PC 88-95WH:~REAS, the Anaheirn City Plann~ng Commission did initia~e a
peti.tion far Reclassification of certain real property situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, 5tate of California, described as fnllows:
~
RESOLUTION' N~_,_,P 8 =„~5
i P Y~
~F(.
..~~n
~~.
~,~~
~'a~
.~~`f ~
A R~SOLUTION OF TFi~ t1NA.H~IM CITY PLANNING COMMTSSION
'PFiAT PETTTION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 87-88•-45 BE GRAN'rED
PARC~L 1: LOTS lb THROUGH 23 IN BLOCK 4, LOTS 3
THRQUGH 9 AND 14 THROUGH 19 IN' BLOCK 5, LOTS 3
THROUGH 7 AND 12 THROUGH 16 IN BLOCK 6, LOTS 3
THROUGH 6 AND LOTS ANA LOTS 11 THRO'UGH 13 IN BLOCK 7
OF TRACT ~12? "MILLS PARK TRACT', AS PER RECORA~D I1~
BOOK Z5, PAGE 481, MISCELLANEOUS 2d~1PS, RECORDS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CAL:CFORNIA.
PARCEL 2: LOT 1, BI~OC:i A OF TRACT N0. 530 AS PER MAP
RECORDBD IN BOUK 20 PAr~ 10 OF MTSCELLANEOUS MAPS,
RECORL~S OF LOS AIJGELES COUNTY, CALIFORI~IIA.
PARCEL 3; LCT 22 BLUCK A OF TRACT N0. 158 AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 12 PAGF 8 OF MYSCELLF-NEOUS MA.~'
RECORDS OF LQS ANGELES COUNTX, CALIFORNIA.
PA^^.~L 4: LOTS 1.6 TIiR0UGI3 10 S~,OCIC l, LOTS 1 TFIROUGH
10 iLOCK 2, LUTS 1 THFtQUGH 10 BLOCK 3, TRACT N0. 135
A5 PER M.~P RECORDED IN BOUK 11 PAGE 24 OF
MTSCELLANEOUS MAP RECORDS OF LOS ANGRLES COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL 5: LOTS 1 TFiROUGH 6 BL,OCK 1, LOTS 1 THItOiTGH 6
BLCCK 2, LOTS 3 THROUGH 5 BLOCK 3, LOTS 7 THROUGfI 12
fiLOCK 4, LOTS 1'PHROUGH 12 BLUCK 5 l~NA LOTS 1 THROLTGH
12 BLOCK 6 AS P~R M]-P RECORAED II~ BLOCK 4 PAGE 82
MISC~L~LANEOUS MAF RECORDS OF ORAIvTGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.
i'~` ;
PARCEL, 6: TIiAT POR'PTON OF LOT B2 OF THC VJNEY.ARD
TRACT A'S PER M3~P RECOFDED IN BOOK 4 PAG^nS 629 AND 630
OF DEEDS UF LO:~ ANGE;LES COUNT:' MORE uPECTFICALLX
DESCRIBED AS LOTS 13 '1FiR0UGH 20 AND 26 AND 27 CF
ASS~SSORS PARCEL M,~1P 035-164 UF ORANG~ COUNTY, ALSQ
L,OTS 1 THFOUGI•I 6 OF' TRAC'r N0. 154.~'i MISCET.LANEQUS MAP
BDOK 45 PAGE 35 MISCELLANEOUS MAPS RECORUS UI' ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
0252r FC88-95
`::!r i
' ~i~~
``~~
'~?'a
,
,
;
,;r~i~
`,,: nt
'~.?~ ;
~pr.
r 1~
~~' ~
a
_ .._~.,,~
'~`~f
' "~
;~ .
~:
'',~
,~.
.; ;~~:
r; ':~
.
. .:. +~ ~
~,r;
_
~, , ~ ~~
~
. ~
`.~.
~
;Yl
~~1
:1,.~
.
' ~ . ~
, , ~
. . . ~f. I
. . ';.,':1,ii
'
~~:
.
~ ~ !,1(r,
;i
_ii : . . . -~^~t
PA.RCEL 7: 'rHE EASTERL~t 17.2 FEET OF Y~OT 1, LOTS 3 AND ~ji
;~, 4 OF BLOCK A, LOTS 6 THROUGH 21 OF BLOCK B, LOTS 22
` THROUGH 37 B~.OCK C, LOTS 38 THROUGFT 53 BLOCK D, LOT~ ;+
~ 69, '75, 76 AND THE WESTERLY 4g FEET OF I,OT 79 AN17 LOT
80 OF BLOCK F, LOTS 85 T.HROUGH 1(i0 QF BLOCK G, ANL „:,;;;;
LOTS 101 TAF.OUGH 116 OF BLOCIC H AS PER MAP R~CORDFD '
~~
" IN BOOK 'l PAGE G48 AND 249 MISCELL:aNFOUS R~CORDS OF
t,~~ LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALII'ORNIA.
