Resolution-PC 89-328
RF50LUTtON NCZ,,`P~8~-32p
A RESpLiJTTON OF THE ANAHEIM CTTY PLA.NNING COMMT;~,lO1~T
TAAT PET:[TION ~"OR I2ECLASSIFxCATION NO. 69-•~0-33 1'sE GHANTEll
WF~EREAS, a pei:ition tor Reclassi£i.c~tion was 3~nitaated by ~he
CiL•y of AYiaheim far certain real pxopPrty s.ituah,ed in the Citx of Anaheim,
C~vntx of. Orange, Stats of. California, described as fallows:
~ Property is approximately 1,26 acres generall;~r
boun3ed by thp allay north of Broadway to the nc~rth,,
F.~chisori Street to the east, Hroadway to the sout.li
ana MelrCSe Street to the west, 2xcepting thEa
easterly 125 teet.
WHER~AS, the City Planning Commission did hold a; piablic, txearing
at the Civic Cen'ter in the City nf Anaheim ori DQCOmber 18, 15~851 at 1:30 p.:m,,,
notice cf said public hdar.ing havir_g beRn duly given as required by 1~,w and ~i~i
a.:cordance with th~ provisions of the AnahAim Municipal Coda. Chapte.r 18.Oi{,.
to hear and consa.cler ~vidence for and against said propns~d re~classificaticrn
and tu i.:~vestiga~e and make Eindinqs and r.acommex~dation,s in connec~ic~n
therewith; and
WHEREA5, sai~' rommission, after due inspQCtian, inves~ig~it,ion
and sf:udy macte by itself arici in ; hs behalf, and afte.r due considerati.or- 01: ~all
evidonce ~.nd. repor. ts off~red at sn i.ci hearing, does find a:~Yd determine !ch~s
followinc~ f~.cts:
l. That the petitioner propc~ses rec7.aasifica~tion of ~ubjEact:
properL•y f~:~m the RM-1200 (Residential, Multiple-Family? Zon~e ta t.he R~~;-24100
(Residentis~al, Muit.iplQ-Family? zone.
2. `rhat the Ar.aheim fyenerr~l Plan designates subject propes•ty
£or Me~ium Density RE~sidential land uses; ho~ever staff is recommenc3ing a
General P.lan Amendment red~signating subject nroperty to the Low•-Medium
Density Ro~idential Designation which wil). be conoidered Y~y the City C'nuncil
at their January 2, 1990 meeting.
3. That th~ ~ropos~~d rec]assxfication ot subjec:t property is
noc~ssary arid/or desirable Eor rhe orderly and proper aeveloprnAnt oE the
c.ammuni ty .
4,. That tho prop~sQd reclas~ificaCion of subjecL property doss
properly re].at~ to the z~~,a~ sncl their permi.t~~d use3 locally esta~:Lished an
clos~ prox:mihy to subje,;t property and to tha zones and thezr permittQ~ uses
generally es:.ablishFC1 tnroughout the community.
5. :Tha~ no one indicated their presence at s~id public hearing
:in opposition; and that one lett:,9r was received in appo:.it~ian to subject
petition.
12U2r -•i- PC 89-328
~1~~~ ~~1 ~ , ~ („~.
. . . . ' i~.f. ~' 7'..L
~ i,4
g"~'~' ,r^
~I>
,~r
~
,~ ~
+f
•.;
; ~~:,ur;:e4
•.
