Resolution-PC 89-156~~
RE~S'~Lt~,TI~N N0. PC 8~13i~,
~~
A RESOL~UTIQN OF THE ANAHEIM CTTY PLAI~TNING COMMISSTON
RECCIMMEATDING :0 T'HE CITY COTJ27C1L ADOPTIUN OF
GENERAL, PLAN I~.MENDMENT N0. 'l56 - CIRCULATTON ELEMEN'.C
WHEREAS,, ~he ~ity Counci.l o.`. the City of A•naheim did adopt the ='
Anaheim Gen~ral Plan on a solution No. 69R-644, showing the general '"~i
description and extent o£ passibl,s furura dQVelopm~nt within ~he City; and
WH~REAS, pursu~nt to a r.c~quest from t.he City Enginaor, the PJ.anr.inq
Commissian initia~ed an amendment to eliminate the .followiny streets from the
Circulation Element o£ ~he Genoral nlan:
A. CenLer Strc;et (from Li.ncoln Avenue ~o State College Boulevard)
:-~ currently designated Second~ry Art~ria]. Fiighway; '~
~• B. Clement:ine Street (Broadway to Lincoln A~enue) currently
''~'
, designatod Second~ry ArCorial Hi.gh.way
, ~
'~ C. Crescen.t Way (Li.ncoln Avenue to CrescQnt Avenue) currently ~
~~ desigiiakod Commuter Stree~.;
D. Via CortQx (Santa Ana Canyon Road i:o ~2oute 91) currently ~;'.
.
` designated Hi.llsiae Secondary Arterial Highway; and ';'
~
!
~'
WT3EREAS, thc~ City Planning f;~mmissian did hald a~ublic he~ring at
~ the Ci~~i.c Cen~er in the Ci*y of Anaheim on June 5, 1989 at 1:30 p.m., notice .'•
~ o£ aaid publac hearirxg having been duly given as requir.ed by 1aw and 3n ~
I
°
; ar,coraanr_a with the pravisions of the Anaheim Muriicipal Cr~de, Chagtex 18.03, ~~
~
-,`~ to hear and co,isider evidence for and against said propoGed gQnEral plan ~'~
; amendment and tc invastigate and make findings and recommendatir,ns in 'r
'~'
, connQCtion therowith; and ,
~
":;'
WHE12i~S, said Commission, atter due insnection, znvQStigation siid ;;
r'
study ma~iP by it::~~t and in its behalf, and afL-er due coiasideration of all
. evid~nce and report~ offPred at s3i.d hearing, doQS Ein~ and det~rmine the
~ following facts: '"
r:
`
1. That savera.l incons:~ntencies between the Anaheim Circulation
;+ Elament end the Orange Caunty h;aster P1an of Arterial Highvrays were
~ id~:ntified, and conformit~~ between local and regaonal ~irculati.on elemonts is
nacessaxy a5 a~er,uiremQn~ oL- a variety ~f fc~de~al higrwuy fuziding programs. '~
,ri
;,
2. :hat thQ current capacities of the roadways wi11 remain
' f
ragardless of
their appearance on khe Circuiat.ion Element. ;;;
~ 3. That local strecsts do not a~~pear on 'the Circulation Element ana ~1
;
' ~ufficiQnt evide~nce was presented to S.ndi,^-ste that Centier Strs~t, Clementine
'
~ Street, Crescent Way and Via Cortez should bP redesignated to tha~ af a local ~
street in order to provide consi.stenc~• aith the Oxange ~County Mastax Plan oE ~'
~
~ Arterial Highways.
' -~`
~ . ,i
,~,, ;:;.
~
`.~~ 0890r _~_
PC 89-156 ~'`Y
`~
`iF
r; ~
!. ~
~
,~1.
n~~ ---_ . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ ~ . . . ~ . ~ .. ,
.... ll~
,~,~.,,.
y.
;;
1'. „' y'
~
~
~ + i~r ~ r~t'~f~1
~~~ V~
i ~
~ ~ ~
/~
~'+j~
`;~S
~~(
'~A IF~RNTA ErTVIR~ENTAL QUALTTY ACT_ FIN~ING: '~hat the Anaheim ~;
Ci.ty Planning Commission has revi~~red the propasal t.o amend the Ciraula~ion '~~
Element of the Goneral Plan to eliminate Center Straet, Clement~ine Street, ,:;
Crescent Way and Via Cortez fxom the Circulation Element and redesignate said
to that oF a local street Ceiztex~ Street; and does hereby approve the Negative ~;'ti
Declaration upon fincli:~q that it has considered tlxe Nec~ative LeclaraL•ion i;j;
toge~her with any comments received duryng the ~~ublfc review process anc~ '°'
tu::ther f.inding on the basis of the ixiitial study and any a~mments received ;;.
L•hat lhere is no substantial evidence that thQ projeat will have a `'`
significant affect c~n tho environment. _~?;~
~ .;:
NUW, THEREFORE, SE IT RGSOLV~D, that piirsuant to t'he above ~1~,'
findings, the Anaheim City Pl.anning Commissinn does hareby ado~t and ;~;;t
recommend to the C3.ty Council of the CiCy of Anaheim ado~tion of Gen~ral Plan
Amentlman't No. 256 - Circulation Element.
i;i
THE k'OREGOING RESOLUTTON ia signed and u~~roved by ma this 5th day
of J'une. 1989. ,;!,~
.~ ;; .~ i
~- ,<-. .,;,
i,;;~~,~, ; ~'` ;. G~.~~~ r.. ~
C~iAIRWOMAN, API~IM CITY PLANN7NG COMMSSS101~ ?'
• , ;t
r"~ ...
ATTESr;
.~~~1...~_.___.~~~.~..~ .--
SECRETAt2X, 1~NAHExb; C:CTY PLANNING COMMISSION
5TATE OF CALIFnFNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANG~ ) ;.s.
CITY OI' ANAEiEIM )
S, Edith L. Harr~s, Secrotarx of. the Anaheim City Planning "~~~
Commission, da horeby certify that tho foregoing roso].ution was passed and "'~.},
adoptad at 2 meetfnc~ oF the Anaheim City Planning Commission held c~n Juno 5, .~;s
1989, by L~e following vote of tY~e members thereof: '''`
AYES: ~OMMISSIONSRS: BOUA&, BOYDSTIJN, CARUSILLO, FEGD~fAUS, HE:FtBST,
MC SURNEY, MESSE
NOES: COh4y1ISSI0NER~: NONE ~~~
f1:
AFiSENT: COty4ytISSTONERS: NONE
~'i;!'
IN WITNESS WFIER~:Ok', I have hereunto set my liand this 5th day o~ ,.;,,
June, ~98~.
~~,t;~~ ~_ • _
SECR~ T,NAHEIM CIT3C PLANNING CObII~t:[SSION
4~; ° ,
~~
~;
r7 y ~
~' '
+,
~~`~ .. _
-2-
PCti9-].56
;;!~
r~
~i
,,~
~ i;;
;,;:i,
`V`,.
', ',i
M,
:C
. . . . .. ., ..~,:a
,.p;
,fr~,3
I'1' ~
~
~~;a{
, A's`~I
+ ,;~
' ,.. x
tI ~~r'
,°' r.`'~G^~.~