PARCEL 8: LOTS 1 THROUGH 13 OF BLOCR 1, LCTS 1 `; i
' TI~ROUGH 14 OF BLOCK 2, LQTS 1 TFiROUGH 3 ANA LOTS 9 '~,-'
THROUGH 11 OF BLOCr 3 AS PER MAP RECORDED TN BaqK 5
PAGE 3 MISCELLANEpTJ5 MAc'S OF L'OS ANGE'LES COUNTY,
~"' CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL 9; LOTS 1 THROUGH 13 AS PER M.AP RECORDED TN
1300K G PAGE 7 I~SISCELLANEOUS MAPS OF LOS ANGEL~S
COUN7.'Y, CALIF08NTA.
PARCEL 10: L~TS 1 THROUGH 12 OF BLOCK E, LOTS 7., 2,
i0 TIiROUGH 12 OF BLCCK D AS RECORUED IN t300K 3 PAGE
144 MISCELLANEbUS M~.PS OF LOS ANG~LES COL'NTY,
GALIFORNIA.
WHGREAS, the City Plannin~ Commission did hold a public haaring
at the Civic Cent~r in the Ci~y of Anaheim on April 11, 1988 at 1:30 p.m.,
riotice o£ said public heari.ng having bpen duly yiven as rQquired by law and in
accordanc~ wzth the provisinns of t'he Anaheim Municipal. C~de. ChaptEr 18.03,
L-a hear axic~ consider evidence for and against said prupc.:ed re~classificati:+n
and to investigate and make findings and racommendations in connecti.on
therewith; and
WH~REAB, said CUmmission, after due inspection, inv~estigation
and study made by itsolt and in ii:s behalt, and after du~ con.sideration of all
evidence and reports offered al said hearing, does f.ind and determin~ ~~E
I:ollowinq Eacts:
l. That ~he petitioner proposes recla~sifica~ion. of subjec.t
property from RM-].200 (RESiden~ial, Multiple-F~miJ.y), CL (Commerci al,
Limif:ed), ~fL (Industrial, Limited), and CG (Commercial, General) Z~nes ~o the
RM-2400 (Residential, M•.~ltiple-Family) Zone.
,~ 2. That on March 28, 19Ei8, the Anaheim City
Ccmmission recommended adApti.on of GenQral P].an ~m~ndment
~ redesignatinc~ subjech. area fror,i Madium nensity Resiflentia~. l~nd
}~I Low-Meclium Density Residential land uses,
-2- PC88-95
Planning :°iE
~:; ~
No. 227
uses ~o ~°
::,~~.
, ''~:i
:td~
_.,
s';~
§
,r;~s~
;:j`L;
: ,~`
;;o
}'G
i'/i"
/ ~ ~j
~~~ ,
4f
, ic, zr,'s
~
~
3. That the proposed reclassification of' subject property is
n~cessary and/or desir.able for the orderly and proper development oE the
community.
4. TYiat the prapcsed reclassification of sulaject property does
properly relate ta the zones and their pern~itted uses locally establi.shed in.
close px•oximity to subject property and to ~he zones and thei,: permitted uses
generally established throuqhout the conununity.
5. That ten (10) person:; 9.ndicated their presence at said
public hearing in favor of subject r.eque;st and £aur (4) people indicatecl their
presence in opposition; and th~t no correspondence was received in oppositi.on
to subject petition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRQNMENTAL OUAL~ITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim
I City Flanning Cammission has reviewed the proposal tcs recl~ssify subject
' praperty from the Rbt-1200 (Rasiden~ial, ldultiple•-Family), CL (Ccmmercial,
T.,imited) , ML ( Industrial, Limited) aric3 CG (Commercial, General ) Zoiles to the
RM-2400 (Resi~ential, Multipte-Fa-nily) 7.one on approxirnately 91.3 ar.xes
generally bounded b~ Anaheim Bouievard ~to the west, Cypross Street to the
soiith, ~.he Union P~cific Railway to the east and La Pa1ma Avenufa~ to the
north, and excluding the following: (1) tY.~~ area bouizded b~y tlilhelmiria St,reet
tc the noYth, Sabina Street to the west, 5vcam~re Street tc the south anci the
Union Pacific Raiiway ta the east; (2) thoso ~Sroperties f~c•onting onto Anaheim
Boulevard and L~ Yalma Avenue; (3) Portions A, praperties consisCing of
approximatsly 0.87 acre located at the northwest corner of Claudi.ria Street
and Wilholmina Street; (4) P~rtion 13, 7 propert•zPS consisting of
approxirnately 1.29 acres located at the southwest corn~:r of Ad~::. Street and
Emily Straet; (5) Portion C, 15 proporties consistzng of approximately 2.13
acres located on the north si.de of North Srreet between Olive Street ar.~;'. the
al'ley immecliately east• of Anaheim Boulevard; and (6) thcase properties
presently zoned RM-2400 as follows: 15 propextiF~s s~uth oF Mi11s Drive east
of Anaheim Boulevard to Olive Street~ 71 proper.ties sou lz of La Palma Avenue
north 4f North Street, bnunded by Uliv~2 Straet and the i;. i.on Pa~ifia Railroad
axcept for the northe~~t corner of Olive Strest und North Street commonl~
kn~wn as 405 North Street; lE0 .properties south of NortP: Str.e~~ and north of
Wilhelmina bounded by the alley east of Anaheim B~ulevard and the Un~an
Pacific Ra.3.lway except: for the property lncated at 726 N. Claudina Street.
