Resolution-PC 89-108,,;~AY:~
~.~QLI~Q~ ~T.4~_~.2: ]~Q~
~~~
A RESOLUT:[UN OF' THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOtd
THA'P PETITION FOR COrTDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3145 BE GR.ANTEI)
WHFREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Cortunis3ion did receive a veriEie~i
F'etit3.on L•or Conditional Use Yermit from ~ARL ~LSNRR, 2791 IIun~inq CirclA,
Costa Masa, CA, awnar, and GEORGE~TA PI AND FRAiJK SCFITRI~, 7722 ~verst Circle,
Fiuntingtun Beach, CA 92647, agent~ ~or cort~xn real properLy situ~ted in tho
City oE' An~hQim, Cuun~y of Qra:ige, Stato of California, descrihocl as:
...a.~...
i ;>c~~;
7.'HAT PORTION OF TFIE SOI7THEAST QUART~R Or' SECTTON 18,.
TQWNSHIP 4 SOUTFI, RANGE ~0 WEST, IN '~CHE RI~NCHO LOS
COYOTRS, CITY OF ANAHLIM, COUNTY Or ORANGE, STATE OF
CALTFORLITA, AS PER Ml~P RECORDED IN A BOOK 5~, P~-GE 10
OL' MISCEL~LA~IF.OUS MAPS, IN ~'HE Of F'IC~ OF THF COUNTY
RECORLER OF SA.iD COUNTY, ~ESCRIBFA AS ~'O[~LOWS:
BEGTNNING AT THE YNTERSECTIQN OF TH8 NORTHERLY LINE
OF COLCK~,STEFt ARIVE WITH THE EASTE~tLY LINE OF TH~
FIRST ALL~X OF BROOKFIURST STREET, AS SHOWN ON A MA.~'
OF TRACT N0. 2701, RECORUED IN BOOK ?.15, PAGf:S 5 AND
6 OF SAIb MISCELLANEOUS NTAPS; THENCS NORTH $9 DEG.
57' 48" EAST 100.00 FEET THE TRUF YOIN1 OF B!s'GINI7ING;
TF~GNCE NORTEi 0 UF.G. 02' 7.2" WEST 121.71 FEET 'PO THE
SOUTH LINF. OF TRACT NU. 2295, A5 P~R MAP RECORDED IN
BQOK 62, PAGE5 7 7~1D 8 OF SA;D MISCELLANEOUS MAPS:
THENCE NORTFi 89 DEG. 57' 48" EAST 301.30 FEET AL~NG
SAID SOYlTH [,INE 'i'0 TFiE C~NT~4t LTNE QF BROOKHURST
S'.CREET; TI~ENCE SOUTH U DEG. 40' 06" WEST 153.73 FEET
TO THE CF.I~TER LINC OF COLCHESTER DRIVEs TFIEIJCE SOUTFI
89 DEG. 57' 48" WEST 299.d1 I'EET= THENCE NORTH 0 DEG.
02" W~ST 32.00 FEET TO THE TRilE POINT OC $EG2NNING.
~~IFiFREAS, zhe City Planning Commissiun did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of A:-aheim on Apri1 10, 1989 ~t 1:30 p.m., notice
of ~aid p~ublic heariiig h~ving boen duly c~iven as ~aquired tay lr~w and in
accorciance with the provisions ~F the An2heim Municir.:~l Code, ChapL•er 18.03,
to heaz~ t~nd consider evidenc~ for and agaii~st said proposed conditional use
permit anc3 to investigate and make findings and recommeiidations in connecti.on
therQrizth; and
w'HFREAS, uaid ~ommi~sian, after due inspoctfon, investigation and
study made by itself and it- its behalf, and ~fter due considsration ot r~ll
eviderice ana reports offered at said heacing, does find and determine thQ
Following facts:
0811r
- ~. -
PCA9-10$
~;'.,"
~
' , ~
v~r
~ ~tt~4
:*~~,.:. ~;~~I
: ,' ~: ~ . ~,.;~;i
1• ~'hat the petitioner requests approval of a C~ndit3onal ~Tsa
Permit under authority of Code Sect;ion 18.44.050.010 ta r
lounge (w•hich repldced a former restaurant:) with waivor oE th_e~ll~w.in~cuxl~il
aut2xor.ity of' Section 18.06.080: ~ der
F. Tx N 18 • ~ 6. O.~O~Q2~
I`'Li.~~-LR~~I_. ~ ~~-~_4:.E
' ~~:4 2 ~ (~ required: : ~pro~ se~~pa es.
