Resolution-PC 89-272. ~ ~ , . ' . . . . . . . . . . ~ ' . , ., ~ ~ . . ~ ..
.,. r 1 :'r,' +` x£x~.~+ f'{
a
R
L
k
~
' ~
~
'~
1 ~
'
i ~r
,R
j i r;
1
~'
~'~!~ ;
;
`Y.
U," ,
,
~oLUTlorr Na, pCBr_.2Z? ;'
i\ RESOLU'PTON OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CUMM.TSSION
1
; r~1~0.PTZNG ~NB 12EC~~I~IMGNDIi~G TO TFiE CITY COUNCJL ALOP.T.IOil UF '~1
~
GENEStAL PI,AN AMENDMEtJT 230. 268-1
WHERG~~;, the C.it~~ C,~uncil of the City of Anaheim did ~dopt the
, Anaheim General Plan bx Re:~olut.ion No. 69R-644, showing the general
,,
+..: desari.ption and exCent of possib;ie £uture develupmen.t wil.hin the cii:y; and
WFiFREAS, p~irsuant t_o a P:ianning Commission reruest for ar~ amendment
to the Land Use Element of the G~•i.eral Plan, ~u conform~nce with Sections
18.03.050.05 and 18.~3.05p.03U of tk:a Anaheim Mun~cipal Code~ staff prepared a i'
Gen~r.a7. P1an Amendme~lt to redesigilate ~rom the exis~ing Medium Densit~
Residential designa~:ioit to r~ Low-Me6ium Dens.ity Residontial designation Lor
Lhe si:ucly 3rea coiisisting oF appro~cimately 5.6 acres generally bouxided by
Santa A.n~ 5treeL to the nortli, Janss Street to the eas~, Water Street to ~he
south, ~nd the alley wes~, of Resh Street to tPie west, Study Area 1(s:~own as
Area A on Attachment A); ~~nd -
WJ3EREA; . the Plar;.ning Deparrrnent; daeme~l it ~ppropriate, pursuant to
.
~ thP provisions ~i thP Ca1i.Eornia Erivironmi~ntal Qu4J.ity Act, that there are
~,'
- no
significant environmpnt:al :lmp~cts nnd. rQC~~rnmended that a Ne
qative Lec'laratnon
~,
, ~~~ ,
be approved; arid
~:
'
WHSREAS, the Anahaim City P1anr_ing ;,qmmisszon did hold r~ pub)
ic
~ .
hearing at the Anaheim Civic Cen~or, Cauncil ~hamber, 200 S~uth Anahe:im
~
: NoulPVar~i, on Nove:nber 6, 1939, at 6:OQ p.m., xiotice of said publir_ hearing
Y,.aving beecx uuly given a~ required by 1aw an.~ in accordance wit~ ~he
provisions nf th$ Anaheim Municipal Code, t~ hear and c~nsider evidence
for
.
and ~gairst said General Plan Amendment; ancl to investigate and make findings
and r.eeomm~ndations in connection t2aerewith; and
;,`
'~ WFIEREAS, said Cnrmiission, after due conszderation, inspectican
,
3.nvesta.gation and ,tudy madc~ by itself, and aFtQr dus cansideration of all
evidence and reports ofEered at heaxinq, DOES H~RE~BY FIND:
1, That d~ue to Cit;y Cnunc3l and Planni.ng Commxssion concerns
reg~ardin5 multiple-f~uni]y resicieriCi.al development in Anahoim, a phased ~~ork
p1ar,~, was developed wh:.~h included~ in gart, ~.n analysis of areas daaignated as
Medium Dens:t,y Resic~ential on the Gen~aral Plan, as well as th4se areas z~ned
RM-1:?00 wost of State College Soulevard tn the western City limits to
detez•mine land u~~~ inconsistencies.
~, 2. That staff conductod a detailed ~nalysis of the General Plan
desig^ations, zon3Mg and land u~e and 3.denl:iLied 308 acres on which
inconsastencies ~xi:;t i~etween land uses and thP General Pl~tn designation
snd/c~r ::on~ng,
3. That ovidence presented substant~.ate3 the need far an amenclm~nt
to the AnaYieim Goner~l Plan and thzt Exhibit A be adapY.ed redesxgnati
ng
`` subject area far Low-Medium Density R~s.idential lanc~ .
uses.
