Resolution-PC 89-275R.~iL~"~ ~,+~'u?~
;
R~ ' L JTIAN N~_ Y$9-278
A RESOL,UTION ~F Th~, :+NAHEIM CITY YLANNING COMtrlISSION
THAT P~xITION FOR RECLA5SSFICATIQN NA. 89-90-24 B~ GRANTED '~'
,
WHRR~AS, thn Anahei.m City P'ldnning ~ommission did Leceive a
verified peti~3un for Reclassification irom the CLARENCE W. MAUERH7~1 TRUST, ''',~y
A'.CTN: 'r1ILLIAM MAUE~2HA:I, 210 NARCISSUS, CORONA DEL' MAR, CA 92625, owner, snd
J. WARD DAWSON, ATA, 2~532 L~AP'WOOD DRIVE, MfJRRIETA, CA 92362, agent ~or
nertain real prope~ty situated in the City of Anaheim, Cc~unty af Orange, StaL•e
of Calif~rnia, describea c~s follows: `'`.:
THAT PORTION OF LOT5 ~. AND 2 OF ~'ALNUT CQLONY TRACT,
AS SHOWN ON A MA~' FILED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 14 OF RECORD
~F SURVEYS, ZN THE OFFICE OF THF. COUNTX RECORArR OF
ORANGE COUNTX, CALIFORNTA, DE;SCRIB~D AS FULLOWS:
BEGINNtNG AT A POINT ON TIiE CENTER LINE OF THAT
CERTAIN ROAD ADJOIIJTNU SAIA LOT 1 ON THE NORTH, NOW
Y.NOWN t.S KATELLA AVEPti1E, L~YSTANT SOUTH 8~3 DEG.. 51'
20" EAST 200.OQ Fr;ET ~ROM THE IiY''.TER.°iECTIJN OF SAXD
CENTER LIN~, WTTH TI?F NORTkIERLY PnOLC.ItiATION OF THE
W~STERLY LIN,t'., QF SAID LOT 1; iHFiICE CONTINUING SOliTH
89 DEG. 51' 20" EAT ALONG SAID CFNTER LINE, ?1
DISTAIv'CE OF 190.00 FEET; TI~ENCE 50UTH 0 DEti. 01' S9"
EAaT PARALI~EL WITH T.HE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS I
AND 2, A DISTANCE OF 365.00 FEET; TH~;NCE NOYtTA 89
DEG. 51' 20" WE51' 39U.00 FEET QARALLEL F1:[TH THE
CENTER LINE OI' SAID KATELI.A AVENUE T4 THE WESi~RT~Y
L7NE OF SAID LOT 2; TF:ENCE NORTH 0 DEG. O1' 59" WEST
85.00 FEFT A.LONG TSE W'ESTERLX LT23E OF ~AID LQTS ]. ANB
2, Z'0 THG SOUTHWE:ST CORNER OF LANU DESCRIEED IN A
DEED TO JOFIN CRADDOCK AND WIFF., RE~CORDED MAX 15, 1942
IN BOOK 1135 PAGE 374 OX' OFFiCIAL RECORDS: THENCE
SO'UTii 89 I1EG. 51' 20" EAST 200.Q0 FE6T PARALLEL WITTi
THE ~ENTER I,IN~ OF SAtD KA'PELLA AV~NUE, T.Q THE
SOUTHEA5T CORNER C1F LAND DESC~tIBED I27 A DEED TO JOHN
~. CRADDOCK AND WIFE, R~CORDBD FERRU'ARY 25, 1944 IN
BOOK 1238, PAGE 216 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN TH~
OFFICE Or THE CQUNTY RECORDER OF SATD ORANGE COZJNTY;
TFiENCE NORTH 0 DEG. O1' 59" WFST 280.00 FEET TQ THE
PQINT OF $EGINNTt7G,
E~-CENTING TI~EREPRQM THAT POkTION DESCP.IBED AS FOLLOWS:
1142r
-7.--
PC89-275
,I,~
~: i
'~~ ~
;.,
i:
'u
'T ;
~;; w
~ f«~~
_ ~
BEGINNING AT A POT~iT ON THF CFFTER LINE OF TI3AT
CEE2TA:CN ROAD ADJOII3ING SAID LOT 1 ON TFIE NORxH, NOW
KNOV'JN AS KATELLA AVENi1~, DISTANT SOUTH 84 DEG. 51'
20" EAST 295.00 FEET FRUM THE INTFRSECTTON OF SAID
CENTER LINE WITIi TF~E NORT.HEItLY PROLONGAT201~7 OF THE
WESTERLY LIN~ OF SAID LUT 1' THENCE CONTINUINu SOCITH
$9 DEG. 51' 20" EAST 95.00 FF~Ty THENCE SOUTH 0 DEG.
01' S9" EAST 280. U0 FEET; 1'H~,NCE NORTH 89 DEG. 51.'
