Resolution-PC 89-234~
~,~Sa''il8o~
.a
RES~LiJTTON NO ~S.Q4_~~4
~ ~ "a ~~±;;°v
.
~F1
~~ts~n~
7 ,,t
, S
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY pLAN1~ING CUMI~SISSIQN
TEiAT PF.TITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-1~
BE GRANTED, AS MODIFIED, Ut7CONAxTIONALLY
WHEREA5, the Anaheim City Planninq Cammiuszun dir~ recei.v~ a
verifxed petirion for Rcclassific;ation from TiARE KISHTYAMII ADTD J'IM ICISFlI1'AMA,
028 Soixth Western Avenue, Anr~heim, CA, owne.rs, and MAGDY FTANNA, ~A00 MacArthur
Boulsvard, Suit~e 900, Newport BEach, CA 926G0, agent Eor certain raa].
property situated in the Cxty of Anaheim, Count,y oE Orr~nge, 5t~te of
California, described as follows:
THAT PORTTOI~I dF TH~ SOUTH HAI~F OF THR NORTH HALF Ur'
THE SOUiHWEST QUARTER OF xHE SOUTFiEAST Q*JARTBR ~F
SEC~ION 14, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUIFI, RANGE 11 WF.,ST, IN TFi~
RANCFI~ COYOTES, C:I7'Y OF ANA,HETM, COUN'PY OF ORANGF,
ST~TE OF CALYFORN~A,, AS SAIA SECTION IS SHOWN OAT A
MAP RECORDED TN BOOK 51, PAGE 11 OF MIuCELI,ANEOUS
MAPS, IN TH~ OFFICE QF THE COUIvTY RECORDER OF SAID
GOLTNTY, DBSCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
TfiE N~.RTFI ].6?..00 FEET OF THE WEST 340.00 FEET;
EXCEPTING 'rHE.REFROM ALL THAT POF:TION OE SAID LANU
17ESC.RIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE CENTF.Ft OF WrSTF:RN AVENUE
BEING ].43.28 F'CET. SOUTH 0 DEG. ].6' 25" EAST pF THE
NOR7'HWEST CORNEI2 OF SAID SO[1TIi TiALF'; TAGNCE NORTH 89
DEG. 3'7' 14" EAST 45.U0 FEET TO THE BEGINN.ING OF A
TANGENT CURV'E CONCAV~ SOUTHERLY, HAV:CNG A R1~DTUS pF
222.00 FEET; TF3~liCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROLTGH
A CE2TTFAL .ANGLE UF 1% DEG. 35' 5~" AND A DISTANCE OF
68.19 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE; ~HENCE
EASTaRLY ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY HAVING A
RhllIT1S OF 178.p0 F~ET T.HROUGH A C~NTKi+L ANGLE OF 17
D~G. ~5' ~4", A DIS'TANCE UF' 5~.67 FE~'P TO 'tHE END OF
CURVE; TIiCNCE SOUTH $9 D~G. 37' 14" W~S~' 165.91 FFR1'
TO TFIE C~NTER 0~' WESxEI2N AVENU~; THr.NCE NOR:I'H 0 A~G.
16' 25" WESx Y8.7?. FEET TU THE POINT OF BEGINNIt1G.
.,~ WHERGAS, tY,e City Planr_ing Commission dzd ho.id a puhlac hearinc,•
at tlie Civic Center ixi the City of Anaheim on October 9, 13A9 at 1:30 Z~,m.,
no+.ice of said public hc~aring having be~n duly given as :~~uired by 1aw and in
r` accordance with ~he provisions of the Anahoim M±%niciy:~1 Coae ChapCer 18.03, ~o
hear and considor evidence for. and agt~i,nsl: gaid proposeu ~~rlas~ific3tiCa t~nd
~o '.nvestigate and make findina,s and recommendaticns iz~ cot~~:. ~~r_ian therewith;
ar~d
1062r
-1-
~ ~ ~~ •
ri n x ). . ~
~
PC89-~3t~
i-'i;
i",
~
;; ;.
r- ~.
n;:r~»hi
,~~a+,r~~
,~~+y
WFi~REAS, said Commiss5~n, af~er due inspecLion, inves~agatien
and study made by itselt and in its !~ehali, iiT1C~ aEter du~ consideration o~ all
evi~~encQ and reporY.s off.ered at s3id. nE.~iring, does find and determine tha
f~llowirig f'acts:
1. That the petitioner pr.opc~ses recl•sssiEication of sub;jec~
property from the RS-A-~3,Q00 (Residenti.zl/Agricultural) Zone to the RM-300~
(ResidenL-ia1, Multiple-Family) Zon~.
~ ,~
~
°,.}
w
2. `ThaL Che Planning CommiGSion detc~rmined tl:e prop~rty shou].d
more apgropriately be reclassified *c~ RS-7200 (R~sidentia?., Single-Family)
Zone due to ttie high qual.ity exi.sting sangle•-fami.ly residences in the
surruuridi.nq neighborhood.
