Resolution-PC 89-220~
;
r'"'~
. ,
RESQLUTIOt~ ~~F? _2;?(z
~
A RESOL~U't70N UF T'HG ANAHEIM CTTX PLAN'NING COMMISSIaN
THAT PETITICIN FOR VARIANCE N0. 398G BC GF~NT~L1
~-~%.l~y~
,t,~,..~~;
WHGkEAS, the Ar.t~beim City Plannin~ C~mrnis;~ion did receive a
v~~rified Petition for Varia.nce fr~m P/A STATE COLL~GE INVFST~JRS, l~a7a1
F.ockfielc't Houlevnrd, Suite 200, ~:rvine, CA 9271f., araners, and LA~2RX LAKE,
15751 Rockfieiel Boulevar.d, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92718, agent, for certaa.n
r~al propert,y situated in tt~e City of Anaheim, County of O,:ange, State of
Califprnia, clescribed as:
PARCFL~ AS SHO'~TN ON 7~ MAF FII,E~ TN BOOK 27, PAGE 32
0~ PARCEL MAPS, !N THE CITY OF ANAHGIM, IN THE OFFTCE
0~' T.HE COUNTY ~,2ECORDEIt OF SAID COUNTY.
WHER~,AS, the Caty Planning Commission did hold a public haariny
~~ thQ Civic Center in the City of Anaheirn on Septgmber 11, 19A9, a~ 1:30
p.m., notice oF said ~~ublic het~xing having been duly given as required 'ay law
and ~n accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter
18.Q3, to hear and consider evic;ence for and against said pxpposed variance
and to investigaL-e and make findings and rECOmmenaatior~s in coiinection
therewith; anfl
WHER~AB, snid Com;nission, aftsr due inspe~tion, investigation
an~ study made by itse].f ~nd in its bohalL-, anrl after ciue aonsidex•ation of ~11
evidenc~ and reports offore3 at said hearing, does iind and determine the
followiu~ fucts:
1. That the p~titio:ier res~ue5ts wa.i.vQr oF the £allowing under
authority of CodQ Section 18.06.080 to permi.t a take-o~xt pizza and pie
restauraut in an eMisti.ng commercial retail centEr:
uECTIOPrS 18. p6 LQ~QsQ22 - Minimu,ro nwrbex r~f p~r in s~agQ~.
l.$-L4-~.~2,.023' (.~_9 required; ,~3 existing)
.~.n a. . ~ 4 ~2~4~4~.
2. ThaL• the above--menti~ned waiver is hereby granted an the basis
that thQ parking waiver will not cause an increas~ in traffic congestion in
tlle imme3iate vicinity nor adverse2y s~fect any adioini.ng lani~ uses and
granting of the parking wazver unil~r the conditions imposeQ, if any, will not
be detrimental to tha peace, r.da.lth, aa.Eety and general welfare ~f the
citizens of the C.ity of 1~nahe.im.
3. That tliere are exceptianal or oxtraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable t;o the pso~~erty involved or to the intendeci use of the
property that do nat apply ger-erally to the property or olass of use in the
same vicinity and aone.
4. That the requested variance is necessary for the rreservation and
enjovment of a substantial ~ropez•ty right possesseci by other prop~rty in the
same viciniky and xoiie, and denied ~~ Lhe property in questio~l.
1032r -1- PC89-220
lf:
;;~.
, . ~'~.'i AA
~~
~~~~
~
5. That the requasYed variance wi11 no~ be matQrially detrimental to
the public welg'ar~ or injurious to t.he pro~erCy or zm~ravemarits in such
vicinity and zone i~ which the proper~y is locatgd.
6. That no one irxdic~ated their presence ah_ said ptiblic heuring in
oppasi~ian; and tha~. no c~~rrQSpondence was r.eceivod in apposi~ion to sukaject
pet? tion..
NOW, xFTEREF~RE, BE TT 1iESOLVED that the Anaheim City N:l.aniling
Gommission dpes hereby grant subject Petition for V,~riance, upon tho followi.ng
conditior~s which ~re here~y found to be a necessary prexequisitQ te tho
piopased ~zse of the 3ubject property in order to preserve the sa£et.y and
general welfare o£ ~he Citi.zens ot the City of Anaheim:
* l. That trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in a location
acceptab?e to the SL•reet Ma.intenance Anc1 Sanitation Division, and in
accordance ~aith appr.oved plans -n tile witb. said Di.vision. Such
informakian shall b~ sp~cifically showi~ cn the plans submittPd for
building permits.
* 2. That all air conditi~ning facilities ar.d other roo:E and ground mounted
equipsnent shall be properly shielded f:rom viaw, and the sound bufEerQd
from adjacent residentia'~ p~~operties. Such infarmatiou shall be
sp~rificxlly shown ~n the plans submitte~ f~r building permits.
* 3. That ~~.e ~roposal shall comply with a21 signing r~quiremenL•5 of ~he CL
"~ommorcial, Limited" Zono, un1QS~ a varianca a].lowinc~ sign waivers is
~~proved by the CitX Caunc:il, Planning Commiss3on or Zoning
Adrniziis trator .
