Loading...
Resolution-PC 89-159ti 'r;~!,,v w .;, ,'~.itiy,.. r . ..,... .,. ~ 4 , , ~ .. . :~ , ...: :.n ~ . ~ ~ .~.~, .~~~,y~~ Z1~Y,,.~{~ti~i ,4t1~d.~ r~w,Y tii ,K~ ~,~, 1fa~:~t 1~ . :~,.~ . . ,,, , ,~,. ~.:; '~-~,. t I ~rL~:i . , . ..~ , '~ (xlA f~1u ~~,tf~ ~,,i.+lrii~ , , ~h+,(~~~",~;Y~;j+'~f~ , ~ ,, i,~. ~ . ~ • aY:b)p~ V~' ~g;~'i~1~ . . "i,,t.f ~; , w . . '..~f•;J RESOLUTION ~v'0. PC¢~1~$. ,~'1 ~ A RESOLUTTON QF '.~FI~ ANAHFIM C.CTY i'L~NNTNG COt~lISSSON TFiAT PrT7TI0N FOR RECLASSTFTCAxION NQ. R8-89-55 BE; GRANfiEB WHERrAS, the Anahcim Czty Planning Commission did receive a veri£ied p~tit.ion for B~classitication from I30NAT~D HiJNT, 128~4 Ingiewuod Avenue, Hawthorne, Cp. 902a0, own~r, azid WILLTAM PEARCE, 12D44 Ynglewood Averiua, IIawL•horne, CA 90Z50, agent Cor certain rc~al ~roperty situated in the City of Ariaheim, Count,y of Orange, State of. C~liForriia, described as follaws: `~,' BEGINNtNG A7' TFI~ NORTIIWEST CORNCR OF PARCEL 3 OF PAR('F,L MAl' P70. 79-279, Th* THE CITY UF ANA.HF.ZM, CdU11TY' OF OKANGE, STATE QF CALIFARNIA, k'ER MAP ~'ILRD IN BOUK ].43, PAGES 34 A23D 35 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF' SATO COUNTY, SAIA CQ'RN~R BFING ON TEiE SOUTHERL~Y RTGFiT-OF--WAY OF WII,KEN WAY; THENCE SOUTI-T 89° 3(i' 0$" EAST; 258.08 FEET ALCNG TI3F NORTFi LINE OF SAID PARCEL ~; THENCE SOUTH 00° 20' 52" WEST, 55.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 8J° 33' OS" EAST 192.G6 FEET; TH~NCE SOUTH GO° 41' 55" E~,ST, 534.57 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE pF SAID PARCET,, 3; T~iENCF NOk2TFT 89° 3f3' l:i" WLS~', 2~7, 59 FEk:T, ALONG SAID SqU'fHERLY LTNE, TO 2H~. SUUTHWEST CORNLR OF SAIU YARCLL 3; THENCE N~JRTH OG° 91' 55" WEST, 5£i9.89 FEET, ALONG THE WESTERLY LIPtE QF SAID °ARCEL 3'rp TH~ POINa OF BEGTfiNING. WHEREAS, the City k~lan:~ing Commission did hold a public hearing a'.: the C3.v3.c Center in l•.he Ci.Cy of Anaheim on ~June 5, 1989 at 1;30 p.m., notice of said public hoarzng having begn cluly givon as required by law and in accocdancQ with tlio provisions of thc~ Anaheim Municipal Cot3o, Chapt-.er 18.03, to 2iear znc~ conszder ~vidence for and against yaid proposed reclassification ~~nd to inv~3tigaL-e and make findinas and recemmendations in c..onnsction therQwith; and , 67HEREA5, said Commission, atter dus inapecti.on, inve~tigation and study mada by atsolf and in its behalf~ and after due considPrakion oE all evi.clence and reports of:fered at said hoaring, does find and determine the r~' followiny factg: l. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subjac~ pL•operty xrom kho CG (Commerci.al, General) zon~+ to the :M-290 (Residential, Multiple-Family) Zone, 2. That the Anatieim Ganoral Plan desiynatas subject proaerty '` for Low-Madium Densi~y Residenti~Z 1anQ uses. .' 3. That the proposed roclassifica*_ion of subjRCt praperty is :incessar~• and/or des.irable for the orclerly and ~^raper deve'lopment of thQ community. . 4. Tr,at thQ pr~poseci rer_lassification o[ ~u3.ject property does properly reiate to the zones and their permitted usQS 'lo~ally establis~ed in 'a ~loso proximity to subject pxoperty and to r,he zones and their p~rmikLsd uses ~ generally establishod thxoughoat th~ cGmmuni~~. 0894r -I- E~C89-159 '_i ;; .; :; ?' ~ ~'~~ ~~ 4 ;;: , 5. That ~leven (11) pQOp1Q indicaked their. presence at saic~ uublic hearing in opposi~ion; ~nd khat no correspondt~nce was received in appositian L•o sub;jeat ~otitipn. ~LI NT _ ENVIfiONM.~r~TAL QUgLITy A~T ~IN N.: That the Anaheim City ~lanning Commission kzas reviewed the proposal tc reclassify subject property from rhe CG (Commercial General) Zone to thQ RM-2400 (Residen~ial, Mult.iple-F'am.ily) Zone to c~nstruct a 26 building 3-s~ory, 106-unit, air-space cox~domfnium complex witti wa3v~rs of minimum numbex of paxking spacea, required handi.capped accc~;s ~nd minimum recr.eational-2eisure area on a roctangularly-shaped p~rcel of land aons.isting nf approximately 5.A5 acres having a frontage uf approximakely 420 fee~ on t?