Resolution-PC 89-106n
t, l
~
RES__ OL~1_TTf~1 _~jQ.~$~:.~
A RESOLUT70N OI' TI3E ANAFiETM CITY PLANNING CAMMI5SION
THAT PETITIQN FOR CUNDiTIONAI~ TJSE PGRMIT N0. :I1~0 BF~ GRANT~D
-; ° W:~E;REAS, ~h~ Anaheim City Plannin~ Commission dici receive a var.iEied
Pe~ition for Conclitiona]. Use Pexmit from BROOKFiURST SHUPPING CENTER, 2293 WBSt
`~'` 8~11 Road, Anaheim,
CA ~28p4, owner, and pARCO DEVE.LOPMENT, 2402 Michc~l5on,
Sui~Q 200, Irvina, CA 9271.5, age.nt fo:: ~;ertain real property ~itut~ted in ~ha
Cit~ of Anaheirn, County of Orange, State ~,f California, describ~d as:
YARCEL fl, IN THk~ CITY OF ANAHEIni, ~~LTNTY OF ORJ~.NGE,
STATE OF C.ALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP k'ILED IN BUOK
18. PAGE 30 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORAEll IN OItANGE
: COUNTY, CALIFOftNIA.
WEIFREAS, the Cit,y Planni~ig Commission did hold a publi~c hear~.ng at
the Civic Center in thc~ City of Anaheim ou April 10, 19f39 at 1:30 p.m. , rxotice
, of: said public hearing hav.ing been duly giv~n as rPquired by law and in
accord~nce with th~ provisions of the Anahaim Municipal C~d.e, Chap~ar 18.03,
~ to hear and consider evidence L-or and against saici proposed conditional use
• permiL• ana to investigate ana m~ke find.ings an~ recomm~ndations .in connection
{ therawith; and
WHE;REAS, sai.d Commission, afkor dae inspection, invest.ig~tion and
study mac~e by it~olf and in its behalf, and aft~r due cons.ideration oE al~.
evidence and regorts a£fered at s~id h~aring, does find and determine th,o
~ollowing £acts:
1. T.hat thF petitioner roquests approval of a Condi~ional Use
Permit under suthority o.E Coc1e Section 18.~3.030.U10 to pormi~ an automotive
rapair service with wa.iver af th<= following unc~er author.ity of Cod~ Section
18.OG.080:
SECTTONS 1~~06.050.J22
~.;@~~~~~4.~
-'~-YLY.1~-~ Y J V2 Z Z
~~~t~S 0 . 0 2 31
1-$L4Sz.z.4-~.4.~_~
1 ~~4~.~ Qz .~
~n~i 18 . 4~ • 4 6 6 Q~Q
~~~~;
- Min'm~m n~nLkgr 4F nar~ci~_.~P.~~~~•
(1~37 r~quir~d; qb~, proposQd)
~. ~hat the requested waiver is rereby granted on the basis thaC
thal- the parking waiver will ~not cause an incr~ase in L•raffic cong~sGion in
t~ie immediate viciniL•y nor adversely a~fect any adjozning land uses and
granting of the parking waiver under lhe conditions imposed, if any, will not
bo dotrimen~al to the pe~acc~, healLh, safety and goneral welf.are of the
citizens of the City of Anaheim.
land uses and the growthPand deve].opme k lofl Cheaac~a ein wh ch it is ~~~oininq
to be loca~ed. proposed
0808r
e
-1-
PC89-•1.06
t'~
' n~
"`~~ i
;.'f
;
;!
;~.
;`, ,
..._ . .. ... . ......., ~ •.,,:..,. r t i~r:ra~a ~tt1ti'~d~t
~f ' 1j
y.~ ~ qy~ . . ~ .~~,~
4P.'~'~~~ ~ ~.<<!f
~.~ M~ , . ~5At~4t, . . ~ ..,a~
. f.,~j
`;,'i
4. That ~he size and shape of the site proposed for the use is
aclequa~~ ta :a11ow ~he fu11 davelopment oP khe proposed use in a mannAr nut
~~Qtrimental to thQ part9.culttr area nor to the peace, healtlx, safety and
general welfr~r.e oE tl~e Citizens of Lho Ci~y oF Anaheim.