~.~.~~~ ..,.,~ .,~:::r.., . ~~. .. . . ~ . . . ,.... ,' _'
t$7, ,~Q:,.~. .., ..; ;. -. , , .~....,......_....... ~. . ,;~, ' ~;~'_~ ~ ~ii. ~;:~~,A
. ~ ~ . . . . .. ,N,;~
. ~tC.'~, .~j ~ . „~ i~
S} ~i
CA1'a~OR2JIA FTIVT.RONMENTAL~ C2UALITY A~T FINDIN': That the AnaYaei.m •
City Planning Commission has reviewed thQ prQposal to reclaaci.fy
approximai:ely 1.26 acres general].y bounded by t.he n11ay nor~h a£ Broadway to
the north, Atchison Street to the east, Eiroadway to the sou.th and Me~rase
SLreet t~ the west, axceptinq the easterly :.25 feet, frnm ~he RM-:1.200
(Residential, Diultirle-Family)Zone to the 1tM-2400 (Ro3idential,
Mult.iple-Fa.mi.ly) Zona; and i9oes hereby appr.ove the Negative Declaration upon
finding that it has considered the Negat3.•~e Declaratzon together with any
~omments rECeiv~:d durinc~ t~~e public x~eview process and furCher finding on the
basi.s of. tkie in,itial st•udy and any comments received that there is no
~ubstantial evidence that the projec~ will have u signif:icant effec.t on the
environinent. •
NUYd, 'TI3EREFORE, LiE IT ~ESOLVED that the Anahei,m Czty Pl.anning
Co~~mission does hereby grant subject Petition for Rer.lassifir,ai:ion and, by so
doi,ng~ that ~itle 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Muxiicipal Code be amended to
cxclude the ab~ve-described property Erom the 12M-1200 7.one and t~ incoxporate
said described property into t.he RM-2400 7ar~e upon the following condition
which is Yiereby £ound to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of
subject groQerty in order to preserve the saf.oty and qenerai wel~are of the
Citizons of the City of AnaYieim:
.l. That subject reclassificatian is con*_ingenL- upon the adop~ion of. General
Plan l~mendment No. 269-2.
gE TT Ei1R7.'HER RESOLVL:D that tiie Anaheim City Planning
CommissS.on does hereby find and determine that adopLion of this Resolution is
ex~r.essly predicated upon +ipplicant's com~~.iance with each and all ~f the
conditaons hereinabove set Forth. Should any such con8itions, or any part
thereof, be dec'larod invalid or unenforceab].e by the final judc,~ment of any
court of competent juri5dicti.on, t2ieix thzs ResoluL•ion, and any approvals
herein contained, sha'l1 be deemesi null and void.
THE I'OREGOING R~SOL~UTION was adoptod at thc~ ~lanning Carnmis ,ion
, :' _ -_
meeting of December 18, 19~9. +`~ ~ i
- ,J ~ `~ /~~r.t: 7>~ _ `
`~._CH T MAN. ANAHEiM ITY PL~NNTNG COMMISSION
ATTESTs ~ , f '
~~~-~~° ~J~_ ~---,~~~~ '-~~
SECRET}+,~tY---~~, ANAHETM (:I'PY PLANNING COMMISSTON
STAT~ OF CAT,IFORtdIA )
COUN'PY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ]1NAfiEIM )
.
; ^~
? -:~'
.:
I. Fdi.th L. Fiarri~, Secret~ry af the Anaheim City Pla:niiing
Commission, do hereby certify that tha foregoing resolution was gassed and
-2-
PC 89-328
,J
'. ! ~: ~: •.V
i ~r~
r?'i£Y
r.'~A•!'.:,31r9~4i.Y~WfYNY~tUN~
, ~ ..r~ ' . . . . .
~
~
~"-
adopCecl at a m~e~ing of the Anaheim City P1a:an3.n~r Commission held ~n December
1.f3, 198g, hy the fo].luwing voL~e of the members thereof:
~YES: COM2dY~STOZIER5: FiELLYER, ~i~RBST, MC BURNEY, MESSE ~,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: BOXUSTUN
ABS~NT: COMldISSI0NER5: HOLTAS, FLliDHAUS
:_;~
~ (i'
=N WITNESS WHEl2rOF, I have he~reun*q S~ ~ mx hand tlxi~ ~, day A
~ 1990.
~-+ ~~. :`,
~~
.` ~ ; -~ t''
SECREi RY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CU'nA1TSSI0N ~S,
~;;
r;~ ~: ~ ~
,;II I.
f~~;',
~~~~