Resolution-PC 89-174,. ~<
,,,4~~~ti
, ,
~~tlM't1y`
,: ~
~
,
,~:
;p.
,~}.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~•,:Jij'
,~
RF:~.~QLtLT:[ON NO• pC,~,~ -174
A f2ESnLUTION OF THC ,ANAHETM CIT1' ?L,ANNII~G CphII~SI5SI0N
THA1' PETITION F'OR VA.RII~NCE 2vp. 3970 BE GRANTF.P
WI3EREA~, the Anaheim C~.cy Flanning Com-nission did roce:ive a
verified PeLitf~n ~Eor Variance ~From WOODCREST L~E4EI~UPMEI~T, Attn; JAMES
H:CU"FiL1t2TD, 17911 Ma.tchell Avenue, CA 92714, owner of certa3.n real
Pr~perty situatod in the City f V A aheim, County of Ormnge, State oE
California described as:
PAI2CFI~ Y OF PARCEL MAP N0. fi7-2:10, IN THE CITY OI'
ANAFi~IM, COUNTX QF ORJ~NGE, STATE OF CALIFORNTA, AS
PER M~P FIGFU IN BOOK 231 PAGES 42 TO 47 INCLU5IVE OF
PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFTCE OF THE CqUNTY RECOp~~R OF
SATD COUN'I'Y.
:~
~~HEREAS, the City Planniny Commission did hold a public hearing
~-t the Civic C~ri~cr in the CiL•y of Anaheim on ~7uly 5, 190g, a~ 1;3p p~m~~
natice of said public hearinc~• having been ciuly given as requ:Ired by law and in
ar.cordance wi.~h the provisi~ns of thc~ Anaheim Muni~ipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear anri ~consider evid~ncQ for and against said proposed vari,ance ancl to
investigate <<nd make findings ar.d re~,ornmendatians in connection therawith; ari~
WHEREAS, s~id Commission, after duQ i,zspection, ~inv~estiaa~ion
and stuciy made+ by itse].t and in its beha'lf, and zftor due consi~erai:ion of all
evidanre ansi z~epor.ls offered, at said he~ring, does ~ind and determine tho
t"nllowing facts:
1• That the petitiox~er rec~~,~ests urdiver of. the fct? lowing t~
construct a 5:Eo~t, 6 in~h high solid wa11 with 5-ioot, 1C1-inch high pila~cters
in the £ront satback abutting Canyon ~~r~ek Road in orde.r to pravide ~atio
walls foi~ units in a previously-.approved Lo~nhouse complex;
~SF~TI N 18 ._?( 4. 043 101 - P r-mi
1 1. q '_~`-- ~S1~9r08Chmenta an~4_~.q'~.~.,I.~.~.r~.
8.3 06 ,070 (permittecl: maximun f
' ~-•-~~ •~~ •~t-~-' ~.~ - ~.15.? rsquired 1~-foot wide~l nd caped building~setback;
r; proposed: .5•5-f~t hic~h_ w~ll wi~h ~~-foot
~0-a.•~ch tiigh pilasters) ~`
h
x. That ~he aba~re-mentioned waiver is hPreby granCed on the
basis that there are special circi.unstances applicable to the pro~~Qrty sut;h as
si~e, shape, tapograph,y, location and ~urrounuings which do not t~pply to other
iden~ically zoned property in the same v.ic?nity; and that strict appliration
of the Zoning Code de~irives the property of privileges enjoyc3d by other
properties .in the identical zone and classificaL•i~n i:. tho vicinity.
3. That thc~re are exceptionzl o.r extraordinary circiunstauces
or con3itions applieable ta the property .involved or to the ir~tendQd use of
the properL•y that 3o not apply generally t~ the property ~r class of use i.n
the same vicinity a2id zone.
~J9~br
-1-
PC89-174
'" ~
'~',
~,~tM~y`
~
~,,~,i
;,,.
4. :^hat the requested varianc~ ia necessa.ry far the
prgservation and ~njoyment oP a sub~tantiial praperty right hossessed by other
property in the same vicinity and zone, and da:iied to th~ prop6rty ir. question.
5. That the requeatR~ vara.ancP will n~~t b~.~ materially~
clotrimaxital. Lo ~he public wel.fare or ir~jurious Lo the prnparty or improvements
in such vicini~•.y anQ zone in which the propex•ty is located.
6. 2hat no one .:nGicated their presence at sa:i~ public hearing
in opp~~sition;. and thai: no correspondence was re~eivod in opposition to
subje^t ptti~ion.
4ALIrORN1A ENVIR(LENT~L ~iJT.LITY aCT FINUING: TYIa~ thQ ~1n;,heim
City P.ianning ~Conunission has reviewecl the ~roposal to c„r~truct a 5.5-Eoot,
ii-inrYz hig'~ solid ~val.l with 5-foot, 10-inch high pi.lasters in t;Y,e front
setback area ~bixtting rany~n Creek Road in ~rder t~ provide patio walls Eor
u;~iis in a prevlc~uslt-approved to~.-nhouse complQx with waiver oE permitted
encroachmenLS into requirAU }•ards on ar., i.rregulaxly-~lxaped parce'! of land
con,~istinc~ o~ apprnximately 30 acrzs located northerl,y ~t the i'uture
intersection ni Car.yon Creek Ruad and Serrano Avenue, having fron~ages of
approximat~~ly 16C~0 ieet un the no.rther:ly sid~ of Canyon Creek Road ancl 575
feet on the westorlX sidQ of Weir C~n;,~o:i l:oad, and further. described as xrr~ct
Map No. 12995 (Sycaunore Cany~an Specifir. P1ai~ (SP88-1) Deve].o~meni: Arcia ('1);
and does hereby appr~vQ the Negative Dc~c.laration u~on finding that it has
consi~ered tY:e Negative Dacl~r~tinn toc~eL•Yier s~rith any commonts received
dur.inq the public review process ~nd fux•ther finding on the basis of the
initial study and any commant~.s rece.ived that tb.ere is no substanrial eviaence
that the prujec" will ha~e a s~c;nif icant effect on the environment.