~. ~hat L-his resolution sha11 no~ becorne effec~:tve un~i1 Condition No. 6
of Reso].utiau No. 88R-373, adoptQd in connectian with Conditional li'ae
Permit No. 3051 and prohibiting take out/fast-L•cod ssrvice facil'_L-ies
(restaurants) in subjert comm~re.ial ret.ail centor, is amsnded or
deleted to permi.t such foocl service usage.
5. That subject propertX shall be da~relope~ suristantially in accordance
witY~. plans and specifications submitteii tu tha City, oE An~heim by t~ie
potitioner and which plans are an file with the City mar?ced ~xhibiC
Nos. 1 a~d 2.
6. That prior to cammencemer~t of the ~ctivity authr~rizad hy this
resolution, or priar ro issuance oE a building permit, az within a
perioCl of one (1) year from thQ flatA of thi.s resolution, wkii~hever
~ccurs first, Concii~ion Nos. 1, 2 and 4, abave-mention~ed, shall be
complied with, Fxtensions for £urth~r tima L•o aomplete said conclitions
may be grante:i in accordance with Sect3on 18.03.090 of tYeo Anaheim
Municipa7 Code.
7. Th~t prior to the conunencement of the activity author3z~d by this
res~lution or prior to final building and zoning inspections, whichaver
occurs ~irst, Conditian No, 5, abave-mQntzonec~, shall be complied with.
8. That employees making deliverios sha11 use their. own vehicles.
-Z- PC89-220
: `,,
; .s:,~i~`
,:1:1~r~.
~
af;
~ .,
:. ~~
;:,.
;:~
:,i> S .~F,°~i' 1 u ~n.A ~1 I'~y~ ~ P i'1~~;, P'l ,i•~ r~• a
. ~ .'..~1 . i:~S ~ ,.~~1't, ~j P r~.. ~ ~7 a}~I~dq~r~~`:~~~f ~ ~~7iNl~'r~~r~~~`.~
. .~ ,,, , , , . . , ..., ~~ . .. ..
fy..~S ~
* 9. That appruval of L•his application consL-itutes appr.oval of the prop~sa
requPSl: only ~o the Qxtent that i*_ comp;lies wii:h the A.nahPi,m Mun3.cipa
Zoni~g C~de and any o~her applict~ble City, State an.cl Federal
regulationg. Approval does not ,ine~.i~de atiy action or findir~gs ~s to
com~liance or appr.oval o~ ~he request regarfling any other applicable
ordinance, rQgulation or requiremont.
'
;~~
r i~,~(
,:'~r,i~~
;,~
`.:`
Cl ;~
1
Further, conditions m~rked with an aaterisk (*) are requir~d by
P.6~3b11S~1~C1 J.aw;s, codes, rogulations and/or agreements, and axe not
SLi~~]@Ct ~O riCC~Ot:l:il:lOri.
BE IT F'URTHElt RESOT~VED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby fi.nd and determine that adop~ion oF this Resolution is expressly
prediaated upan appli~ant's compliance with each ~nd ~17, o£ ~he conclirions
;> hereinabove set Eorth. Should any such conditions, or ~~ny gart thoreof, be
i; declared invalid or unenforr_eable by the f.inal judgment of any court of
campe~ent jixrisdiction, then ~his Resolution, and any approvals herein
containecl, shall be deemed nu11 and void.
THE F~JREGOING P.~SOLUTION..is signe¢ and approvod by me this 17.th day of
September, 1989. !` ~ ~ .
. ~_Y~ ,•~l; E,.•Z , %" / ~ 4 -~`!' 7 /~ ~
,~ ~.
---- CHAIRhL~N, ANAHEI CITX PLANNTNG COidMI5SI0*T
ATTEST: / ~
~/Cr ~ ~~ •
~ ~ C.!' ~ ,
{~ ;~~~1~ ~ , ~ E ~-U1."L~~,_
SECRETARY', ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CUh4rfIS5I0N
STAT~ OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OE ORANGE ) S,,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
,`:{
=~ ~
::~
`:r
,:'
_,
+,
''
r.
~i
i
~;
,,,
'-.~
;~
~' I, Edith L. H~rri~, Sc~cretary of ~he Anaheim City Planning Comm3ssi.an, `;
" do hQreby certify that the forego~ng resolution was passed and adopted at a `
a,: meeting o£ Y.he Anaheim City Qlanning Commi.ssion held on September 11, 1989, by ~~
the following vcte of tho m~mbers thereuf: ~
AYES: COMMISSIONERSt iiERBST, F~OYDSTUN, HELLXER, BOUAS, MC BURNEY, MESSF. ';~'~
NOES: COMhfISSIONEkS: NONE ~
ABS~:NT: COMMISSI013ERS: FFLDHAUS ";~~
IN WITNESS WFiEREOF, 't have hereuzito set my hand this llth day of -:?;
Septernber, 1989. ',s
~
~! ; ~~
.,.o ~ , ,
y~J ~1
~• ~ ~~ ~..~ ~`~~~~~Lw . ~ . ._y~
SECP.CTARY,, ANAHFIM CI~Y PLAN23IIJG COMMISSION ~~
, z~,
,.. ~
_
. ...- ;~?
'r~
, ~. j.
.,, ~.
,f
=;i
-~- PC89-?20 `.'~~
,''.f
=w~
L L
~' - _ - " ,, I. .. ~. , Ctr~. RI j'~~'
~