Resolution-PC 89-202~
R~SULUTION N0. PCQ9,"_2~2
A RFSOLUTION OF 7.'I~E ANAEIEIM CITY NLANNTNG COMMISSJON
THAT PETITION :'OR CONDTTIUNAT. T;SE PE~2MIT N0. ~186 BE GRANT~D
WHRRF,AC, ~,he Anaheim City Planr.ing Commission did receive a verS.fied
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from PACIFIC SCI~:NTII'IC COhfPAATY., 620
Nev~port Centor DrivR, P.O. Box 7070, Newport Bc~ach, CA 926~8, owner and
SHAW/CROOKALL, :160 rlFwpcrt Cent~+r Dr.ive, Str~. 290, Nowport, Beach, CA 92660,
agent for ce.rtain rQal property situated in tha City of Ariaheim, County of
Orang~, State of Calif.orni.a, described a3:
.:~~.~a
_ ~•:.
THE NORTF~WEST QUAR
NORTHWEST QUART~R
RANGE lU WEST., TN
ANA, AS SFtOhN ON
OF MTSCELT,I~NEOUS
CALIFORNI'~
TER OF TFiE SOi7THWEST QUARTER OF THE
OI' SFCTIDN 24, TOWNSHI~' 4 ~OUTFI,
TIiE RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJON DE Sl~,NTA
A i~P RECORDED IN HOOK 51, PAGE 10
tQAPS, RECORL~S OE' OFANsE COUN'1X,
WfiEREAS, t2ie C.ity Planni:ig Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 14, 1989 aC 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said public hearzng having been duly giv~n as required by law and in
accurdance with the provisior.s of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hoar 3nd consider evidence for and agai.nst saic~ pro»o3r~d con.ditiona7. use
permit and to investigaLe and Make findings anu recommendatious in connectian
ther~w3~h; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and a~ter due consideration of a11
evidence and reports offE~rod at said hearing, does Pind and determine ~lae
follawing facYs:
l. ThaC the peti.~ionQr requests approval of a c;onditiona? usa
permit under authority af Code Section IB.51.050.145 ta permit ~n
"industrially xelated" ot•L•ice bui.ldiiig.
2. That the proposed use will not adversely aff~ct the ac~joining
lxnd U:iC3 and the growth and development csf thH araa in wh3.ch i.t .is proposed
to be located.
3. That khe size arid ~hapo of the sita proposed £ar the use is
adequa~e to allow the ~ull development of the proposect use in a manner not
dvtrimontal to th~ parti.culax area nor to the p~acQ, h~ealth, safety and
ge:neral welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anahe.im.
4. That khe ~ranting of the Conditional Use PQrmit under the
cond~.tions impoQed, if any, wil:l not be detr:i~mental tu the pe~ce, health,
safety and general welfara of the Citizens of the City of Anahei~n.
5. 1ha~ thz traf~ic genarated by the praposed use will not i.mpose
an undue burdcn upon the streets and highways designed and impruved to carry
the 4:raftic in tY,e area.
0~97r -1- PC89-202 `'.~
~`
,.
,,n~
.,., .:;;~;-;~;
-
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ , ' ~~;j~,; ~v:4
'~i
" ~~~ !~.~~
6. That no one indicatAd their presence at sttid publia hearing in
opposition; and that no corraspondence was received ir. oppesi~ion i:o the
subjsct petition.
~ALIFORNIA ENVIRONM~NTAL UALITY ACT FINDIPI : T.hr~t 1:he Anaheim
City Planning Commission has roviewed the propast~l to pe~ma.t an "indusLrially
related" of.fiae building on a rer.tangularly-shape~ parcel ot Jand consisting
of approuima~ely 9.16 acres located at the southeast corner oE WinsLon Roacl
and State (:o.llege Boulevard h~ving ~pproximate frontages oF 59'1 feot on the
sou'th sido of Winston Road and 6b9 feet on the eust :~ide oF State Co1lee~e
Boulevard and further describQCi as 1350 South State College Bou'le~;ard; and
does hereby approve the Negati.ve Declaration upon Einding ~,hat it has
considerPd ~he Negat.i~•~ Declaration to~ether with any comments received
durinc~ the public review pr.ocess and furLher finding on the basis of the
a.nitial study and any comments rQCeived that thexe is no substantial evidexica
th~t the prr~ject will have a significant e+t'fect on the enva.ronment.
