Loading...
Resolution-PC 89-64~ -: , ; ,. ~, ~r~ n~~~'$'~ ~r~ ~' ~4.•+~ 1 ~wyt,n'j( ~ ~ ~ `,~~ ~ ie~~'z ?i';~ ; rs ', 8E~4.L.~~ 2N_..~..4.,_?~.$~.~ ~ A itESOLUTION QF THE ANAHEIM CI'rY PLANNING COMASTSSYnN TfIAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE 2I0. 3911 BE GRANTED 'r~HEREAS, thc~ Anal~eirn City Planning Cornmission dicl receive a verified Petition for Variance .£rom JACK NOSEIK E'T At.., ].2Q6 w. Ash Avenue, I'ullertoxi, CA }2633, owner, ai~d T1i0Ml~S M~URER AFA & ASSOCIATES, 150 ~l Cainino Real, Suite 200, Tustiin, CA 92680, a~ent for certain real property si~uated in the City of Anaheim, County oi• Orazege, StatQ oi California described as: Z`HS WESTERI,Y 74 k'EET JF T+~E NORTHERLY 195 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF LOT 11 OF xHE MILES RANCHO, IN THE CITY OF ANAHE:[Ni, COUNTY Ok' 4RAi~'GE, 5'TATE 0~ CAI,TFnRNIA, AS SH0~~1N ON A MAP TFYEREOF RECORA~D IN BOOK 4 PAGE 7 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAI'S, RECORAS Ok' SAID F ARANGE COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FGLLQWS: f3~GINNING A7' A POTNT ON THL SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT, 332.35 FEET FROM TIiE SOUTHEAST CORfTER OF SAID LOT; TH~I3CE NORTIi 0 DEGREES 9 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST 1318.71 FEET, MORE OR LE$a, TO A POIN1' IN THF NOItTH LINE 0~ SAIri I.OT 11; THENCE WEuTERLY ALONG THE NURTH L~TNE OF SA.ID LOT, ].74 FEET. TO A P~INT; TAENCE SOUTH~RLY ON A DIRGCT LINE 1318.71 FEE'T, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE SOi1TH T~IN~ OF SAIA LOT 11; TI3~NCE EASTERLY A.LONG THE SOUTH LINE 08' SAID L' OT, 174 FEET T.0 THE POINT OF BEGINPIING. .Y . WIiET.tEAS~ L•he City Plann.ina Commission did hold a public he~ring at the Civic Center in L•he Cir.y of Anaheim on Februa.rg 27, 7.9t19, at 1:30 p.m. , notice of said public hearing havinq been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provi.sions of L-he AYiaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, tn hoar and consider evidence for and against said proposed var3ance and to i~vestigate anc~ make fi.nding, and recommondatiox~s in connection tYiQrewithp and WFIEREAS, sa~cl Commission, aft~^r du~ inspection, inves4:igation and study rnacle by itselF an3 in its beha.lr, and after due considerati.un ~f alY evidence ~nd repdrts offared aL sa.ic] hearing, doe~ find and determine the f~llow~ng facts: 1. That the petitioner proposes waivers of the f.oa2owinc~ t~ construct a 3-skory, 9-unit apartment complex: (A) SECTIONS 18.34.Q~~~11 - ~~ximLxUL~~C~ral heiaht. Ar~$., 4 Q 2.012 ,~l storv wi~hin 15d_feek of RS-72Q0 Zoni.r.g ~n~l 2 storig~ otherw~so p2rmitted; ~_ at 7U feet ~torie,~ ~~ropo5ed) . 069~r pr-a9-64 ~.¢ . ~ ;a %'a:': r ~ i,''t%w~' ~ J ~<'u~' `'-_ ~ ~ . ~ ... ~... ~4.W~t~:r}!%i~elt~~~ ~ ~ ~ ',, ~ ~ ~ . ~„ ., ~ ~ ~ '~,1"~'~7 ~h .. .:~..'.t~ ~+ ~ :! 7 2. That the above-nientionocl c,raiver is hereby grantod on the basis ; that there aro special circwnst~n.cds app].icable tc the properl:y such as size, i~ ~hanc~, ~apaqxaphy, location ancl surroundings which do not apply to ather identica2].y zoned property in the same v;icinit~; and that stricC a~plicati~~n j ~t the 'lon~ng Code deprives the prape:rt,y of priviloges e:njoyod by othe~r ( properties 9.n the idQntical zon~ and class.ification in the vicinity. ~ 3. That there are nxceFtionaJ. or extraordinary c.ircumstances oz• condiLions aQplicable to t•.he groperty invulved or L~ t~e inCo:nded use of the ' proper~y that do not apply q~ner.all to th;e ,. ~' sam~ vzcinity and zone. y Property or clas,s ~f u~e ,iz~ the ~, 4. That the req~r~sted variance is necessai:y for tl~ie ~+r,~servation and enjoyment o£ a subst~ntial proporty ri5rhl ~ossossecl by other praperCy in Lhe same vicinity and zone, ancl d~nie~i to the praper~y in questirn. 