20" EAST 95.00 FEET; THENC.E NORTH 0 DEG. O1' 59" WEST
280.00 ~'EET TO TAE POINT OF AEGTNNING.
AND
LOTS 15, lfi, 17 AND 18 OF TRACT N0. 3290, AS SHOWN ON
A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK lQl, PAG~S 43 AND 44 OF
MTSCGY,LANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFOkNIA.
6v'~iEREAS, tlie City Planning Commissic~n 3id hold a ~ublic
hearings at the f;ivie Ce:~~er in the Ciky oi AnahQim on November 6, 1989, at
1:30 p.m., notice af said public hearing having veen duly given as required by
law and in accordaxice wiL•h tho pro~3.sions of the Anaheim Municipal f:ode,
Chapi:~er 18.03, ta hear arid r.onsider evidence tor and again~t said pr~posed
reclassif.ication and Lo investigatQ and make findings and rscammendations in
connection ther~swith; and said petition was contir.ued to the Planning
Commiasion meet3,r~g of November 20, 1389~ and
WHEREAS, said Convnission, af~er due inspection, investiga~ion
and study made by itse~f and in its bHtialf, az~d s~£~er due consideraLion of. ~11
evidence and reports afEered ati said hearing, c~oes find and de~ermine the
;
~ f~llowing P~cts:
~;
1. That the p~-titioner Qroposes reclassa.fication oi sub;QCt
praperty from the RM-J.20U (Residen~ial, Multiple-Familyj Zon~ L•o the CR
(Commercial Recreat-ioii) Zone.
~i 2. That the Anaheim Genoral Plan designates subject property
£~:. Commercial Recreational Land Uses.
k:
` 3. 'That the proposed zeclassific$tic~u o£ subject property is
;`-': necessary and/~r desirable for the orderly and proper development af Lhe
community.
4. xhnt the proposed reclassification of subjdct properLy does
properly relate to the zones ar.ii L•heir permitted uses locally e~tablished in
close proximity to subject propQrty and to th~ zones and their perm.itted usey
generally establislied throughout ~he community.
5. That uo ane indica~:ed their prasQnce at said public hear.ing
in oppositian; and that no correspondence was raceivod in opposition to
subject petition.
-2- PC 89-275
A
,'~~.;
,
' ~ ~i
~:i:
, ,;;ili
~ r.';!r {ti t~i~
/~;~~ ~
4' ~'~ r'r~u`, ~rl,i
CALIr~G4NIA EtTVI'RONME.NTAL QUALITY ACT FTNDTN'G: That the Ar~aheifi
Ci~y Plarzning Co.nmission has reviewed the proposa]. to reclassif.y the
southerly portion of Subjec~ pxopQrty (Lo~ Nos. la, 16, 17 and 18 of. Tract
~Jo. 3290) from tlie RM-'12p0 (Residantial, Multiple-ramily) Zane to the CR
(Cornmc~rciaZ~ Recreation} Zone and to permit a 169-unit, 4-story, 50-Foot
high, subject proper.ty consistizig of 94,18Q square feet, "all suite" hotel ,y
witn waiver of minimum number of parking spaces an irregularYy-shnped parcel
consistinq of approxima~ely 1.97 acres, having a£rontage of appr.oxzmately 95
teet on the south side of Katella Avenue, having a maximum depth of :
approximately 340 feQt, being laca~ed appr~ximatel.y 1,015 feet west of the .~r
centerline of G1est Stre~:t and fixr.ther described as 1176 West Katella Avenue
(Space Age Lodge); and does hereby approve the Negative Der.laration upon
Finding that it has considered the Negativ~ Declarati~n ~ogethar with any
comments received during the public r~view ~rocess zlnd further finding on the
basis of the initial study and r~ny cemments received that there is no
substantial evidence that the projact will have a sigi:ificant eEfect on the
environment.
NUW, TFIEREFOR~, BE IT RESOLVED that tha Anaheim City Planning
Commission aoes hereby grant subject Petition ~'~r RecXass?ficaL•iun and, by so
doing~, ttiat x'itle 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Ca~ie be amended to
exclude the a~nvQ-descxibecl property from the RM-120U (Residenti.al,
t~ultiple-ramily) Zone and to incorporate said. describPd r~copert~~ ,into the CR
lCommercial, Recreation) 2ono upon the following conditions which are~ hereLy
Found to be a nec~ssary rr~requisite Lo the proposecl use of ~iibject uroperty
in order t~ preservr the saE9ty and general welfare n~' the Citi2Qns af the
City df Anaheim;
1. Thah_ a parcel map to combine the five (5) existir-g lots of ~he subjeat
properh.y shal7. be sul~mitted to and approved by the Public Works -
Engineering Department and then bo recorded in th~ Office of the Orange
County Fzcorder.
