Resolution-PC 89-44~ ~~
~
RFs50LU'TION NQ. PC£~ 44_
A RFSOLUTION OF iHE ANAHEIM CJTY PLANNING COMNtISSTON
THAT PETT`rION IOH. FECLASSIF~CATION N0. 88-89-36 BE GR.'aNTED
WH~REAS, the AnahEim City Planning
veri£ied p2Lition for Realassifica2tion trom LL'CILE
F~ERRYMAN, 7r3 ~f. Anaheim Eioulevard, ,Anahoim, CA
CAANG, Y.O. B07C 2868r Anahc-~im, CA 92014, agent,
situst~ed in the Cit,y nf Anah~im, County of Ora
described as foll~ws:
Commissian did receive m
M. P~RRYMAN AND FFANK E,
92805, o•,~mex, and 'KOKO
cE certain real p~operty
nge, 5tate o£ California,
BEGINNING AT TIiE vORTI3WEST CORNE~2 QF 56, THENC~
EASTFRLY ALONG THE NURTIiERLX 'LTNE5 OF LGT 56 AND 5~,
210 F~ET ANIa 4 1/2 INCFIE;S 1'0 A POIIrT IN THE NORTFIERLY
LINE Of T.,OT 55; THENCE AT RTC+~TT ANGI,r:S S~UTHERLl' AND
P]-RALT,EL WITIi THE WESTERL,Y LTNE~ GF I,Oi 55, A DISTANCE;
OF 51 1!2 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES
W~STERL'Y ANB PARALLEL WITFI THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LO'~
55, A DISTANC~ OF 32 1/3 FEFT TO A POTNT: THENCE A.'T
RTGHT ]1NGL~S SOUTHERLY AND PARAGLET, FVI'PH THE WESTERL'Y
LINE OF LOT 5"~, A DTSTANCE ~F 'll F'EET TO A POZNT;
'rFiENCE l~T RTGHT ANGLES 'R~STERLY AND I'ARAL,LEL WI~H THE
SOUTEiERLY LINES QF LOT5 55 AND 56, A DISTANCE OI' 178
1/2 I'EET TO A POINT; THF.hCE AT RIC,HT ANGLES NORTIiER1~Y
T,LONG THE WESTCRLY LI11E UF LOT 56, A AISTANCE OF 122
1/2 FEET TO THR NORTHWEST CORN~R THI:REUF' AND TO TETE
POINT OF BEGZNPIIkIG.
WIiEREAS, the CS.ty Planning Commission did hold a public hear.ing
at the (:ivlc Center in tk-e Ci.ty of Anaheim on Janua•ry 30, 1989, at ~.:30 p.m. ,
notice o.f said publ:.c hearing having been r~u1y given as raquired by la~r and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Muni~ipal Code. Chapte~: 18.Q3,
L-o hear ancl consider evidence tor ai~d again~t-. said p.roposed reclassi~i.cation
and to invQStiyate ancl make tindings and recommend~tions in r.onnecti.oii
therewith; c~ai~l ~ublic tiearzng having been contiziued to the meeting of•
February 13, 1989; and
viH~REAS, said Commission, after due inspection, inv~stir~ata.on
and study made 'by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideretion of all
evidence and reports offered at said h~arin~, does find and determine the
following fact5:
1. That khe petitioner reques~s ReclassiEication of subj~ct
property from the ML (Industrial L~imited) Zone tu the RM-'12U0 ( Residential,
Multiple-kamily)Zane.
i. That the An~-heim General Plan designates subject property
for Medium Density Residentia:l land uses ,
06T7r -1- PC89-~4
~"~
. ;.,
,:'r,
~;;'t
~ :N~
,. :;::'-:~:~
~
~
~
,. ,,, ,::~
3. T~iat the praposed reclassificntinn o~ subject property is
necessary r~nd/or desir.r~bl.e for tikxe orderly and proper develnpment of ttle
corr~n~unity.
4. Tha~ tha proposed reclassiiication of subject ~roper.ty does
proper.ly relate to the zanes and thei.r, permitted uses locally established in
close proximity to subject property and tu tkie zonos and their pe~mitted uses
generally es~ablished throughout- th~ cammunity.
