PC 88-79~
l~
RESOLTJTZON,~iQ, PC$8_7y
~
~ ;~ ~ "t`K
. r:'FI ~ ~,
F,~
~
. ~ . ~ .'~;~,ty~
.. ~ . . :'~~~f
. , -~~ ~,~~~•~
~
A NESOLUTION pF THr aNAF1EIM CITY PI,ANiTING COMMISSION
~'FiAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 87-88-32 BE; .D~:NIF,D
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Comrnission cli.d receive a
verified pQtition for Rocl~ssif3cation from SANTOA BECERRA f~ ~tOSA BECERRA,
J.OIh F:as~ North Street, Aneheim, Cala.fornia 92005, UOllALn K. SMAL,T~EY & JERI
M. SMAGLEY, 1020 E. Nor~h Street, Anaheim, CaliEornia 92801 and J~1MES R.
NEEDIiADS & SHTRLEY A. N~EUHAM, 128 E. North StrQ~t, Anaheir~i, California ~2801,
owner and MAGDY HANNA, 4000 MacArthur Baulevax•d, No. 680, tJewport Bc~ach,
California 92660, agent, Eor certain real property situai:ed in the City oE
Ana:~eim, County of Or:~nge, State of Cala.fornia, described as Eollows:
HE;GINNING AT 1~ POTNT II3 TFi~ NORTH L:[NE OF VINEYARD
~ 'L07.' A-1, AS SHOWN UN A MAP RECORDED IN i300K 4, PAGES
~ G29 ANU 630 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF LQS ANGELE~ COiINTY,
; CALIFORNIA, SAID POINT BEING A 306.5 FEET WESTER'LY OF
THE NOP,THEAST CORPILR THEREQF; I2U~INING THENGE
SOTITHERLY PARALL,T:'L TO THE EASTBRLY LINE QF SAID LOT,
' 225 FErT; THENCE 'RESTERI,Y PARAI~L~L 'f0 THE NORTHERLY
I,TNE OF SAID L,UT, G7.5 FEET; TIiENCE NURTHEttLY
PA1tALLEL TO SAID EASTERLY LINE, 225 ~EET TO A POTNT
TN THE ~AID NOR:CHERLY LINE; TFIENCE EASTERLY ALONC,
SATU NORTHERLY LINE, 67.5 FEE~ TO TIiE POIN'.P 0~'
BEGINN:[NG.
f3EGINNING AT A F'OINT III THE NORTH LINE OF VINEYARD
LOT A-Y, A~ SHOWN ON A MAP RECURDED tN BOOK 4, YAGES
629 lND o30 OF DEEDS, RECORDS Ob' LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
f:ALIFORNTA, SAID POrNT BEI~IG 164 Fr,ET WFST,~RLY OF THE
NORTHEAST COR276R THEREOF; RUNNING TFiENCF SOUTHFRLY
PARALuEL TO THE EASTERLY LINE OI' SA:tD LUT, ?.7.5 FEET;
THEPICE WES'PEP.f~Y PARALLEL TO TIiE NORTH~RLY LING OF
SAID LOT 75 FEET; ~HENCE NORTHGRLY PARALLEL TO SAID
EASTFRLY LIIQ~, 225 FEET TO A POTiJ'3' IN '.".:?F SAID
NQ~THGRLY I.ING; THENCE GVESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTiiERLY
LINE 75 FE;ET T4 THE POTNT OF' BGGINNING.
: WHEREAS, the City P.lann.ing Commission did hold a public hearing
?` at khe Civic Center in th~ City oE Anaheim on January 4, 19K8 at 1:30 p.m.,
n~tice oP said pi~hiic hac~ring having been cluly given as roquired by law and fr~
'. accordance wilh the provisions oE the Anaheim Muiiicipal Cade, Chapter 18.03,
u' to hoar anc1 consider evidence for and against said proposed recl~ssification
~ and to investigate and maka :Cindings and recnmmondations in conmoction
'~ therewith; and subject poti*_ion was cnntinued to the m~etings of E'ebruary t,
Pebruary 17, Fobruar~ 29 and March 14, 198a; nnd
0231r PC88-79
~; i
1,
;
<.l
r
~-,t5
: o;i~;
, `„
,. „:tt~
,.
y'~y . p:z'~.,,ez{ ~:p :,:~sle r rr:,.:.;..:._.. .S~r!~!'ta u ;::a~rr ~,,. ~....~..i>... ~ ., ; .,,~ , ..., . ... _ _ .. . . .
. .. ._ . _ . . ~ ~ ~ . . r ' t ,L.~'~~?~~,2t
' , ~-"I ~4. {: 'F
~ r~ ' %n~
,r.{,
„i;
,,,,n
~ ~4
;,'~ ~~,
~i
, ;;
iVHEREAS, said Commissaon, af~ar due inspecL•ion, inveskzga~ion
and sLudy rr~ade by itself ancl in its behal£, ancl after due cons.ideration of ~11
evi~~ence and reports oEferQd ~+t said 'hearing, does find ai~d cletermino the '~`~
followinq faats: '~'
1. That l:hQ petitioner pz•opo5es reclas~ifir.aCion of subject `~;
property from the RS-7200 (Resadential Sing~.e-Family) Zo.n~ to the RAf-2400 ~,
" (RFSidan~ial, Multiple-Family) ZonQ.