5, That the reque;;ted varianc~ ~aa.ll not be rna~eria].ly aetr.imentai to Y.he public welfarQ or injur:ious to thQ pruperty or improve~ments i.n such via'ni~y and zone in wtiich tne propNrty is 7.oratecl. 6. TYis~t no onQ indicated their presence at said pub:lic~ 2iearing in ~pposition and two Pe~plo indieated theS.r prQSence in favor of subjc~ct requesS:; and that no corresp~~ndence was :raceived in opp~~sition to sulajecG pelitior~. ,~LI~ RNII~ENVTRQN~1~rYTA~~ALI'rY, i~ 7 F~NDTt1G: 'That r.hE~ An~h~tim City Planning Commi.ssion ha:~ re+view~ed the p~-o~c~sa1 to cons~truct a 3-skor,y, 9-uni~ apartment c~~mplex w:ith waiver ~f m~axin~um structur~~1 heic~ht ni~ a rectangularly•-sha~ad par~cel oF ;~,and cor.sis+ting of. ~ip~rosimateay 0.2f~ acre having a£rontage of app~oximatE~ly 74 fee~t nn the south sic~e of Romneyt~ Driva, havii~g a maximwn depth c~f approxiinz~tely ].63 feet, b~si.zig located approximately 1500 feet we5t o£ the cent~~rline af Harbor Boulevard ~-nd turther tlescribed a~ Fi06 W~rt ltomneya Drive (subsoque~ntly deLerr,iined t~ be 81U West l2omxieya Briv~e); ar.~d does herP~y a~p,prove ~h~ Negative Declaration upon finding ~htat it has ecnsid3re~i tt:e Nega~tive Doclaration t:ogothor witli any comments rec~eived dur.ing the public reviaw process tind furthEtr Einding on tho basis of the initi~;l st~~dy and anp c~mme~lCs receive~d that there iis no substantial evidenctr tll~tt the prnject: wi11 ha~~e a s:iqnificant ef'fect ox~ the envirunm~ent. NOW, THEREE'GRi:, HE IT RESAL,VEU tr~at the Anaheim GiLy P1~-nning Commission doos hQr~el~y yrr.nt; subjecl: Pf3ti.tion 1'ar Vazi~,ncQ, upon the follcwing conditions ~~h:lch ar~e heraby faund to b~ a nec.essary prer~quisite to the prapnsed use ~f tlie yub ~~~ct prope,ty in o;c~le~r to presorvr the~ gafety s~nd ganeral welf~3re ot the ('.iti::~~~is o£ tho L'ity of. A~zahezm: r. That pri,or to issuFincr•~ of a bu.ilciin~7 per~r.it, tha appr~pritite traf.Ezc Eignal assessment ~eo ~.ha11 bo ~aid t~ t;he City of Anaheim in an, amount as e~tablishe9 by CiL•y C~auncil zes~lution. Z. That t}xe ~3~~isting di~iveway on Romneya Drive shall be removed and replacod wieh stand~~.rc~, curb and gutter, ;:idewalk and landscaping. -2- PC89-64 f ~ ~ _ . . . ~ ;'r~; ~ ~ ~1~6~~~ t ly ~ ,(, i (t~, ~ ~i i ~ i .f. ~ ;~isl ', h ~ 3. That parking shall not bs permitked on the ten peraont (10~) grade port.ion oE the parking garagQ r~unp as required by ~he C3.t;y Tra.ffic Engineer. 4, That street lighting facilities along Rumneya Drzve shall be installed a.s required by *he Utilities General Manager in a~corciance witk~ specifications on file in the Office of Utilities Gtneral M~ager; or t.hat security in the form of a bond, certificate ~f depos~t, letter of credit, or cash, in an amount and form satzsfacf;orX to the City of Anaheim, shall be posted witn the City to guarantee the satisfactory completi~n ~f the above-mentioned impro~remen~s. Said socurity sh37,1 be posted w~lth th.e Citlr of AnahQim ~rior to i3suaiice ~f a building permit. The above--re,quired impravement~ ~hall be installed pr.ior to occupancy. 