Resolution-PC 89-17-. . . . . . . . .. - Vy,141
'.~t
/ '
r~l1tY~ ~. I : r
~~ ^'
RFS L TI N NQ~ P. C89-11
A RENOLUTION 0~' THE ANAT3EIM c:ITX PLANNING COMMISSION
TFIAT .PETITION FOR RECLASSxFICATION N0. 88-t39-33 aE GRAIdT~D
WE~ERFAS, L•he Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a
veriFied aeta.tinn for FeclassiEication trom tha City of Anaheim, 200 South
Anahe:im BouleWar~i, AnahPxm, CA 92g05, owner, and ROHERT J. WALLER, 188QU
Delawz+re StrQe~, S+aite 1000, HunCington Bea~h, CA 92648, agent for c~rtain
roal property situated in the City of At~aheim, County o£ Orar,ge, State of
Califc~rnia, ~escribecl as follows;
ALL THA1.' CER~AIN L7~7D SI'.CUATEA IN 'PHE RANCF3'~J SAN JUAN
CAJON ~E SANTA ANA, AESCRIBL''D AS FOLi,OWS:
TH,'~T 1'ORT~ON (1F TH~ NORTHWEST QUARTER pF SECTION 8,
IN TUWNSFiIP 4 SOUTH, RA,NGF 10 GdEST, UESCRIBED AS
FQLLOWS:
BEGtNNTNG A1` A POINT IN TC•IE WEgT L~NF aE' SAID
NORTHWE;ST QUARTER UF SAiD SECTI~t~ 8, 474.67 FEET
NORTFiERLX OF TH~ SC1U'THWEST CORNER UF SAZD NCIRTHWEST
QUARTER OF SAID SECT70N; THENCF, EAST~RLY PARALLEL~
WITH TH~ SQUTH LINE OF THE l~ORTFI 25 ACRES 0~' TFI~E
SOUTHWF5'T QU.'~RT.ER OF TFiE NQRTHWE51 QUARTF,R OF SAID
SEC'~ION 8, 238 FEET; THEt~•GE 50UTHER~'Y PARALLEL WITH
THE WLST LI27F, QF TFiL NORTFIWEST QUARTER OF SAID
5fiCTiQ~I 8, 16(3.15 FEET, MOR~; OR LLSS TO A POINT
305.92 FEET NORTH~RLY OE 'PHE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
NORTHWEST QUAR'lEK; THENCE WFSTERLY' PARALLEL WITH SAID
SOU'1'H I.INE QF SAID NORTHWFST QUART~R 238 FEET TU TFiE
WFST LINE OF SAID NORTHWESr QUART~R; TI~~21CE SOUTFIERLY
AL,ONG SAID WEST LINE 7.$3 , 02 FEET TO A POINT 12.9 . 9Q
FFET, NOF2THERL•Y OF THE SOi7TH i.TNE OF SAID NARTHTn1EST
QUARTER; THEYCE EASTE;RLY PARAT~LEL WITIi SAID SQUTH
L' :[NE OF SAID NORTFiWEST QUAl79'~R 8?.2 F~ET; THENCE
NORTHERLY PARALL.~:L h'iTH TH~ WEST LII~E OF SAIU
NORTHV,'~ST QUARTER 3fi7.63 FEET TO THE SOUTFT LINF QF
'PHE NORTFi 25 AC~c~;c pF 'THE SOUTHWEST QIJ~,RTER OF SI~ID
NORTHWEST ~UAF.TER OF SEC`PiON 8; THENCE: WESTERLl ALONG
SAID SOUTH LIN~ pF ~A:LD Z5 ACRE TRACT OF LAND g22
:'rET TO THE Wk;ST LIN~ p~' SAID Nq1~xFIWEST QUARTER;
THE2ICE SUUTHFRLY ALONG SAID WEST LiNE OT' TH~
NORTF?WE.~r QUARTGR 16 F~ET, MQRE QR LESS TO THE POINT
OE' L~~;GINNIPlC; .