2. That Ch~ r.naheim General Plan designates subject pr~perty ,
for Low Density Single-Family land uses; and Gener~l Plan Amendmerit No. 235 ~
proposinq redesignation ~o medium den~ity risidential land uses submitted in ';',
conjunction wi.~h th:s reguest was denied, `!±:
F~, 3. That the pruposecl rc~c:lassi£icata.on of subjer.t property is
';:~ not nece:,sarx nor desirable for th~ orderly and prop~r developmant of the "(,~
`~ community. .~
I
4. That tYie pr~posed reclassification of s~ibjoct property doos '4:
~
I riot proporly rolatQ +:o the zones and l-heir perrnS.t~eci uses locally establislied `~~
~,~. in c1osQ proxiraity to subject ~rcp~rty and to the ~ones and their perrr~itted
~,
,
~ uses generally established throughout the comm~:nity. °i:
~
5. Thal• approxima~ely 10 per: were presari~ at the
March 'lAth public hearing; 27 ~~ersons at t;kie Jai~~~~.1 4 hearing; 3 porsons at ~~~
~he FPbruary 17 hearing; and 3 persons c~ r.he Febru~ry 29, 1988 public hearing ;;'
in opposiLion; ar,d L•hat rei:iticns and let~ters contair~ing approxinately 280
signatures wero receiced in opposition to subjoct request. '~
~AGIFO NIA ENVIRONMFNTAT~ (~j(ALITY ACT :'INUIN~; That the Anaheim
City~ ?lanning Co:nsniasion has reviewed the proposal to amend the Land C;se
Elameiit oE the General Pl.~n to ch~nge khe currc~nt designation of Low Density
Residential to Low-Diedium Uens:it~ Residentia]. land uses aiid to reclassi£y
sabject property i'rom tnQ RS-720U (Residential, Single-Family) 'Lone to ~he
RM-2400 (Resid~ntial, riultipie-ramiiy) Zone to construnt a 19-unit, 1-story
"afEor3able" apartment compiex ander authoritp of Government Code Secta.on
65915 with waivers (de.lQted) of (a) minimum building site area per dwelling
uni~, (b) maximum sitE cov~racJe and (c) maxiniurn fencQ helght an a
rectangular.ly-shap~d p2.rce1 of J.~nd consi:;ting of approxfmately 1.07 acres
located approximately :190 feet w~st oE tk~e conterline oi'. East Street and
r~ascribecl at 10].4, 1020, 1028 East North SL-reot; and does hereby approve the
Neqative Declaration t~pon Pindinc~ ttiat it. has considered the *1ega~ive
Declaration togaL•her with any e~~:.,~ents received during the public xeviaw
process and iu1•ther finciiny on the basis of the initi.a]. stufly ancl any cpmments
received that .".nQre is r~o substantial evid~~nce that the pro;oct will have a
si.g:,a.ficanr Q~Eect on the environment.
, ;.~
`
~ ;y
r,~.
~ •' ~
~;;
; ~
,, ''r:~
.
,<
~~. , ;~
~
~....
' ~ , r~
m~
-Z - PC8 8-? 9 ~;~i.
`~ ' "~
iS
; ~
~'
,
,;
~ ,,
~
~ <<r
~
~,. ~ 1
~
5
_ ~
~'
,
~
~,k
~?
~ . , . . ~ . . _ . , , . . . ~
. ~ . . . . ~. . . ~~~
.... . .. . . . .. . . .. .. . . ... . , ~. l
iY tY~
;
. , .. ~ . - i~~~
. `~'` , ~ ~ J~; ~;~t <<,~ ~ fi~~` ' i',"; t,'~'~~t~G^N%~~a
~ ~ ~ ~ ' i js ~~'~; . {(a g
~1' . . . .. ~ ~ . . ~ . ~t~\I~{
1 ~ • , ~*~`` I`~~"2,1~
.~ a~~~
' Y i~~t :
p~_. ~ . . . ~ ~
j ~
}~,.~
<~ N04~, THER~F03C, BE TT RESOLVEA that the Anaheim Ci~y Planning ,y,-~~~'+~
~~ Comm3ssion does hereby deny PE3tition fox~ kealassiEic~t;ion on the ba.sis of the '~:;;;>~
aforementioned findfr~gs. ,r;i~,.
:-!,`;
THF. FOREGOTNG XESQLUTION is signad and approved by me this 14th `}~
day of March, 1gg8, ,:,~
• ~~!
J
%
~ ~
~~
,; :.~.,~ ~L ~._.~__. ~
4~,; ._._.`___.__ .__. ~y '
.,~:
1~ C'.H~~i`.2MA:V, ANAHE.IM ITY PLANNII~G~ CONIIrSISSI.ON ,~~~t
,~~; 'I'~;d
ATTEST: ;,~.
'+ G ~ / ~s,
r~P'~~~°~~ ~.ta..~_ .`~
SECRE~AFY, AN'AH'EIM CI:c'Y PI,ANN]:NG CObiMISSI01~t y,~~
;
y' ~
!~ . S7.'AT'E OF CALIFOHNIA ! ~'
y;i CUUNxY OI' ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEZM )
r. :c.dith L. Harris, Sec~~c~tary of the Anaheim City Plax~nzng
Commission, do hereY,y cer.tiEy that the ;:oreg~ing resolution was pass~3d and
ad~pted at a meeting oE the Anahei~n City Planning Commission he~1d on
M~rch 14, 1988 by t~le follo~siug vo~Q of the mernbers t2iez•eof;
AXES: COMh:ISSIGNERC: BUUAS, F3~YllS:t'UN, FF;T.,DHATJS, IiSRRST, ME:SSE,
NOE$; COMMISSTCiNERS: CAF.USILI:,I'.0
ABS~NT: COhIIrIIS.~'iIC1NERS: MC HIJRNEY
Itl 1~1ITNE5~ WziER~;OF', t Iiavt~ )x~r~sunto set n.ri~ hand thi~ 1~lth day
of March, 1988.
~ ~
--- ~-~ "~~ ~~ ! ' ~
S~CkETAR , A,NAHEIM CITY Y AN1;fING CQMi~fISS:[ON