Resolution-PC 89-320
A RESOL,UTION OF THE t1,NAHEIrf CITY PL~NNING COMMTSSION
1HAT PETITION F'dR CONDITTONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3227 }3E UENT~D
W?-i~RE~,S, the Anaheim City ~~lanning Commission dic~ receive a
verified PeL•iti.on for Conditional Use Permit for r..er~ain real pro~erty
situated in the C.ity of Anaheim, County of Orange, St~te of Californi3, ,!
described as: '°+
THE SOUxHERI,Y 255.00 OF TkIE iVESTERLY 336.00 FEET OF
THE WEST ONE-I3Ai F OF THE SOU't'H ONE-FIAL,F OF THE
NORT.H4JEST ONE-QUARTER OF TEIE N'ORTHWEST O~iE-QUARTER OF "'
S~CTION ?.2, TOWNSHTP 4 SOUZ'H, RANGE 10 WES:P, S.B.B.
]aND M. A~ PER MAP RECORDEA ~N BOOK 51, PAGE 10, OF
MICELLANEUUS MA~'S, RECORDS t1F TFIE CALiNTY OF (3RANGE,
IN THE uANCHO SA:i JUlaN CAJON DE SANTA AN,A, CITX Or
ANAHEIM.
WHEREAS, the GiL•y Planning Convnission did hold a public hearing
at tho Civic Center .i.n tl-.e C:i.ty of Anahaim r~n DecernLier 7.g, 19f39 at 1;30 p.m.,
notice of' said public hearing having been duly g.iven as reguired by law and in
accordance with tkie pravi.sions o~ the Anaheim Dtunicipal Code, Chapter 18.Q3,
to hQaz and consic3er evidence for znd against said propossd conditional use
permzt and tu investigate and make findings and rer.ommend~tio:is in connection `~`~~
therewith; and ,.
WH~REAS, said Commission, after due irzspection, investic~atio~
az~d study mado by it,~el.f and in it;s behalf, ~nd after due consideration n£ all
evicience and r.oports offer.•ed ~t said hearing, does find and detormin~ thQ
following ~acts:
1. ThaC the petit;ioner requests approval of a cr~ndi~ional uge
pNrmit under aut•h~rity of Code Section 18.48.050,142 to ~ermi~ a 166-r.oom,
5-story hotel, with waiver of the followi.ng uniier au~hnrity of Code SectiQn
18.0G.080:
-~~•xI~N~-1}3•OE,=~_~41. - Minimum num_er of parki_ ncr~n_a~,
~n,~. 18.4~}~~6.05~. ~,13g r.equired; 121~proposed)
2• That rhe proposed ~xse is hereby d~rried on the basis that a
3tudy of the Commercia~/Recreal•ion area is c~arrently boing conducted vrhich
could considerably chdnge requirements arid also the sewer skudy ~urrently ~
being conducted should be completed Co detPrmino sewer nc~eds for this project
in that area; and furth~r th~ realignment of We~t Street cot~ld drastically '
affect dQVelopmont of. t.his site.
~i
3. That the proposed use will adversely affQCt the adjoining
].and uses and the g~owth and clevelupmeni: nf the area iii which it is proppsed
to oe located.
1192r _Z_
PC 89-320
~~ ;~_~
:.;~~
: ~:;~
y „y . ~ . . "w~'
~~.' ~ .. . . .... .... . . . .. . , . ~ . . ~jii~~
t 1
~~ ~_ _ . . . ~`(.~>~yt 7F~J~~ ~) ~1~ A
_ _ F ~~}~a,nt ~~~
~~~~'h
a~,}'~
~r'.
~~!
~
, ;,~,
_ ;itr.
,
,%ti.
4. That the t.xnd shape of the site proposecl for the use i,
not adequate t~ allow the f ::vQlaprn~nt of the prnposed use a.n a manner not
detr.zmental t.o th~ partict. area nor to tlxe peace, health, safety an~
qeneral welEare of tho Citir s o£ the City of An~he:ir~.
5. Tha~ t' granting of t;~e ~onditional Use Permit will be
detrimsu~al to the peace health, sat~ty and g~neral welEare of the Citizons
of the City uf Anaheim.