k*HERLAS, the Ci *.y Planning Comm.ission did hoZd a publ.ic hearing
at the Civic Ceracer in thr~ City of An;lha:m on Janu~axy 16, 1989, at 1:30 p.m.,
tiotice r,E ~Rid public txearing having :,een du~y qivon as required by law and in
accordan..e with the nz•ovision3 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chegter 18.03,
to hear z~nd coasider eviilenco fc+r and against said prop~sed reclassification
ar~d to investic,~ate and make f;ndings and recommendations in connecti.on
therewith; and
0625r _.~_
. PC89-17
~ ~}dG,t~. ~~~r.+i~g'i ~. ..r"!- , h -
, i _ r": ~.",i;i«IV }~.~;~. ~ ~ ~ ~~q
7 ~.~.. . . ~ ~,.~S:i 1 i: ~ .',i ~ ~i a~v~ 7 i l~ly ~ i AA"Y«~ ~
i' ~ ~ ~ 'r ~ ,y1~t~~~f/~
..~ y ~1;K1~;~ ~;n~.~.'<% ~!i
, !~
WHEkEAS, snid Commission, after due inspection, investigation
and study made by itsel£ ~nd in its bPhalE, and aftes due c~nsidermti.~r~ oP all
eaidence and roports cffarad at said hearing, does E~nd snd determine the
fo11owing facts:
. L ~• T~a~ the peti.tione•r proposes reclass.ification of subject
p•opertp• £rom the RS-A-4~~,000 (Resident.ial/Aqricultural) Zone to ~he RM_12p0
(Re~iclen~ial, I~ultiple-ramily) Zone.
2• xhat Planniny Commisszon has recommended approval o~'
G~nerml P1~n Amendment Nn ?.:i0 ka arnend the land use dc~signati.an of subject
proper.ty from General Indust~ri~,l ta bfeditim Density Residenti.al,
` 3. Tha~ t~~ prQposed recla~sifieat:ion of ,subject pro ert is
I' : P Y
~' necessarj~ and/~r desirable for the orderly and proper devolo menh Qt
community. P the
%., properly relate .tojthe tz~ Sro~~~~th~3er1$SSification oE SU~]ACt prQperty does
w~ close proxzm3,Cy t,o subject property ~s~d oe~the taoziQS Qand~their permittedeuses
genei•ally establish~r~ throuc~hout L•he r.ommunity.
'' T~a~ ~h~" pzoposed reclassificatior~ of
rac~uires t;he dodication and. improvement o£ abutting stroets in~u ccorda cepwith
thQ CircuJ.ation E1em0nt of, the GenQral F~lan,
in tra£fic which w~ll be generated by~ the .intensifi a~ione oP~land usea ~ncreasz
6. That no oiie .tndicat~d th~air presence at saicl pub].xc hsaring
: in oppusition; and th~~ no cvrres~,ondenco tivas received in oppoeitian to
'i subject petit.~on.
~ALiFURNIA ENVxR NMENTAL~~~~,I~Y l~ T
: City P].ar.ning Commission .~--FT.NDING; That rhe AnahQim
; E].ement of th~ Gerleral Plan~fr.7rn the ~Qxist ng LGeneral Tndustrial, 4 3s ~ na Use
j
g tion
to the Medi wn Density Tcesidential designation and tc~ reclassify sul~ject
i property trom the 12S-A-93,000 (Residential/Agricultuzal) Zona to the gM_
~ (Resi3er.tial, Multiple-Farnily Kesidentia~) Zone to constcuct a 3-storOU
176-unit "affordablQ~~ apartment complex with waivers of min3.mani site area per
dwglling unit, maximum s~xuctur~,l heiqht, maximum site aoveragQ and mixiimu
di~~~nce between build.ingg ~n an irreg~Yarly-$ha ed m
oF approximatAl~r 3.91 ~cres 1ocated at the s~ut westl~~rner~ of °Gramer~~
Avenue and Va~ley S~reet, having appraximate frontage o£ 715 feet on the
sQUL-h side of Gr~exCy Street, 131 feet on the west wide of Vallgy Street and
18~ feet ~n thQ east szde of Brookhurst Street a.nd further described as ~52g
North Va7.1ey~ Street; and ciaes heraby ~appxo~.Q the Neg~tive Declarataon upon
finding *2iat i~ has cansi~erQd the Negative Do!;larat.fon together with any
comments received durfng the public rQ~r~,EW pro~e3S and Purther finding on tha
basis of the Ini.tial Study and any comments received that thor~e is no
subst~tr_tial evidence that the projec`: will have a si.gnif.icant effect on ~~~
envi ro:iment . ..
