PC 88-84~~
~ ~
:~ ~ ~24~L'~4N_N9~_~~
A RESOGUT.I~N dF THE ANAHE7M CITY PLANNT27G CO2~SISSION
'PHAT QETITION FOR VARIANC~ N0. 3773 BE DENIRD
WtiER~AS, the Anaheim City Pl~nning Commission did receive a
vorified Petition for Variance from TRII)~R CORPORATION, 12 Corporate Plaza,
Newpor~ Beach, CA 92G60, owner and GARY McCANN, 12 Corporate P1aza, Newport
Beach, CA 92660, agent for certc~in real propert;y situat~sd in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, 5tate of Calif.ornia descri.bQd as:
0238r
~, ~~
~~7}' _ . /d~ , , . . . -
ALL THAT CERTAIN LANA SITUATED N THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, COUNTY aF ORANGE, CITY OF ANAHEIM,
DESCF.IBED AS I'OLLOWS:
9EGINNINC 1.T A POINT IN THE NORTH I~INC OF SAID
SECTION 6, DISTl,NT THERGON 869.82 FEET E~15T OF THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SH;f::CTON 6, 6AID POINT BEING
ALSO THE NORTFiEASTGRLY CORNF•R OP TFiE LANU CONV~YED TO
RALPH LEROY DA.t~KER I~.ND WIrE BY DEED RECORDED
SEPT.EMBER 19, 1946 IN BOOK 1455, E~AGE 293 OF GFFICIAL
RECORDS IN THE OFFIC~, OF THE COUNTY RECURDGR OF SATD
ORANGE COUNTY; ~H~NCE EAST ALONG SATD NORTH LJNE,
25A.94 FEE'l TO ~HE NORTHWI;STERLY CQRNER OF THE LAND
COhVEYED TQ W.E. SCTiMITT AND WIFE $Y AEED RECORDED
JULY 7.9, 195Q IN BOOK 2044, PAGL' 46 OF OFFIC:IAL
RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY P.ECnkUER OF SAID
ORl~NGE COUNxY; THENCE ALONG TF~E WESTERLY LINE OF SAID
LD.ND CAPtVEYFD TU SCHMITT, THF, I'OLLOW?NG COURSES:
SCUTH 59 DEGRI:ES 42' EAS'1 277.00 FEGT; SOUTH 29
DEGT~EES 33' EAST 398.1~ FEET; SOUTH 5 UEGREES 31.'
F7EST 91. $8 FEET TO A POINT IN TE3E NQRTFIERLY LINE OF
THE LAND CONVEX~;D TC~ JACOB G. TINKEN 11t:ll WIFE HY DEGn
RECORDED F~~'RUA12Y 2t3, 1948 TN BOOK 1730, PAGE 3?.6 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS TN 1'H~ OFFICE OF THE CUUNTY RGCORDER
OF SA1D ORANGE COU2dTY; THE2ICE WF.ST~RLY ALONG SAID
tdORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LAND CO*t4 EYED TO TIh1KEN, TU
THE SOUTHWESTE;RLY CORN~R Or fiAID LAND rONV~l'ED TO
DANKER; THEtJCE NOR7:Ii 88 DEGREES 24' EAST 192.36 FCE;T
TO TI~iE SOUTE[EASi~RLY CORNER OF SAID LAtiD L'ONVEYED 'TO
AANKER; THENCE NORTH 0 bEGREES 33' EASi 400.00 :EET
TC THF: POINT OF BEGINtdYNG,
PC$8-84
~,~;> ~ y E~ «a, f~ "~k~
~ ,~tl~~~'L~
, , ~.
«.;
~ ~ ~~~n
,?~,,'
;I
``~
_~
..:~
~
~
M
~~'i
~, ., . :.~r~ ~ wy-.~~uti•SF~~'
!
~~~
~
, ~~~t i ~ ~,"~1"1~4`,~
}" yy~
i 1
~ . . . . 4 : t1. r
, ~"1
r4{
. '. . ~~.~I,::i
WHERLAS, the rity Planning Commissio:~ dia hold a public hRaring ''~~
at the Civic: Center in the City of Anaheim on March 28, 1988, at 1t30 p.m.,
notice of said publin hearing havinc~ been duly given as required by law and in "`
a.ecorc~ance with the prc~visions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, '~;~
to hear and cansider evidenco fpr and against said proposed variance antl to y
invQSti~ate and make findinqs and recamrnendati~ns in connection th~z~ewi~hs and
~ WHER~bS, said Commission, afrer due inspQCtion, investi.gati,on ''
~ and study made by itself and in its behaJ.f, and after d~;e cor.sideration of all ~.`'
evidenr.e and reports of•f:ered a~ said hearing, does find ar~d determine the
~ following facts:
1. That the petitioner propose~ waivers of the following to
construct 11 single-family resiciential units:
~ TI~• ] 8.-$4 •Q 2_~l:l -- Maximtim Stru tvra~ Heigh~.
