Resolution-PC 89-103R . .... .. . . .. ^^t4 wrq4~
~~~~
,
~ ' ~~~. ~;
a t~ ..t~ ~,~'1,*,~ ~ ~:?~
,
r
~ .
$ESQLU~'ION NO Pf 89_10~
A F~SOLUTIOIJ OF THE ANAHETI~I CTTY PLANNING GQD7MISSIUN
THAa PETITION FOI~ Vi\RIANCE N0. 3923 BF GR~1NT~;D
WFiEREAS, the Anaheim City E'lanning Gommission did receive a
verified Petition £or 'Variance from MAGANgHAI NARANgHaI PATEL ANA ASFIABEN
MAGANBIiAT PATEL, 2176 S. Harbor Boul~vard, Ana2ieim, CA 92802, owners, and
WENDX WONG, 2~58 L~ee Avenue, South E1 Monte, CA 91733, agont of certain r~~~
propErty si~uated in the City oE Anaheim, County of Orange, State of.
California aescribed as:
TIiAT FORTION OF THE SOUT~' HALF OF THE NOR1'HWEST
~,~ QUARTE;R OF THE SOUTHGAS:~ QUARTER OI' SECTION 27,
j TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANCE 10 W~ST, TN THE RA17CH0 LOS
a
~ BOLSAS, TN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AS SHOWN ON A MRP
~ RFCORDED T.. BOOK 51 PAGE 10 QF M:[SCET~LANCOiJS MAPS, IN
THE OFFICu OF THE COUNTY R~CORDER OP' SAID COiJPITX,
.~
DF,SCRIBEI~ AS I'ULLOWS t
BEGTNN:CNG AT A POIN1' DZSTANT SOUTH 0 DEG. 42' 47"
EAST 233.0~# FEET AT,ONG THE t~1ESTERLX LTNI: OF SAID
50U~A HALF, I'ROM THE NOFtTIiWLST CORNER OF SAlD SUiTTH ''~
xALr, SATD POINT H~ING T[~IE MOST WESTERLY
SOUTHWESTERL'I CORNER OF ~HE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEEU TU
LAYN~ E. FSTTS AND OTIiERS, RECORAED DECEMIIER 27, 1956
'
IN
BOOK 3753 PAGE 106 ~F OFF;LCIAL RECORDS; THENCE
SQUTti 89 DEG. 38' 07" EAST 300.00 P'EET TO AN ANGLE
POINT IN THB SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LAND OF ~~;
rITTS; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEG. 42' 47" EAST 1flQ.00 FEET
, ALONG TdiE WESTERLY BOU~IDARY OF SAID LAND OI' FITTS, TO
THE NORTFiEAST COr~NER 0~' THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DrED TO
CARL ARTHOFER AND T4I~E, R~CQRDE~ DECEMBER ].6, 1959 IN
BOOK 5017 PAG~ 197 OF OFFICIAL R~CORDS; THENCL NORTFi
89 DEG. 36' 07" WEST 30d.00 rEET ALON~ TFIE IdQR'PHI:RLY
LTT1E OF ~Atl~ L~AND OF ARTHOFFR AND ALOtv'G THE WESxERLY
~ PkOLUNGATION THBREOF TO A PC~INT IN SAID W~STERLY LINE
UF THE 50UTHEAST QUARTCR OF SECTTON 27; THENCE N'JRTH
! 0 DEG. 42' 47" WE6T 100.00 FEET ALONG SAID W~STERLY
'
Ll
NE TO TFiE POTNT OF' BEGINNTNG. ,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Comrnissic~n did hold a p~.~blfc heariny
at the Civic Center in tho Gity of Anaheim on Apri1 10, 1984, at 1:30 p,m.,
iio~ice of: said public hearing h~ivincf been duly c~iven a:, raquired by law ~nd in
~ccordance with the ~Srovisions of the AnahQ.im Municipal Cod~, Chapter 10.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said propased varidnce and to
izaves~igate and make findings and recommqr.dations in connection tharewith; and
i~HEREAS, said Comrnission, after dur: inspection, investigatiori
and sttidy made by .itself and in its behalt, and after due consideration of all
evidence ancl reports offorec! at said hearing, does find and determine th~
following facts:
08COr -1 PC89-10~
;;~
~.~~ -- _ _.., i•;~~s
~
~~
~~
, t:'~'. ~ 1 ~+ rl4 7~'Sd ~,9i 1 1
(`~1 d ,~y~.y~~
, ~iy;? ~~ t~t~t.~
~yi
+4 '
. . .. . ,ti~Ui
i fit
~ :'':~iS
7.. Tk~at the ~etita.onQr request~ waiver of the f.ollowing to rPnlg~g
an existing freestanding sign:
.5~~~9N~ t$~~s9~.sQ~~ - P_~r.m.i.~ted 1~ °:,;.tion of f.r~s~andina sign.
