Resolution-PC 89-76~n~
F~,.F,~QLU'~t_O~J N F~8 ~¢,
, : ..~,~a~;
;;i
~
A 1RF.SOL'UT:fON OF THE ANAI~EIM CITY PLANNING COhII~tIS,~sION
TFAT PETITIAN EOR RECLASSIE'ICATION N0. 88-89-31 DF, GRANTED
~iHEREAS~ tho Anaheim City Planning Commiysion did receive a
veriEied ~,etition for RQCIA531'F.].CSt.lOTl from Raymond L. Ph.illips, 929x N.
Batavia Street, Orange~ CA 92665, owner, anc] Magdy Hanna. 44(l0 MacArthur
Boulevard, Suite 680, Newport Beach, CA 926G0, agent for aertain real
proporty situated in the Cit.y of Anah~im, County of Orz~nge, State of:
Cnlif.ornia, dQSCribeci as follows:
LUT 22 OF TRAC'.f 793, "WOODWARU TRACT" IN TFTE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AS PEP,
2~iAF~ RECORDED IN R04R 22, PAGE 10, OF MISCELLANEOClS MAPS, IT.d TFiE
OFFICE CF THE CI~UNTY R~CORDER OF SAIn COCTNTY,
iVFiGRGA5, the City nlanning Commission did k~old a public hearing
at the Civic Center ir- the City ~f Anaheim on Jdnuary 16, 1989, a~ 1:3U p.m.,
notace of said public hea•ring ha~~ing heen dtily given as required by law and in
accordsnce wikh the prov.isions of Che Anaheim Municipt~l Coda. Chapter 18.Q3,
to hear. and consider evidQnca for and against sai.d propoaed xeclassiEication
and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connectior
therewithj and said public hearlug was conti.nuod to the meet3nqs of
February 1'3, 198Q, and Narch 13, 1989; an@
WFi~,REAS, said Commission, afte: due inspect3.on, investigation
axid stuily made by itself and in its boYialf, ancl afh.er clue consic3eration of a].1
evidence and reports off~red at said hearing, do~s find and determino the
follo~vizi~ Pacts:
1. Tha~ the petitioner proposes reclassiflcation, ~~f subject
property from RS-A-A3,000 {Resadential/Agricultural) Zone ~ta RM-1200
(ke3idantial, Multiple-Family).
2. That tho ?`.^aheim General ?J,nn desiynates sunject proper4:y for
medium ~ens~.ty residentia). land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassificaL•ion ~f subject property is
necessary and/or desirablP for thQ ordQrly and proper develo~ment of the
aummunity.
4. That L•h~ praposod rsclassification pf subjQCt propertp fioes
proporly relate to the zones and theix permittc~c~ uses loeally eatabllshed in
clo~e proxxmity to s~~.bject property a~id to the zones and ttaeir permitCed uses
generally ostablished throughout the c~mmuiiity.
5. Tha.t the proposed rec:La„~ificaticn o~ subjecr pr~perty requires
the improvemen~ of abuttinq arieots iii accordanco with the circulation of the
Genera~ Plan du~ to the anticipa~ecl increase i.n traffic whzch aill be
qener~-t~~d by the inrensificati~n of land use.
0718r
-1- PC89-76
<`,'~,
~ ~ ~ ~ . ~~:f~
~/9.~!~~1 .1wr~
6. That one pQr3on indicat~d their pre~ence at said public hez-ring
in apposii:ion; and that no correspondenco was receiveci i.n appositiaii to
subject ~roperty.
~~3~.~~~~~~_~.~TVI~20NME~~L pUAGIT~,p,~,~,F~ND,~p~= That the Anah~im
City Planning Commission has raviewed the proposal to reclasaify subject
property from the RS-A-43,QOU (Residential/agricul~ural) Z~r~e ~~ the RM-1200
(Residential, Multiple-Family) Zone to r.onstruct a 3-Story, l0~uniit xpartmant
complex wzl-h aaivers of maxirnum strucCural height and m~+ximum site coverage
on a irr~,yu].arly-shaped parcel of land consisLing of appr~x.ima~ely 0.57 acxe,
having a franr_~q~ of a},proximately 133 fQet on tht nortl~ side o~ Savanna
Streer, tiavinc~ a maximum depth ~f approximately 214 ~Qet, bein~ located
approximately 1,050 feet west of thQ centerline uf. Knott Street and further
described as 362Q and 3633 Wost Savanna SCroet; and does herQby approve t;he
Negative Leclaration upon flnding ttiat it has considered the Negat:ive
Declaration togekhec with any commc~nts received dur.ing ~he public review
process ~nd further finding on the basis of ~he initial study and any
corrunents rer.e.ivcad that there .is no substant°,,1 evidence that tho project will
have a significanr effect on the ezivironmenl.
