Loading...
Resolution-PC 89-118~ ~`1 . ...,'~ ~''~:'.' f ~'~~~~ ~ t~~), ~ ~ M ~~ RESLOLI7~IODT NU• pC89_11~ ~ ~ ~ S1~•\}F~}I~~ ~rf ' ~1~ ~~1~1P !~.~ ~rrj ' ~ . ~ \~~%r:~ ;~i i~'~I A RESOLLITTQN OF T~iE ANAHEIM CITY FLANNI37G COhA~iISSION W~IENAII3G CONDTTIONS OE 1#PPROVAL -; rOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 88-84-40 i i WHEREAS, on February 1'I, 1gA9, Che P~.anning ComruisSiQn, grantec! :~ Reclassification No. 88-89-~0 and Conditior.al Use Permit No. 3626 ta roclassify subject p.roperty from *he RS-7200 MFiP - MobiJ.ehome Park Overlay) Zone to the RS-A_43, 000 (~.g;pdential, Si~ng1~-~Farnily Family - Mobilehome Park OvQrlay) Zon~ in connection,with~la ~ 16 a space~gto ~xpansion ~o an existing mobile home/trai7.er park on property consisting uf approx.imately 6.55 acres locat~d on the south si~le o~ Midway Drive westerly o£ Zeyn Street and Furth~r describe~ as 200 h'est Midway Drive (Midway Trailer Park); and WHEREAS, sub;ject roclassif.i.catinn was granted in connection with ~( Resolution ivos. P~ p9_67; and WHEREAS, the petitioner has requested amendment ta Condition No. 1 (pertaining ~o triQ abandorunen~ of C1~mentinQ Skreet), to allow posting of a bor.d to guarantee processing of an abaiidonmQrzt reques~.; nnd WHEREAS, r.h«~ pQ~,itioner has also reque~~Rd deletion of Condition No. ~(per.ta:ining to street light in~tallation and said 4(p~rtai.ning to a public utzlity easement) of said Reso]ution; an3 WHEREAS; tha City Planning Conunission did hold a pub~,ic heax.i.ng at tne Civic Centor i.n the City of Anaheim on Agril 24, 198g, ar ~,;ap p.m., notzce ot said public hearing having bee~i duly given as roquired by law and in accorda.nco with the provisions c~[ the Anahr~im Municipal Code. Chapter 18.03, to hear and considor ovidenco for and against said proposed amendments and to investiqate arid makQ findinc~s and recommon~atior-s in c:onnoc~ion t.harc~with; and WH~REAS, sai.d Commi~sion, aFter due inspection, iuves~igation and study made by itself and in it~ behalf., and after due cons.ideration of all evidonce and reports off.ored at said hearzng, does finc~ ancl determine the following facts: 1. Tha~ the Feai Yroperty SQCtion is i.n aqraemex~t with the requ~a~ to permit posrinq oE' bonci to guarantee processing uf the abandonm~eiir dus ~o the existxng backlog for proc~ssing abandonments, thereby allowing ~he p~titioner to finalize zoni~g in ~~.imely manner. 2. T.hat the Elpc~zic:al Enqinoer~.rig Division is ia agreement with dele~ing Condition 1Nos. 3 t~rid 4 since both requ.irements hav~ been previously satisfiQd, 3. That nc one ir~dicated ttieir presenr.e at said public he~rinq in opposition; and that no correspondenr.e wa~ received in oppositior~ ~o the subject petita.on. ~0844r PC 89-17.8 ;;i . _ ., .;~,`Gr , ,. . _. ... ~+~ ' A ,~` , . , , ,.. . .. , ._, ,. , ~. „~ !~`~ ,.,, 1 A,IF4RNIA Rt3VTRQNM~NTAL OUALTTY T FTNDIN~C: T}iat the A~iahei~ City Planning Commissi,on has c~er_ermined that the 2J6gative Daclaratio areviously ap~rovod in connection wi~h Reclassificatic~n N'o. 88-89-90 3. a~3equate to servo a;~ Lhe required envirunmontal. d~cumt~ntation in connectio ~rith this request. NOW, TFiEREFORE, HE IT Fi~SOLVED that the Anaheim City Plannizxg Cammissiuii doe~ hereby amend canclitions af appra~val of Rocl.assification No. 88-89-~0; to delete Condition Nos. 3 and 4 of R~solutiun No. PC 89-67, b~sed on th~ faregaing findings, aud to s.mend Condi~ion No. 1 tn read as iollows; "1. That an abandomen~ shali be requested for Clementine Street; az~d that a bond may be postad w3.eh the City of Anahairn in a form and amount approv~d by the City Engineer; and complati.oii of sazd abandornent by the pekitiorier." THE FOREGOTidG :2850I.UTION is signed and appr~ve~3 by me this 24th day ~f Apri1, '1964. ,-, ., ' . --~ ~~~- ~ s~1._-„~_;-.~' _ ~ ~ ~~. ~Y y( • CFtAIRWQASi~N; ANAIiEIM CITY' pLANNING CnMMISSION ,, ~.TTES'P : • `' ~~t~-~ SECRETAR , ANAHGIM CZTY PLANZtING CQMMISSION STATE OF CALIFOI2NIA ) COUNTY 0~' ORANG~ ) sg, CITY OF ANAEIETM ) ~ j. EdiL-h L. Harris, S~cretary of the Anaheim Ci~y Planning ~ Cammission, do h~reby certity that the foreyoing z•esoluCion was passed ~nd adopted ~~ a rr~eeting of thQ An~heim CiCy Planning Commis;,ion helc~ on April I ' 24~ 1g8~. by the fol:owiiig ~~ote of the members thereof: ~; AY~S : C;0r~~1I ;SIONERu t BOUAS, BnYDSTUN, FELDHAUS, iiERB5'.~, MESuE NOFS: COD1M~$SIONE~tS: NONE ~ ABSEN';: CA1~,MISSIONERS: I;ARUSIC~LO, MC EtURNEY ~ IN WITNESS WHFREOF, I have hereunto set my hand tt~is 24th c3ay o£ x April, 193g. • ~~~~~ ..G~/ SECRExARY, 1-rTAHEIM CITY PLANh'ING COhIIrtISSION' -2° PC89-118 s <, `~ '',~( ~' ~,,,,~ . . . . .~ •'.'yf ~ ~~:.:.~I~: :,. n `:'' & ';~ n s3 `;i ;:; :={ r +; ~ .~ ~ ' :; ~ :'a ~yk {'r r iJ : ~ ._,.