Resolution-PC 89-132~~~t.('~'~`P ~R`~ ?...,".r~?.~1~n{t.~y~r~G~t`!rfi 1~5L(`I~~~~(~r ') ~ 1 t ~i ^'t t I
. :~.,•., . ,
~~
. .. . ._.
~~ ~.,,r ~ ~~'i 1({~~y~5( 1tr i~' 4NAS1~7 ~}1iY ~ ~ ~1~ '~'Y7, Rv~P 'µ" ~ A~a;"i
i,.., ,t , . . . _ .. .. ~ . . „
~ , a. b,~'~ 4 ~!'f1~ +n~yf
,~ °
.... n ;.
iliY~;,~rrr+~ ~y~}~~ffr~t~YpwV,w~t~'v{~r ~J~.',iy .
' !. ~ t
i ~~~~~~~',
r 1
~
.
4x
!
~ . ~
..
~',~~ie
'
S r
5} ~ ~ .
~ ~ 1,
I ~ j~~h).Mry~
~ ~ . . .. ti,
P~ESO~ N 1~Q,_PC89-132
, ~ti
A R~50LUTION OF THE ANAHF.TM CITY PLANI~ING COMMISSTON ,~~~
THAT PETI'.~ION FOR RECI,ASSIFICA'rTON N'0. f~8-f39~-52 F3E G1tANT~D, .AS MODIFIEll
~J
, WTiEP.~AS, the Anaheim City P~anning Commissi.on did receive a
~~. verifiQd petition fo.c Reclassi£ic.ation From MAX WILLS, 3838 San P.abla brive, '~
"I Fullerton, CA 92635, ownor of cert~in resl property situatecl in the City of ~~~
~' Anaheim, County of Or~nge, State of CalzEornia, described as Eollows: :1
;~~
LOT 1 AND T.fIE EASTERLY 13.00 I'LFT OF LQT 2 IN BLOCK 1
OF EXGABROAU' S SUBDIVISIAtd, IDT THE CI1`Y OE' ANAHETM,
COUNTY UF ORANGE, STATC OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A '~!;
MAP RFCORDED IN HOOK 7, E'AGE 13 AF MI$CELL,AN~OUS ~~~
M1.PS, TN THE QF'FIC~ OF TkIE COUtdTY RECORLER OF ORANGE
COI7NTY, ' .,
WH~REAS, the City Planning Commission did Y,old a public hearing
et the Civic Center in the City ~f Anaheim on May 8, 1989 at 1;30 p.m., notzc;e
of said publ;.r. hQaring having b~en duly giv~n as roquired by law mx-d in
accordancc~ with Lhe provisions ot the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to lnear and consider evi.dence for and ag~it~st said proposed reclassifiaation
and to investigate and make finc;ings ~nd recommendations i.n conneck:ic+n
tY,erewith; and
WH~REA^o, said Comm.is~i.on, aft~r dus inspection, inveatigation
and study made by itself and in ita J~ehalf, aizci. ~L•~oz due considera~ion ~f all
evidQnce and ~r~ports ~ffered at Qaid hearing, does f3.ncl ar~d determine the j
following fact;~;
1~ Tha~ the pe~itioner Proposed roclassificstion of subjsr,t
property From l;he CG (Conrmercial General) zoue ta the RM-1200 (Rosi.dential,
h:ulti.ple-lamily} or less inkense zor~g; howQVer, khe Planning ~Comrnission
fletecmin~d that il; would be more ap~xopr3~te to rezone the property to the
RM-2400 (Residenti~31, Multipl~-Familyj Z~ne.
Z. That the Anaheim Gonera7. Plan ~~esigr~ates subject property
k~ for Mc~dium Aensity Residentia.l land usHS,
3. That the proposed r~c2.assificati~n c~f subject propertp is
neces~arX and/or desirable for the orderly ar~d proper dove2opment cf the
cammunity.