NOW, TH~REFORE, BE IT RESULV~D thaY. ti~e An~heim City Planning
Commission does hereby~ urant suY~jecr Petiti~n for Rar,lassification and, by so
doing.. l•hat 7'itle 18-~or.ing ot the Anaheim Mun.icipal C:ode be amer.dod tu
exclude t:~e above-described properCy from the RS-A-43,OQ0 (Residential/
Aqric;ult~~ral) 7,one to the RM-1200 (Resider~4:i~1, Multiple~Famil,y) ZonP and to
incorporate said describsd propsrty inta the Zone upon the ~o:llowing
conditions which dre hersby found to be a nQCessary prc~requi~i~e ta the
prop~sod use of subjec~t p:o~erty an arclQr to preserva the safety and genaral
welfare of th~ Citizens oL• the Cit}• of An~hQim:
l. That all engin~ering requi.rements ~f tne Citiy of Ant~heim along Savanna
StrQet, including preparation ~f im~,rove~ent plans ttnd insta].lation of
all irr,provtiments such as curb~ and gutL•ors, sidewalks, water facilitiPS,
s'treet gradii~g and pavemeii~, sewer and dra.inage Eacilitaes, or othe:
uppurte,i~nt work shall be complied wi~h as xequiced by the City Eugineer
and i~i accoxdance with spe~ifications on Eile in the pffice oP the City
Engi.neer; or that securihy in the form of a bond, cerLificate of
deposiC, letter of creciiL•, or crosh, in an Fvnount und ~orm sntisfactory
to the Cit1 oP Anaheim, shal.l be posted with the Caty to guarantee the
satisfactary completion of said improvemen~s. 5s~id securitX shall be
posL•ed witr rhe C~ty prior to introduction oE an ac•dtrtRnr_e zezoning
subject property, to guarsntee ~hQ insta'lla~zon of *_ne above-r•oquired
improvements prior to oc;cupaacy.
2. That a fce sha11 bQ paid to the City of Anaheim for. tree plaiiting along
Savnnnt~ StreQt in an amount as established by City Councii resolution.
~2- P~ 89-76
__ , _ ... .
,
,;;~
ti'~~'"~4 ~
3. That s~reat lighting fncili~les along Sa~anna Stroet shall bo installed
as required by the Utilities General Mar~ager in accordanco with.
specificationa on fa.le iri the Offiee of Utilities Gene.rsl Maiit~gers or
that secur.ity in th~ Porm oE a bond, certiEicnte oi doposit, :lettor oL
credi~, or. cash, in an amount ~nd form satisfactory tn the City o£
A.naheim, shall be pos'~ecl with the City to guarantee th~ sat.isfactory
comp~etion of Lhe above-mentioned impruvamezits. Said sECUri~y shal~ he
posted. with the City of Anahoim prior to introducti~n of an c~rdinance
rozoning subject property. The abo•-e-raquired impravements ;shall ba
instal:led prior to occupzncy.
4. 'ihat prior to inlroduction of an orclix~ance rezoni.ng subjRCt g.ruperty,
the 1egb1 prope.rry owner shali prepa:•a and record an unsubardinated
covenaizt limiting or,cupancy of each apartmenL unxt to no more than two
(2) persons (other than children undar the aqe of tw~o (2) ya~-rs) per
bedroa-n. Said limitation sha11 be iiicluded in each lease/rer~tal
agreQment. A copy of the covenant shall t~e submitted tn and ~pproved by
the City Ahtorney prior to rccord.3tion. A copy ot the recurded covenant
s2za11 bo Eurnished to the Zoning L~3.vision.