2.~ ThaY. the leqal awnor of subjoct property shall irrevocably offer tc+
dedicate to the Citp of T,naheim, on additior;zl strip of ].and along
Katella Av~nue for a bua bay a~ th~ exact location anci width as
determined by the City Traffia Engii~eflr. iurthermore, the l~gal omner of
subject proporCy shall po~t a bond to guarantee the sat3sfactory
installation a:1d c~mpletiuY~ of said bus ba~r pr~.or to final buildzng and
zoning inspection,
`: 3. * That a fQe shali be paid to the City of A.naheim for ;.ree planting along
t°~ Katella Avenue, Casa `.tista StreEt and Casa Grande Avenixe in an amount as
established by Cz+:y Council resol~xrior..
4. '.Chat the leqal owner of 3ubject property shall dedicate t•o ths City oE
Anaheim a five (5) foot wi8e easemPnt aZong tihe most southarn portions af
the narth properky lines r~f 3ubject proper.ty for. public utility purposes.
-;-
~.
';'; -3' PC 89-275
'' j
r„J
~
':t~
M X~
'~ ~, ~ . .
, .
, ,.
...~., a.i . , ~,. ;a ; ,.:. .,,.:. _,. , , ,~%a,'
.. . .~ ,..- -- ~. . . .. . , . . .. ~. . ..,...,, ~~,~.;. ,..~ _r!_=A.,r.Y..i-:.i^IY~
u,4{ • ~ qF;
~ ~ 4~~ - ., ,~~}:
, i` 1~ia~;? ~;~,~~ . . . . , 4,;
~ ~.
~ ;i'',
.'i~
5. That prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subjeat pxu ert• ~
P }. '
Conditinn Nos. 1~:hrough 4., above-mentioned, ~hal7. be complotec3. ~h~ '
provisic~ns or rights grant~~d by Lhis ri~solution shal). becomo null and ~r
~
void by action of the rlannirig Commistiion unless said condition~ ar~ 'i
complied with witllir~ ane (1) year from the date at this resaluti.on ~r `=';!;';
sxch Eurther time as the Plannang C~mmission ~na~ grant. ,
~,* '!'hat appruval of ~:his applica~io.n cor~stztutes approva7. uf ~he pr.apused
roquast only to the exte~i~ tha~ it comp.lie~ with tk~e Anaheim Municipal
Zoning Code and any other applicabls Ci.ty, State and Federal
regulat5.ons. Approval does not include any action or fi.nclings as ~o
compliance o.r approval of tha requegt regarding any c~tk~er applicable
~rdinance, reg~ilation ox requirement: Conditzons marked with an asterisk
~'~) are required by establishe3 laws, codes, regulatians and/or
agreements and are n~t subject tn negotiataon.
BE IT FUR'rTiER R~SOLVEA that the Anah~im City Plctnning Commi;siqn
does hereby .find and determine tha~. ~-doption pf this Resolution is ~xpraRSly
preGicated upon applzcant ~ s com~liance wiL•1~ each and all ~f. t*~e cunc~itions
her~inabove set tor~h~ Should ~ny such conditions, or a~ny part there~t, be
declared invalid or unanforceable l~y the final ~udgment af ~ny court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any ~pprovals horein
contained, shall be deemed nul.l and void.
THE FOREGOING RI~;SOLUTTO:I i.s signed and approv~d by me this 20th day
of. November, 198g, ~ ~ /
.. \~%~"~ /~~ /,~~`~ _~,~~_._~ l
~.. - -~=~--•'~+~~~~ I ~ ~
C A~, ANAiiEI ~CITY PLANNING COMMISS70*I
aTTEST; i,~
~~ ~~~. ~.~
SECRETAR , ANAHEIM CTTY PL N N1G ~ rpdIS5IUN
`~
i
~ ;
.;i
F ~
~
:~Yr
~~
~~~
S7ATF OF CALLFORNIA
COUtrTY Ok QRANGC ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM }
t, F(lith L. t',nrria, Socrer.ary oE the 1-naheim City Planning
Comm3ea.i~n, c]o hereby ~~r~ify thaL• the foreqoing resolution wae paased anfl
adoptecl at a mee~iny . tho An~hetm City Planni.ng Comrn3ssion held on Novamber
20, 19f19, by tihe fallowing votr~ of ta~e momb~rs thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIQr1ERS: BO`CUSTUN, DOldAS, k'CLDFiAUS, HELI.XER,
MC BURNEY, IQ~SSE
NOES: COtrRrtISSIONERS: NONL~
A$SCNT s COt+II~iTSSIONRrZS : LtUNE
A~STAIN: COtrIIdiSSI0NEE2S: HERBST
IN WITNESS WH~REQE', I havo hsrounto sut my hand this 20th day
Novembor, 1989.
~~_ ,~
___ ~ __
SECIcET RY, ANAf:EIM C TY PLANNING COt~SISSION
7.tiir~:'~ r+wa.~~rp
il
j ,~1y~
~ `~,~~~
,, ~ ~,. .
~,, ~
y~
`,I
'
Of
~t~ -5- PC 89-2TS
~~:~i
~
;
~,:~
r~
, ~~
~