Resolution-PC 89-111
~
RE~.~,QI~jTION N0. PC89-111
A 12ESULUTION OF THE ANAHFIM CTTY PLANNING COt~1I~SI0N
TffAT PE'PI~ION ~OK RECLAS5TFICAZ'IUN N0. 88-89-54 BE GRANTEll
WHL~tE~S, ~ha Anaheim CiL•y P1ann.ing CammissxUn did raceive a
verified pcttition foi ReclassiFicatian from TRSDER CORPORA'rION, 12 Corporate
Ylaza, Newport Boach, CA 92660, owne.r, and GA~tY MC CANN, 12 Corporate Plaza,
Nowport Beac1Y, CA 92660, agent of certain rea.l pxop~rrty situated in the City
of Anaheim, County of Orange, State ot Calito.rnia, dasczibod as ~'ollows:
PARCEL 1 CF PARCFI. MAP N0. 87.-272 FxLED N.AY 24, 1982
I~T AOQK 17Q PAGES 39 to 96, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL ''~
MAPS, IN THE OFFIC~ OF THE COUNTX RECORDER, Ct~UNTY OF
OFANGE, CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, tho Ciry Plarining Comm;.s~toxi did ho:d a public hearing
at tho Civic Cente.r in the Cit~~ of Anaheim or~ April 24, 1989 at 1:30 p.m.,
natice uf said public hearinc~ haviny bean duly gi~~en as roquired by law an~i in
acr.ordance with the provisipny of khe Anaheim Municipal Cods. Ckzapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidenc~ for and against said propused roclass~ificaCion
and to invastigatQ and make findings and recommQndations in connection
thQrewithj and
wHE'..~5, said Commission, after due inspecti~n, invost.igation
and study made by itself and in its behalf, and safter due consideration of a11
QvidQnce and reports afferecl at said hearinq, does find arid determine thc~
following facts:
1. Th~t the petitioner proposes reclas~ification oi subject
prop~rty Erom the RS-A-43,000 (8C) (ResidQntial/Agricultural-5cenic Corridor
Ovorlay) Zone to tho QS (SC) (Op~n Space-Scenic Corridor Overlay) Gone.
2. That tttQ Anaheim GeriEra'1 Plc~n designates subject pro~,Qrty
genQral open spac~,.
3. That the pro~os~d r.ecla~sification of sub;jec:t px•opor.ty is
necessary and/or desirable fox the ordorly ancl proper dev~lopment of the
community.
~. '~hRt tbe proposad reclassif:iaation of subject prapezty does
pcoperly re].atc~ r.o the zones and their permitted uses locally esCablished in
close pruximity to subject pxo~orty und tu the zonos and their parmitted uses
generally established througteout the community.
5. That no ona iudicated their pz~sencg at saicl public hearing
in opposition; a:id tl»t no correspondencP was receivec] in oppo~ition to
subject ~~etition.
Oa20r -1- PC89-111 ._V~
;r'
,':~
; t.'
~ ;.~:
~~
~ _ . . ' :'•`b"C,! +r r~
u
r,, ~!4~~ .,`r<'
~::~
. .,.~,~,.I
~Ltr RNIA ENVIR~NMENTAL_QU'A,LITY' ~~T FINDINC~: xhat the Anaheim
City Planning C:ommissior~ 2~as rtaviewed the proposa]. to reclass.Ify subject
property .from the RS-A-43,000 (SC) (Residential/Agricultural-Scani,c Cor:idor
Averlay) Zone to ~he ~S (St':) (Open Space-Scenic: Corridor Overlay) T.une on
property di.scribed as an irre7iziarAy-shaped parcel of land consisting of
ap~ruxima~oly 12,2 acr~as having a Eron~age of ~pgxoximately 2,800 f~e~ on the
west side ot Anaheim Hills Road betwa~~ Santa Ana Canyon Rnad and a~oint
approxzmatel~~ 650 feet nortxi of the centerline ~~ NohY Ranch Road; and does
}iereby approve tha 2leqative Dealaration upon £itiding that iC h~s cons3.dc~rod
t.he N~gat;ive Declaration togetl~er with anp comments receivecl duz•ing the
publ.ic review process ~nd furthor f,in~.ing on ~he ba~i, of. th~ 3.nitial study
and an~ cumments recoived that thexe is no substantial evidence Yhat the
project will have a significant eF£och. on the envirorur~ent.
