Resolution-PC 89-57~!
~.L1~~ I ~N4~p~$~~
~
A R~SOLU'lION OF '~HE ANAH~IM CITY PLANNING COMM:[SSIUN
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAT, USE PERMIT N0. 37.?,1 BE GRANTED
h;r g f ~
,'~
~~~
WFiEREAS, the Anaheam City Planning Commission did receivt~ a verific~d
Petition ~or Conditional Use PFrmit L•rom WALT ItISNEY PRODUCTIONS, ATTN:
EDWARD M. PRIBONIC, 1313 South Hzrbor Bou].ava.rd, Anaheim, CA 92803, o~rner of
certazn rQal progerty situated in tho City of Anahc~im, CounLy of Orange, State
of California, d~scribecl as:
THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUT1iF1rST QUARTER AND THE SUUTH
HALF OI' THE NOI2THWE5T ~UAR1'ER OF ;iECTTON 22, TOWNSfiIP
4 SOUTHo RAi]Gi, lU WES'1', xN TIi~ RANCHO SAN ~TUAN CAJON
DE SAPTTA ANA, AS PER MAP RECORDEA IN BOOK 51, PAGE ZO
OF MISCE~LANEOUS MAPS :[N THE OFEIC~ OF THE COUNTY
REC0~2DER OE 5AID COUNTY.
WT3EREAS, the City P.lanni.nq rommission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Cpnter in the C~ty o£ Anaheim on February 27, 1989 a~ 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said publia hEaring having been duly qiven as required ksy law and in
accozdance with thp ~rovisions of• ttie Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to he~~ and consic:er eviQence ~or and against said ~roposed conditional use
permit and to investigate anc~ make fi.nd3ngs ancl reca~mendations in connection
~hQr.~with; and
WHEREAu, said Commis~ion, aEter due inspection, investigati~n anr~
study made by it~olf ana in its behalt, and aftgr dug consideratiori o£ a'l1
evidence aricl reports offored at said hearing, does find ancl determine the
following facts:
1. ThaL tho potitionar requost;~ approval of cond.itional uso permit
' under authority of C~de Sections 1.8.03.030.010 and t8.48.050.020 to witi: to
replace the existing marquee sign locatied at the main entrance to Disneylaud.
2. That the proposed use will not advQrsQly a~fect tlze adjoining
land usRS ancl the growth arid dev~lopment of: th4 area in which it .is propoced
to be loaated.
3. That the siz~ and 3hape of the site prop~sed for ChR use is
ade3uate to nllow the fuli development oi the proposed use in a manner not
detrimantal to the particular area nor to ttie peace, health, safety and
g~rner~l wQl~are of kbe CitizQns of the ~ity of Anaheim.
4. That :re granting of th~ Conditional Use Permir., undc~r t2ie
conditions imQ~sed, if any, will not be dctrimental to the peace, health,
safety and general welfar~ of the Citizens of the City nf An~heim.
5. That t2ie traffi.c generaCecl by thp proposed use will not impose
~;n ~zndue burdan upon the streats and hiqhways design~d and improved to carry '~
the traEf.ic i.n tY,a area. ~
~~; 0694r -7.- t~C89-a7
,
,S
' °~~
%~
~ ~;
~
! 5.., c,,..~ , ~ ..... .. .. .. . .. _. ... . . _ , . . , . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ~. _ . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . ~ ~ .~ . y.. ~f.~'~~.~
~~
~
'
N
5, That no ono indicatc3d their pres:.•nce at sai.d public hearing iz~
opposir.ion; and ttiat no carzesporide:ico was receivod in opposition to the
subject petition.
GALIFORNII~ ENVIRQ~IMENTA~, +Q~F~LTTY ACT FINDIN~: The Planning
llirector or his aiithor.ized reprasentat3.ve has detormined that tne pxoposed
project fa11s within the deSiniL•xon of Calegorical Exemptione, Classes 2 and
11, as detined in the State EiR Guiclelines azid is, ~ho:•efore, catagorically
exEmpt fxom the requiremenr to prepare an EIR.
NOW, THER~T'ORE, BE IT RESO~VED th~t the Anaheim City Planning
Commission doos ho~eby grar.t subjuct Petition f.or Cond3.~ional Use Permit,
upon the fnllawing conditions which ar~ hereby found to be a nec~ssary
prereguisi~e to the prc,lsosed use of. the subject propdrty in order to preserve
the safety and gener~i ~relfare of LhP Citi.zens oi• the City oP Anaheim:
1. That the 1eg~1 owiier af subject propr~rty aha11 irrovocably offer to
dedicate to tho City o£ Anaheim a strip oi land sixty (60) i•eat in width
from tha centerline of the strc~et along Harbar Botilevard for street
wid~ning purposQg.