5. That a covonant shall be reaorded agreeing to provide t;he rox~tez of each
dwelling unit with writtt~n infurmation obtaiiied from the School.
DistriCt(s) portaining to pos~ible overcrowded conditions and busing
status of tlie achool(s) sorving the dwe].ling unzL•.
6. That tha ownc~r of subject property sh~ll submit a lettQr requesting
terrnination of Var3.ancQ No. 11f45 to the Zona.ng Division.
7. That pri~r to the ~ntroducticr. of an ardinanee rezoning subject
properl-y, Cendition Nos. 1 thr~ugli 6, above-mentioned, sha~ll be
c.~mplAted. The provisiuns or rights granLed by thi~ resoiution shall
become nu11 ~~nc~ v~id by action of• the Planninq Cor~vnlssion unlo~s said
condition:s ar~ complied ~vith within one (1) year from I;he date c-f this
resolution, or such further time as th~ Planriing Commission may gr~ant.
8. That approva~ of this applicat;i.un constitutes approval of L•he pxoposed
reauest only to the ~„tent that it compl.ies with the Anaheim Mu~licipal
Zoning Code anci any uther applicable City regulationa. Approve.l doe~
nat include any actiun ox findings as to aomplianco or approval of thQ
request regarding any other appli~cable ordfnance, regulation or
requiremenC.
HE IT FURTHEdt RESOLVFA that the Anaheim City Planning Comriission does
hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predict~ted upon Applicant's compli.anc~e with 8ach and ~,11 of the condit:ons
hereinAbove sek forth. Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, be
declared invaliit or unenforceable by the tinal judyment of any court of
compet~n~ jurisdiction, then this Resolu~ion, and ax~y approval3 :here3n
contained, shall be deemsd nu11 and void.
-3- PC 89-76
~ ';
,;,
.i
; %;
.,,
. ,;~:;:',~a3
f 1 1'.
',~ ., , , . .. . ~ ' I'.~ . , ' i ;-~~
~.1 . . , ~,". r ~,1 r.
~m l
i ,
~ '~ p .`,h=+~i t f~~~+itiy~~A~~~~~~.. '~~~iP~
~1~~~~
l t~~
TEIE FOI.EGOING RESALUT:[ON io ~ir~ned ~nd appr~ved by me this 13th
dmy o£ March, 1989.
.~
,'~%' .~ i,.`~1~:...~_'...-.~/ ,:'~l~le.'~~_~ ~
CI•IAIFtWOh1 y, AN~.HETM CITY PLAN~IIP7G CUMMTSS70N
ATTEST : ~ ~ ~
W~ ~~~a ~.~ .+
SECRETA.RY, ANAHEIM CITY. PT~ANNING COMMISSIQN
STATE OP CALIr~R~7IA
:~7,
~ii~
~%
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS.
C:TY' OF ANAHEIM )
I, ~dith L. ~Iarris, Sacre~ary oi the Anaheirn City Plann~ng
Commissian, do hereby aertify that th~ foregoing .resolution ~aa p~acsed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anuhoim City Planning Commission held on March
13, ~.989, by lhe followzng vote of the m~. iberz~ tlier.eof:
AYE~: (:OMM'LSSIONEfZS: E~OUAS, CARUSILLO, I'FLllHAiJS
NOES: COMMIS5~ONERS: BOYUSTi)N, MFS5S
VACANT: TWO SEATS
Ii~ WT.TNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand rhis 13tki riay of
March, 7.989.
-~-1~~ -
SECRET.ARY, ANAHEI2Q CITY PLAN'NING COMMISSIOZt
. . . . . .. _, ,_1
, i'.
.. ;~;~;~;~
~,`'
h~~
j41~
ilh
-~- rc: a9-~~ ;;~~~
1 ~an,
, ~
tii
. . . . . , . . . . . .~ ~~a~)~ ~~°~w`
, . . , .. .. , . . . _ . . . . . ~ . . ~ . ~ ~ . . ~ . . . , . . ~ . . . _ , . . . .. . .. ~ .. . _ .. . .. t.. _, ,..1. ....~n.{,.. ~L.kS