5. Tha't sub;ect praper.ty sha11 be sprveci by underground utili.ties. 6. :Chat the 1ega1 owner uf subject property sha11 dc~dicate to the City of Anaheim with a Etrip c~f land five (5) .feet in width locateci along the southerly ~ixty (GO) fest of ~he wa~t ~roperty line ot subjeat property far public ut:il.iCy purposes. 7. Ttiat trash s~oxuge areas gtiall be providad and r,~~zntained in a locatiAn accel~table to ti:he Street Maintsn~nce anci Sanitation 1Division an~l in aecordance with npproved pl~ins en file with said Division. 8. Thtat prior to f:inal buildang ancl znning znspectipns, "Ho park: ng for street swe~ping" saqns shall be instal:l.ed a~ required by the Street Mainten,~nce and Sanitation Division and in accoxdance with speci~'icaLions on file with said ciivi~ion. 9. That: the renter u~ each residonLial dwPlling unit shall be provided with writ:ten ini•ormation cnncerning Anaheim Municipal Cude Section 24.32~50U pertainii~g tio "Paiki.nq restricted to fac.ilitaCe s~~rePt sweoping". Such wrii:ten informatiori shall cl~arly inilicato when on-street parking is proh.ibited ~nd the pen~3ty for violation. '10. That khe cuxbirlg adjacent to subject property sha]..l be painted red to f.acilitate on-street trash p3.ck-up. l.1. That a fee s}Z~~11 k~e y?aid to the ~iL-y of Anaheim for tree planling along namneya Drive s.n ar~ an?ount as Qstablished by City Council rssolution. 12. Th~3t prior to issuance of a building pezmiL-, apprepxiate paxk and rocreaCion in-liou kQOS sh311 be paid to the City of Anaheim in an amaunt as deterRinod by the City Counr_xl. 13. Tha* ga~es ~hall nat be insta.lled across C2ie driveway i.n a manner which may adversely affect vQhicular traPfic in the adjacent public stroet. Installat.ion of any gates shall confprm to the Fngineering Division'~ Standard Plan rlo. 402 and shall be aubject to the reviow and appr~ral of the City Traffic Engineer. -3-- PC89-64 '~(~~ _ . . . . . , . . . . .. . . ~ . . . . . . ~ . ' ~ ~ . . . . ~~~~ 1 }~rtir~N~)~~iYIF'~f~ ~a 1 V ~~ I ! rt~~y It ~~ ~{~ ' ~ ~ . ~ r't~ ` ;' ', '~ , ~ P i~a ~ , ;y^ ,;i ~~ • That thc~ proposed g,arking struc~ure desiqn slaall conforu~ to the ;; Engineeriilg Divisxon's Stanclard P].an No. 402-Ti perta3ning to atanciard ` details Eor parking structur~s ~nd r.amp requirements. -~; 15. That r.:;e clr.ivc~waX shal.l be cons~,rucY.ed with ten (10) foot rad ius curb t' '~' returns as required by the Czt,y EnginQer. _?; '''; 16. That dra~.nage o~ subject proper.tiy sha11 be disposed nf iu 1!'~ z sa~isFactory to the City Etigineer. m2nner ~r;~:'i 17. T.hat aJ.l lockable podestrian, vehacular access gates sh~s11 bp with " " ~quipped '`f ,}; a ki;ox box dev.ice, if required by tne Fire a~nd/ar Department. Po~.ice ~i. : 18. That fire ~prinklers shall be installeR as reg~iirod by the Ci~y Fire Department, 19. Tha~ all air condition~ing Eaci~itiQS and other roof and ground mount;ed equipment shall b~s properly shielded from vieur, and thQ sound buf:fer9d from adjacerit; resi.dential properti~s. i0. That all plwnbing loaated on i:he exterior of the building shall be properly scre~~ned irom view hy archiY.ectura.I devices and/or landacaping, 21. Tliat praor to issuance of a buil~iing permit, the .legal property oknar shall prapare anr3 record an unsubordinated covenant limiting occupancy of, each apartrr~ent un:it to no more ttlan twa ( 2) per. ~ons (oth~r than children under the ag~ o£ two (2) ya~is) per bedro~m. Said limitation shall be inc].uded in each lease/rental agreernent. A copy of the covenant shall be submitted tc and approved by the City Attorney prior to recordation. A copy af the recorded c~~vc~nant s2ia11 be .furnished to the Zc~ning Division. 