Resolution-PC 89-205. , , ~w^w rr ~ ~~.
` '~
~~'~~~
~?~4~IQN N2: PC89 ~NO~.
A RESULUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COt~1rfISSION
T~IAT PETITION FOR ~JARIANCE N0. 3982 BE GRANTE~
'`~>+;'~-~~~'t~+~'~^~a~' .
~;"~
,,
,~
:~
WHER~AS, th~s Anahexm ~ity f~lanning Gommission c~id receive a
veri;Eied Pc~titi.on ~or Variance Prom SfIELL QIL COMPA21%, 51J. N. Brooklzurst
Street, Anaheim, CA 92fl03, ownor of cer~aiii real pr.oper.ty si+tuated in the
City oE Anaheim, County of Oranye, Stat~ of Ca1i£ornia describe@ as:
5'ARCELu 4 AI3D C OF PARCEL M.~P N0. 86-333 AS SHOWN ON
MAP FII~ED AS INSIRUMENT N0. f37-~6Q75ti IN BOOEC 222.,
PAG~'S 37 THROUGH 41 OF' PAF.CELS MAPS, tN '1'H~ pFFICIAL
RECORDS OF TH~ COUNTY OF QRANGE, STATE OF CAI~IFORNIA.
WHEREA^a, the L'ity Planninq Commission did hold a puY~lic hearing
at the Civic Center in the City~ of Anaheim on AugL~st 1~k, 1989, at X:30 p.m.,
notice of. ;;aid public hear:ing havzng been duly given as requir~eci bx law and in
accor.danc~ writh the provisi~ns af t:,t Anah~im Municipal Code, Chapter ~.8.03,
to het~r and consider evidence for and against said proposed variance ancl Co
investigate and makg findings azid recommendations in connecti~n therewith; and
WFiEREAS, said C~mmission, tsfter due in3pection, investigation
and stu~ly mad~ by itself and irz i~s b~half, and after due consideration o£ a11
evidenc~ and reports of.fered at saxd hearing, does finc~ and determine the
follo~iing facts:
1. That the ~~titionQr requests waiver of th.e following to
cnnstruct an 84 sR.ft. Lr~estanding sorvice station pricQ and 3deri'tification
sign:
(a) ~FCTION$ ]~Q~~Q~1 - P~,~mi,t~gd ty~p of sign x•n Sceni~ Coxridur
an 1 ~4.062~4Q QtiF~rlay Zone.
(perrittQd freestanding sign: Qz~.20 sq,ft~,
~p~ina cg~~r .~,~li. n ific Y~'on signs onl~;
proposed freecCanding sl,qn: one 89 sq.t•t.,
~x.~~~~~~~~~~5~ )
~b) ~E~TION 1~~,Q~.O~~.sQ~2 - g~mittod hoL~rs of s'~9n il~.umina~i~.
~nd ~,Q.84.(L62tQ4U .~6.~.~0 ~stm~ to mi8nac~}~}.~ Par.mitr.ed; dusk to
5],~awn propose~)
2. That the above-m~ritionefl waivers are hereb,y grar-tr~d on the basis
that thPre are ~peczal circumstances applicable to thQ properl:y such a~s siae,
share~ topogs•aphy, location ~nd surroundiny~ which do not app?.y to other
identically zonod pr~party in thc~ sbmo vicinity; and that sCri~t application
uf the ?,oniuq Code deprives the property of pr,.ivilegea enjoyed by other
propertios in tho idontical zone and classifiaation in *_Y.e vicinity.
1QOqr -•i- PC89-205
;,
'j~
.. . , .. . .... . . . .. ..... . ..~.y.... .,., .. ... . ,. ... . ...
~kl~'+kYl'M4Uf1/x~Y:4 L1.., ..., . ,;, . ,~~.~,~. i .~ . .~...... . ...., . . . . i~,~..~.. ~.,. _ ... , ~ ... .... . ~ - .~~ . -
. . . .. ~ .~ ~. ~: .. ...:.,,, . . ~.,., ..
I .. ... , ' ., f rit k~
~ r ~~Y
~ ~ ~ '. S~~`i ~ ~1
i ~: .. ~, ~:xr~, . ~
a~~
~ ,,,'~_
;.
3. ThaC there are ~xeeptiona7. or extr~aorc~inary circumstiances or
coxxditions applzcal~la to ChQ J~ropQrfy involved or ta the intended use of the
property t:hai: do not app.ly generally to the pra~erty or class of use in the
samo vicinity and zone, ~
4, xhat the requested variance is necessary for the Preservation and
en;joyment of. a substantial property right possessed by othQ:, property in tl-Q
same vi~.i.nity and zonn, and denied to L•he pr~perty in ~rueat,ion.
5. ~hat the .requested variance will n~~t bo matexiall;y c~etrimental to
the publir. welfare or anjurious to the property or improvemen~s in sucli
vicinity and zonQ in whic'~ the pro~ert~• is locate~9.
6. That no ~~n~ indicated ~.h~ir FreSencQ at said pub~.:.c k~earing in
opposition; and that no corres~ondenc~ was rec,eived in oppositiou to subject
petition.