;
;,:
~~~
1135r
-1- ;~:
PC 89-272 ?~7
'n `
;. `
~'
~ i
~
~~~~
~
'.
?'~. ~ ~
'.f~1
'~:'~~'' ,+ ~`
., ~~ i ~,:;;.
-- - ,
' ~ . .. , I~
. ..,. . u,,; t.~l ,.,~. _;.i•„. ~.1.+..:;r,5.~a1~
' ~ Y 4 ~', .~l • ~ , ~. ) - a `l'~~ ~d ll i ~ r~~jx'~ ~~H 1~~ L v .R ~ li i~'~W!k l-y:,- ~ r ~ ~~ t s
,, . ~ , , ? ti`~ rrr~ a.,~ ~~ 7~ , ,
rt ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ r ~ -~ ` ~' k -,. ~ i ~ t , r~. r ~~~~ „~ ~ ~~j-~~1,~^y??~
H+W . ~ . . ~ . - . . - !>:
, ~
~~P~1 hA'tyjf'~
^~4?.~2$N~~-~~~3.4~3M~Sl~~~.~~4.~~~~~~~.~G~3. That r}ie Anah~3m C3~y
4 P7.t~nnin ammission has reviewed tho p:oposal '~o amenQ the Land Use tilemen~ oE
the Gr ral ~lan to change ~ht~ curi•rnt dosignatfon of t4edium Danaity
Residential designation to Low-Medtum Density Res:idential 1anc~ u~aes nn
approximt~tely 5.6 acres goneral.ly bc~unded by Santa Ana Stre~k to tho nortk~,
' Janss Street to thR o~st, W~-ter. Stro~t to the south, and the alley west of
~ Reshk Stroet to the west; and does therefore ap~rove the rteqatfve ver.laration
on tha bas~s tihat it hus consideced ~he proposed Nega~ive noclarar,ian tayethRr
with •r,ny comments received during tho public review process snd further
finding on the basi~ of t.he Initial Study and any c~mments receive8 that ~here
is no st-bsta.ntial ev3dence that the project will have a signi£icant eEfoct on
th~3 environment.
NOW, THERC~ORE, QE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to the above findings,
tho Anahoim City P2annirig Commiss.ion does hereby adopt and recummend ta Ghe
City Coiincil of the City of Anaheim adopti~n of Goneral }.~lan Amendment Nn.
a 26a-1 - Lsnd Uae Element - Ex.hibit A to redesignat3.ng subjoct aras for
~, Low-Modium Density Residential land uses.
`~
~f THE kOR~;GOING RE:SOLUTION is sl~ned t~nci rsFproved by me '~his 6th day
' of November, 1989. -~7
~ ' / /~// r ~w
' _~~ ,~~~-~_:~-~Cl~~~'-'~c.t.~L%--
HAIRWO , PRQ TEMPORC ~
ANAFIEIM CIsY PLANNING COMMIS$ION
ATTESTs /~
P~ / /
~ .__-_._. ____~~~:.~~~~:.~,,~~u-1%~__.._._
,~ SECRETAHY, ANA2iEIM CITY PLA2INING ~ONIIyfISSION
5TATB UP CALIPORIJIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHFIM )
T, Eclith L. Harris, Socretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commissior,, c~o horeby certify that the foceqoing reso7ution rras passed and
adopteii at a moeting of the Anahoim City E>lanning Commission held cn Kovember
6, 1SA9, by the following voto of tho memberrt thereof:
AYE;S: COMMISSIONBRS: BOi1AS, BOYUSTI)N, FBLDHAiJS, HELLYER
MC S(3RNEY, MESSE
NOBS: COh4~1ISSI0NEFtS: NONE
ABSENT: C~I~(ISSZONERS: HERSST
IN WITtJESS WIiEREOF~ I have hereunto ~tet my hond this 6th day of
lJov~:~uQr, 1989.
._+.._ K!,~~I~ ~ ~.~~~..-Ldr~.. ~
SECKETARY, ANAFiEIM CITY PLANNING COMMI.~iSION
-7- PC 89-272
~..~..vtl::>~}v~'~
. ~. ~..'„{t
~
''1
;~
n
. . r:~e