an 1~.44.Qf~7 (minimum 4,~~, of lo~ wicith [4~£~~] from sa.de
property linos required; 21~ ~[21s5 feet] fxom
south propQrty line proposed)
?.. That L-he abov~-mentioned waiver is hereby granted on the basi~s
that there are sNec3al circumstancQS applicable to the property such as size,
sh~pe (consisting of a rectangular. shape wi~h a narrow frontage oi 100 f~. b,y
240 ft. deep), topography, locatiozx and surrounc~i.ngs which do not apply t~
other identica].1y zoned pro~arty in the same vicini~y; arld that s~rict
application of rhe Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges onjoyed by
other properties in the identical zone and clas~?.fication in the vicinity.
3 That there ara e~cceptiana'1 or 6xtraordinary czrcum~tances or
conditions a~plicable ta the proparty involved or to the inrended use of the
pr~perty that d~ not a~ply generally to the~ pro~erty or c1a::s of use in the
~ame vicini~~ atid zone.
4. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservati.on
and onjoyment ~L• a substantial property right possessed by other property in
the same vicini.ty and zone, and d~niea to the property in question.
5. That the rPquested variance will not be matarially 3etr.imez~tal
to tY~e public welfare ar injurious to the praperty or impr.~vements ir, such
vicinity and zone in which the progerty is located,
ti. That no one indioated their presence at s~id publ3c hQaring in
opposition; and tha~ no r.~rrespondence was received in opposztion to subject
pPtition.
ENVIRQNMENTAL IhfPA~T FINDIN : The Planning Direct~r or his
authorized represantat.iva has datermined that the propc~sed project fa11s
within the tlafiniti~n oF Ct~tegorical Gxemptions, C~.ass 11, as dai•ined in the
State EIR Guidelxnes and is, therefor~, categorical'ly exempt Erom khe
requirsment to propar8 an EIR.
NOW, TFiERFFOT2E, BE IT RESOLVED that ~he Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereb,y grant subject Petit.i~~n for Variance, upor~ the
follnwi~2g canditions which are hereby £ound to be a necessary prer~equisite to
the pr~posed use of the subject property in crdor to ~,reserve the satety and
q~neral. welfare of the CiL•izen~ rf the City of Ana:~eim:
1. That the driveway oi~ HarY,or. Boulevard shall be reconstructed to
accommodate t~n (10) £~ot radiu~ curb returns. Existinc~ ~roken or
crack~~d drivewzys shall be removed and replaced as required by thQ
City Ei:gineer.
~.
:Phat a fee sh~:ll be paid to the ~i~y o£ Anaheim for. trea planting
a~ong Harb~~r Houlevard in an amount as establishod by City Council
r~solution.
_~_
YC89-103
i a i ~ ~J;',ii+'~V
r:~ , , .r •; ~. .~~.,, , ~ r r:.r; xa 9 rt r. ... . , . . , ~ . ,
' ti r f: .rl fr C. tY I,..N1;c'tl.. i.'~tn~ ° . ,~ ;.~-: ,. ., . „'.-
... ~. . _ , , , s , ~~'
,..
r,ur-+r~~ol ~~~~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ .
~° .
%
>'~;
,~
y'; .,~
construct.S.on autborized by this r~solution sYiall be I;
~
That the new
3.
served by undergraund u~tili.tie:a. ,
~.
~ '
That plans sha~.1 be submitled to tas ~fil~~eg CD~YzSOfn ~ ay.~eimg
4
.
compliance with the minimum standax
trical
d
E1er ,~:
ta~~
.
ix~cluding the Uniform Building,
pe mxts sYia11 bQ
Tho appropx'
heim
A ~,'.':
.
na
adoptod by the CiL-y oi ;
'~
obtained for ang nc~cessary wor.k. `~
~~
5. That ~ht~ shrubu~r.~r a~jacent tA sub
t Sasr~ specified pby~ tYxe DCity '
Eee
a height not exceerlin~g tw° ~ Z ~ ' ~'.°,';'
~C
;``
Traffic F.ngineer. ;_,:
~
p p in
ro ert shal~ bQ devela c~d substant.iall
That subject p P Y of
file with Ghe City
S ~
~'
j,
+~.
