Loading...
Resolution-PC 89-153~ ' ~ . . ~ ~ . ~. . . - , ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ti ~ r~~ . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ~,,. ~ ~) • I ~ I , ~ .. ~ . .. . . . E3,E.~~LUTIQN N LY~69-15~. A ItESQI~UTION OF TIIE AxIAfIFIM C7TY PI,ANNING COMMI55IAN 1FIAT PETITION FOR RECLaS5IFICATI02d N0. £i8-89-53 AE GRANTL'D ~: WH~REAS, the Anaheim City Planning Cammis,i.on da.c3 raceive a verified petition fnr Reclassificatzon fror, RODR'IGUEZ, JON~S 5 COMPANY, INC., 2045 S. Haster Avenin~ he t Cx~Y/ o~ a~~nahe mA CounY.y c~i~g Orang'~ er St tereof pr.operty situated Calitoxnia, described as foll~w:c LOT 20 ~F "rRACT. N0. 255, ~;AST ANAHEIM SUIIAIVTSION, IlT ~rg~ CTTY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTX OF OFtANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIR., AS PER MAP 7'FiEREOF R~CORDED IN BOUK 14 PACS 2f3 OF MI5CT:LLANEOUS MAP5, IN THE OP'F:CCE OF' THF COUIITY RECORI.~ER OF SAID COUNTY, TOGEmFiER WI~H THAT PORT.ION OF CYPRE55 STRE3T, 1~S VACATED aY UTTON CNOX COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AN~.FIEIM, }3X RESOL~ ggg_pg, RECORDED ON p.E'RIL 2U, 1989, AS TNS~RLIMENT N0. g9-208189 OF OFI'ICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, MOIiE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED A~ FOLLOWS: gEGTtII7T1~1G AT 'PHE t.TURTFIhP;ST CORNER OF LOT 20 OI' 5AIP ~~A~~ 17Q, 2555 THENCE, ALONG 'PHE NORTHGRLY PEtOLON~ATION OI TAE WESTERL,Y LITIE OF 5AID LOT 20, 28.25 FEET TO TAE NURT~I 15 DEGRRES 16' 05" V~EST, CENTERLINE OF SAIU CYT'RESS STREF,T, AS SHOWN ON SAYD ~p; TAENCE ALONG SATD CENTERLINE, NORTH 74 D~G?~E5 g~~ 25" EAST, 1?1.00 FEET TO THE 50U7AERLY YRULONGATION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 18 OF SAIU TRACT N0. 7.55; THENCE, ALONG SAID SOUTFtERLY 1'ROLONGATIQN OF SAID EASTERLY L' TNE, SOU'1kI 15 D~GREES l~,' p5" EAST, 28.25 F~ET TU THE NORTAERT~Y LINE IaEST, 171.00 FEET 7'0 THE POINT OI' BEGINN:CNG. WH~,REAS, the Cil:y Planniiic~ Commissx~n did hold a publia h~aring ~.989 at I:30 p.m.. at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on April 29, noticQ of said public hearing having bQOn duly givon a~ required by law~ and in accordance with the provisions of• the Anaheim btunicipal Code, Chapter 10.0~, to hQar and cor.~idpr evideuce for and again5~. said prnposrsd r~classification and to inve~tignte and make izndings ancl rQ~~umm4ndations in connection therewrir_ti; and said petition was cr~ntinuod to the ~lanninq Commission meei:ixigs o~ May 8, 1989 and June 5, 1989t ~n~ WHER~AS, said Commission, aiter due inspoction, investigation axid study made by i.tself and. in its behalf, anu artPr 8ue cAnsideration of all evic~enc4 and reports offered at said h~~rang, does Eind and dQterminQ the followii~g facts: ~, That the petitioner pro~oses reclassif.ication of subject propRrty from the RM-2400 (Residential, Multiple Famil~y) i:o the Rbt-1200 (Residential, Multiple Family) 'L~ne. Z. That the Anaheim General ~'lan designatQS subject proPer.t~ for Medium Density Res.idential ~.and uses. -1- Pr89-J.53 0$66r ~ ~ if t ~j ~--.- _. . •~~r ~. tIt`:kQ` L~~~ t~ S~ I . ~ ' . . , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~/rt~~t~~w'(~~. ' , , ~r "~ Ix r~~~ _ . . . . . . . . ~~ i'~ '~ 3, That the ~L'Oj1q5P.C1 roc7assifict~tion af sub,;ect pro~c~r'.:y ~ S necesaory and/or desirable f:or ~h~ orflerl;~ and ~roper dQV~l,~pment of thA community. 4. 'lhat the propo~c~d reclassi£icatie~.i of subject property does propexly rela~Q to th.~ zones an~t theS.r. perrnitted uses lacally establis2i~c1 i.n close proximity to subject pro~erty ar.;1 to che zones and their permitted use:. genera,liy established thr~ughout tha comrr~unity. 