6. Tha~ ~the traffic ger.erated b,y th2 pragosed use will imp~se
an undue burden upon tlie streets and hi.ghways designed and improved ta carry
the tra~fic in the area.
7. That one person indicated their presence at said public
hearing in np~osiCior,; and that no c~r.respondence was received in oppoaition
t.o t.he subj~;ct perition.
,~ALiFURNIA ENVIROt7MENTAL ~IIALITY ACT FINDIN~C: Th~-t; the Anaheitr~
City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to permit a 166-raom,
5-story hatel, with waiver of minim~,un number of parkinq spaces on an
irrQg•ularly-shaped p~rcel of lana co.~sisY.~ng of approximately 0.95 r.~rre,
havxnq frontages of approximately 135 tee~ oYi the north 3ide of Winston Roaii
and 8n feet on ~:he Qast sids~ of West Stre~t, having a max3.mum deptih of
appxoximatelx 295 feet, being located approximately Z050 f.eet sonth of t;he
cent~rlin,e of Ba11 Road and further described as 1326 Sout:h W~si: Str~tet
(~unPS Motel); and does hereby deny the troqative Declaration upon findir~g
that it has considere~l t2ie Plegative Dec].aration togeth~r with any comments
receivgd during the public revzew proces~ and further fincling on the basis of
the initxal study and 2ny comments received that there is substantial
evidQnca that thQ project wri].1 have a ~ignificant effect on tlie e.nvzronment,
particu].arl.y sewage needs and the traFfic.
NOW, THEREFQR~, BE IT I2ESQLVED that tchr~ Anaheim City Planni~g
Comrr-is ,ion does herc~by deny subject Petition fox Conditional Use Pc~rmit, on
the ba~sis of L-he aforemenLioned £indingc.
7'HE FOF~;GUING RESOI,U~70N was ~c~qpt~sd 2t t2ie Planning Conun.ission
/
ATTEST:
i
i Q-(~J'~, (/1 r .i
r '~Lv
SECRETARY, ANAFiE;M CI2'Y PLANNING COMD*.ISSIOr!
of necember 18, I989. ,/' ;. ~ i
,,~ . ..~ , i L.
__= ='~-~='-~~'~~~~~~~~~~~ - -
CHAIRMAN, ANAHETM CITY Pf~ANT7ING COMt~fISSION
>,1
-2-
t~C 89-320
r...,..... +~.' ,wr.•,wc., , rf;Kn.wrc~x.'4~n.nz~M1r..enaSC~-a.ic-s5mae.~..~w., <: ..;...: .. .,Y,.~. .. , .. .,,::, ,. _ . .. .... . _ . , . .
, ~ ~ . . , ~. ~ - . . + t
r.'.1 .. ~ l ~ y y~
r ~,,"1"„'' ,.,
' ~:
~
STATE OF CALI~'ORNIA ) . ~;
COUNTY OF ORANGE } ~S,
f'.~'iv bF ANl.HEIM ) ~~
_ ~<
I, F.dith L. ~arris, Secretary of tlic Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do h.e: aby cert9.fy 4:ha~ the fr~regoang resolution was pass~d and
aclapt:ed at a,ii2e~;.ing of the l~nahQim Ci~:p Plaaining Commission held on December
18, 1989, by the ~ol~owing vote of L•he mernber;, thereof:
A.YES: COMMI^aSJCJNERS: BOYDST.'UN, HEI:,LY',;R, HEREiST, MC BURNEY, MESSE
NOES : COMMISu'CONERS ~ NOIJE
IaBSFNT: COt~fISS:LONER5: aOUAS, FELbHAUS
~"
~~.
' f~
<. ,
,,~,,
; ~,
:~
r
,,,
`,>.;i?
1.:'~
IN WITN~SS WHEREOF, I have hereunto sat my hanc~ thi.s ~f 1.,~N a'•y
oi~G~w„~,,.~, YS90.
~~,~~ ~ - ~
~ ~a°~ ~ - __._ ' ~~;
SECEtE7'ARY, b~NAFIEIM f:IT'Y P~NNING CO2«A~I:LSSION '-,~.`I
-3-
PC 89-320
;;,~
~~
J~