4. That the proposed r~classific.~tio;a of subject property does ;
pro~+er].y r.glPte to l•.he zones and their permitted u.ses locally establishe~ in
c1a~i': proximity to subjoct prnpert} and to the zones and their permitted uses ~'
g~nori~l.ly ey~;.sblishec3 L•hr.oughcsut thr~ comm,,+ ;iL•g,
•:~. ThaC t;he ~ro,posca xecla~sifi.c~tion of aubject proparky
requires thz u~dication and :improvoment of r,butting streets anfl alleys in
accordanco ,+ith the Circulation ~lemgnC of the General Plan, du~ to the -
;, anticipatea increase in traffic which will be gen~rated by thQ intensification
of land usa.
•;-~ ;
OH59r -.1- PCB9-132 ;'
;,~i
1
f~
'it't '...:;1,
n:~
'~ (
~ ,~p
. . . ~ , . ~. , ~: Y.
;~ ... , - , . , ~i ,~,~~W ~~,ayp'i~4Q
~Y~ ~ . ~ ~a .;,"K~
i `? ~ 3,
+ ,r~~ ;~~i7
~; { , y ~
~r.;S,
; ;d; )
6. That f ive p p "`
(5) eo le indicated th 'r presence a~ said
public hearing in opposition; and that no aorrespandence was received in
opposition to sub~e~;t petition. ,.
CAL'tFORR?A ~IVVIR~~N:MrNTAL ALITY ACT FI2JD N '
',,
City Planning Car.unissi.o.: Yia~ revaewed ~he p sa1~o rt'c7.assify subject '
Qroperty f.rom the ~:G (Commercia~. Gener3l) Zone to the RM-2400 (Residential,
Multiple-Family) to construc;t a 3-s~ary. 16•-unit "affordable" ~partment
com~lex with waivers of minimiun building site area per draellinq unit, maximum
s•L•.rixctural height, ma~cirnum sih.a coverage, minimum f:ront yard and requxred .~J,
vehicular access on 3n irreyularly-skla ed ~~~~
approximately 0.38 acre loeated .~t the soutti est corner of CentexsgLr,,et and
Walnut Stx•eet, and further deseribed as Z204 West Center StrQet; ~nd does
hereby z~oprove the Neg~tive ~aclar~t,ion lxpon findinq tnat it has considered
the Negative Aeclaratian tagetlaer with any comments rec~si~ed during the `:~'
public review pz~oc~ss and fuz~~her finaing on t:he basis oE the iniCial study
and any~ conun~n~s received tY.at; th~re i5 no sub3kantial evidenr;e that the
project wi11 have a significant, effecl: on hha envirorunent.
NpW, TFiEREFORG, BE ~~ RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant sub7ect Petition far Reclassi:Eication and, by sa
doing, that Tit:1e 18-i;oning oE t;he Anaheim Municipal Code be amenled to
excluc~e the above-describQd property from the CG (Commercial G~neral) aone
and tc~ incorporate said descr.ibed property into the the RM-2400
(Residential, Nlultiple-Family) zoris ixpun the following conditions which arR
hereby €ound to be a rAe~ess~ry prerequzsite to the proposed ~zse nf subject
pro~erty in ord~r to preserve thQ saPaty and gen~ral welfarQ of the Citizens
o~ ~he City of Anahoim:
7. ~rr~~c; th~ leyal owner of• ~ub' ect
dodicate to the City o£ Anaheim a f• ft en (15)hfootlra3iu~acarne fi eturn
along Cen~tr and Walnut S~reets.
~. That the 1Qga1 property owner sh~I,1 prepate and recoxd an unsuborc~inated
covenant 1im.itinq ocpupancy of each aparlment unit to no morp than two
(~) persons (othor than children under the age of twa {2) Y@a~s~ p~r
bedroom. Said limitation shall bo included in Qach lease/rc~ntaJ.
agreomenr. A cc~py uf the covenant sha11 be submitted ta and ap~rrovQ~3 by
thQ City Attorney prior to rvaordation. ~ copy of the recardad cQVenant
shsll be furni.shed to thc~ Zoning Division.
