Resolution-PC 89-139~ 11
,f~Y.
!2.k'KY~~_l~+~ ~_T~..S,SeX.7~3.
~"~ " ~
A RC.~OLU'xTON OH THF I~NAHEIM CTTY PLANNlNG COMMI5SION
T,HA~' PETTTJON FOR VARIANCE TTO. 3939 DE GRANTED
WHL;fiEAS, thQ Anaheim City Planning Commi~s.inn did receive s~
vQrifiecl Petition Enr Variarice Crom BARIIARA ANN SMITH, 6555 S. Fdinboro
Circle, Anaheim, CA 92807, owner, and ROAE;RT E. SMITH, M.D „ 6555 E. Edinbora
Circle, An~heim, CA 9280'l, ~gent L•or certai.n real proporty ~itua~ed in the
CiL-y of. AnahE?m, County of Orange, SLake of C~~.lifornia doscribod as:
LUT 4~ OF TRACT 8375 A^u SFiOWN OD1 MAP RECQRDED IN BOOK
395, PAGES 34 TO 39 INCI,IiSIVE Or MISCELLANEOU~ MAPS,
IN TfiE OFFICL OF TFiE COUNTY RECORDFR OF SAID OR~-Ir'GE
COUNT'SC, CALTFORNIA.
WEtEREA5, the City nlanning Commission did hold a public hearing
~ih t!:e Civic C~ntoz• in tna City of Anaheim on April 24, 1989, at 1:30 p.m.,
noti~e of said public hearing haviru~ besn du.ly givon a~ required by law and in
accordanc:e with the ~arovi~ior_s oE tho Anal~eim Municipal Code, Chapter 'I$.03,
to bear ancl consider avid~nce for and against said proposed variance and ta
investigate 3nc3 make findings and recommendations .in connection therewith; and
said petiti.an was continued L•o tho meeking ot May 22, ].989; and
WHEREA5, said Commission, aEt.er dve inspection, investigati~n
and skudy made by it~elf and in ~.ts behai~, ~nd a£ter due con~.ideration of a11
evidence and reports offered st said he~ring, doe~ Eind and detexmi.ns L•he
following iact~:
1. That the petitioner r~quests waivar of the following to
relocate an existing groui~d-mountacl sate113te dish;
S~~TIQN _18, 84., U1.2 .~12 - Pr92~it,Zi~..~d 9r.Q4i2~.lL~o~~S~ ~q~~'2~S~r~•
' (N~ root• or ground-mounted sat~lli~e dishes
permittad .in the Scenic Corridor Uvorlay 'Lone; one
10-ft.-diumeter ground-mounted dish existing)
2. That thE abov«~-mentioaed waiver is hereby qrantPd oii tho
basis that theie is sFecial. circunstances applfcable to the proporty such as
sizs, sliape, tupography, location and surrouridin~s whic2i clo not apply to other
.id~nti.cally zoned prcperty in. tliQ se-me vicinity; and that strict applicatiozi
o£ tho Zoning Code deprives the property af. privi.leges enjoyed hy othRr
properties in ttie ident•ical -,,oiie and c].assification in ~he vici.nity.
,~
~
~.
3. That ~he proposod var.iance is hereby grantAd on the basis
that revised plans were submitted celocating the di~h 10 Eeet do~an the slopo,
30 foet from the westerly proporty l~.ne, 49 feet from the north property line
ancl 45 feet from the sou~h propertx line thoroby makin~ it less visib'!e.
4. That thare are Pxcc~ptional or exL•raordinary circumstznces or
conditions appiicab3.e to the property inv~lved or to ~he intended use of tho
~ property that do not app2y genorully to the proper~.y or class of use in Che
; same vicinity and 2one.
; `,
i
0867r -1- PC~g-1's9
~ ~
k~ar~
~ . . . . --~- . . . . -a ...
, ` '~ tM
~
T
;
f~~~'I ,
~
~ ~~
P.
;
:1 .
rl~;;
i
5. That the requ~stec~ variance is neceas~ry for ~he
pYesdr~~acion and e~ijoyment of a substantia)
, propertY ri ht
?xr ~F~rL•y an the samo viciniL,p and zone, and dQni
n by o~her
3
s
~'
e
~o the pro ert
;
P Y question. ''
6. Tha~ the i•eque~~ad variance wi11 not be materi~lly
de~rimerr,a~, ;;~ ~ho ~,ub.Lic welf~re or injuri
au~ to h,he proparty or improvemonts
in such vicinity a:.d zone in which ~h~ ~
pruperty is loc;ated.