(?~ feg~t permit~ed in the Scenic
Crrridor; 31 f~et proposed for Q -
rasidences)
2. That the above-mentioned waiver is hereby denied on t~ho basis
t.haL• thore zre no special circumstances applicabxe to thQ property such as
si~~e, shaps, top~graphy, location and surroundiz~gs which d~ not apply to otho.r
ideni;ically zoned property in tho same vicinity; ar.d that strici: application
of the Zon.iny Code deprives t:he property of Qrivileges enjoyed by ol-her
properties in the identical zone and classi£ication in the vicinity.
3. That th~ requested waivQr is hereby d.enied on the basis that
subject ,~roporty is locaf:ed i.n the Scenic Corr.idor Zone Overlay.
4, That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstaacQS or
conditions app'licable to the propQrty inwolvefl or to the in~~nded us~+ r~f the
groperty t.hat do not a~p.ly generally to the ~aropert~r or class of use in the
same vicinity and zone.
5. That tlie requQSted variance is not nec~ssary for thA preser.vation
~nd enjoyrnent of a substantial property right possessQd by othQr prope.rty in
the samQ vicinity s.~nd zon~, An~l deniad to the property in question.
6. ThzY, thp requested variancQ will be materi.ally detrim~nt~l to the '
public welft~ro or injuri~us to the property or i.mprovements in such viaini.y ~`
and zone in which the prope.rty is located. ''
',': i
6. That 17 perxons indicated their presence at said public hearinq `~
in opposition; ar.d that one lettgr wa5 rQCeived in opposition to subject ~'
patition. '"
. . ' ~ . . . . .. ~ . ~ . ~ ' . . .. . . iC ~ , ri i lY t { ~l ~``t ~r~~ i'~~~lrf?~
~
~
r
i , ; f a
~ ~
a t',;li
~~
~~fY,,~ ~
N
'
'
~ ' ~ ~ ~
,
/
, ~-
.
a
. ~1~,. . '
. ,. . ~ t,1~~+
1~~ ~
~
(
~~Yk
~~
`~~
~ALTF~RNIA FNVIRONM~NTAL ALITY' ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim J
°;~
City Planning Commission has reviewed the p.roposal to construct 11 ~;#
single-famil~v rosidances with waivers of maximum struct~:ra1 hnight on an '~~~
irregularly-shaped parcol of land consisting of approximately 7.3 acr~s, t,~
,
having a front~g~ of approximately 9].2 feeti on the north side o~ Mohler ~~
~k
~
;
Arive, and being .located ~pproximataly 60 feot east of te centerline of „
;
'-+~
~
~ CounCry Hill Road and fur~hor de3cribed as 27p S. Mohlsr. Drive; a.nd does ''~:yj
,
'
hexeby appro~ve the Negative Declaration upon findinq that ih has considered ~
r::;;~;
~s the Negativa Declaration together with any comments recsived during the ~'~+,ti
~:M public rQView process ancl further finaing on the basis oF the initial study '~;f
~.,;. and any comments rocefved tl~aC therc is no substantial evidence that the ';;;
project will have a signi;icanl: efEect on the environment.
, ,;~~
~:~
=; i~:
NOW', P:iEREF012E, BE IT RE50LV~D that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission doQS hereby deny subj~ct Petition for Variance on L-he basi~ of the
aforementioned tindangs.
TfiE I'OR~GOING ;ES~LUT N is signed anc3 anproved by rie this 28th
of March, 19g8. '
Q 'l
-- c.~'Z~ `~~ c,f ~-~
CHAIRMAPI, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: ~ _
- __~ - '~~~ ..._
SECRETARY, ANAHETM CIT PLT,N ING COMT4ISSION
STATE OF C~~LIFORNS?. j
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CIT'Y OF ANAHEIM )
I, ~dith L. Harris, S~cretary of tha Ai~aheim City Pl.an:~ing
Commissioi~, do hereby certify thar the foregoing :asolution was passed and
adopted at a mQeting ~~ the An~heim City Planning Commission held on
March 28, 1988, by the following vute of the members L•hereof;
AYE5: COMM:[SSIONERS: BOUAS, CARUSILLO, FELDHAUS, HERBST,
M~SSE, MC BURNEY
NOES: COI~fISSIONC~tS: BOYDSTUN
ABS~,NT: COMNtISSIQN~RS: NONE
IN WiTN~SS WHERF.OF, I have hereuntc set my hand this 28th day uf
March, 1988. ~1~ _
/ iv
/
.
5ECFtGTARY, ANAHEIM PI~ANNTNG CO ISSION
-3- PC88-64
;~~
(`;~~,
'~';
1'lyi'
.:W.
;..vj
~r
;",f
+;
_ ,;~•
',~ ~ , .
~'~~tri.., - - , ~ •''l,i!