~e south sidQ s~f Wilken Way, having a maximum depth oE approximately 600 feet, L•~ing l~cated ~~~proxim~tely 77Q feet east pf t•he cent~rline of Harb~r Boulevard ax~ci furthgr ~~soribed as 400 West Wilken Way; and does horei~y apprnve the Negative *~eclaration unon finding that; it has coz~sidQred the Negative Declar~t:ion together with any comments receivad duriny the public review process an~? further fincling on the basis of the initial study and any comments roceived tYiat there is no substantial evidence that the projer.t will have a significant effect on tr~e environmen~. NO"rI. TfiEkZEFURE, BF IT RESOLVED tfiut ~he Anaheirn City Plann.ing C~smmission does horeby grant subjer.t Potition for Reclassificat.ion an~, by so dozng, that Ti~le lg_Zoning cf the Anaheim Muni~i~al Code be amonded to exrlurle the above-described property from the CG (Commercia]., Genoral) Zone and co incorporatR said desGr.ibed praperty into the Rhi-2400 (Residential, Multiple-~'amixy) ~Une upun the tollowirig cond.itiori whir.h is hereby founc~ to k~e a nec~ssarx prerequisito to the pr~posed use of subject pruperty in order to prese~ve the safety an.d g~neral welfare of the C.itizens of the City of Anaheimt That prior tc~ int:oduction of the ordinance rozoninq ;;ubj9ct property, a parcel or tracC map to seps~rate subject nr~perty from ~he remaining mini-•warehouse sito ao the oast sb.al.l ba submittec~ to and approved by the City of Ariahezm and thr~». be rQrorded in the Office .nf. the qranqe Caunty Rocordor. T'he pravisions or rights grant;~d by this rc:solution ~hall bacome null and vofd by action oY the P1annS.ng Commission unless said condit;ions are compZied witta within one (1) year from the ciate oC this rosolution, or a::ah further time as the Plann3ng Comrnissi,on may grant. BE IT FtIRTHER RESALVEA that L-}~e Anaheim Cit}~ Planning Commission do~s :iereby find and determin~ that a~optior, of this Resolution is expressly predica~eci upon applicanr..~s complia~ce with each and all of 'the conditions hereinabove sgt forth. Should any such condiCions, or any pazt thereof, bQ declarecl invalid or unenEorreable by the final judgmcnt of any courL• of c~mpetant jurisdiction, the:i this Resolu;tion, and r~ny approvals herein contaixied, shu11 bQ deemed null ai:d ••oid. -2- °C89-159 MI~t~AlhWVn,k ~ . . ~h ' 1 ~ t , ATTE5T; THE I'OR~GOINC Ri;SOLU'.CION is signed and a~~provad by me this 5th day of June, 1989. :.r• ` ;~ /..~ -- i= ~.-~'~! ..~ r'~14/'CrY- rr Ct:AIRWOMAN, AZI EIM CTTY PLANI~ING COMMISSION ;~ ~ ~. y:e~r. .. :,.1•.c:~ ~~.r.~ i,..~ ~~. ...i„~...~:>. ~ f.. ..:~,:... r ';~r:~t~ ,... ~~.,. ~i.~•.~i;,Y,+}. , ...'~~;if!I f fV~'y1,~;.ti1 ~n1~"1 ~+'~ . 1+•'l.~,l~SCiYYiw41t ,ff~dDl ~ ,~ 11p ~j C ~ ,~ R ~ 1 ~ ~ . . . ,t~P~~ k~ t ~~~ ~~i '''i r ~'F""'+~,~'~~-- -- - SECRETA. Y, ANAFiEIM ZTY PLANNING GO.+~IIriISSIUN CIT% A~ 7~NAF3~TM ;'r ;~t:, i Y STAT~ Qr CALiFORNIA ) COUNTY Or^ ORANGE ) ss. ~''''+ T, Edzth. L, Harr.as, Secrerary of the Anr~heim Cii:y P].anning ~ommission, do hereby certify that tlis forag~ing rasolutiori was pas~oct and adapk~td at a meQting of the Anaheim C:ky Planning CommiSSion held on June 5, 1989, by the following vote a.f the memAers Lherc~of: AYES: COMMT5STONERS: BOiJAS, BOYDSTLTtt, CARUSILLO, FELDHAU'S, HERBST, MC ~URNFY, MF.SSE NOES: COMMISSTONERS: NOP1E ABSENT: COMNfISS2~NERS: NONE IN 47ITt7ES5 WIiGREOF, I have Yiereunto set my k~~nd this 5tn dax of June, 1989. ~•~, ~~' ~~ ~'_~, ~~' ~~~ 5ECRET ~ ARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COPM~f:SS7UI~T "'~ -3- PC89-159 ,~,'~,1. ~:i ;