Resolution-PC 89-11Y
~~
.~5~2t~ ~~xQx ~r~, PCg9-1.~
~
A RESOL'UTION OF TH~ ANAHETM CITY YLANNING COMMISSION ,;'~~
THAT PETITION FOP VARIANCF N0. 3891 BE DENIED ±~
iVHFREAS, th~ Anahoim Caty Pl~nni~zy Commission did recoive a
veri.£ied Peti~iun for Varianco f.rom L•he CI7:Y OF ANAHr~IM, 200 South Anahei~n
Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805, property own:~r, anci MALTRICE P, DESTOVERT, 2800
28th Strc~et, Suite 10Q, Santa Monica, CA 90405, ayen~ for certain real
pr~~erty si~uated in f:he C.ity of Anaheim, County of ~range, Statc~ of
Califarnia dESCribsd as:
THF EAST HALk' OF ^'HE NfJRTHEAST QUA.RTER OF TFIr
NGR~?iWEST ~liARTER UF SEC'.CION 27, TOWNSHTP ~! SOU'PH~
RANGE 10 WEST, IN lHE RAN~~HO SAN JT1AN CAJON DE SANT7~
ANA, CITY ~JF :~NAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, ST)~TE OI'
CItLIFORDTIA, AS PER MAP ~2ECORDED IN AO(~iC 51 FAGE OF'
r1ISCGLLAN~OUS MAPS, IN TKE OFFIC.E OF TFiE COiTI'fTl'
R~CORllER OF SAID CGUNTY.
§
WHEREAS, the City Plann.ing Commisszon did holc] a public hearing
a~ t-he Civic Cenror in l:}:a City of AnaT~ei.m ~n January 16, 1489, at 1:J0 p.m.,
notiae~ o£ said public hearirig having bt+r~n duly given a~ required by law and in
nccordance with tho provisi~n~ of Lhe Anahei.m Municipal Cocle, Chaptar 18.03, ~
to hear ancl consid: r ovi~ancg £or r~2id against said Yiroposed va,riance and to ~
i,~vestfgah.e ~nd make finclings and recommendations in co~inection therewith; an~ ~
WHEREAS, ~aid Commi~sion, a~C~r due in.^,pection, investi.gation ~
and study madQ ~y itsolf and in ir.s behalf, and aFkar due consideration of all ~
ev3.dence and reports offnred ar sai.d hearinq, does find and determine Che
tollowing facts:
1. Th~t the petitioner pro~oses waiver.• of the ~ol].owing to
retain an Qxisting 9 sq.ft., 5-f•out high menu sign:
~~T]' 11 18.05,p~Q,0231 _. Minimum i•t- n w c~n fxeest i
~~~~_5~~~4~ .~~1?~_~i5.~ •
(.~_OQ_~eet r~quired; 2~~•5 feeh exist~ng)
Z. That L•he abovQ-mentioned waiver is hor~by deniecl ori thR
basis khat a study to consider improvements and enhnncements ~o the CommecciaZ
Recreatior Area is underway and inclur~es consideration of ineans to eliminate
tY~e prolS.ferdtion ~f s.igns and that subjQCt sign is i1lFgal; and that no
hardship was shown to justi~y approval.
0619 -1- PC89-11
_.r-~
~
~~~
~
. . . . . ~ . .~ ~ . . - ~` ~(~~-tY~t~~
~ ~ , ~ ~.':I .. .-1-1 r
~~~ ~ `.
~ ^'~
n ~2 ' ,
3. xhat there ara n~ exceptianal or extraordinary
cirqumstances or. condations app].icable t.o the property~ involved or to the
intencled use ~f rhs pxoper~:y thar do iiot apply c~enerally to the proper~y ox
class of use in the same viciYiiCy and zor~Q.
~, 4. That the requested variance is not neceset~ry for ~he
'' ~
pr.~servation 2 d enjoyment oi a sube~tr~ntial propQrty right p~ssessod by ather
properhy in the sarn~ vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
~. That the reque~~~d varian~e wi11 be material.ly c~etr.imental
to the public welfare or injurious co Che r~roperty or improrrements in sueh
vicinity and zone in which the proper.ty is locst~d.
6. Thai: no one indi~:ated their presence at said puhlic
heax•ing an opposition; r~nd L•hsC no corrospondence was recea.v+~d in Appr~sit:.on
~ to subyect ~etition.
C~.xt'URi1IA ENVIRONhSEN'SAL OLTA~,ITX A~_rINDII3G: Tha Planning
Diro~;;or ~r his authoriaed rapreser~tat.ive has decermined that the propnsed
project falls within rhe definition of Categorical Rxamptions, Class 11, as
defined in the State EIR Guf.delinos and is, thorefore, cat3gorically exemp~
.from Che re~uir~menL• ta prepare an ET1R.
Z10W, THEREFO~tE, BE IT 12ESOLV'EA rhat the Anaheim Cit.y PZanning
Commission do~s hereby ~3eny :,ubject Petition for Variance on tl:e basis o£ the
aForQmentioried findinqs.
TFiE FOR~GCIING R~50LUTION i~ signed and approved by mg t:tis 1.6Lh of
January, 1989.
' . ~ ~ r~
;.
~'~~~~r'~,~~!-~.i . r,~l~,~`,
CI~fAIRWOMAN, ANA'~iETM C~LANNING CA~fMISSIQN
A.TTEST: ~/
r
SECR r .~'--~ ~~~~ -
T.ARY, ANAH~TM CITY PLANNING CONIIYfISSION
STATE OF CAI,IFORNTA )
C~JUNTX OF ORANGE; ) ss,
CITX OF ANA:3LIM )
I. Edith L. FIarris, Secr~tary of ~he Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do here.by rertiEy thak the fore~oing r~solution was pas~ed and
adopted at a meaL•iiig o.E ttie An~lxeim City Planning Commission held on Januu+:y
lEth, 1989, by the Following vote of tho members thereo£:
AYES: COMhfISSION~R$; AOUAS, BOYDSTUk~I, FELLHAUS, tIERBST,
MESSE, MC BUR~IEY
hI0E5: COIr4+fI5SI0NERS: NONE
i-}3~ENT: COt~IISSIONERS: CARCISILLQ
IN WITNESS WKEkEOF, I have h~reunto sQt my hand this I.6th day of
January, 1489.
.(-~ "
'~ --~ ~~~ , .
SECREI:ARX,. ANA~iEIM PL.'~NNIt1C ~':, '.z: CSSION
r
. , ~,'~~~t`,~
1
,~'
;;;;
,f;~
~~~
,,;,~`
~.~.;~i
;;`
~`:i
'~
,: ~ ~ .