K+OW, TH~REFOR~, IIF. IT RESQLVELI th.at the Anaheim Cit~• Planninq
Commission doea herok,l ~rant subjecE Petzt3.on for Variance, upon the
following cc~nditions wY,ian are heroby founcl to bg a nocessary prerequisit~ to
the ~~roposed use of the ;subjeci: property in order to preservc~ ' he safdty and
general wolfare of the t:.it.izens of the City of Anaheim:
1. TYiat prior to issuancQ of a building permit for subject wa11~ tY,e pracise
wa.ll location shall be submitted to the City Traff.i.r, EngineAr Eor review
,snd approvul to verify compliance with Sta:idard Detail No. 137.
2. ThaL, as r~quired by Coiidit.ion of Approval No. 4~(a- of Specif.ic F1au No.
6~-i , ~~~iestrian access to ttie 3-acre pablic ~? park at the northwast
~urnex of Tract No. 1'1995, shall bQ provicled from Car,yan Cr~sek ltoad
~hrouyh Tract Na. 12995, and therefore, subject wal]. shal.l not bluck ttaid
~cce~ss. Furthermore, no gatrs shol ~. be insL•a11~ad acruss said access.
3. That prior to the approva7. uf the 1anc13cape plan for tl~e tandscape nroa
adjacent to Canyon Creok I2oad, the ~e~xgn, l4cation and type of trAe roat
barriers sha11 be subm.itted to the Cihy M~i.nte~ar.ce Operations Sectian
~~r review and approval.
4. That subject ~•t~ll shaJ.l be a~~~~ioPea substantially in dreordance w;.th
plans and specizicahions on file wi~h Ck~r~ City of Anaheim mtariced Exliibit
Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
_ 2 ._
PC89-1%4
' '
SG.
`))
1,
~~
: ii
.%''n~~
~~
~~
C~rl1•a.
;. ~That approval of this ap~lication constituh.es ap~r.nval of the pro~osed
r.equest only to Che extont that it camplic~d wi.th tho Anahoim Muni.cipal
loning Co~e and xny other appltcable City requlatiana. Approvul do~s not
.tnc:iucie any actinn or findinqs as ro compli~nco or ap~roval cE the
xequ3st reg~src~ing any other. appl:cnLle oriifn~nce, regulat~lon or
requiremonk.
g;; IT E'!iRTIiER RESOLV~U that. tha Anaheim Cil:y Plz~nnin7 Commissi.un
doc~s h~areby fincl and dstarmine thaL• adoptidn ~f rhis Resolution is expressly
pred.icatc~d upon applicant's complianco with each a~id a11 of the conditions
tierc~ir_abuv~ s~k [urt}~. 5hould any such c:onditions, ar cn~- part thereoi•, be
r~~clared inval.id or unenforceable by t.he final judgmant ot any court of
compat~nt jurisdiction, then this Resolutian, ancl any Approvals hereiii
~ontained, shall be doemed iiu.ll •r.nd voi~.
THE FORGGOING RESALUTZOtT is signe~3 and approved by me thi~ 5th day
of July, 1989.
~ ~ '~' ~~' ' ' -•~~'~;~
-.~i , ~ /r _t. • , , .. ~J
CHAIRWUMAN, ANAHETM CITY^PLr~NNTI3G CUf~4~STS5I0N
ATTESI: ~:' i
` ~. . ~
' s %ia-' ,~~~j1 ~L ~_-.
SECRT~TAR , AI3AHEIM CITY PL T-tJNTNG CO~~4VIISSIOt3
STATE 0: CALI FORNII- )
COUNTY OF ORA.NGE ) ss.
rITY dY ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Hacris, Secretacy of. tha Anaheim Clty Pl.anninq
Commission, do h~reby cerCify that the f~req~~inq resolu~ion aas pbssed and
adopted at t~ meetiny of the Anaheim Citl Planninq Cummissio~ hetl~i on July 5,
1989, by the followin~ voto ~E the mambc~rs thereof:
AYESs Cpt~tISSI02?BRS: BOUAS, BOYDSTUN, ~'ELDfiA.US, FlERF3ST,
MG5aE
NOES: COMMISSIOhERS: NO,IC
Af3SENT: C~MMLSSIONERSs CARUSILLO, r'C HilRT1EY
It7 47's TiIESS WHEREOF, I have .~ereunta set my h~nrj this 5th day of
~uly, 1A29.
V •L~ ~
, ~~~ _ .~° _ _.__ __..____
SBCFcET1-RY, ANAHEIM CI'TY ?LI-lt~iiN(, CGMMISSTOt3
~-3-
PC89-17a
.,...~ :-.x~i