~~~.IFnRNIA ENVIRQNMENTAL ~TALITY A~T FINDING: The Plannirig
DirQCtor or his au~horized reprQ~entative has determined that tno proposed
project falls within tho definiL-ion of Categoricll Fxemptions, Class 11, as
defined in the State E;IT2 Guiclelines and is, therafore, ;ategor.ir.ally exempt
from the requirement to prepare an E.l'R.
NAW, THEREFORE, F3~ ZT I?ESO;~V~D tha~ ~he Anatieim City ~lanni.ng
Commis~ion does horal~y grant subject Petation fo.r Varis~nce, upon the
Eollowing cnr~ditions which are herehy found t-~ be a necessary prerequ.isa.te to
t2ie proposed use of the subjec~ prop~rty in order ho pr9se~ve the~ snfety and
general kelftire o£ the Cit:izens o° the Cit~ ~f Anaheim:
l. That subjear sign shall be servad ~I~ undergroun~l eiectrical utilities.
2. That plan.s sY-all be submitted tu the Builcling Division. sho~ring compliance
with the nrinimum standards of the Cia;y oL Anaheim, i.nclucling the Uniform
Electrical Cade as ac]opted by the City of Anahoim. The appropriat~
permits sha~ll be obtaine~. for any necessary work.
3. 7.'hat subjecl: pr.operty shall be dev~lopad substantially in accordance with
~lans and s~~ecifications on file with the City of Anahe~m markc~d Exhibi~
:Tos. 7 and 2~raviclo~, however, that the reference t:o thQ food mart an~t
ire~ car wash shall be deleted from the sign, and the sign shall bs
luwered accordingly.
~. That priar~ to issuance of a building permit or within a period of one (].)
year from the date of this resolution, whichover ~ccurs first, Condition
No. 2, abovo-mentioned, sha11 be compliod with. Extensions for further
Cime to complete sazd conditions may b~ grantPd in accordance with
Saction 18.03.090 ~f the Annheim Municipal Code,
5. That prior to f..irial building and zon.ing inspPCti.ons, Condition Nos. 1 and
3, above-mentioned, shall be complieci with.
r
'~
~.
4.
-2"' PC89-•205
i "
d;' ~
~ ~ ~ '*~ ~ l~"+ e~v ~;,ty
t~~~,~" ~''~,~~5~
~ ~ ~ ~,i~
A~~ ?
;
,ji
~ r :~
6. That appr~v~1 of this application consti.tut.as appraval of tkae pr.oposecl
requ~st only to the ex~en~ that it camplies with ~he An~heim MuniGipal
Zoning Cude and any athe.r appli.cable City regixlations. Approval does no~
inr.lude any action or find.~ngs as tu cnmpliance or approval oE tho
.requF~st regaxc~ing any oCher appl9.cak~lc~ ordiriane.e, regulation or
reS;xiremQnt.
EiE IT. FURTH~Ft RESQ'VEB ~hak thQ A~zah~im City Planning Commission
doos l~.ereby Eind and dQtermine that adc~ption o~ this Rosolution is expre~sly
predica~ed upon applicant's compliance rrith each and all of the coxiditions
t~or~inabo~~e set forth. Shou.ld any such cond3tions, or any part therPot, be
dealared invmlid or ur.enforceabl~; by ~ho fi.nal judgment of any c.ourt of
competent jurisdi-;~ion, then this Resolu~ion, an8 any approvals herein
contained, sha11 be deemed null ancl void.
TFiE FQF.EGOING R~SOLUTION is ~igriod and approved by m~ this :l4th day
of AugusF, 1g89. 1 ~
%,~ ~ .. -
PRp TEMYORE, AN]~FiEIM CITY PLANNIt1G COtdMI~SION
A'iTEST:
-____ ~.,~ ,.,~ ~ ~-,~.~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CIT'~C PI~ANN HC; CpMMTSSTON
STAT'E OF CAI;IF'ORNIA )
COitN1'Y OF ORA.NGE } bs,
CITY OF ANAFiEI~I )
I, Edith L. Harris, SecrQtary of the Anah~im City P'anning
Commisaion, do h~reby aertify thut ~hc~ Eo~•egoinq resolution was passed and
aflopted at ~ mc~eting of the Anaheim City Planning Corrur.ission held on August
14, 1989, by tr,e kollowing vol•e of th~ membars thQreo~:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BQYDSTUN, HELLYER, F~'LDHAUS, BQUAS,
MESSE
NOEB: COMMISSTONEI2S: N~NE
ABSRNT: COD4rfISSIONERS: HERBST, MCt3URNEY
IN WITNESS WHEI2EOF, I have harQUnto sot my }ia:ad this l~ith c~ay of
August, 1989.
~ ~
G~~~~~ ~
SECRETAR~.', ANAHEIM CTT7f +.PLAIvNIPTG COhAMISSION
-3-
~
PC.89--205
I.;'~'
, .,,.~
'i~%~~~,
~~IS~
~ ;~
,,,f,
'~;
;.`'
; 'i
.;,.