Resolution-PC 89-36~~'~
RE~SQLZJTION N0. PC89-~¢,
~
,:. j.,~
1~;~9: ~ r
A RES~OLUTTON OF TH~ AITAHEIM CI'rY PLANNING COI~fISSTON
THAT P~TITIpN FOR VARI.~NC~ N0. 3351 BE GRANTED
sr~
~
, ,:,,
~ ~
~
~
,,;
i
~
; WHGR~AS, the i~naheim City Plat~nii~g Commission did receive a
veri~ied Petition for Variance £rom HUTTON AEV~LOYM~NT COMFA2vY, TPlC., Z01 East
Sandpointe, fE~00, Santa Ana, CA 927Q7, ownPZ• ~f certain real prQperty
situated in khe City of Anaheim, CouiiGy Qf Or~n~ge, Sta~-.e of Ca1if'orn.ia
described as:
PARCF•L5 1 AND 2, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOpK 27.U,
' 1~AG~S 22~ 23, AND 2~1, OF PARC~L MAPS, IN THE OFFICE
'~ i~k' COUNTY RECUI2DLR OF ORANGE COUNTY.
i
,~ WIiERLAS, the City Planning Commissi~n did hold a public hearing
at, the Civic Center in the Ciry of Aiiak~eim on January 30, 1989, aL- 1:30 p.m.,
k narice of ;sa~id ~ublic hea.ing :~aviug been duly given as required by law and in
~ accorflance with t~he provisians of the Anahaim Municipal Code, Cha~ter 18.03,
h to 2iear and consi3er 9videncQ for and agains~ said praposed varianr.e anc~ to
` investigate and make findings and r~commendations zn connec~ion tharewith; and
WFiEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation
and study ma~~e by it~Qlf and i:i its be}xa1f, a.nd a.fter due .:onsidaration oE all
evidonce and r~ports offered at said hearing, does f.ind and determine the
~ollokting 1~acts:
1. That the oetitioner proposes waivers ot the following to
construr.t 2 garclen wall signs arid 1 freostanding monument sign:
;~ (A) SECTIQN 7.8~(jS,.QQ1 Q1Q -• PgrmittBU Jho_p,Qin cQn •~_ id~n~ifica~iQn s~n.
' ~:~,
's (Permitted in t:ie Sceaic Corridor: one 20 ~
~~ sq.ft. sinyle-face~ decorativ~ wa2l sign; ~
'~ Proi~osed: khzee signs consisti.nq of:
(i) One 144 sq.ft. c~ouble-faced gardon wa~l ''•'
-j s.ic~n,
(ii) Qne •14 sq.ft. single-faced gar~~Qn wall
,
;:
~
~ sigr~, arid
~,': ;~J~~
• .
,~. (iii) One 90 sg.ft. double-faced monument siqn) ~r~
;
x: (B) ~E~I~N 1$,~0~,,~1~Q~2 - F~ermi `c~,d hQ~r~Qf~i_gn illumin~r.ion. ,~
(.f~~,30 .~ m• ~o mxdnialit permitted; 24 hours ~'~~
proposed) '~:
,~
:;
%' 2. Tliat the al~ove-mention~d w~ivers are heraby grar~teci on the ±`~
basi~ rhat thero are spocial circumstances applicable ~o the ~roperty suc2i as
~' size, shape, ~opoc~raphy, locarion and suxroundings which da not app:ly ~o other
,
'.
.
identically zoned propQrty in the sama vicinity; and that strict application
~
' of the 7,Unin Cr,de do rives the ra ert ~f rivile es en'o pd b other
~ 5 P P P Y P g J Y ~ Y ~~"~
'' properties in the identical zone~ and classificatian in the vicinity.
r° "~`
i'
~~~~Zr
-~-
PC 89-36
'•;
'' I
, ~'
s
~
i ~~,.p
~rw..~i . . , , ~ . t.l~4:f.y~f.
~ ~1 ~ ~Y
~t ,~ ,,~
i~4
~ ~I
.Yr ,
t
3. That L•here are exceptional or extraardinary cirewnstances or
cond:i~xox~s 3pplicable to t11e pro~r~rty involved or to ~he in~endec3 use nE the
~roperty that do not apply generally ta the property or class ot use in tlie
same v~.cinity and zone. ,
4. That the request;eca variance is necessary £or the preservnLion
and enjoymeni: nf a s~i~stant„ial p:-op;sr~y ri.ght possessed by other property in
trle same vicinity and z~ne, arid denied to the property in ques~ion.
5. That the requestad varianc~ will not be inaterially detrimen~al
to the public we].iare or injurious l•.o rhe proparty or impruvements in such
vicinity and ~one in which the pronerty is located.
6. That no one indicated thair preserice at said public hearing in
o~position; and Ltiat no corz•QSpontlence was received in opposition to subject
pei:it:ion.