5. That the qra.nting of the Conditiona~ Use Permit under the
condi~inns :imposeci, if any, wi11 not be cletr3meY.t-,a] Co tho pet~ce, health,
safetx anr~ goneral welfare of the Citizens oE ~he City~ oF Anah~im.
~i., That the traffic gonQrated by rche proposed usQ wzll n~t impose
an undue htirden u~~n the streets and highwa~rs designed and improved to car.ry
the tratL•ic in the area.
7. That no one indicated the.i r vreseiice at said public hearing a,n
opposition; and that no c~rrespnncience wa~ recoivod in ogposition to the
subject petiLion.
~ LIF RNIA ENVTR~NN;ENTAI, QUAGITY'_ A~T FTNDIN~; That ~he Anaheim
Czty Plann:ing Conuni.ssion ha~ r.•eviewed the propo~al to permit an automotive
rapair sorvica with waiver of minimtun number oP parking spaces an an
irregu).arly_chaped Farcel of• land consistiiig of approx.imately 1.26 acres
haviny an approximate ~rontage of 202 feet on the nortY~ side of Ba].l Road,
having a maximum dapth of approximately 414 feet, being located appr.oximately
625 feet w~sk of khe center~.ine of Brook2iurst Street and f~arther dascribed as
27.93 West Bal~ Road; and ~loes hereby approvc~ the Negative Declarataan upon
finding that it lias cunsidered the regative Declar.ation togc~ther with any
comments zeceived during the public revit~w procPSS and f.urther fin~3inq on the
basis of the ini~ial study and any comment~ received thal; there is no
~ubskantzal evidence that ~r,e project will have a significant e£fect on the
environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, H~ IT RLSOLVED that t:~e Anahoim City Planning
Conuniz~szaxz does horeby grant stibjecC Pe~3.tioii for Coridi~ional Use Per.mit,
upon rhe following condit•ions which ar~s hereby found to bQ a necessary
prorequisitQ tu tho proposed use of L•he subject property in order to presorve
the saf:ety and general welfare cf tY:e Cikxzens ot tl:e City oP Anaheim:
1. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate traffic
s5.~{r,al assessment fse shall be paid ta the City of Anaheim i.n an amount as
establ.i;thed by Ciky Council resdlution.
2. That a reciprocal access and parking agz•eemenh, in a farm satisfactory tQ
the City httorney, sha11 b~i recorded with the ~JEfice of the Oiange County
Recordex. A copy of t'tie record~d agreement ~hali then be submitted to ~he
?.oning Divisiqn,
3. That drivowa~s stia.ll be repaired along Ball Road as requ.ired by the City
~ngineor and in accordance with stanc]ard plans r~ud 3peciEicati.ons on file
in l:he Office of t.he City Engineer.
4. Tha~ no above-ground storaqe tank~ far automobile fluids sha11 be
permitted, ~ss requiread by the City Fir~ Department.
-Z-
PC89-106
.., ~>,
~ ~~F~, rrnhr~°rw.~ . . ~ f , v_ d .
. _, , x~ !':.73 . ,. ':.9-• ~~a+Tf r ir, !y;l ui~;r,~ ,n.~„~ ~.;~„ ~, u'qnt .,~
. :, . ' ( ~.~:~: +'~F~i` 11 '~ t r r.i,-r i i ~~ ~/~,~}7~
, . . .. . , .. , . 1; ..., ' ~1 ~ 7 ~;,'~~ ~ ~,~ flv~~.IG `~.~.S~~Yt~ d ~i.~~YNI.lil~
I ~N
~
,AA't0a~1 ~
I
~l~"'i~4~ ` ~ .
. , t ~ ~ , _ '~~~~
• ~~
!i. xha~ trash s4:oz•aqe areas sha.11 be provided and ma3ntained in a location
~+cceptab].e to th~ St~ree~ Maintenance and Sanitat3on D3vlsion and in ;;:
accur.d~nce wzth as„pruvod pl~ns un Eile with said Division. ;.
6. Thal the new construction auth~rizyd by this resolut.ian sha11 be served by F;
underqround utiliries.,
'1. That all sir conditioninq fACilities and oth~r roof and grounc~ mounted
equipmant shall be properly shieldc~d from view.
8. That the proposal shall comply ~vith a11 s:igning requirements of the CL
"Commercia3., LimitAd" Zone, unless a varianc;e allowing sign waivers is
appravad by the City Council, Planning Commission or Zoning Administra~tor.