N'OW, THEREFORF, BE IT RCSCLVED that Y,he Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition Eor Conditiunal tJ~e ksrmi~,
upon the Pollowinq condi.~.ions which are hereby found t~ be a necessary
pr~reqitisite ta the proposed use of the subject pruperty in order ta ~reserve
the safety and general welfare of the Citixe~:s ot the City of Anaheim:
l. That a fee slzall be paid to rh9 Ci~y of Anah~im for s~reet lighting aloYig
Winston Road in an aunou.nt as established by City L'ouncil .resoluCion.
2. That trash storagc~ areas shal'1 be ~rovided and maintained in a locatian
acceptable to Clie Street Mai.ntenanca and Sanitation Divisi~n atid in
~ccordance with approved plans on file wzth said Division.
3. Thr~t the propasal shGll comp].y with all signing requirements of the ML
"Industrial, Limited" 'Lono, tinless a variancc~ allow9.ng sign waivers is
ap~ravec~ by the City Council, Planning Commissaon or ~uning Adma,ni~trator.
4. That pri.ar to the commencement of. the activity authorized under this
r~solution, ~r prior to the tame ~hat a building ~c~rnit is issued, or
wzthin a p~riod oE ninety (90) days frnm th~ date o£ this resoJ.ution,
whichevel nccurs firsti, t'he leqal owner(~) oE subjec~ property sha11
pxecute and record a covenant in a form approved by the City At'torney's
Office wherain such owner(s) agr~Q riot to contest the formatian of any
assessmont disL•ric~(s) which c~~ay hereafter be ~ormed pur~u~nt ta the
provisions oF Aevelo~moz~t Agreement No. 83-0]. bgtween the City oE Anaheim
and Anaheim S~adium Associates, which district(s) could inc].ude such
legal propcrty ownQr's propertp.
5. That the proposed office uses sha11 bQ lzmited ~o the following listed
uses and that a covenant, roviewed and approved by the City Attorney's
Oifice, so-1imi.ting said uses shal.l be recordea in the OfPice of the
Orange County Recorder. A r,o~y of the recorded covenant sha11 than br~
submitted to thP Zoning Division:
-2-
PrBS-202
, {1
~M'ti~~F..i'~ln~ ~f.~t~r: ,...;,
~ ~ .,
i
a
ij
.. .. . . :~~; 1 ?, .'.' ,~ i f t.~ or .tV11^~}I~ dMn n ' ~,,f ^t~`P~ ~, i`Yi~ 1 .' ~~w~l t ` ~,•.i~ ~~~~~ rA ~{~ Y
. r . . -. . . , ~ , ., . . .:1 : ~~Y~~ ~ ~t`~I~1~Y;~ ~ S~i,:' ~~i ,I`~~l' f!'J3k{VI~~Y'~l`~~~Y<< j~ttTVf~e~t,}~~r,~~~
~ ' ~4
~~~
i:~Rk~ ~
C Y(
I~J
(1) Accounting - Bookkoep~.ng, CPA Firms or tempor~ry CPA Firms ~~~
(2) AdverCi5ic1~
(9) Appraisors
14) Bank; `
(5) Arokers - Real Estate, Business OpportkniL-ies, E~tc.
(6) Businsss System Companias `
'
(7) Communicat:ion Cansultant~ ;;~;
(8) C~mputer ~.nalysis Firms ';-
(9) Credit Repnrting AgeYicic~s
(1U) Designers - Indus~rial, Interior, Graphxc
(11) Development Campanies -'
(12} Facility Mainten~nce and Planning ,;.
(13) Insur.ar.ce Comp~nies/Agoncies
(1~} Invontory Sorvices
(15) Leasing Companies
(16) Managemex~*_ Cansu].tants/Companies
(17~ M~rketing Researcn
(18) Pers~nnel Agencies
(19) Quality Control R.nalysis
f2U) Sales Office (which sQrve the industrial arAa)
(21) SRCretarial and Business Services
(22) Ax~y~ us~: permitted under 2oning Code Section 18.G1.Q20, and subject
to a].1 conditions o£ said Section.