'~ 7' Thar at t21e May 2l, 1989, pub).ic he~-ring, there was one
per~nn indicatir~g l~er presence i
n opposition and fivo pt~ople appeared a£tor
th~ hearii:g was closed indicating their
opposition; and that three peopla
indicated ~heir ~rasence .fn opposition at the A~r
il 24
, 1989, public l~earing;
and that a petition contai:~in ~
g Zppro~imate].y 74 sigr~a~uros wa
oppositio
~ received in
n to subject petition.
~At~IFQRN~_ EN~~IR.QNM~i~xAZ.,~~ ~ TTX_ ACT ~HP~N~s The Planning
Girector or hi~ author
iza~ r~
.
~reseutativo has det;ermined that th~ pr~posed
project ft~11s with.in the defini'tinn
f
o
: CategoriGal Exemptions, C1ass 11, ,~s
dQfinod in the State ETR Guidelinas and i
. s, thare~ore, categorically exempt
from tht~ requiremen~ to prepare an EIR,
NOW, THEREFORE, E3F. IT RESOLVED that thQ AnahRim City Planning
Commission cioes hareby grt~nt subjecC perition for Variance, up~n the
following conditioiis wtiich are heroby found to be a nec~ssary prere~uisiro to
tho proposed us~ o.E tho subjQCt propQrty 9.n order to preservo L•he safety anci
genQral welfarR oL• l:he Citizens of l:he Ci~y of Anahc~im:
1. That plans stiall be submitted to tha Build.fng Division showang compllance
with the minin~wn 3tandards of the L'ity of Anaheim, including the Uriiform
Building, ElecCrical and Mechanical Codes es adopted by l:he City of
AnahQim. ~ho appropriar~ pc~rmit~ shall be obtainad For any nece~ssary
wurk.
u Z• Thdt ~ubjer.t propQrL•y ~hall he developad subsL•an~ially in accordance with
; plans and specifications on file with tho Cit}~ of Anaheim marked Rovision
~
No. 1 of Ex}~.ibxt No. .l, and Cxhibit Nos. 2 and 3.
~ 3. That appxova7. oP this application c~nstitutos approval af the propo3ecl
roquQSt only to tha extenr_ t;hat it comQli.es witki thp Anah~im Municipal
Zoning Code and any other rspp~icoble City regulatiohs. ApprcvHl does noC
` include any acti.on or findi.ngs as to compliancu or a
re:c~uesC regardiny any othor aPPlir.~b2e ordinance, pPegulation tor
~ requiremRnt.
Bk IT PURTHER RLSOLVED that the Anaheim City Plannin
does hereby find and determine hhat a4op~ion oi this Resoliition ~s CQ presgly
predicate~3 upon appli~:unt's compliance with ea~:h and all of the conditionn
horQinabove ~e~ Eor~h. Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, }~e
cieclaroci invalld or unenforceable hy the final judgm~nt of any court of
competent jurisdiction, L•hen r.his Resolution, and any aQprovals herein
r,o:ikained, shall be deemed :~ull ar,d void.
-2-
E'C8A-139
~~.;
} ( '.. , ~ ,~ , ~
~ ..1~.'~W; .~f~`.l f:u... .1 ~. : t•~ ~ ~ .... . . . .u ...
+'~Y.:': .. .. n ~ . _.. ,~~~
~
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTJO~T is signed r~nci approvecl by iY~e this 2Znd day
o~ May, 19~9.
....~f~/~~f±_.r'!. /%~/C!G.l.~~~~_..
CHAIRWODIAN, ANi~iEIM CI~Y' PLANNING COt~4+~f:[SSION
r~
A'rTEST: n
~,~
~,.~.~.
_._____...~. y ~
.''iECRET,ARY., ANAHFIM CITX PLANNING COMMISSION
S'rATE OF CALT~ORNTA
COUPITY OF ORANGL ) 5s.
GITY UF l.~tAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Sacretary of the Anu'rieim City Planninq
Commiss.ion, do hereby cer.ti.fy th34 the Eores~oing resulution wa~ passod and
ac3o~ate~ at a m~ering oF tha Anr~hQim City Planning Cortunission hold on May 22,
1989, by the following vote of the membezs th~seof:
AXES: COMMiSS:[ONERS: BOUAS, BOYDSTUN, CARU^uILLO, FET~llHAUS, FiERBSx,
MC FJURN~Y, MESSE
NO~S: CO1rL'~fISSIONrRS: NONE
ABSEPiT: CONIt`fISSIQNEkS: NQNE
IN WITt3ESS WHEREOF, I hdve horeunto set my hanci this 22nd day of
May. 7.989.
~...~. • ~ '
~.__---'~~-~~^-~` "'~ ° ~ -LL~" .'.~'v
SECRETARY, ANAHETM C,ITY PI,ANNING COt~tISSION