5. T2iat the proposed reclassification of subject property
requires tbe doclication ot r~;~uti:ing streets in accorddnce wi'th the Circulation
Elernent o' ls General P1an, due to the ~nticipated increasr~ in traffic which
will be qer; :~ted by hhe in~ensification of land use.
6. 'that no one indicated ~heir preser~ce at said public
hearing in opposit;i~~n; and tha} no ~:orrespondence wa3 rQreiveci in, op~ositaon
to subject pet~i~ion.
~ALIFQRNIb EP7"V.LFtON~fEN7'AI~ 1~LITY ACT E'TNDING: Th~.t the Anaheim
City Plann,ing CommAssion has rev,ieweci the proposal to reclassiFy subjQCt
property frum the ML (I,imit~d Industrial) Zone ro the RM-1200 (Residential,
Miiltiple-Family) zone and t:o constrixct a 3-story, 22-unit "afford~blQ"
apa•rtment comple:: with waivers oE minimum building site area per dwelling
unit, m~zximum ~tructur.a]. hr°ght and maximum site covQrage on an irregularly
shapad parcel ot land consisting of approxirnat~ly p.~2 acre, having a
froxitage o~' aPprr~ximatelZ~ 122 feet on the east side of Lemon StrQet having a
m~ imum depth o~ approximately 203 feet and b~ing located a~proximately 85
faet north o~ the center.line oE Elm Street and further des~ribed as 3Y8 South
~.emon Streot; t~nd does herel~y approve the Negative Declaration upon finding
~hat it h,~s considered the Negative De.;laration tugekher wifk~ ~tny comment3
re~eivetl during the public review process and further finding on the basis oE
the initial study and any comment, received L-hat there is no substantial
c~vidence that tl~e project will have a significant effect on tY.e environmez-t.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT :~ESOLV.ED ~hat the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant suLject Petition I•r~r &erlassification and, bl su
doing, that Tit•Ie 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municip~l Code be am~nded tc
exclurle the above-clescribed property from the idL (Limited Industrill~ zono ~o
incorporate said de3cribed propt~rty in-.;o the RM-1200 (Residental,
Mul~iple-Family) Z~ne: upon the foll~wing concli.tions wY:ich are her.eby found to
be a necessary prerequisiL-~s Co tha proposed use of sub;jecE property in nrder
to presarve t'rie satety and ganeral wel£are oE the Citizens of the Ci~y oE
An3heim:
1. That the 1ega1 owner of :~ubject propexty shaJ.1 irrevoc;sbly nffer to
ded3cate to the Citg c~f Anphaim a strip of lvnd th3zty two (32) Feet in
wi~lth fr.om the .r,enterline uf the 3treet along Lemon Street for street
widening purposes.
2. ThaL• a fee sha'11 be paad to the CiL•y oE Anaheim for streQi: lighting alonq
Lemon 5treet in an amount as establisY.cjd by City Council resolution.
-2-
'`
PC89-44
~
~ ~,,
;,,,,,~:~'s5
.e
~.
~ ~~'~ ~'~
,~
3. Tha~ ~he 7.ega1 owner oi subjecl•. prop~rty sZiall dedica~~ to the City oE
Anaheim a fiva (5) ~oot wide public utility easQment along the north
propert~ line, as required by the Elec~rical Engineering Division.
i ~. That a fee shall be paid tio the City af Anaheim for tree planting along
i
3 Lemon Streei: in an amount as established by Cii:y Council resolution.
5. Thar prior to intr~ducY..iar~ of an ~rdinance rezan.ing subject property, the
l~g~l property nwner sha11 prepare and record ari unsubordinated covenant
limiting OCCl'pancy of each apaztment unit ta no more thaii two (?.) persons
(other. than children uiider the age af i:wo (2; years) per berlroom, 5aid
limitation shall be included in each loase/rental agruemexit. A copy of
the covenant sh~11 be submit'ted to ancl approved by the City Attorney
prior to recordation. A copy of t2ie recorded covenant sha11 be furnished
to th~ Zoning Division.
