Resolution-PC 89-84f~n' 11 f - 7.~.
~ Y'„
'~.~~f~ ` , "
I
r,;
~
, . . , . . ~ . ! l i~l~ T ~ ~{' '~~~
~r
~ ~.
rik
,}
`;;;
' ~,`
~~4tL~T rr N ~.~as_~
A RESOLUTxON OF THE ANAHETM CTTX FvANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETTTIQN FOR RF~CLASSXFICA~rTQN N0. Sf3-89-25 F3E DE1xIF.D
WFiEREAS, Lhe Anahe.im City Planning Commission did raceiye a
veritied petiL•ior~ Cor Reclas~ification from JASON C. WU AND J~At7 G. WU, 7342
Oranqathorpe, Suite C-103, 9uena Park, CA 90621, owners, and KU ~ ASSOCIATES,
1NC. , 2?.632 Gul~len Springs Dr. , Suite 29p, Diamonc~ klar, CA 91765, agPnt for
cortain raal property situated sn the rity of Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of California, de~crik~ed as follows:
THE WEST 66 FEF.T OF 'rHE EAST 132 FEET OF THE WEST 26~:
f EET OF THE SOUTH pNE-IiALF Or '~xIE SOUT'IiEA.ST
OriF-•QUARTER UF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-~UART.ER OF THF
SOUTHEAST UN~-QUARTI'R OF SF:CTION 14, T0VIPISFITP 4
SOTJTII, P,AhGE 11 WEST, S. H. B. & FI
WHEREAS, the Ciky Flanning Commission c~i.d .hold a public liearing
at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on M~rch 13, 1989 at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said public hearing havinq been duly gi~~on as requix•od by law and in
accordance wit}i the provisions of tho Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hoar and considQ: evidonce for and against s~id proposed rQC].assifiaation
and to investigate and make findings nnd recommendations in COriri@CtSGri
therewith; and saic] public hearing was c~ntinuQd to the meeting of March 27,
1989; and
WhEREAS, sazd Cormnission, aftQr due a.napection, investigation
and s~udy made by itsQlf and in iks behalf, and after dua considerat.ton of all
evidenca and reporCs ofFered ~t said hearing, doos find ~nd determine the
following facts:
1. That the potitioner proposes reclassificarion oF subject
property from Che RS-7--43,000 (Resident.ial/Agcicultural) 7o:ie to the RM-1200
(Residantial, Multipla-Family) i.nne.
2. That ttie Anaheim Goneral F'lan desiqn3te3 subjeat property
For Medi.um Density Rosidential lanr~ uses; althaugh the Planning Corrunission
direc~ed s~aff in conjunction with this action ~o aeny s~je~;~
reclassification L-o prepare a General Plan Amendment For tho area to co.asider
rQdQSignatiny it fpr Low Madium Density Res.idential land uses.
3. That the propo:~ea reclass.ifica~ion is denied on Che basis
that i~ would bQ cnnsidered "spot zon.iaq" in an arRa surrounded b,y
single-.Eamily rosid~r~cQS.
4. That t~he proposed recYassiFication of sub;ject pronerty is
not necessory nor desirab.le fo: the orderly and proper dRV~±lopment of tho
communiCy.
5, That the propased reclas~i~ict~tion of subject praperty doe4
nut properly ro2ato to the zonc~s and their permitted us~s locally establ3shed
in close proxfmity to ~ub;ject property and to the zones and thair permftted
uses gvnor~lly esCab.lished thrauc~hout tho community.
0741r --1- PC89-84
_ --__- ____ _ _ ~ ' ~ ..:.J lJi
r~
r'`~"1
i.
' ;~ + ~,`~~M~t
`'r=~'i
~
5. That twonry (20j poopla indicate~~ their pr•esence a~ said
public hoaring in ~~,~position; ~nd t'ha~ letters and a petition ~ontz~ining
approximately 44 sxgnatures were receivaa in opposition to sub~ect petition.
5~.~~Q~~Is'~ ~~~~_~~~~L. ~.~~___.A.~.~_~.~.N~.~~ TY.at khe AnaY~eim
Cit;y Planninc~ Cnmmission has r~viewed tho proposal to reclassi~y subject
property from t;he RS-A-43,000 (Residen~ia.l/Agrir.ultural) 2one to tlae RM-1200
(Rc~si~tential, Mult;lplF-Family) Zone and to r_onstruct an ~.l-unit, 2 and 3
story apurh.mont campl~x with wai.v~rs of m~rximum structural lxeic~ht, maximum
site coverage and m3nimum setback adjacant to inter.ior progert;~ line on a
recrangul~rly shapeci parcel oF land consi~ting of approximately 0.45 acra,
havinq a frontage oE approxi.mately 66 Eeet on the north side af Eiall Road,
being located appror_imately 760 Eeet east oE tho c~nte~rline of Western A~~enae
and furtlior d~scribed as 3121 Wast Bal]. Road; and does he°eby approve the
Negative Declarat.ion upon findiny that it sias considerod tkze Ne~ative
Declaration together wi~h any c~mments received ~uri.ng th~ public ~eview
process and further finding on the basi.s ot the initial study ~,nd any
commen~s received that r,here is nn substantial ev~id~nce that th.e projoct wi11
have a si~~nificant effect on the env~ironment,
NOW, THF.~EFURE, HE T'P RFSOI,VFD that the Anahe=m ~.ity Plar~ning
CorimS.ss,ion d~es hereby deny PeL•.it.ion for Roclassiticat3on an the basis oE the
aPorem~ntioned :Eindznqs.
THG FOREGOTi1C R~SQ~,UTTON is signad and approved by mQ this 27th
day of March, 1588.
-----•Y--~ =~_~.'~-.~!~~«~~:;~_
CIiAIRWO~fAtr,/~NAHL''IM CITY PLANNIN'G COhII~SISSION
ATTEST; `~
--- --'""=__1~f~`~GL.= _,._~ _
SECRETA , ANAT3EIM CtTY. P~,ANNING COMMISSI023
STAT.E pF CALIFQRNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANC+E ) ~~,
CITY OF I~I~TI~HEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of tFe Anaheim City Pl~nn,iny
Corrunission, do heroby cc~rCify that L•he foregoi.n~ reso.l.ution was passed and
adopted at a meQtinq of thQ Anaheim City Planning Commissi.or. held on March
27, 1989 by the Follow.inq vot~ of tha members thoreoE:
AYES: COhLtiiTSSIONI:RS: BOUAa, BGYUSTUN, CARUSILL'L0, FELllH~tJC, H~RBST,
M~SSE, MC BURNEY
NOE~: CUA4fISSIONERS: NONE
AB~ENTs COh4rtISSIONERS: NOT~F
~;
IN WITNESS WFtEREO[', I have horeunr,o ~at my hand this 27th day ~ f~
of March, 29gg,
~,'
... __..~~%~--'s-'Lt.J ~
~-/~i1/~.a~ ~:
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM ITY PLANNTNG COhA~lISSION ~
-2- PC89-84
7 Y 1.,1 ,r4 , y;, ~ _ . . , . , '
-- - ,. .. '~