.
ccordance with plans and epocific~tions ~n
~ ~r
~.
.
Anaheim marked Exhibit Noh. 1 throizgl~ 3• ~,;
r of subjecl. propax•t~y shall submit a lotter requostyn5 ~;
Tha~t the owne
7.
termination of Variance No. 540 to the Zoning Division.
~
g. That prior to issuance of a building pormit or within a per~nd of
f tni5 resolution, vrhichever occurs
or:e (1) yPar fr~m tY~e date p
ab~vo-mentioned, shall be
4 axid 7
,
£irst, Candition Nos. 2,
cten~iorYS for fuzthor time to comu].ete ~aid
E ''~
~
complied w~th~
bo granted in accord~r-ce with Section 1.8.03 ~090 of +
canditions may
ti1B An~heim ~tU373C1.r2~ CUaf.' • ~
rior to final building ancl zoninq in~pection~., Condition Nos•
That
h
p
g,
.
~bove-mentioned, shall be comp:liQd wi~
6
,
1, 3~snd
li4at:ian constiCutas approval ot the
That approval of this app
10
t it Comp~
h
h
.
a
proposad request only to the extent t
~icab'le
CttY
de and any uther app
C
o
Anaheim MuniciPal Zoning
proval does no~ include any ac.tion or findings as
A
~h
i
p
er
nns.
regulat
re9~rdiiig any o
or approval of the reguQm~
i
ance
to cc~mpl
nt
ap~licab~e ordinance, rogulation or rsquire
`
BE xT FURTHER RESOf.,V~D that tYie Ar~aheim City Planr.ing Cornmi5xion
s
o
1
R
h '
;
does hereby find and determine Lhat adop~~~h esch
condltions
the
of,
a11
and
liance
com
t ~~
p
s
r art thereo~, be
predicated upon applicAn
nd
o
such
u/ ,;:~.
~
tY
Yiereinabove set forth. Stiould ~ny
ju g~ment of any court ~f
final
nforceable by a
,'~
rova3.~ her.ein
declared invalid or une
this Resolution, and any app ~
,,,
compet,ent jurisdici:ion, then
mec3 null and void.
d '~>
ee
contazned, shall be
-3 -
~
pC89-103
;,,~.
;:;:
:a
?~i~
j~
,,; , , J r ,,,-,;•r,~a~'a,'tP'.~r'' r
~ ~'~s t i ~i ,
~ ~ .`~, i r
'. .~, ,
',
..~t ~ ~ ° .
J ~ ~
SLCRETARY, ANAHE7M CI'PY FLANN:LNG COMMIuSYON
,,~
~
~> ,~,
~~;s
-4-
r; .t ~ , ,
THE FGREGOING RESGLCITION is signed and ap~ruved by me this lOth day ;€
of Apri1, i989,
/~7'~ '.~ ~`.~ ,~
_ ~%f •4•`~;~'~~ ':!"r~-2,.i `. !;~,
CHATRTJOMA2J; ANAHEIM CIxY PLANNING COA4~lISSIQN
;/ '.ii
ATTEST : ~
~ ` ~ ,
~
i~~,~'a ~
~- ~ r.
SECF2ETAFtY, ANAHEIM CZT'Y PLAIINING COM?r1ISSI0IJ r~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUN:PY OF ORANGG ) ss,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
• ;`:
,
';
,
,f
I. Gdith L. Harris, Secretary ot trie Anaheim Cir..y plar.nzng
Cornmission, du hereb~ certiiy th.at the foregoing resalution was passed and
a3op~ed a~ a meeting of the ~:~aheim City P:lanning Ca:nmissior_ 1-.eld on ?lgril 10,
1989, by th~ followir~g vote of the members there~f:
AYES: COMMTSSTUNERS: BOUAS, 60YDSTU2J', CA.R[F~ILLQ, F~LDHAUS, HERBST,
P~fC BURNEX, MESSE `~
NOES: COMMISSIONF.R5: NONE
ABSFNT: COMMISS ION~R~ : NON'E
IN WITbTESS WHEREOF, i have hereunto s~t my hand this lOtZi day of -r`'
Apri.1, 19gg,