Each individual use shall require thp written ~ppx•oval of the Zon~,ng ~~:~
~ivis ion prior lo occupancy which approval shall only bo given when it .is ,
demon strated that such uso is Rither an Qxpr~ssly pc~rmitted uso ir~ the ~~;~.
unae~:~
lyin~g "ML" 2one or meets the criteria of Sec.tion 18,61.050.145 of ~..,
the A naheim Munic9pa.1 Code.
6. That t,`.e on-site lanclscapinq and irrigation system shall be refurbish.ed
and m aintained in compliance rrath City standards.
7. TYiat subjec~ property shall 'be developed substantially in ~ccordanc~r with
plans and spc~ciEicr~~ior~s on file with the C.ity of• Anahei-n markQd Exhabit ~~
Nas. 1 trrough 4. ;;
8. That prior to commencement of the ac~zvity authorized by this resolution,
or prior to issuance of a building permit, or within a period oE ane (1)
year from the ciate ~f this xPSOlution, whichever. ocaurs first, Condition
Nos. l, 2, 5 and G, above-mentioned, sha11 be com~'laed with. Exkension.s
for f.urther time t~ complet~ said conditions may bs grnn~ed in accordance
with 5oction 18.03.09() of tha Anaheim Municipal Code.
9.
~hat a~proval of ~his applicaL•ion consti~utes approval of the proposed
request only to t;he extent tk~at it complie.; k~ ~h the Anaheim Municipal
Zoning Code and any othor appl5.cal~le Ci~y regulati~ns. Approval does net
incluc~e any actinri or f-inding; as tc aompliance or approval of the
r~quest rQgarding any other appli.cable ordinance, regul~tion or
requirement.
_~_
PC89-202
~~ e~sir~.~ n,. , ~,.
j
{ .
... ~ , . . `~ ~ , '~~~~~ ~~<<.~~~ ~"~~~~~~,~~74 ~ ~~~~ ~ ;`~ ~ ~ r~.~3 Yy h~~ ~,tt i1~ r~j.j~,:_ ~ i~S. 15 k ~.-.
~NM iL~~
r~i1.YY~
f::i
4 fy
.I.p!
;i~' 1
i
,~
y'
~~I
BE IT FURTHER R~~aLVED that th.e Anahoim City Planni.ng Commission
does hereby find anc! determine that adoption of this Resolution is exprd,~sly
predica'ted upon ry~plicant'~s compliance with oach and all o£ the condirions
hereinabove set for~h. Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, bs
declared invalid or unen~~rceable by the final judqrnent o£ any~ courti of
comp~tent ;urisdiction, then L•his Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, sha11 be deemed nu11 and void.
THB FOR~.~;OING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by sne this 14th day
of August, :.989. ~,
G/,~G--~~ ~t~' ~'~"~
- ~- ~~` . 7 ~,,.1
CIiAIRWOMAN PItO TLMPO~ANAHEIM CZTY PLAN1dING COMMISSION
ATTEST: ~ n '
i ~
_~~ -~lit-~~
SECRETAR , ~TAF~TEIM ~ITY yPL]\NNING COMMISSI01~
STATE Ok' CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CiTX OF ANAFIF,IM )
I, E@itki L. Iiarris, Secre~arp of tho Anaheim City Ylannirig
Commission, do hereby certify tr.at the foregoing resolution was pa:csed ana
adopted at a meeting of the Anak~eim City P13nning Gommissi.on h~ld on Auguat
].4, 1989, by the follawing vote of the members th~reof:
A'YES: COhfMTSS70NERSs AOYDSTUN, HELLYER, F~LllHAUS, BOUAS,
MC BURNEY, MESSE
NOES: COI~SISSIOId~RS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: F~H~I2BS?
;t'
;.~
. . .,- ,,.;.1.
.~
;1.
'E
,'~
'~
}
;~i
,, r.
IN WITNESS WHEJR~aF, I have hereunto set my hand thi3 14th day of ;.~,~
August, 1984.
~ •
~t'~~~ ~ ~ -
S1'sCRE'PA:2 , ANAHEIM CITY PL ING COI~*.ISSIAN
I,' _4_
;;
~;
?;;
';~
%~,
, ,.,
; ::;~
;!,,
~~<.
f ~h.
. ~ e.:r iy~
.... . . .~ . rv ~,:~~~Y:~.