3. That a. eoverant shr~11 bo rQCardsd agreeing to provide the r~nter of each `~
~, riwelling unit wirh written infor.mat.ion obtaix~ed from the School .~{
~ Dis~rict(s) perLainzng to p~ssible overcrowdad conditions and busing
sL-akus of the schonl(s) seruing thc~ dwelling ~t~,;L~
4, That the owner of subjoct prope.rty shall
termination of Varianco No. 19n7-17 to L-k~e T.oni g1Division.ker req;~esting
5.
Tur.~,`
' .
, ,~
~~ fE~
~~ur„, , ~~~~e~
~ :,v;~'
wj+
, i01
~~::
,~ y;
Tl~at prior to .L•he introdueti~n of an ordinance rezoning subiect '%
Pro~erty, C:and.ition Nos, 1 through 4, above-mentioned, qha11 ~ae f
completed. The pravision~ ar rights granL•ed by thie resolutton shall {
bacome nul]. and void by action of Che P:~anning Commissi~n unless~ said .l
conditions are aompliPd wi~h wa.thin onQ (1) year from the date oE 'tlzis
resolution, ar such furth.or timo as the Planning Cemmies~.on may grant.
6. That a~gro~-al of Chis a~plic:ation constitutes agproval o£ the proposed
reque~t unly to the c~xtent that it complies witli the Anaheim Municipal
Zoning C~de and any ot~her ap~licable City regulation~. l~~~proval does
not 3.ncl;zde any ac~ion or findings as to compliance or appraval of thF
request regarding any other applicable ordinanaa, regulati.on or
zeqairemant..
BE IT FUR'sHRR RESOLVED that the Anaheirn City Planning Cortunisaion
does kiereby find and determine that adopta.on of this Resolution is oxpressly
predicatQd upon applic.ant's compliance with eaeh anc] all of the con~iitions
hereinabove sot forth. Sk~oald any such condi~ion3, or any n~rt ther~of, be
declar~d znvalicl ~r unenfarcoable by tha fina.l judgment of anf aourt of.
competent jurisdict.i~n, tYien this Resolution, and any appravals h,ere:n
contaixied, sha11 bQ dQemed iiull and void.
:i'HE FORF.GOING 12ESOLU~ION is ~gried and ap~roWed by me thfs 6~h day
aP May~ 1989.
_ , '~/ f{' c%~rV.,~~/''"~-....,
CHAZRWQMAN; ~AN,AFIFIM CTTX PLANNING COMMISSION
.:
AZTEST: ~
~. ~
SECRETARY, A,NAHEIM CTTX PLA~7NING CON~SIS ~ION
STATE OF CALIE'ORNIA )
COUN'PY OF O12ANGE ) Ss,
CITY OF ANI~FSEIM )
I, Edi~h Le E~arris, Secretarx of the Anahalm ~Cir.y Pl~an~x~.~tg
Cornmission, do hereby certify that t,he foregoing resalution was passe~d aud
adopted at a meetiny of the Anaheim Cit:y P~ax~ning Commissiun h~ld on Ntay 8,
1989, by tho followi.ng ~~cte of the mem}~ars thereo~:
~~'E~: COMMISS_T.ONERS: BOLTAS, &pYDSTUN, CARUSIL~LO, FELDHAUS, HERBST,
MC BURNEY, M~SSF
NOES: COMMTSSIONERS: N027E
ABSLNT: GOMMTSSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHER~OF, I have hereunto set my hand this 9th day of May,
19L'9.
~~ ~'•
.-~=~C.~~ c~.
SECRETAF.Y, 11I~AHEZM CITY PLAN~TING CONLMISSION'
-3-
~
PC89~-132 ''~il
;~
;~;s~~