N04V, THER~FORE, II~ IT RF.SOLVEn that the Anaheim City Planning
Commissiori does heroby grant subject Petition for Reclas3ifica~ion and, by so
doirig, that Title 18-7.oning of. tYze Anaheim Municipol Cocle be amended to
exc].ude the abovo-describ~d property fr~m ~he RS-A-~l3,000 (SC)
(R~sidential/Ac~ricultura].-Scenic Corridor Overl~yj Zono an.d tn irlcorporate
said described property into the OS (SCj (Oger~ Sp3CQ, Saanic Corridor
Over].ay) ?orAe upun the following candikions wh,ich are liereby found to be a
necessary pre.rgguisite to the proposed use of ~ubject prc~pc~rty in ord~r. to
prese•rve the safety an3 gen~ral welfare o~f the C~tizens of th~ City of
Anahaim:
1. That the Electrical Rngi~ieering Division sha11 r~vic~w and approve the
adoqua~:y of all existinq on-si~e elect:ical utility easements.
2. That ~ha appropriate fees fur primary and second~ry EirN pz•otection shall
ba paid.
3. That prior tu the i:-troduct;i~n of an ordinance rezoning aiil~ject proper~y,
Cond.itioal Nos. 1, and 2, abovo-mentioned, shall be comple~ecl, The
provisions ar right~ granted b~,~ this resolution sha11 become nul]. and
void by action of the Planning Commission unless st~id ~;onr]itions are
complied with wi~hin one year fr.om the date of t;hts rosolii~;aun, or sach
fustiher time aa the Pl~nninq Commission mt-y granh.,
~. That ~pproval o~ thi.s a~~plication constit~.itos a~proval of the proposed
request atily to the extent that. it camplies with ti.~e Anaheim Munic3.pa1
Zon:ing Code e,nd ~ny ~the;r app].icable City regulattan~, Approv~l does not
include any action or findings as to compliance or approval nf tlie
request renarding any otnec applicable urdinHnce, r~gulatior~ or
requi.rement.. ~
;
t,
_..~.
{;
_2_ ~,
PC89-ill
1::
- .~ .. .~ , ..,. . . . ~ .'~i' ~. .. . ,. .
/ ` ~~ ~
BE IT FURTHER RESGLVEU ~hat the Anaheim City Plannia~g
Commissian doos hereby find and determinc~ that a.doption o~ Chis Resolution is
expressly preclir.ated u~on applicant's complianc~ with each and xll of the
conditioi~s hereinabove set forth. Should any such GondiL•ions, or any part
'~heraoi', be declared invalid or u.nenfarceable by the tinal judgment o£ ariy
cour~ of competant jurisdiction, than r_his R~solution, and ~n.y approvals
herein contaxned, shall be deemed null and void.
~Fi~, FORb;GGING RESOT~UTION is ~igried and approved by me this 24th
ciay o£ April, 1985.
', ,
/~~~'/I~l~C: : •1'J~ j Yi11f.~:.
~_--__ ~~ ' ~ . ~d. J ~.
CHAIRWOMAN,~ A F,1M CIT'Y PLA~]NING COMMISSION
I~TTE;iT ;
' _" ~ -_._,~--,-~'~~'`~~'. ~,
SECRETARY, ~#N7#HETM CITY. PLANNING CptvR~IT5SI02d
aTALE OF CALIE'URtdIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGF. ) ss.
CITY OF AN,~FiEIM )
I, Edith L, Harris, Secratary af tlie Anaheim Czty Plannzng
Commis:aion, do hereby cFrtiFy ~hat the foregoing resolution vras pass~d and
ldoptoci at- a meeLing of the Ana~.eS.m City Planning Comrnis~ion held on April 24,
1989. l~y the to'. ring vote of the members therEOf:
AYES: COtyIIrtISSI0~1^ci2S: BOUAS, BUYLSTUN, CAF2rJSYLLO, FELD~YAYIS, HERBST, MESSE
~~~~~ COf~.MISuI:ON'ERS: NONE
ABSENT: COhIIrfISS70NERS: MC BURNEY
IN GIITNESS WHEREOF, I liave liereuTito se4: my hand tnis 24t~. aay
of April, 19$9.
----- ~~ ~ ,7~ _..~..
SECRETARY, ATIAFTEIM CITX PLANNING CC-D4fISSION
~~:. .
-3-
PC89--111
+ 4'+ ~
1}~~
,%Y
~,, ~
`
{
;
._ ~
i
i
i
t
t
,~ S,
x
~~' ~ ~~r~~
.~ Y