Resolution-PC 89-55..'- . .. . ,.. . . i, .:'• N ~.. r r i~ ..~.~ t :,~'! (i ~ ~~ I~jk4y~'~~,t~llt \~~'If Sr ~~~~1s~b~~ r h i, ~t t ~
,~h.S . ' ' . , " ', r l~f~~ ~ Y ~ 1 • fj
,~f 7~. ;~y,rr~~i~~~~ts~ t , 5
'~.~,` . . . ~ ' 4 vj(:~F°~~' ~ ~,~5 .1,
i .~ ~> h~ ~ . 3 a~ • ~~
. °~,:.~ ~ ~~'
.".1:
',iG
:~,~
,'t u:
RESOLUTIpN N~_ P~B~
A R~SOLi1TI0N OF T.HE A11AHEr, '`
THA'.f F~isT~~ION FOR R~CLASSIFIC TIpNyNO~~NING COhLtitISSION
; 88-89-35 BE GRJ~INT~U t
`~i ~~TdEREAS, the Anakieim Cit~ Pla.ni~in `.,~,
" ~erified p~tition fox RQ~~~ssiEicati~n from MBLODEE ~ommission dw '
~ SWALT,OW. 644 South Wabster d recexve a '%`~
WEST DEVELOPMENT. Attn: ~tr~et• A~aheSm. CA ~N SWALLOW' AND GLADYS F.
Robert F. ~2~04, owners, and C~NTURX
Anaheim, CA 928q~, a ent, Torres, 814]. Kaiser Boulev~Rrd,
Anaheim, Count ~ f°r cer~ain r,a1 property s.',tuated in ~2~~~
y of Qr3ng~, Sta~,.e o~ California~ descr3bed as tollowsth~ ~ lty of
LOT 17 Or TRACT' N0. 796
RECORDED TId BOOK 'l4 • IN' T.HE CIT'I OF ANAHEINI. AS p~R ~~,
OFr^. ICE; OF THE C~JUNTy, RECORDER OF ATAC COU ~y US t~Aps, IN 1'FT,~
WHEREAS, the City P],an.ninc,~ Commxss.ion did hold a /
at thc~ Civic Center in Che City of Anaheim nn January 30, 198p ~
n~L•ice of said pub].ec hearing .~
public hearing }iaving beQn du.1 '~~ 1°30 p.m.,
accordance with the provisioiis of the AnalieimgD4uni as ,required b
~o hear and consider evidonce for Y 1aw and in
and and II 1P`1 ~O~Q~ ~~apter 1g,Q3
~o investigaL•e a~id ga.inst said praposc~a reclass3ficat.i,on -,;
therecvith• mdke findings and rec~mr~~ndations in
. and s3id publ.ic hearinq was continuad connectxqn !~~?
k'ebruary Zq, 1gpgp an$ to i:he meetin
5 of and ~`~,
WHEREAS,, sai~ Commission ~•
and study made b ~~fter due inspaction, investigation j',
evidence a.n.~ repurt5~lofie odnat ssaidahearin ,~',`
. and a~ter due consideration of all
following far.ks: '':~
~ „',
5. docs fznd and determixie th~
~. .
t..::
l. Tliat the
pxopert~ P~'~itioner proposes reclassa.Fication ;1
~ fram the RS_A-43,OOp a'•
(RPSidenti~l/Agricultural °f subjec~ ~~`
(Residential. Multip].e-Family) 7orle. ) zone tn the Rp.l_ ~/~
1 y V 0
~,^'
2• T.har, t;he An~~ai.m General Plan designatos subject pr.opert ;::;;!'
for Me~iu~n Density Residentrll land us~~s. ~
Y
;~ s`;.
necassary and/or „>~
~• xr°t the prnposed reclassificah.ion of subjoct prop~rtY 15 r''1
community. a~sirab).e Par the ordQrJ.y and ro ~r ~ y
P P dev~lopment ~f thQ ~~~''~~~~
I, ~,
4 . That the i: ~.`;'~.
grop~.sed reclassification oE subject property does h~
properly relate to the zozles and L•heir ~`~'
close proximity to subject proparty an~ ptomtheeaones sa d c~heir ;~ 4`:
Y esMablishecl in ~`'~'•;;;
generally estAblished throughout the cQrrununxrx. ~'
~~rmlttod uses ;.`1'~;~
;_,
re uires subject ro
~3 the d4dica iort and~f p ~~me t of1abuttination of
the CircuJ.ation EYement o~ the General Plan p I~~rty ~;
~ streots in accordance with ` ''~
in traf.fic which will be ~ d~~~ ro the anticipated xncroase
genara~~d by the intensification of land use. s y~~
; ; ;;;;;
0693r i .:~,
-1- a s`'`~;
~ :~:. ,
PC89-55 °'~~ ~'~.
r~ ~
t~~5'n'"a
~~
, ~ ' ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ t y~~',t~~~~~ i
i. ~~1
r u.
ij
~ - ~ `.~~,~~i;~
6. That six (6) people indicated their presence at Jar~uary 30,
1y89, public hearing and two (2) people indicatQd there presence at ~he
February~ 27, 1989 publac hQarinc~ in oppo~irion; and that n.o correspondenco wus
roceived in opposition to subject petitio:~.