3. Tliat the Anaheim C'enoral Plan designatES subjec~ proparty
for lnw-dex~sit,y Residential land uses and that ~c~npral P.an Amendment No. 266
to redesignate the ~an~3 use to 1ow-m~~iium density residantial was submitted i.n !
conjunction with suhject F.eclassifical•ioxi, and wxc denied by the Planning I
Gomm.iss i.on.
4. That the approved rer.lassificatzon o€ subject ~rop~rty to
the R~-7200 2one i~ necessary and/pr desirable for the ordorly and proper
d~vel~pment o£ the community.
5. :Chat the reclassification uf subject proper.ty ~ss apprnved;
does propezly relate to the zones and the:i.r pormitted usos locally~ establis~Zed
in close prar.imit.y ~a subject pr.operty and to thQ aones nnd their permitted
uses generally es+,;ablished throughouk the community.
6. That approximate.ly eight•y-Eive (85) to ninety (90) persons
indica~ed their presence at said public hearin~ in opposition; and Lk~at nn
correspondence was received in o~~prsition t~ subject petition.
, ALIF RNIA EtI'VIRQ~IM~N'CAL tALI~Y ACT ~IrTDIN : That the Anaheim
City Flanning Commission has reviewed the ~iroposal to reclassify subject
pro~~r.rty f.rom the RS -A-43,000 (Residential, ~ingle-Family) Zone Lo the
1tM-3000 (ltesidential, Mu.ltiple--Famxly) ZonQ tr construr.t a 2-stary, IQ--unit,
sem.i-attacYied condominium complex witli waiver oF inaximum structural. height
and m~sximum fence height c~n an irrQgularly-shaped ~arce] of land cpnsisting
nf approx.imaL•aly 1.04 ~acres located at the northeast corner oE Teranimar
Drive an8 Westecn Avenue, having Erontages of approximately 152 feet nn the ~`~
east side of Wsstern Avenue an~i 265 te~t on the nor.t.h sida oE Teranimar
Drive, and further described as A28 South We~tern Avenue; and do~s hereby '7
approve thc~ NQgaL•ive Declaration upon fznding that i~C has constdered tbe ~~
Negative Decl~srati~u togethor with any comment.s receivad during ~he F~ubl3c
review process and £url•.her findin.g o~ the basis of the anitial study and any
commonts xecea.ved tY.at there is no substantial ev5.dence that the proj~ct will
have a~ignificant effect on the environment. y
2~OW, THEREFpRE, BE IT R~50LVF.D that the Anahei.m Cit~ Planning
Commission does hereby gxaat subjoct Pe*ition for Reclassification, as
mocLiL•ied, ancl, by so doing, tlia~ Title ~8-Zoning of the Anaheim Mu~icipal
Code be amended to exclude the above-describocl propQZ•ty frorn the RS-A-~l3,000 ;;{
Zone anci to incorpo•rate said c~escribed property into the RS-7200 Zon~, ~
unconu~t~~nall;y.
'
~
-'L-
PCB~~-234 ~
;,;;f
!ri;
~
a ~
r'~••~.
~. r-+,~;., .rrr_ i i.,!~~t.`~ i~.,~:: ~ r 1 :M~n ~e~lp~iilti~SDllR~,BS~
~.~('
ii
,~+iqbn, . . ;i
. , '...:.,'~.
1;
THE FO~~GOING RE50LUTT~pN is signed and approvec~ by me this 9th day ''
of Octnber, 1989. -'~
! ~~,• , ` ~/ • `,
; _ ~~"_..~.~~...,!r~t' J ~, c~ ;
j GHl~IRMAN, AI'v'A.FiEI CI~Y PI,ANNING G02~lISSION `~'
~ ....
~ AT1'~ST t ~ , ;
;i ~ ~
'C_____~•c~.JV'~-'L _ . __ ,';
SECRE'PAR , ANAHEIM C7 ~" 'T~ANNING COMI~fISSION
ST.ATE OF CALIFOR~TSA ) ';;
",
COUNTY OF ORANG~ ) ss.
;~ CITX O£ A.NAHEIM )
,i~
I, Edith L. Harris, Seci~etary of- the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby c~rtify, that t:ie forog~~.ng r•~solution was passed and
adopted at a rneeting of ~he Anahe.im City P1ann~.ng Cammission held on t~ctober
,, j
' 9, 1989, by ~he foliowing vote of the members :.har~~f:
w ~
{ AYES: C01~Ly1ISSI0IJ~RS: HER3S'f, 90XAS'i'JN, HELLY'BR, r~LDHALfS, L'OUAS,
~~ MC BURNEY ~
'~ NOES: (~OMMTSSIONERSs NONE
4 AASENT: CO',~tA 'SSION~RS: MESSE
-;4
`' TN WITNESS WfiEREOF, I have hereunto set mg hand t.hi~ 9th day ot '
~ Octaber, 1989. ~
;,;
P- '
~ ~ ~ ~ .
~, .-. ~ 1,.-----~~~1==-''~a.L
,~ S~C2ETAR , ANAIi'EIM CITY PGI~NNZNG COMr'ISSION
~
~';t
: ,t
,
.;~
:+';
;;~
~, , ,
`~~
ry3~
, ;i
._ . .. ,.`„,~~3~