22. That a covenant shal~ b8 recox•ded agreeing to provide the renter of eaeh dwolling unit with wri~ten snformat.i~n obtained from tho School Distri~t(s) pertaiuing to possible overcY~owd~d ;:onditione and busing status of tho sch~oJ.(~) serving ~he dwelling unit. 23. That subject property shall be devolaped substaxitially in ~cc~rdance with plans and sperif3cations on file with Lhe Cizy of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 ~hrough 4. 24. That prior to issuancQ of a}~uild:ing permit, or withi.n a ~1) f per.iod of ona year rom the date of thi; rondition Nos 1 3 resnlutiori, whichc~ver ocr.urs first, . , , 4, 6, above-mentioned, s2iall ~ie c;omplied 1~., 12, 13, 14, J.G, with Extensio i 21 and 22, completc~ said conditions may be . ns or E granted in accordance urther with time to Secti 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. on ;~ <i ~=~ ~ 1j ;;~: F; =,; }' ~ `, ~?: ,Y .; ';a ,;; PC89-64 _~~ i .,; '~: ~;: ... .,.... ''t?;S ~,~`~~.~',ix"~" L.,; n.sx~9~ , ;;~ :.. . ....::.. . :...... .~i~::!~~'~r,?,~k,,,~14,!•` '. . , ., ,.. . .. . .'?~,; _v.iy . , .^:sen . , ,.,u~: „~avry~ } ,~N'4''Y~G,O~ hxp•~,~nr~ ., I . . ~ [ jr~~~ y~~~ . 11 ~ ^~ ~~ ~~ r ;tr i r'~ 25. That p.rior tU £.inal building and zoning inspecL•ians~ Conditian Nos. ~,, ~ 4, 5, 7, 8, lU, 1? • 14, 15, 16, .l7 ~ 18, 19, 2p ancl 23, above-mentionec~, shall be complied wi~h. 26. That approval oE this appli.c.ation constitut.es approval o~ tho proposed requost only to the oxtent that it complies with the Auaheim Municipal ' Zoning Code and ariy uChox applicable City reguiations. A~proval does il not include any acL-ion or Ei.ndings as to compliance or approval of the ~~ request regarding any oth,er applicable ardin~nce, regulation Qr ; requirement. ~ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commissiori ~'~4 ~3oes hereby find and determine that adoption of• this Resalution is expressly ~i pr~dicated upon applicar~t's cc~mpliance witYl each and all of the conditions "`.f hereinabove set forth. Should any such cor,9itiorzs, or any part thereof, be d~clarea invalid or unexi£orceable by ~he final judgment of any court of ~ competent juri.sdiction, then this ResoluL•ion, and any apprnvals herein. cox~tained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOF.GGQING RESOLUTION is ssgned and apprcved by me this 27th day o f February, i989 . - ,J L G'l.-.P. ti i //~~! 1/ ^ ~ . , _ ., J -T __~ .~ ._. _._ CHAIRWOMAN,. ANAHETM CITY PLANNIHG COMMTSSTON ,~ A1rTEST: V ( ~ ~ 2 Ol ~ ~ i UC-,,. . . , ~(~_ SECRrTARY, ANA~iE7Di CITY PI.,AN~IYNG COMMISS:[ON STATE OP CALIFOR2~IA ) ,~ COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss . ~'' , CITY OF ANAHETM ) T, Edith L. Harris, Secreta•ry of the Anahe,im City Planniizg Commis.zion, do horeby cartify that th~ forec~uing resolt~tion was passed and adopted at a meeting of Che Anaheim Cii:y P].anning Comm.9.ssion held on Fabruary 27, ~989, by the following vote of the mcmb~rs thereoi•; AYESi CCIMMISSTQNERSt BOUAS, BOYASTUN, CARUSILLO, FELDHAUS, MESSE NO~St COMMISSTONERS: NONE VACANT: COMMISSIUNERS: TWO ~~ACIIDTT TN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuuto set my hand this 27th day of ~ February, ~?89. ~ ' ;: 7l~~ ~ ;ti SEC: ETAP.Y, .ANA'clETM CIT`t PLAIJNING COMMYSSION '`~' ';r . ;;y i ~r iv --5- PC89=64 ;;~ ~f . , ~.'~`'i 4 ~~'il~~~ ~,~: y~ . . . ~ , ' ~ . . , . . . . .. . . ~ , ;. . _ ~,;.:i+'}~,