MOW, TH~REFORE, H~ ix RESOLVED
Commission does hQreby granC subject Petition~for Rec1a a fi ation ail~l8bxi1s~g
~~ing, that Tztle 18-zoning ot the Anak~eim Municipal Code }aP
Y
_2_ amended to
PC89~17
~; ~' ~ ~ ~ ~
:;;
;#~
- , . . „ , ~cr,
r'~~
Y; '~
~ J I 1~1 n
~1~
t~~
exclud~ tkie above-deacribed proper~y from ~hQ RS-~A-43,000 (Re~3dentixl/
Agricultural) Zone and ~o incorporats said described nropert~• into the
RM-12170 (ltasidential, Mult:iplr;-Family) Zon~ upon tlie followinq aanditions
which ~sre hereby found to be a nocessary pr4requisa.te to the prnposed use of
subject property in oxder to preserve the safety and garieral wc~lFare of the
Ci~izens of the City ~f Anaheim:
~. That the legal own~r oi subject property sha11 ii-revocably off~r to
dedicate to Lh~ City of Anaheim a strip of land twenty seven (2~) fe~t
in width from the contcarline of th~ street along Gr~nercy Avenue
including a fif~een (15) foot radius corner return at Valley StreEt for
street widening purposes.
2. That tha vehicular acce:~s rights to Brookhurs~ Stteet sha11 be dedicated
ta the C.ity of AnahPim.
3. That a fee shall b~ paid to th~ City oE Anaheim for strr~et 13ghting
along Valley Street in an amount as established by C.ity Council
resolution.
~. 'Ctiat a fse sha11 be naid to the City of Anaheim for tree planta.ng a]on~
Val.ley SL-reet, Gramer.cy Avenue ~nd Brooknuz•sL StrQet i~i an amount as
establ.ished 3~y City Council resolution.
5. That street light.a.ng facilitic~s along Arookhurst Strec~t and Gxamsrcy
Avc~nue 3ha11 be i nstalled c~s rec~uired by the Utiliti.es Genera7. Manflger
in acc~~rdance with specifieations on tile in thc~ Office of Utilitias
GQnera7. Manager; ox that seciirity in thP form v~ a bond, aex•tificate of
depos9.t:, letter of .r.reciit, or cash., in an amuunt anc~ Porm satisfactory
tA the CiL•y of Anaheim, ghall be pUSted witti the City to quarantee khe
s~atisfact~ry comFletion of the above-menY.ioned imp~rovement,s. Said
security ~hall bo posted with the City of A.-~aheim psior to the
introduGtion of an ordinanc;e rezoning subject propexty. TYre
above-requ.ired zmgrovemexit~ sha11 be insti~lled prior to occupancy.
ti. Th~L• tho 1Qga1 owner uf subject propQr~y sY:all dedicate a fzv~e (5) faot
~ wide public utxlity easemant along the wester.ly leg of the nortYx
property line. Said easr~ment shall be to the satis~action of th~ City
~ Electrical Engineering Divi.sion. Proof of recordatien af Said eas~men.t
~. ~hall be subi~itted t.o t.he ?oniny Division.
7. Trat prior to introduction of an ardinance rezon.ing subjeat property,
the legal propert! owner shal"_ prepare and secord an unsubordinat~+d
cover.Ent limxtinq occupanc; of ea~h dpartmo~zt unit to no more than twc
(2) persons (other than ~hildren under the age uf t~wo (2) years) ~er
beCiroom. Said limitr~tion shall be included ix~ each lease/rental
agreement. A copy oE the cov8nant sha11 be submitted to and $pprovefl by
the City Attorney prior to recnrdation. A copy of the recordea covendnt
sha11 be furnished ho the zoning Azvision.
