Loading...
Resolution-PC 89-54A R~SOL~LITION OF T.HE ANAH~TM CI7.'X PLAN'NING COMMISSION xHAT PE~TIT:[UN FOR VARII~NCE P70. 3896 AE GRANT~D ~ S ~~~ i i~(+,l~.ti A~ ,u fj CS ~~i~~ . ~ ~ ~ . .i:~Wi~ "; ~~~~~ ; F~Fi~,REAS, r.hP l~naheim City k~l~nnix~g Canunission did receive a ~~erified Petition fur Vaxiance Erom CHEN-CHIA CHEN' ~nd ITEN~-MQ HSIAO, 465 Bridgeview Urivo, AnahQ~.rt~, CA 92807, owners, and FIUI-Ald FTSTAO, 465 Bridgoview nrive, F,nahEim, CA 92a07, agent £~r certain real property s3.tuated in the City of An~.hei~n, County of drax~ge, Stato o~ Califarnia dascribed as: LOT 6]. Ok' TRACT N0. 8560, IN 'i'EIE CTTX OF A2IAHEIM, AS SHO~N UN A MAP RECORDED IN IIOUb' 412, PACES 32 TO 35 IN~LiTS:CV,:, Ok' DIISCELI,ANEOUu 2viAP5, RECORDS OI' ORANGF COUNTY, CA'LIFORNIA. ~J " '! ~ R~ r,T~Tzorr No. YCBQ-5~ WHEREAS, L•hQ City P1ar.ning Commission did 2xold a public hearang at the Ci.vic Cenher in the City of Anaheim on Jsnuary 3Q, 1989, at 1:30 p.m., :notice o~~ saicl ~~ublic haari.ng having beQn duly given as requized by law and in ~cc~rdance with the ~rovisicns of tlie Anaheim Municipal Coae, Chapter 18.03, ~~:o haar and consifler evidence for ancl against said proposed variance aYid to investigatQ and make Pindings ar~d rocommendations in connacrion therewith; arsd s~iicl publi.e hQariny was continuefi to the meet.iny o£ Februnry 27, I989; anci FJFIEF.EAS, said ~ommi:,sion~ afk~r due inspection, investigation ar~d sL•udy made by itse.lf ~3nd in its behali, and after clue cansideration of a17. ev::~cJ.~snca and repo:ts affered aL• said h~aring, doQS find and determi.n~ the fo3.l~tivring facrs:• 1, That thQ petitioner r~quosts waiver of the Pollovring to permit a grpund-mounteci satellite dish: ~FSZ'~~_~~ a4 ~~~~Q~?. - Pr~~~~~~Q9~m 'e eguip~nQnk. (ito rooP=mQun u eaui m n permitted in the Scen.ic Corridor; one 10. 5_fQpt~ dz~met~_r._ c~' r4.~n4].~~Pounted ~~~ l~li~.,~~~ish~r~t,gnn~ proposed) 2. T.hat 1~he original proposal was to retain a roaf-mounted sat~:lite dish. 3. lhat the nbovc~-mentioned waiver x~ hereby gr~r-ted on thg basi~ thal-. thPr~ are a~QCial circums~ancas applicable to the prop~erty such as sizP, shape, topagr~phy, locatian and surroundings which do not apply to other idont~.cally zoned property i.n the sz~me vicin.ity; and that strict a~~~l3cation of the Zonsng Cnrle deprives the property of privileges enjoyed bI- othor propertiQS in the identical zone and r,lassiticatian in ttie viciniky. 4. That there aro excpptional or extraordinary circumstances or c:onditions appliaable to the proporty invo].ved or to t.he intended use of thQ proL~~:rty that do not apply generally to the property ar class of ure in the samg vicxnity and zone. 0692r -1-• PC89-54 _:~ ~ '~:: ~'~, ~:~~~ ~r.... ~ ~ .... . . . . _ . . . . . . ~ . . ~ ~ ..n ~ i ~<`~ PpI~Y~ b i~ ~ . . ~ ~ bb y~,~;i}~, ~ y. ~; ~n '. . t I 4, ~ Sx1 x .. . - ~,!;,~. _ ' ~'.'~ t,,. 5. That the requested variance is naces~ary Eor the pre,ger~ration and enjoymonri r E and4zone~nand1den~edrto the pr perty ind q estianr praperty in tha ~ame vlcx P 6, That the requestQd varianae will not be mrsterially detrimental tc~ thc~ gublfc welfare or injuriaus to tho property or impr~~gmonts in such v3cinity anc~ zone in which the proper~y is locatod. 7. That no one indicated +thair preser,r.e at sa3d public bearing in opposa.tion; and that n~ cor.respondence was received izi opposit.'.on to subject }~etition. A IT A~,_ Nb N: ~ho Flranning _~T.~~TA ENVIRQ.~I~TA~.~~~!.