And that the Anaheim City Qlanning Cnmmission does heroby approve the
Negative Declaration upon £ir,di.nc7 that xt has considered the Naqative
D~claration together wi~h any comm~ents received durinq the public review
process and iur~her fzndzng on tk,e basis oE the initial study a:nd any ~
comments recQived that ther~ is n~~ substantial eviclence that the project wil~. ~~'
have a signifiaant ef.fect on trie erivironmenk.
-3- PC88-95
:~
~ : `•'y
- - -._ ..,,t, ~
~,~,.~r4 _ .
~
- x p ,!t. "• ~;,~~,
;:t ..i..~~ ~ . ~'~~y~ . ..
. . ~ i - i k r ; ~.,~.~ ~
j
r~U,;
~ ~~~4~
NO'~T, TH~REFORE, BE; IT RE~OLVFD that the Anaheim (;3ty Planning
Conunission doc:+s t~ereby grant subject Petition for ReclbssiEicatison and, by sn
• doing, tha~ Title 18-xoning of the Anaheim Municipal Coc~e be am;~x~ded to
exalude the abave-descr'h~d proporty Eram thES RM-],200
Multiple-Fam31 (ResidQntial,
Y~• ~~ (~ommercia~, (,fmitod), ML (Indastr3al, Limi~od) and CG
(C~~mmdreiaY, General) Zonas anii to incorporar.e aa.id described pi•operty 3nto
'~ the RM-2400 (Resi~ential,
f con~ition k~hich is hQrebyM~found Q p~heY,a lrieCa~s ~~eC~ ~O ~~R ~ollowing
~ proposed use of sub'ect Y prerequiatte t~ th~~-
a proper ty 3n order to preserve thc~ sa.fety and general
welFare oE the Citizens of ~he City ot Anaheim:
1. That pr.ior to adnption o~ an ordin$nce rec:.assiEyfng aubjoct
property, Goneral P1an Amenr]ment No. 227 s}iall be t~dopted by the
City Council.
BG t:f FURTFIER RESULVED that the Anaheim City planning Commission
does hereby finil and detsrmine thak adoption of this ;o~o).ution is expressly
predi.cated adoption of. Genoral P1an Amendment No. 227 by Che Anaheim Ciky
~ouncil. Should said General Plan Amendment not be ad4pted, then this
Resolution, and any ~,pprovals herein contaixied, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGCING RE50L'TI~N is
aE April, 19t38.
~~.
CHAII;MAN, ANAIiEIM CI
ATTEST: ,~? , , ~
~i ' ~~
I~ ~ , ~,
SECRE'Pl1E2St, ANAF(EIM CITY PLANNING COt~lISSION
STATE OF CALIFOFNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANG~ ) ~s,
CITY 0~ ANANEIM )
znd approved by me khis llti~ day
PLANNING COMMTSSION
I. Edith L. HArris, SecreL•ary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commissi.o:., da h~reby cerkiFy th~t r.he forQgoing r~sc+lution Wbs passad ancl
adopted ac a mPOtinq of thQ Anaheim City Planning Commisuion hold on
Ap''=a ~.i, 19$F3, by the folloWing ~~ota of Che m~mLers ~hereof:
AY~~= COtrA~fISS70NERS: SOIIAS, BCJYDSTUN, C4RUSILLO, l~ELOHAUS, H6[2BST,
MC 1~URH£Y, MESuE
IIOESi C4t~t~SSIONERSt NONE
ABSHNTs COMMISSIONERSt NON~
IN WIxNESS WHLREOF, I have herounto aor, my hand this ~.ith day of
Apri)., 1988.
r . .
--• -- ~ -~~~,~~ __~~ .
5ECItBTA Y, ~NAHEIM CITY PLANNtNG CONlMIS5ION
-4-
PC88-95
~,q:~
. ,~.~,j~~'i
~l{i
i
,
„+
e~
~' - - r~"
,