Resolution-PC 89-231`,11'~ ' . ' i. ~ ' ' . . . ' . . . ~ . . . . . . ,. .
~';~~1.'F~ '• ' ~~ . . .
f , '~ -.
~.,, ~ ~, ~~ ~ ~ .
RYF.~S,~OL TYAN NQ._pC8~3-231
A EtESOI,UTION OF THE ANAHETM CTTY PLANN7NG COMMISSTON
THAT PETITION FOR R~CLASSIFICATTON N0. t3a-89-5(3
Br^, GRANZED, UNCONDITIONA.Y,LY
~~I~~;AS, th~ Anaheim City Planning Commissaon 3id rece3.ve a
verified petitio n for Reclassirica~ion from MARYN MORTGAGE 'PRUST, 4004
Carlisle NE, Sui te U, A1buRuerque, NM 8710?, owner, an3 VECCOR DEVELOPMENT,
AT~N: Gaorge Kraj ack, 720 T~wn & Country Road, Orange, CA 92668, agent fos
certain rQa1 property situated in the City oF Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of Ca,lifornia; describec~ as follows:
LOT 1 OF ORIGINAL TOWr1 LOTS OF ANAFiEIt~;, IN THE CI'TY
OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ~RANGE, ST.AT~ QF CALIFORNIA, AS
PEP. b1AP R~CORDED IN BOOK 4, PAGES 629 ancl 630, DEEDS,
R~CORAS OFLOS ANGELFS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
WHEP.EA5, the City Planning Commission did h~ld a public k~earing
at tzxe CS.vic Center in the ~:ity of Anaheim on May 22, 1989 at 1:3U p.m.,
rio~i~e of ~azd public he~ring having been dii7.y given as rc~quired by law and in
accordanco with the provisions ot the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 18.03,
to hear anct consider evidence f.or anc~ ~gainst sai.d pronosed reclassifi,cation
ar,d to investigate and make finding;; and rQCOmmer~dations in connection
therQwith; and sa,id petition tia~s can*inued to the meetings of J~uns 19, July 5,
~7uly 17, August 14, Sept;ember 25 and Ocrober 9, 1989; and
6VEiERP;AS, Faid Commission, a~fter due inspaction, inv~stigation
and study made by itself and in its behal€, and aftQr clue cor,sideratian ot all
, evidence and repoz•t9 ofL-ered a~ said hearing, duas find and determine the
fo].lowing facts:
;
1. Tha:: the p~L•ition~r r~quests reclmssification o£ subject
property from the CG (Commercial, Ger.e•r;~l) 'Larie ~o the CL (Commercial 'Limited)
Zone.
Z. That the Anaheim G~nc~.ral Plan designates subject property
£oz General Comn:ercial ~and uses.
3. ThAt the propose8 reclassificaLion oE subj~ct property is
nece~sary snd/or desirable for the orderly and proper developmant of th~
communi'ty.
4. That the prcposed reclassiEic;a~ion of subjoct groperCy does
properly relate to the zones ~nd their pezmitted uses locally establistied in
close proximity tio snbject property and to tlie zo~:es and thei.r permittRd uses
genoralZy es~abZis hod throvghout the communi~:p.
• ~ ~~ . . . . . . . ..
, ~r;'~9{,
~. ~ha~ ona pQi•son :.~ict~~aci hi3 prQgAl]r,@ at the October 9,
19a9. pti~+lia hoaring in oppositions that 9 persons inciicat~d thuir preovnce sL•
the May 22 he~ring ~hat ona or tw~ pooplo appearad at the June 14, J~i.l.y 5,
July 17, Au~~ixst 14 and Septembor 25, ].9t39 haarings; anc~ that no corre~pondence
was received ~n opposiCion to subject peL•ition.
~'~~~ Y~ ~.~Y3L~4~N-T~r-Q~x~-~-_I~~-~.~L?3..~: That t2:e Anahaim
City ?lar.iiing Commiss.on hac~ roviewed tha propasa~ ~o roclassiPy subject
prope.rty fc•~m i:he CG (Commarcial, General) Zono to the CL (Commercial,
Limited) Zone on a rQCtt~n~ularly-~shaped parcQl of lar~d consistinq oE
~pproxirnatoly 0.49 acr~ lr,caL•ed at thc southwest corner of Sycamore Street
and Anaheim Daulevard, hr.vin~ approx.irnat.o Erontagos af 118 feet on the south
side of Sycamore Stre~et and 101 feet on L•he west side a~ Ax-ahoim FiAUlevard
and furCher described as 4?.3 North Anlheim Eioulovard; and daes horeby approvo
tho Nogativo Declar~tiun upon findiiig that. it has cqusidered the Negative
Declt~ration toget•'nor with any cortunont:~ recQivsd dur.ing the public reviQw
proco;s~ and furthor findinq on the basis af tho initi~l study and any
comments r.r~cc~ived Chat thero .is no subs~antial evfdenco that the project will
havQ a signifir,~nl. Q~fect on th~ anv.iroii~nent.
NOW, THERBF~RF„ BE IT RESULVE~ that the Anaheim CiCp Planning
Commission does he•rvby grant sunject Potition for Roclassificatian a~d, by so
doing, that Title 18-Zuning ot tho Anaheim Kunicipal Co<te be smendPd tu
oxclude thu abovo-desr,rib~d properL•,y from the CG !Commer~ial, Gensral) Zone
ar~cl to incorparate said doscribed prop~zty inko the CL (Cummo~c~a1, Limited)
Z~::c~, uncoii:litlonally.
THF FUREGOING Lc~SOLU'TIUN is signo~ and apprcvad by me this 9th day
of OcL-ober, 1989.
,,- _...___ ~
- ~_.~.,LCt::`_~_~) ~ ~iC ~
CF~AIRMAN, 1~2~AFi31~i C7TY PLANNIIrG COt~SISSION
ATTEST:
/~
---J ~!~%~ _-- ~/~. i( .-l.t./ `
SF:CI2ETARY, NAHEIM ~;ITY PL~IWNING COMMISSION
STA~'E UF C11LIrORN[A )
COJi~TX OF OIt~NG~ ) ss,
CITY OF At~i1~F~~IM }
I, Edith G. Harris, Secretary of ~he Anaheim City Planning
Comrr~ission, rlo horeby c~rtify that r.he Eorec~oinq resolution wns passed aad
adopted a'.: a meeting of tt~e Anahofm City P2ar-ning Ccmmi ssion held on Ocl•ober
9, 19Q9, by t•he folloNing vote of tl~e members theroof:
AXES: CO!~4dISSI0NEI2S: HERRST, DOXb5:CU?t, HELLXER, FE[.DEiAL•S, HOtJAS,
MC F3URNF.Y
NAES; COMMISSIONERS: Ir'OiIE
ABSE:tT: COh4dIS5 TONERS : MB~SE
O~tobor, LN WITNESS WHE
1999. [t~OC, I h~ve hereu to ~ et my hand fchfs Sth doy of
_._._""._, "/ ---~ ~ _~-.~
SECR~TARY, 11HEIM CITY _
FLANNIti(; COMMI55:ON
"2" PC89-231
'~'~, ~ , . . . _