5. Thai: ~he propcsad recl~ssificaLion of, subjec4 property requires the d~di.cation and imprcvemenL- of abut~ing streE~s in 3ccardance with tk~e Circulation Element of the General P:lan, due to tho anticipatec~ increase in traEfiC which wi11 be generai:ed by th e intensificaCion cF lancl usQ. 6. 7'hat no one indicatpo lheir presence at sa~d public hearing in opposition~ there w~re several people ~,resent in favor of the r~quesC; a letter wit,h 15 signatares in favor was received; and two pe~pZe spoke relating ; concern, about current crime rates and traf;fic ~rob~ems. ~ ~ALII~' RNIA EN"vTRONMEN'I'l~L __~LTTY A^T F"nINC,: 'rhat the Anah~im City Planniny Commission has reviewed the groposal to reclassif~~ s~abjeGt ~~ property from the RM-2900 (Reaic~or.tial, Multiple F~mily} Zone ta tk.,~ ~iM-120Q ~' (Residen~ial, MuZtiple Family) 7.~rio witYa waivers of minimum sitF: area Fer ;t c?w~:lling uniC, maximum structural height, maximtun site co~verage and minimum " structural sc~tback to construct a 10'l-nnit (previously 120-unit "affordable") i' apartment comple~ ori 2 rectanquza•rly-shaped parce'1 of land eonsisting of 2 approximately 2.83 acres bounded by Santa Ana, ~{elena, E1m and C1c~m~ntine 5treatsf and does her~~y apprave thP Negative Lteclaration upon f:r.ding i:hat at has considered the Nega~ivu Declar~tiozi together with any corrunQn~s received d~ring the public review prnces~ and farther findi.ng on Y.he basis of the in.itial study end any c~rnm~nts received that there is no substantial ~ ~vid~nce that tho praject wi:17. have a sic~nificant ef£ect on the envirorunont. NOW, TIIFP.EP'URE, BR iT Ftj.:S(1LVED that the Arxaheim City Plannin~ Commiseion d~es hereby grant subj~ct Petitioz~ f.or Reclassific;atinn and, by so doirxg, that ~it1e '18-'l.oning ot the Anaheim Municip~sl Code be amencle3 tn excludo the abovo-dpscribed pz•c7party from tiie~ RM-2400 (ResS.~ontzal, rsuitip~e Fa.mily) Zone r,nd to incorporate said described property inta the RM-].200 (Residential, Multiplo Family) Tone upon the fallowi.ng condit?o:!s which aro hereby Corznd i:o be u necess:~ry prarequisi~e to tbs pron~;,ad usa o~ ~u2;ject praperty in o~der to preserve the 3atety an3 generay walEare u~ the Ci~iz~ns of Cl1o Cit.y of Anaheim: l. That the 1eya1 owncr ox subjecti p.ro~sert~l shal'1 i.rrevocably offar to {~ dedicate t~ the Cit;y of An~heim a strip pf la~~d *_~izrty (30) Eee~ in width from tt:e ce~.terline of thQ strset ~long flelena, Elm and Clemen!:ine Strnets, includin~ a iifteeri (15) i•oot radius curb returns for street wl.d~ning purposzs. 2. ~hat in the event a parce.l map i:, noz recnrc3ecl combining the existing lots, the legal gropexty ownctr sha11 L•urnish the Z~7ning Di~~ision wiL•h a ; copl~ o~ a reccardod co~•enant and agreor+ent in a farm approved by the City A~torney agr~reing to hold subject proparty az ~ne (1) pax•~el. -2- PC 8J-153 ';, ~., „~~: t p ~ ~~tr~s-"' q N'~ =+ ti.~ ~~~: - .. . ~.:~- ~srr. , .~ Sd . ,_ , _ 'k . ,. Y~~~ i~fA(' ~~~t~~ `.e1~y,~, 3, That stroQt 1i.ghting Eac~lit~QS along Sant~ Ana, Fielend, Clementine and FLn ~treet$ ~hall be install~d n~ reQUf red by the Utilitiact Oenernl Man~agor in accorc~anco w.iLtS spoc.iFications on filo in t.ho OEf3.ae of Utilities Genoral Mannye.rt or t;hat sacurity in t•he form o.E a hond, certificat~ of deposit, letter ~f r,.ro~it, ~r ctt~h, in ~n ~nount and form ~atisf~ctory to tho CiL•y of Anaheim, shall b~ ported with tha City to guaranteo tne sati;~factory compl~tian af the c-bove-mentianed improvements. Saicl securft}• shall bF ~osted w.tkti the City of Anah•:im prior tu ktie intro.-~uction oi ati ordinance rezoninc~ sub~ect property. The abova-rdquirecl imNi•ovements shall be installed prior to occupancy. 