;;., 8. Tha~ a covenant shall be reaorded aqxeeing to pro~-ide the zenter of aach
dwelliug unit with wr3.tten in£ormation obta.ined £rom the Schocsl
.•
District(s) pertaininqr to possible over.crowded conditions and busing
~~ status of the school(s) servi.ng tho dwelling unit.
,a~~ ~
-3- PCi39-17 . '`'
::,;,,
'. ,
`;;~
~~
r¢~~.~~!'~aiM:~'~.~~~ `~.1~,7I~~~r~.~i';~;'~t^`i u.°'a~+t~f.ii"P~r~ 1.i.~ '~-i trr" t7 i,~'}~}r~l ~ r,.n :i_ ~ -r;~~~,~ t A~.,r
~~j ~~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~ . '~ ~
',,,..i.'.~. , . .
' ~ p17i~1)j~ . 'y
h
~ f" ~ ~f~ ~(~ ~i/~
. . , J~/~~~.~- ;~,~ .
r ~
9. That prior to tha introductian of an ordinance rezoninc~ $~j~~ti
property, Condition Nos. 1 through 0, above-montioaed, sha11 be
completed. The provisaans or rights qxanted b~ this resalution sY~all
b~como null and void by action ~f the P1ann3.n~ C~rmna.ssion unl~3ss saia
conditions az•e comp?.icd with within ono year from che date of thi;;
resalu~ion, or such fur*her t.~me as the F+l~nning Commisaion may grant.
10. That approval oF t.his application constitures approval oF the ~~roposed
rQqUQS'•~ ~~n1Y tia the extenL- tha~ it complies wi~h th~ Anaheim Mur~icippl
Zoning Code anr3 any other applicable City rec~ulatians. Appro~a2 does
not include any action or findings as to compliance or. approval at ~he
request. r~qnrding any other applicable ordinance, rQyulation or
requa.rernent,
$E 17' FUI2T.HER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Pl~nning
Commission does hereby finrl ~nd detormino that adoption oE thiu R~solution is
expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance w•ith each ~nd all of the
conditions herei.:sbove seC Porth, Should nny such conditions, or any part
thereof, be dQClare~l invalid or unenforceable by the final ud
court of competent jurzscliction, then th.is Re~olution, and a~e~A Qi any
herQin contained, shall. be deen~ed null arid voic?. Y Fpr~va].s
THE FOREGQJtiG kESOLU'T]CON is signed and appr,ovad by me this '16th
day of January, 1989.
-- ,' ~ , '~ ~ t ., . f' ~/' .>; ;, , i
CHI~TR'WOhfAN, ;l'~NA EIM CI7'Y PL~INNINC CONA4ISS~ON
ATTEST: / `
Cl.:r '" , ~ ~'
_~~~ C '[."~~~ ~ '
' ~ l~'~~-~
S~CRETARY, ANAHEIM CZTY I~L~ANNING COhL~f:[SSION
STATE bF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ~~,
CT.TY OF ANAHEIM )
t, EdS.th L. Harri~, ~~cretary of the Anaheim Ci~y planning
Commission, do here~sy certi£y thai: ttae foregning resolution was pas~ecl and
~+' ~Pt~a at a meeti.ng of. the Anaheim Cit.y Planning Commiss.ion held on January
'.~, 1989, by the fullowing vote nF the members t2ier~of~
A•Y~S~ C0,'~IIrSISSIONERS: BOUAS, BOYDSTCIN, CAI2USILLO, HE~2BST,
MC BL'RNFY, JdESSE
NOES: COMMISSIONCRS: IVONE
AESENT: Cpt~ITSSI0NER5: NONE
ABSTAIN: COMMlSSIONE.FcS: E'ELDFi.~US
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, T 11a~•e horeunCo set my hand this 16th day of
January, 1989.
1-~.1c:~
u~C:~ET .RX, ANAI3EIM CTTY PLANNTNG CObA4ISSI02~
#0625r.
-4-
PG89-17
:~:f