~----~- pirecGor or hi.s autharized repres~ntative has determined that the pr4Pogecl lrojec~ ~'alls within the detiniti~n o£ Ca~egoric~+1 Exemptions, Class l:l, as ~ef iiled in thQ State EIR Guidelinos and is, ther~fore, catc~gorically oxempt from tha requirt~ment. to prepare an EIR. NOW, THEREFORE, RF. :iT RESOLVED that the Ai~aheim City Planning Commiss:.zn d~es hcreby gxant subject Patition far Variance, upon the £ollowing conditions which ax'o heroby found ta be s~ neae~sary prarequisite to the proposed use oE tY~e subject property in or.der to preserve the safety ~nd gener~:l welfaxe of the Ci.tizens of the City of An~.he.im: 1. That vehic~tlar access rights L•o ~'ai.rmonL• ~3oulevard, shall bo dedicated ~o rhe ~ity of Anaheim. 2. T~iat plans shall be ;tubmitL-ed to the F3uildir.g Division showing compl3.ance with the minimum standaxds of the City oE Anaheim. xhe apprnpriate permitw s2iall be obtained for any kwork. 's. That subjRCG property ~h~'l1 k~e developed Gubstantially in accordance wzth glans and specifica~ions on file witn the City of An3heim murked Rev~sion No. 1 o.f Fxhibit Nos. 1 Chrough 3. 4. That Condition Nos. l, 2 and 3, above-rnentioned, shall be complated witl~in a~eriod of thirtp (30) c3ays fx•om thQ datQ of this xesolutian. 5. That approvai of this npplicati.on consti~utos approval of the ~ropos~e~i requQSt only to the extent t~lat it complias with tiae Anaheim Municipal 'Loninq Code and any ~ther a~plicable City regulations. Approval does not includQ any action or findings a~ to compliance ~r approval of Lhe rec~uest regarr3ir~g any o~.her applicabla orrli.nance, regulation ar requirNment. ., q;` _2_ PC89-54 r ,,.. afi ';I ; , ~~ i ~:y . '~Y .~ ,~ . . . . ~ . , .. . . .., . .....,. ~ .. ~... ...., ., .. , ...r ~r~ ,..~ -,. . .. _ ,..~ _..., .t, ,.,,._,..~~. yv~.~...i.t..r~~/.r.~~i~.~l~~~ . ~ .. ~ . . . , . .. , ~ . ~ . ,. , ~ r r+;pirt~rt''~~~~ ~ l' "„." 3i, r ~ ~ •~ i y v'~ ~ ~ . . ~ . . , . ,~ ~1G, ~ . . , . ;:~;'rr, ,~ . . '~ ~:'.I I BE IT FiJRTHER RESOLV,~D that tho Anahei.m City P1a~nning Commissian does hereb £ind d d ' y an c3termine that ad,aptic»~ of thi ~ Rasolu~.i~~n is ` expressly prediaated upon applicant's c.omplianc~ with Qach i~nd ~tY1 c~f L•he ~' cond.itions hereinabove set forth.. :?houl,~ any su~:~Y~ coi~di~ions, or any ~ar~ ~' thereo.f, be doclared invalid. ~r ur.un,forceable by the a°inul j~iagmoxxt of ~~ny aourt ~~f comp~tent jurisdict:iori, ~hQn t~~is F:esoltttion, ~nd any ~ppr~vals ~ hereixi c:ontained, shall be dee~med null and void. , ~ :tl'i~; FORFGOING RESOLUT~T.QN is s~.gr,ed and apprt~vttd by me this 27tt~ ~ ~ day ,r;f Hebruary. 1g89, ~ I ~ti_:. . ~ ,~ 1.. ~ ,`~:.,. _ ~~.~ ~.. ._._._ ; i CF~AIRWOMAI~~; 1~NA.HEII~I CTTY P.'LANNItvG GUI~fI;iSTON ~ i\TTES1`: ~ ~. ~'e c~.L4~~ ~ ~.~' .L,,L,.~,e, _~ .____. _ SE;CRExARY, i\NAHE~.M CTTY PLf\NNING ~AtdMISSIOP~' STATE OL' CALIFURN'tA ) COUNTY OF qR1~NG~~. ) s,s . CITY OF AN'~-HETM ) ~ l., Ec~.ith L. Harr9.s, SHCretary af tlie Anahe~m Cit,v Plann;tng Commiasiail, d~ I1~rel~y cei°t LE that tk f . y ze orc~going resolu.tiun wa3 ~~itssed and adopL~~d a~t a meot.inq o~ t,he Ar_aheirn Ciky Plannixlc~ Commission h ~ld ~ c on . Februa~°,y 27, 1~'8<3, t~y the foIl.ow3ng •vute oL' the mamb.ers thE~r~of; `~~. AYE~: CUMM3SSIOh'ERS~ NOES: CI~MMISSI~NERS: 'V11.CAZIT: COMMISSIONEl2S: IN WITNESS WF.~1 Fabruary, t98,'~. BOUAS, BOYDSTLiN~ Ci\RUSIL~.O, ~'ELAFTAi;S, ~1~SSE N01~rI~; TWLt S[;;A'1`S 3kF,Or, I have he.reunta set my hand thi.~ 27th d,~,y of ----.__..~~'~:_~.~ ' -- ~ S~:CRETAI2Y, ANAHCrM CITY PI,ANNI~YG COMMTS5I~~N ;~ `,' I ~I 1 ~~ _ :~~~ .:i _3_ ~ ~C89-54 `!~ ~