. n~ d 1-~-~ 4 ..Q4S~~ ~4
Z• That the requ,~sted waiver is hereby qxa~L•ed on th~ ba~'
u1S tha~
the parkinc~ wRiver will not cause an incr~ase in traftic c;onr~estion iri the
3mmediate vzGZnity .nor adversely afFect any adjoining land use;~
of the parking waiver undsr the cond3.tion~ impos~d it an ' and 5ranting
detrimental to the ppace, healr.h, sr~fQty dn~ g~neral welfare of tholc ~ z~ns
oi' t:~e City of Anaheim.
~• Trla~ the piaposecl use will no~ adversal-
~ affect the adjoiiiing
land uses anu t2ie growth and develnpment of the area in which it is r
~o bQ locateci. P• oposed
~• 7'tlat t.he size and shape of tt~e si~e proposed for tho use is
adequate t~ allow the full devaiop-nent of t}ie pruposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular nrea t~.~~r to t}xe peace, haalt;h, safety and
gener3l w~;i~~Te of L-ha Citizens of tho (:ity of Anahaim.
5. T.hat the graiiting p~ tne Canditional Use permit
c~ndit.ions imnosK~d, iE any, wil]. no~ be de~rimental to the peace,n health~
safoty and yeneral welfare of tha Citizens of tbe City of Analiezm.
6• T2iat Che traffic generated b
an undue burdc~n upon the streets arad h.igh syshdesignedaandgimproved~tolaarry
thQ traffic in tho aroa.
7. That n~ one indicated their pre~ence at saici pub:lic het~ring qn
~ppositionp and rhat no corrospondence was rPCeived in oppcsition to the
subject petition.
~A.r.iFr~gpTZ_J~ ENVZ~NMF;f1TA[, ~I~ALITY 7~ x FIN,~I~1~; That the Anaheim
City Planning Commi.ssfon ha~ reviewed the proposal to retain a coc.ktail
louttge (wlaich rc~placed a foxmer restaurant) wfth waiver of minimwr nur~ber of
parking spaces on a ractangularly shapod parcel of lar.d consisting of
approxi~-ately 0.67 acre located at the northwest corn~~
and Colctzester Dr.ivR, havin R r of Brookhurs~ Street
side of Brookhurst StreoL• and 24.lrfeetaon th~~nerth side Zot Co choster~D~ive
and further desc:•ibed as al~ South Bro+~'•;~urst StroeL• (Wounc~ed Knee Saloon) ~
and does hexeby ~pProv~ the ;Togative Declaration upon ffnding that it has
consi~lered the Nega~ive Dec~aration togokhar w~f th any Commenrs recei.ved
durati~ the pub].ic; review procoss a~id Iurther finding on LhQ has3,s of the
initial study and ~ny comments received that there is no substantiai Rviaenre
that the groject will have a signif3cant effect on *_he environment~
-2-
PC89-108
''~ ~ ~ .,
:, `
~`
:; '.:
,`$: .
''1 ;;
;~
i',I~] ~f~y~F.} t~ N~'.~iJ 1 ii~..7;~ 1 ~; S~,S+~h' r(7~} ' ~I~~'"1 ~ t~ , . _
, . , .. ~ . ~ ~ ( ~y ~` U ~
;1: ~i:' r~ I' ':'i ~ 1'.;~' F 1~ .7~5~' ~~ ~ ~'~ i~'~I~~
. . . . . . . ,i ~~ .i
~ ~ rk'~..~t~ ~ f^~
' ' . ,%,:,~~
~s.
