Resolution-PC 89-273~r~".St.~p~:Mae ~~r.~"•~: ..e.,,~.~, ,..,..., ..y....,,.
., .~....,, s
, . . ~.. -..~ . ~_J ~,.'+i~:" ~'~r.':~~: ,.~,.~n~. ~ y~a.~~.: , y
... ..,:.~.;i ~ ,..,~. ~ ,.,:~~,. ....~-~i~~ ,.-~,,~.~~ ~1r i r,~ t~~~
fly ~ ' .. . . _ . .. . . . ~ . -. . :~,~
H
rl ~ ~ ~pJ~yk.
~ f,`A.Sia{~
RESOLUTION NQ. PC89-273
A RL'SOLUTION 0~' xHE ANAHEIM CI'rY PLANNING CQ2~IIrtISSION
I.DOPTING ANb RECOMMEN'DIN'G TO THk~ CITY COUNC'[L ADOPIIUI3 OE
GENLRA~ ALAN AMENDM~:NZ' N~. 2(yg..2
WHERGAS, r,hd Ci~y Cauncil of the C3ty t,f Ana~~.im diU adopt ~he
Anah~rim G~ric~ral Plnn by R~solt-t.inn No. 69R-644, ~howing the getioral
descsiption and ~xtent of possiblQ futur~ developmRnt within the citys and
WHEREA,S, purstianC tn a Plonning Comm.issio•.- request for ~n amen~lmex~t
to the Land Use Element o~' the Gener.al Plan, in conf~rmance witY.- Sections
18.03.050.05 anii 10.03.050.030 of the Anaheim Munic:ipgl Code, st~fE prApared a
GQnQra1 Plan Amendment to redes9.gnata irom the existing Medium Aensity
Residenkia.l designation to Low Uensir,y Residential dosign~tion for ~he study
area consist3~ng of. bpproximately 1.9 acres generally buunded by Santa Ana
Street to the nnrt;h, the alloy west oL• Resli Street to th~ eazt, Water Stroet
to the south and Citror~ 5treet to the west, Study A.rea 7. (Shown as Araa B oi~
Attachmeut A); and
WHEREAS, the Plannin~ D~partment deemed it appropria~o, pureuant
to tiie provisions of the California Enviroiimc~ntal Quality A~t, that there are
no Significant environmen~al impac!:s anci roc~mmended thaC a 27egative
Declar.ation bf approved; and
WHFRBAS, thQ Anaheim City Planning Commiosiou did hold a~ublic
hearfx~g aC the Anahoim Civic ~enter, Councfl Chamber, 200 South Anahc~im
Boulevard, on November 6, 1989, at 6:00 p,m., notice of said public hearang
havfn!~ been d;~ly given as required by law and in accordan~co with the
pro~isions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to hoar anci consider evideuce for
and against said General Plan ?.mendment ancl to investiq3ts and makR findings
and rRCOmmendations in connecrion therewith; and
wHEK^cA:;, gaid Cammission, aEr.QL due con~idec•tiL•ion, inspection,
inve~tiqation ar.d stucly mada by itself, and after due cunsideration of all
ev.ic7Qnce and reports r~Efored at hearing, DQES HF:REAY FIND;
l. That due to City Council and ~lanning Cemmisaion concorns
regarding m~,~].tiple-family residential d~velopment: in Anahoirn, a phaseft work
plan was dgve~loped which included, in part, an ar.alysis of areua clesigneted as
Medium Density Residenti~l on tha Gen~r~l Plan, as well as thosA aret+s zoned
KM-12U~ west of State Colleqe Eloulevard to thR westorn Cir.y limita to
detArmine land use inconsisr.encios.
2. That stafP conducted a detailed analys.is of the GenRral Plan
designations, zoning cn8 land use and identified 300 a~:c~a on wh.tc;h
inconsist.encies exist Letween land iisot~ and L•he Genera]. Plan ciesignation
and/or zoning.
~(r~
3. Thnt evidon~~e praseute~3 ~ubstantiaCes ~he nr~ed ~or nn amen8ment
tc ~h~ Ant~heim Genernl Fl~n and that; Exh3bit A ba adopted rerdeaigneCing
subject ar~a for Low-Med.ium Density Residential la~d uses.
1136r _1_
Pr 89-273
y~F
~S
vF
1':
,a
,~
~..
~:,
~.',
. ,`.<i
a , ~
~;~~~
~Q `~
~ ~
~ i;
~~~~~~"'~~~~~T~~--~~1~L~--1'.~~~-.-~3;~A~~$~ That th~ Anaheirr~ City
Planniny Cammiasion has roviewod the proposul to amenci the Land CTsa Elemont of
the Genergl Plan to chanc~e the current c9esignation of Mad9.um Den3,it,y
Resicic~nt3al ciASign~tion to Low-Medium Density ~tesi8en~:i~l land uses ~n
approx3mately 1.9 acres gonarally boixnded by S~nr,a Ana Street ta tht~ north,
the t~lley wes~ of Roeh Stroe~ to hhe east, W2-tor Street ta t.he saath and
Citron St:roet to the wes`t ~nd does ther~fore ~p~rove thQ N~gative Docla~ration
on the basi~ L•hat it h~~ considered t~e prapa~ed Negative Declaration togorher
with any comments received during tha public raview process and furthAr
finaing on the bas3s oE the In~Cfal StuclX anc~ any comments received thal: L•h~rc~
ia no sut~stsntial ov3.dence that the pro ject will have a significant affact orr,
the environmon~.
NOW, THLREr^ORE, BB IT REfiOLVED, that ~.ursuant ta the abovg ~indinys,
tho Anaheim CiCy Planning Commiss.ion does herab~ ~xdopt and recamimend to the
City Councfl of tk~e City of Ariaheim adoptfon of General P1an A~nendment No.
z68-z - Land Uae Elemeiit - Exhibit A rade5ignating subject area fox Low-Medium
pensity Hesid~ntial lancl uses.
THE FURF.GOIN~ RESOL,UTION i9 sagned and approvad by me thfs 6th day
of Novernber, 1gFig.
~~ k-/ ~:~P'1 /// - ,(.ti ~ , _i'
~,f~ f-~-- ~(
LHAIRW~ 1 PE2 TEMP012E
ANAHEIM CIT1' k'LAN~IING COMMISSIpN
ATTCSTs ~ ' .
f ___-,r-~~!~.~w~G
SECRETARY, AN1~FiEIM CI1'Y PLANNI27G COhQ~7ISSI0N
STATE QF' CALIFORNIA )
COL'NTY OF ORANGE ) s~~
CIT1~ OF ANAFiEYM )
I, Edith L. HarYis, Searetary of tho Ana9~-im City Planninq
C~mmission, d~ herc~by certify that tlie foregoing resolution was passed and
adoptecl at a meeting of the Anah~3m C.ity Planning Commission hel~ on Novamber
6, 19a9, by the :~oll~w:ng voto of the membor3 thoreof:
~Y~S~ COI~MlISSIONE;RS: BO-JAS, DCYDSTUN, FELUfiAUS, FIGLLYECc
MC BURNEY, MGSSE
NOES: COD~iISSIONERS: NON~
ABSENT: COhQYSISSYONFRS: HERBST
IN WITNESS WFIEREOF, I have hereunto s~t my hand this 6th day of
November, 19a9.
~ ~C~`-~-C-yf... o~ ,~ ,~,,LiLs...
SE~'RETAItY, ANAHEI~6 CITY PLAN ING COh4tISSYON
-2- pC 09-273
~
i:`r