CALIFORNIA_ENVIF. NMENTAL QUALITY A~T, k'INDIN~; The Planning
,; Direcrur or his authorized repres~ntative has detarminecl tt,at the pro,posed
r ~rojQCt fa11s within the de£initi~n of Categorical Exemptions, Class 11, as
+~i defined in the State EIR Guiuel,ines and is, th.erefore, cate~orically exemp~.:
~'~ from the roquirement to pzepare an EIR.
s
NOW, TfiEF.;EFI)RG~ FiE IT RESOLV~D that the Anaheim (:zt;y Plannfng
Cammission ao~s hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, u.pon the
~, following conditions which arr_+ hereby found to be a necossary preregu.isite to
:'~. the praposed use of the subject property in order to presorve the safety and
' general we.it~are of the C~.tizer.s of the C.ity of Anaheim:
;~~
" 1. That the freestanding sign adjdcent to the pntrance drzvewaX shall be
r located a minimum of ~even
:t right-af-way line, as required`by he City~TraFfic EnyizeerII Canyon Ftoad
,
i 2. ThaC the ndw con~tructior~ ,suthorized by this r~solut.iori sha].1 be served
by un~ierground uti.li.tze~.
3. That subject property sY.all be developed subs~an~ially in accor8ance
with plana and specifications on fiie with the Ciry of Anaheim marked
P
~ ~xhibiL Plos. 1 and 2.
~a
4. Th~t px•zor to issuance oE a sign permit or within x period af on~ (1)
, year from thQ date of this resolutiun, whichever occurs L•irst, (;on~i*;nn
:; No. 1, above-mentioned, shall be complied with.
5. Zhat: prior to final building and zoni.rYq inspections, Condition Nos. 2
and 3, abovc~-mentioned, sha11 be r_omplied with,
6. That approval of this appli4ation constitu~es approval of the propooed
` request anly to the extent that ir complies witY~ tha Anaheim t•lunicipa2
~ Zoring Code And any c,ther applicab:le City regu~ations. Approval does
not incl~~de any action or iindings as to c:ampliance or approval of the
; request regarding any other applicable ordi.~ance, r.egulation or
, requirement,
~
~Z PCg~-36
., . , ;;; r
;«a~''1
. -~
~ ~`''1 f Y~ l~::ii,~T ,~ 1~'7t ~)ir~~h"` ~~rn't ~.°~t}Yf~ µWrfl' t ~
~ , . ~ . , ~ ~~; ,~ ~ > , s,,~~~k~, ,
,, .,~~
~: ~ ~S~
~~M . ~ . . .u_
~,'.~:
' - . . :,~',i
; -~
.:i
~ . - .~~1',if
.,~~
BC Ix F'U'RTHER R~SOLVEA ~hat the Anahea.m City Planninq
Convnission doe9 rierQby find and detQrmine that adoption of this Resolution is
expressly predicated iipon applicant's compliance w3,th each and ~11 of th~ ~.
coildzL-ions herbinabove set Fort;h. Should any such condition; , c,r any par~ ~~
~hereof, be docla~red invalad or unenEor~eable by the final judgment of any ~~I
court of compeCent jurisdzctxon, then this Resolution, and an.y approval~ ':'~
herein contained, sha11 be desmed null and voic~.
TiiE FOREGOING RESOLCITTn27 is signed and ap~rovecl b~ me this 30th
day of January, ~.ggg,
~ l ~.2'~l~c-~_.r~ /~~ %^,!~r~~.
CHAIRWOMAN, ~AHEIM CI7'Y PLANt~TNG Cp2yL`~ISSION
ATTEST:
~ ~~. ~
SEGRE'PARY, ANAI#ErP,1 CITY PLAN'rI~iNG CU1~4dISSTON
STATE OF CAL' I FpRNIA )
CU[TN~'Y OF ORAL~7GG ) s s.
CTTY UF AN~EIM ~
T, Edith L. FTarris, S~cretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hareby asrl:iL•y tliat l:hs : oregoing resolution was passed anc~
~dopted at a mc.oting of the Anaheicn City Planning Commissior, held on Ja:~uary
30, 198g, by tho followinc~ vate of the member.s thereoFs
AYES: COr*3~SIS5IONF12S: BOUAS, BOYDSTTJN, CARUSILLa, CELDHAUS, FIERBST, MBSSE
IJO~S: CODQ.ISSIQNERS: NONE
ABSENT: CO.MHiTSSI~NE[t5: MC BUEtNGX
TN WI7,'NE:S6 WHEI2EOF, I have hereunto set my hand thi~ ~Oth dny of
Janu~ry. 1<389 .
~~..c~J p ~ .
^~S .
S~CRETARX, I~NAHEIM Cjmy p[,~JNING CODQr1TS5I0N
;i
~
~
:i
`. ~
, .' ~
~
,'~
`~
~:.
~'~
,,
_ . ....~
-3-
~C$9-36
' '.11 ~, '~.~
'
. ~ '1 ~ .~~i '~'~\~~