9. ThaL• no outdoor storagc~ of, display of, ur Taork on vehzcles or vehicular
pax~ts shal.l bP permitted.
~C. T2xat tY:e an-site landscaping s}iall be maintained in compli.ance wi~h City
standar~ls.
7.1. That subject prop~rty shall be dt~velopec3 suk~stantia..ly in accardance with
plans anfl specifi.cal:ions on ~31e with ttie C'iCy u!: Anahexm marked Exhibit
Na~. 1 throuc~h 4.
12. T:1at prior to i~3uance of a building permit or within a period nf one (1)
yoar f;com tho date o.f ttiis resolution, whic2iever oc~;urs £i,rst, Can~liL•ion
No~. 1 and 2, above-mentic~recl, sha11 bQ camplieri with. ~xtensions for
further ti.me to compl~te said conditions may be granted iii accordanc~ with
Sec~:ion 1a.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipa3. c:ode.
13. That prior to final buildinc~ aud zoning ins~ectioiis, Cond.ition Nos. 3, 5,
6, 7 and 11, abcva-rnentioned, shall be complied wit2i.
14. That approva:i of thi~ app:l9.catiori cor.stitutes appraval of the pro~osed
reqixost only to ~he extent trat it compliss with the Anaheim Miini.Cipal
Zoning Cod~ and An~~ other applir.able City regixlatzons, Approval doe3 not
include an}~ action or findings as to compliance or approval of the r~quest
reg~rding any other applicab'le ordinanco, regulat.ion or raquirement.
BE IT FURTHER R~SOLVED that the Ana2ieim City Planning Commission
does heroby fin~ and determine tha~ adopti~n of. thi:~ Resolution is Q~pressly
pr~dicated t:pon applicant's complia:ice with each and all of khe aonditions
hereinab~vs set Eorth. Should any suah cflnditions, or any~ part. thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceabl~ by the final judgment o£ any court of
competent jurisdiction, theii this Resoluti.on, and any o.pprovala horein
contained, sh~11 be deemed nu11 and void.
-3' kC89-106
,`'~`~?;
~
~'~
~.
~
. ,~i ' .~yi 1> } 7~Y~~'~~~~i1_~~~~1~1~~~
. ~ ,~ +tl~'):1~ ~'!
' ~ ' ~ r T i ~{I I(°ti (
~ . . . . . . . . ' , ,~;~~ ~'~46
'Fy
, . . '' ,.1, i?I
~I
'I
TIiE FQREGOING R~:SOLUxION is sigaied and approved by me this 10~h dr~y ;~)
o£ Apri1, 1909. ~
.%;~~~`r- -~a~,-,~~.a- ,~• '' ,,,;,f/'~~`t.'~..,r.,~,__ ,~
CHAIRWOM~~,`~'ANAHEIM CI'rY PLANNTN(; COMMISSTON '±~
i
AT'SEST: y ., ,~,~
(~l , / ,
~~1Z-`'~-"'~._..' _~ '~'~ ____.. :~7
~ECRET.ARY, ANAHETM CI7.'Y FLANIvTNG COMMIBSION ..'f~
Y'
S'PATE OF CALIF'1RIvIA ) :~!~~
CUUNT~C l~E ORAN ~E ) s s. °~'"i
CITY OF ANAHEIM ) `ri
~,~~
~ ~ ,n
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary o~' tYi~ Anah4im City P7.annixig ~!
Commissior~, do hereby certify that tho foregoinq resalution was passed and ~'`~"
adnpL•Qd at a meQting o£ the Anahezm Ci.ry Planninq Comm,ission hald on April 10,
3.989, by the following vots o.f the members therecf:
AYES: COIyIIrII557.ONERS: SQUAS, BOYDSTUIJ, CARUS7LL0. FEC~DHAUS, iiERBST,
MC BURNGY, MESSF
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
AHSENT: COMMISSIONEk2S• NON~
IN WITNESS 41HGR~01, Z have hereunta set my hand this ].Oth day of
Apr:il, 1909.
~~ .
---- ~ ~ _~_~,! `~'GfJl--c..~.? ----
SECRETArY, ATTAFiFIM CIT.Y PLI~I.+iIJING CGt~AiIS5I0N
-4-
~~r-~ '.4 .,~ __ , . . ,;
PC89-106
Sr,