2. That the legal owner of subjoct property ahz~ll irrevor.ably offer to
dr~dicate to *_he Cihy oE Anaheim a str~p of 1~nd forty Eive (45) feet in
width from Che cantErla.ne of tho streQt along West Street fo.r street
widening pur~~ses.
~. That lhe ~iew construction authorized by tiiis re~~lution shall ba servbd
by uziderground ut~lities.
4, That subjocL property shall be develoPed su;:~tantially in accnrd~nce
wiCh plans tand specifications on filo wii:h tho City of Anaheim marked
Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
5. That prior to issuance o:E a permi~ by the Building Divi~ion ar within a
~reriod af one (1) year. from the date of this re~~iution, whichever
occurs first, Coriditi;~n Nos, '1 and 2, ~bove-mt~ntioned, shall be compliQd
wiCh. Extensi~ns fAr further time to complete srsi.d conditioas may bQ
grantod itt accorclance wii:h Section 10.03.090 of the Anahe3m Municipal
Codo.
6. That approval of thzs appl.icahion r,.onstitutes approval of the proposed
requost onl.y to the extent that it complies witk- ~he Anaheim Municipa2
Zoning Codo and any othQr applicable City reyulation,~. Approval does
not include any actioz~ or f inctings as t~ cumpliar.ce or approval of khs
rnquest regarding any Athex applicabJ.e ordinanco, rec~uZation or
xequirement.
-2- PCJ9-57
, '_:~'
*~ ~ :
x
. .. ..: „ :_._.., M~,.,,.,
,~Ft~. ~~~~
~rm~u
+
~
~~ .,~ ~ ,
~,,~
r.,
q'!'y"~
~"
'.i
i
;
: ,ti
j
. ~ '~:i:'i
B~ I'.f
does liQreby find FURxHBR RESOLVED that the Anahe3,m City Planning Cammistsion
an
l d ~'
predacatad upan c
etermina tY~at adoption o~ this Resolut3.on ia expressly
applicant's complianc~ with 'r
hereinab~ve set each uncl all of kho con83tions
f~rth. Should any such candit
ion3
or
~
declarod invalid .
,
any part thereof, ~ie
or unc~nEorceable by the Einal ud
ment
E
J 4'~
t
o
9
an~~ court of.
competent juriqdict3.on, L•her, Chis .Reso].utiun
ancl '
,
'
corita3ned, sha11 ,
any approvals Y~Rrein
be ileemed n.u11 an~ void.
~
THE FQREGUiNG R~SOLUTIt]N is signQd and approv~d .by mE this 27+th d~y
oF I'ebruary, 1989.
,~
;'~~ ,/i , ~~'~ ~ J'~L l_11~-9:/
~~~~~~~ ~y.~ ` -r~~~~~
C:HATRWOMANa' ANAFIE:I:M CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
;i
ATTEST.:
.___._`=~'.~-~. ..~`' .
SECRET,ARY, ANAFiEIM CITY PLANNIPIG COMtQI~SxON
$Tl~TE Qr CALIFnRNJ11 )
COUN'TY OE' ORAII~GE ) ,S ~
C:ITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edxth L. Fiar.ris, Ser.r.e~~ar.y of the An2~t:eim City Planning Comm:ission,
do Y~ereby cerLify ~hat• the coregoing resolution was passed and ado~,ted at a
mee~ing of the Anaheim Ci.ty Planniiig Commissian held on February 27, 1989, by
t:he following vate of tho members thereof:
AYES: COt~iToSIONGRS: &pUA.S, DOYDSTUN, (:AItT1SILL0, F'ELDHAUS, MESuE
NOES: COT~II+i:[SSIpNERS: NONE
VACANT: COI~M4ISSIONERS: TWO SEA'PS
IN WZTNESS WFIGREOF, T have liereunto seC my hand --lits 27th day of
February, 1989.
-- ~~L'c-~--G~, iC . f
~5~~ ~_
SECRFTARX, AN.~HEIM CIxY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3~ PC89-57
;
..
,:_
~ ;~
~ ~,~ +~x:r:s,~~ r ~ ,~~:~;~> ,." .:.. ......:: . ...,. . .
_ ~x