NOW, THF.REFORT, F!E TT RESQLV~D that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission do~s herpby grant :~ubject Peta.~ion for Conditional Use Permit,
aFqil tlie fallowany conditions which aro 1iQreby found L•o be a necpssary
prerequi~i~e to the proposod use of the subjeat property in urdez• to presarve
tho safQty and general welfar~ of the Cihizens o£ tho City af Anaheim:
l. That strQet lighting f~cilitios along Eirookhurst Stre~f: s~all bQ
ins~alled as r.equired by the Ut:ilitias General rifan~ger in accordance vrith
specifications on file in the Uftice of Utili.ties General. Manager.
2. That Che existing most eas~er'ly dra.veway oxi Colchestec Drive sha17. be
removed and re~l~ced ~vith a standard curb, gutter, giiiewalk and
lan3scaF~ing, as map ~e x~eqtiired by the City Tra£f.ic Enginear ira view of
the Planning Co~runission' ~ recomr,ien~lation that said driveway be rQt~~iiied
if posyible,
3. That a prarka.ng p.'lan sho~ ~y c~mpliance v~i th City ~oark~ng lo~ design
sL-andards shall be submiGted ta and approved by lhe Cit,y 7'raff:ic
Engineer. The owner ~£ subject property sball restripe the parkiny lo~
withi.n thS.rty [3U] days ~aft.~r ap~+r,o~t,l of said plan.
4• That a fee shall be paid to the City of Anaheim t~r treo planf:ing along
Bro~k}iurst Street and Colchester Drive in an amount as established by
City Council resolution.
5. That the tLash storage sreas ~hall be refurbishQd Co comply with approved
plans an file ~ith the 5treet Maintenanc~ axzd Saui.tatior. Division.
6. T:~~t r~ll air condit~oning facilitie~s and other rc~oE an~ ground roounted
eRuipment s!~a1T ~e properly shielded Erom viQw, and tt~e s~und buff.ered
from adjacenh reuidential propertias to the north.
7. That the p:opbsal shall c~rnply with ~11 signing requiraments of the CL
"Commercial, Li,mited" Zone, unless a vari~nce allowing sign waivers is
approved by the City Counci.l, Planning Cormnissioz~ or 'Laning Administrator..
8. ThmL- a six (G) fooC high mASOnry blor,k wall shall be maintained z,lonq th~
nurth pro},~ert;y line excopting the front s~tback w.iere the wall hei~~h~
shall not exceed three (3) feet; pruvidcsd, however, l:hat L-he C.it;y Tra£tic
Engineer s11a11 2iav~ the authority to reduce the height of the wall to
protect safe .lines-of.-sight ~aher~ pedostrian/vehicular ci.rculaCS.on oacur.
9. That ar-y parking drea lig}itinr~ fixtures adjacent tc the resitiential
properties i:a khe north ~shall be dvwn-lighted with a ma~~imum height of
twelve (12) fAPt. Saicl ligk~ting fixtuc•es shall be di.reeteci away from
ad;jacent residen~ial property l.ines L•o protect thQ residential integr:Ety
of the area.
-3- PCa9-].00
,;~
~ ~r,~
~r,~ . ~ r ~~
, ~
~ ~
A,' . 1• I~~ . •' ~
f
~ rjC
H
10. That the on-site lar~dscaping sha].1 be refurbished ax~d maintaxned in
compliance with City ~t~ndarfls.
11. That 3U.b]Al`.t properry s}~a11 be dev~oloped substant3a'lly xn ~tccordance w3tn ~
plans and s~ec.ifi.cations or. file with the Ci~y of. Anaheim mz~rl~ed ~xhibit '
Nc~ , 1.
12. '~hat Conc~ition No. 2 and 3, above-mFn~ioned, shall be campleted wil:hin a
poriod of thirty (30) days from the date of knis resolutfon.
