oin
r
l
i
~;
'~
adopted
at to me~ting q
g
eso
ut
on wa~ passed "
,i
o~ the AnahQim City Pa.anning CUmnission held ~
March 14, on
1983, by ~he fnllowing voL•e of tha~ membars therenf::
~`.;
'd
~Y~S%
N(iES
CODII~lISSIONERS: '.~
~OUAS, BOY1~S'PUN, FELDFiAUS, HERBST, MESSE,
: COMMISSIO~IERS: CARUSILLO
~~ A2~5ENT: COMMISSION~RS: MC BURNEX
~
P
of March IN WITNESS
1988 WHEREO~, I 2iave }:er~unto set my hand this 14~h day ~'~
~ , .
c`! ~~ J ' . . _. _'
~
_._.._...__
_ .
SECRFrAttX, ANAHEIM CITY PL1WNZt3G COt~fISSION '
"2" PCB~-78
, . ,.,.'a~