E~. That a covenant sha11 be recorded agreeing to provide the renter of each
;
~ dwelling unit with written information obtained fr~m the School
'' District(s) pertaining to possi~le overcrowded conditior.s and busing
v
status af Che school(s} serva.ng the dwelling unit.
:~
' 7.
That prior to the .intro~uaticn a.E an ardinance rezoning subjecr property,
' Condition Nos. ]. through 6, abave-men~:io.zed, sna11 be completed. Tho
' provision~ or righl:s grar:ted by this reso'lution shall bocome null and
void by ac:l:ion of the Planning Cammission unless s~sid c~nditions are
compli~d with wihhin onP (1) year from the date of this resolution, or
'
;~ such £urther time as thp Plazining Commission may grant.
9. That ~pproval of tha.s app.licatiox~ c~nstitut~s approval af th~ proposed.
request only to *he ex*_ent that it cumpZies with the An~heim Municipal
Zonznq Code and any otl~er applicable City regulatioi^s. Approv~~ doss not
include any action or f•indings as to com~lixnce ur approv~l of tha
reqaest regarding any other ~p~licable nrc.iinance, rogulatior. nr
requirement.
^'
~ F;.
;;
~~~
r~
BE IT F(TR~IiEF RE50T~VED that ~he Anaheim City PYanning Commission claes
hereby find and determine that adopt•i~~n of this Ftesolution is expressly
pred.icated upon ap~'icant's complian~ce with each and all ot the conditions
hereinabave set Por h. Should any such c~n&zti.ons, or any part thereoF, be
declared invalid o~ unenf~rceable by the finaa judyment nf any court ~f
com~e~ent jura~dicL•i~n~ then thic Resol.ution, and any approvals he~ein
contained, shall be deemeci null and void.
-3-
PC89-44
': :'';
i;
;;A~~~
;`;~
.r;~;
;'~e
_ . ;:i;.,'u.x
~ j ~~.
. ' ~.. ~ - , ~ , ~ ,u..rwr
. ~ ~; ' ~~r4a
~
~} ~~
i"".,lq . ~ , .
p t . . ,',~.1
if~
x~R
. , ,.'„'~~~;
l~
THE FOREGGING RESOLUTION is ~igned and approved by me this 13th day qf
Feb•ruary. 1989. ,.. ;
~ ' l ~,~~ i/~' G ~.' ~~.~.-~/ -'~~C.-~.-57,_...-~' a
CHAIRWOMAN~~' ANAHLIM CIT.X PLANNZNG COMMTSSION
v~
'" ATTEST:
`-~ ~.~ ~~' .
~~ `=-,`_ -GZ-'til~`',, ~
SECRETAR , ANAfIEIM CITY PI~ANNING CQMMI¢STOh'
STAT~ OF CALII'ORHIA )
CQUNT~ OF ORANGE ) ss.
CIT.'Y OF ANAHEIM )
~,~;,
I, Edith L. Harris, Secreta.y of th~ Anaheim Ci~y Planninq Camm.iss~.on, do
hereby certiEy that the foregoing resolution was passed anfl ttdopreii at a
meating o£ t2ie Anaheim City Flanninr Commissiun held on February 13, 1989, by
t:he f~llowirig vote of ~hP mAmbers thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: A~UAS, C:AFUSIL'L0, F~LDHAUS, HERBST,
MC IIURNEY, MESS~
NOES: COMMTSGzONE12S: NON~
,; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BUXDSTliN
,
,,{
=,~ IN WTTN'r:SS WHEP.EOP', I have hereuntc,• set my hand thi~ 13th day of
'^~` February, 198g,
,~, _
~ ~.~ • . , ~,
,~ ,.~~ _ i ` ~ ,
;+F , _ .-~ ~~ ~~t,~~,~,
'~~ SECRETARY, AIrHHE]:M CTTY PLANN~NG CQir4~lTSS70N
;•,
:;;~
,
~,
;"a~^
'~~`.
~ •,
'y~
::,
-4-
y,.
.=:a;
. . . ~,;i,;~h~
~ ?~S~;S`,~
I:1~
PC89-44 _ r;f
ya ~~
ve
~
~.+J'
~'~47~;
.. . . .~ ,•11~. 1~- !