~;
Y 1
,.;~
, AI,IFOR~IIA ENVTftONMENTAL__Q,uALIT.Y A(:_T, F~ND~~: That tlie .Ananeim
City Planninc~ Commission h.as revie~ved the propos~l to re~lassi£y subject
property ~r~m the FtS-A-43,000 (Ftesidential/Agricultural) ~one to th~s RM-1'L00
;Residential, Multiple-Fami.ly) Zon~ tc construr_t a 3-story, 20-Linit a.p4rtment
complex ~rith waiver of maximum structural height o:1 a r.QCt:~nyularly-shapod
parcel of la.nd consis tiug ot approximately d.73 acre, having a front~age of
flpproximarely lla fee t on the east si.do oL• Webster Avonue, having a maximum
de~p~h of approximately 270 .feet, beinq located approximately 183 feet sou~h
uf the centerline of Clearbrook 1Lane and xurther ~l~scribed as 644 South
Webster Avenue; and do~s herek~y approvo thQ Nogatiao Declaration upon fin2~ir,g
that it has consid~red L•he Neg~tive DeclaraLion t~gether with any cumments
recoived during the public review process and further £in~iinc~ on the basis of
the initial study and any comments receiv~ed that there fs n.a substan~ial
evidence that the projent will have a signiFic~nt effect on the envirorunent.
NOW, 'L'HEREFORE, HE IT RESOI~VED that the Anaheim City P7.anning
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassi.f.~cation and, by so
doing, tha~ Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amend~sd to
exclude the above-dssr.ribed pro~erty from th~ 125-A-43,000 Zone and to
inaarpnra~e said describ~d proper.ty ir.to l:he RM-120C Zon4 upon the follov~ing
conditions whzcY! are hereby found to be a nece~sary prerequisite to the
proposed use of subject property in order to nreserve the safet~ and generzl
welfai ~ of. th~ Citizens of the Cit:y o~ Anaheim:
l. That the lega.l owner oF .~ubject property shall irrevocably o£fer to
de~icate to the City of Anaheim a strip of land thirty t.wo (32) feet in
wir~th frorn ~he centerline of th~ street along Webster Avenue far street
widening ~?urposes .
7. That all enginee ring rec;uirements ~f the City of Anaheim a].ong W~~ster
Avenue, including prepar~tinn of i.mprovement plans r~nd installatzon of
all improvemenL•s such as curbs and guttex•s, sidewallcs, water fzcilities,
streEr grading and p~vement~ 5ewor and drainage facilities, or other
a~UUrteuant work shall be compliQd with su reguired by tho Cit-~ Engineer
and in accordance with sNacificah ~ns on file in the O~fice oE the City
Engineer; or that sc~curity in the form of a bund, certiffcate of de~osit,
letter of crodit, or cash, in an amount antl f.orm satisfactory to the Ci.ty
of Anaheim, shali be post~ed with the Czty to g~~~~~ntee the satisEactory
completion o£ said impro~amonL-s. Said security sY~all be po~ted with tihe
City prior to in troductivn of an ordinance rQZOning subject praperty, to
guarankee ttie installation of the above-required improvements pxior to
occupancy,
3. Th.at a fee shall be paid to the Cxty of Anaheim for strset lighting along
Webster Avenue i n an amount as ~st2blishod by City Coun~il resolution.
4. That the legal ownez• of subject property shall dedicate to ~hQ C3ty of
~.naheim a five ( 5) Eoot wid~ publi.c utility aasement along the nor~h ttnd
east property linos, as required by the City Electri.~al Engineering
Division.
-2-
PC89-55
:;~.
~~~;.f
;; y
~,' ~
! `+~
{ ~~
: :~
i
r~'"'",~
5• That a fee shall k,e paicl to tf,e City o~ Anahei.m for ~r~e p1Hn~3.n~ ~lon
Webstar Avenue in an amount as es~ablished k~y City Council resolution.