4. That a fee sha~l be pe.id to ~he City of Anaheim for tree planti;zg alung Santa Ana, Helona, Clementine and ~1m Streets in ati umo~ant as eAtablished by Cir,y Counci.l resoluh.ion. 5. Thet prior to i.rtroclucLion ot ar, ordinance .ozoning subject property, the 1ega1 properr,y owner shnll preparo ~nd rQCOrd an un3ubordinnted r.ovenant limitlnq occupa»cy nE oach apartment anit to no more thnn twa (2) persons (other than childrQn under the age of ewo [2J years) per bedroom. Said limitation s1~a11 bo includRd in Qac}i leass/:ental agreement. A cop~r of the covenant sha11 be submitted to and appr.~vod by the City Attorney prior to r~cordation. A copy of thQ rec~rdQd cbvonant st~al] be furnished to the Zou.in.~ Uivision. G. That a cavenanC 3ria11 be racorcied ac~rcQing ro provide the rent.er of ear.h riwal.ling unlt with written intormation obtainod fram tho scY~ool d.istricts pertaining to possiblo overcrow:led conditions and buainq sta~us of the sc.hool(s) serving the dwelling uait. 7. rhat prior to tho introduction of an ordinance razoning subject property, Conditic~n Nas. 1 through 6, abovo-nentioue6, shall be 4omplet~ed. The provisions or rights granted by thi9 resolution ahall become null ~ncl void by action o~ the P.lanning Commission un1~YC~ said conditions aru complfad with within ono t1) yoar tron~ the date bf this resolution, or such further time as the Plann~nq Commixsion rt„ y grz-nt. e. That approval ot this application r.onstitutes appr~va2 of the pr~posed requesr only to the exeent that ~t complies with the Anaheim Municfpa2 Zoninq Code and any other applicabte City regulations. Approval does not inc]udo any c~ction ai finc3ings as to compliance or approval of the requost re~ardinq 3ny uther applicable ar8inance, regulation or rQquirement. BE YT EU[2Tl{BR RESOI,VED that l•he Anaheim CiCy Plannfng Commissiou does hereby ~ine and datermine that adoption of this Rcssolution is expreasly pradicated upon applic:~nt's compliance W.ith ~ach and all. ai thc+ conditions hareinabove set Eorth. Should any such conclltionrs, or any p~rt thereof, be dRClbred .{nvalid c,r unenforceable b,y tt-cs final ji~~JgmQnt of any couzt o~E cumpetant jurisdic:tion, then thir. Renolution, and t,~Y approvals heroin containell, sht+ll be~ <tearr,ed null an~ vnid. -3- PC t39-153 ~i7 ''1; ~H 4~=; u+ .~ .~ ~ . . ~ " wit r +..ti~t".^`" £y,ht+;`ta: 1'~ri~lry w"P r_t~t?,~'~rr~ y y7':.~ ,1 ~„'M4y - . ~ i r 1~ ~;a~ , ~,. ~( - , _. _... .. _... ' i7 . h ..~'~ . , ~ , 1 aS,~_~,~ 9 . ~.~~4D7~7, ;: A A -a wiWt u+n ,,(~ ~ - ~ . ..~• ).t . . . { ..~C::r.~i 'lL~~i/~ii'ib j~r'~!.~~ ~Ma`~rs ~ , '. v ~ .~;={~ ~ ~\ , , rK'y~ . ~ `.~t ;i ~ q~ 3 ~HE FORF.G~TNG 1t~SOLUTTON is signed anc3 approved hy me ~kiis 5th day of ~Tun4, 19a9. .Y-__.,L.~_.L~~`r~ S:l~;f~:Get'v.- ~ . .~.. GFiAIkwOM~ I~NAHEiM r,TTY PI~ANNING COh4~SISSION ~ ? ATTEST: ____ {lJ ~ ,. ~- ~`~~- -- SECRETARX, ANI~HEIM CITY PLANNTNG COMMISSION i STATE OF CALIrORNII+ ) ~ COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. j CITY OF ANAFiBIM ) I, F;dith L. Harr::s, Secretary oE tl~e A~iahc~im CiCy Planning ; Commi.ssior., do hezeby certify thaL• the faregoing resolution was pnssed and w ~doFted at a meetinq oL tho Anaheim C.ity Planning Commi3si~n held on .Iune 5, S i969, by tho followirig vote of thQ members therooP: ~ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BOYDSTUN, CARUSILLO, F'ELDHAUS, MC HURNEY', MESSE NOES : COt~4fISSI0k7ERS t NOPiE ABSENT: CGt~tISSIONERSt HERBST IN WITNESS WFIEREOF, I have herc~unto sQt my hand thin 5th day of June, 1909. _ ~ a A - ~YCJ~/~"~ ~ ., V V VL7 ScCRE~'ARY, ANN~F.IM CITY PLAN~II'NG COMMISST0~7 ~ `::; ,. ; "9" PC 89-153 . _ . . ~ `~~ _ ~, ; - J'r'~~~,k . :"u:~