13. Tnat Condition Nos. 1, 4, 5, F, 8, and 9 and 11, above-mentianed, sha11
be camplet.ed wi,thin a periud oF n.ix~ety (90) da~s from the date of this
reaolution.
l~. That approval of this application constitutes approval of, the proposed
, request anly to tho extent that it complies with tha Anaheim Municipal
' Zor.ing Coc~~ and any otrer applicable City regulations. Approval do~s uot
inc].ude aziy action or Eindings ~:s to con~pliance or approval oE "'z~
;y request e~eqac•dznq a:7y other applicab].e ordinance, regulation or
, requirement.
BE; TT FURTHEIt RF,SOLVED that L-he Anaheim City P].anning Commis~ion
does horeby •`~nd and d~termine that adoption of th3.s Resolution is expressly
preclicated upnn applicant's comp~iance wihYi emch aud ~11 of the conditions
hereinabove sQt forth. Should an~. such corlditions, nr any parL- therenf, be
dacl.ared inyalid or un~~i.Eorceable Uy ~he Einal ~udgment of any caurt of
cc•m~eY.ent juzisdicLion, then ~his ResoluCion, ar~d any apProvals herein
containud, shall ba c~eemeci rxul.l and void.
' THE FOREGOIPlG RESOi,UTION is signea and appraved by me this lOth dap
~ of Aprzl, 1989,
'~~ i. r. i' I~
.~ ~ -~(,~(.t.. .-j" ~'~ -r>~.<f'-~ . .
r ~: , ~ ~;1~~:~
~FIAYP.WOMAN, AIJAF~EIM CITY PLATINING COhII~1ISSI0.i
ATT~ST:
; „
'" - --•____ ~~~~a'«--'--, _
SECRGTAR , ANAF~TE;IM CITX PLANNING COI~fISSTON
!,
4
i
~
. . . . ...... ~
-4-
PC89-108
<;
~?
', ~
~:;.'-,.
'~V~
STA1'E OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) sy.
C~TY JI' ANAHEIM ) ~j~'
,1~
~ '.
I, Edith L. Harris, Searetar.y of the Ax~aheim City plt~nn3ng ,1;;
Commi3sion, do horeby certify that 'the Eorogoing resoluti~n was passed anQ ;,ti
adopted at a meeting of tlie Anaheim Cit~y Planning Commission hg1c9 on Aprll 1.n,
1989, by the .Eollowing vota of the members thareof.; `°'r'
uE~F "~,~l~iF+~`u roY~'f 7~~~ Y" ;'~'~" GYF ~d .1~~M~' t'~c~S'VV~'t ~c:` Atrl }r r~qr~~r~W~'yt ~~ r .~.t7 i,~~ ~ i,q r ~+
'~ { t . !, v ~. ~ iY.rf 7 i ~: ~? ~+F~ r C , n~ Jld `~"` ( 1~~~'~ ~'" '~ ~ ~v{q' ~ti~ ~ ~d^G ~q W
~..,. ,_., - ., .. . ~~ ~<<~' ~~~~ 1.~ ~' 1, 1 ..1! M 1'}tt~ .~~p~ ~~,~+~Y~~'!'~~ ~~7~h~~~
., ~ . . . . . ~ . - ,. . . t ~ .~:.,. ~;~~s~.i . ' ~r ~ ' ~ ~^~} Yi t~ -k ~i~,~~ ~~ ~~
1~.i.. t~ ,':
'?t
~rt~~a ;~«~'+~3! f,
~XES: CUb~A4'[SSiONERS: BOUAS, BOYDSTUN, rARUSiJ~LO, EF.LAHAUS, HERBST,
MC F3URNF.Y, MESSP;
NOES: CO2rIIdISSIOfIEFtS: NONE
ABSFNT: COt~QrtISSIONERS: N~NE
IN WITNESS WHr,REUF, I have hsreunto set my hand this lOth day of
~pri1, 1989.
-_-~~_~°_'' .
S~;CkETARX, ANAHEIM CITY' PLANNING COMMISSION
~ :~}.
f',:
;~
~;`'
~;`~
~, ~
_Sy
I~C89-108
,,~
,,,_
;`i~:,
``,i
°~~
,;,,.
,~~
;~t
~ :;
;~'~
''r : ;