4
6. 'rhat prir,r to introduct3,on of an ordinance rezuning suvject prq~erty, the
legal gropor~y ~Wner shall prc~pare and recard an unsiibordinated covenant
Yimitzng occupancy of aactx apartment unit t.o no more ~han ~wn 2
(other than. c:hildren under the age of tWO ~ 2~ ~ ~ p~rsons
limitation stxall be i.zcluded in each lease,~rQ t~lr a xeementdroom.
the cuvenant shr~.11 be submi~ted to and ap~~roved b Said
prior L•o rQCOrdation. ~ ~ c~py ~£
A~bpy of the recordod covena ~ shal2 be furnish~d
to thc Zoning Divis3.on.
~``~'~~~~
~.
7. Tha~ a covenant shall be recordQd aqreein
~iwolling unit wzth written information t~ Prov.ide the rentor of Q~~h
llistrict(s) peri.ainin obtainod from the School
g~o pos~ible overcrowded conditions and busing
status ot i:he school(s) sarving the dwelling unit.
8• That riur
~ to introduction oF an ordinance rezoning subject ro ert
Cnndzt_ion Nos. 1 through 7, above-mexitioned
provisions or rx hts x • shall be comple ed,p The
Vaic~ b g granted b this resolution sha11 bocome null and
y action of the Plamning Commission unless Said conditians are
comp],ied with within one ( Z) y~ar ~rorn l;li~ ~ate oE
such ~urther rime as the Plannixig Commissio~i m~ thas resolut'
xon, or
y grant.
y • ~'hat ap~roval p~
~equast oul this appl~.cation canstitutQS appxoval of the prQposed
y to the sxten~ that it cocnplies with the A.naheim Munxcipgl
2oning Code anc~ any other appl.icnble City regulation~,
include any actiorl or findings as t~ cum liance or AaFr~val does not
requesC regardi.ng any ~ther P pproval of the
requiremPnt. appzicable ordinance, regulation or
HE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that L-he As~,aheim
City P~anning Comm.ission
does hereby fin~l az~d det~rmine tha~ adoption of this Rasol.ii~ion is ex ressl
predicatec~ tlp~n aP~Yicant's cumpl.iasice with each azid all of the condz~tions
hereinabo~r~ set forth. Should a~ . p y
declared invalid or un.eriforceab e bC}1 GOndition~, or an
compehen~ jurisdiction, ~hen y t~"~ ~ina1 y p~r~ thereof, ~e
L-his ~te,soiution, nd gnn~ of any court af
contained, shall be c~~e~~~~ xlulZ and voia.
y appravals n.~rein
THE FQi~~GOING RESOLUTTON is signed arid approved h~,
Feb:uary~ Yggg, me this 27~h
day of
. ,
:.
;
_ " ~ ~' ~~-'~ , ~ , .'~ ~a.~..
CHAIRWaMAN, ANAHEIM CIT1' PLANNING COMMI$SION
ATTEST:
~--.~_ LK~a~'~,~ ,
SECR~T RY ~~'~/
• 1~..NAI'IE~M CITY PLt-NNXNG C02~fT.SSION
-3 •-
?,`~;:
;
PC89-55
.~.-
_ . ~~,:i
;,~
- , ~, Gn
,
. ~Y:~n .. .>~ti ~:~~,~!
4 ~ ~
~p~.r'r•,~~ . .'i, . ~ - v S.J~t n ~~,~~ .r~'~. t ,ti~~:;. ..}',~ tl~ '~S~ ~~ t ~~~~~~ ~~~p7'i'~~~~ ~~~,~~
r , ~ ,,
+ `~~,ti
^i
. r ~ ~a
STATE OF CALIFORNI71
COUt~TY ~F ORI-NGE ) sg.
CI~Y OF ANAt~tEIM )
I, Edith L. Harrip, Searetary oL the Anahe.im C~ty P~anninq
Commissioxt, do hereLy cercify th~t tho foregoing reauluL•ion was passed and
adapted at a meet,inq ~f the Anaheim City Planninq Commission held on February
27, 7.989, by the followiny vote of the memb+ass thereof:
AYESs COMt~tISSIONERS: BGIJAS, HOXDS:[(1N, CAI"JSILLO, CELDFiAt)S, MES5E
NO~S: COMMIS5I0l1ERS: NONE
VACANT: COt~(ISSTONERS: TWO ~EA~`S
, . ~, ~~;'i' ~:i?~%t~!~ 1
;~~~
.i~
;, r
;y
`(i
Y
IN WITNESS WKEREOF, I h~ve horeunto set my ha:id this 27L•h day of
F'ob:uary, 1969.
_ _~L.~~ ~ '~ ~ ~...
3~t~
SECRF.TA2tY, ANI~H~IM CJTY PLANNING COhA~lISSION
,y;
!?ti
~:~~.
~.b
' %;
~~~~;
i, . >;
f 'J,,
"4 " PC89-55 ~~~~
;,~~;~;