Resolution-PC 89-871 ~ ~ '
~
~ , ~,
fY 1Vi~ ~ ~ +',,
-~'','~,.r.<'. i.q,. . . .
/ ~_ _ tt.j,
~,;;fi
~
RF OL TIQN ,~~,~p~~ .$y
I~aiir6l
A R~SOL*JTTpN OF ~'HE ANAHETM CITY' PLAIJN:iNC. COb'',tSSION
THAT PLTITIG!! FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 31f ) IiE DT'NIED
WHER~AS, the Anaheim City Planning Cormoission dicl rc~caive H
v~rifiod pdti~~.on tor Condi.tinnal UsR Permit from SEIELL OTL Cpi1PANY, Akt: R,}x,
Mayers, Sr., ,11 N, F3rookh•~rst Street, Anaheim,
Attns P, KUMAR, 536 W. Arrow Hi hwa~ Ca 9230~, nwne•~ and WSECO,
cr~rtai~i real Froperty situaCec~ gn he Cittea~~Anahovina, CA 9~.7'l2, aqent for
of Caliiorn.ia, doscrib~d F-s: ~ ~t~• Caunty o£ Orange, Skate
FARCEI, 1, IIJ 'PFIE CITY OF RNI~FIEIM, CUUNTY OF OkANGE,.
STAT~ UF CALIF'ORNIA, AS SHOWN QN A MAP FIC,ED IN BOOK
17 PAGB 12 Or PARCEL MAPS, IN THE UI'~'ICE OF THE
COUNTY R~:CORDER OF SAID CUUNTY.
W~iEREAS, the City Plannina C~mmi~sion did hold a public hearing
at the Civic Center in the City of Anallrim on January 16, 1989 at 1:30
noti.cQ of said p+ablic hearing havie,g been du3y giveti as required by law ax~dmin
accordanc~.~ with ~t~e provisions of the Anaheim Munici.pal Codo, Chapter. 18.03,
to hear and cor-:iclQr ~viclanee for ancl agaznst said proposed conditional use
permit anci ta invesL-igate and mak~~ findings and ceco:nmendations in conn~ction
t}ierewith; and ~aid public hearing was continuQd Go the meer_ings of February
13, 198y, Cebruary 27, lgt3g and March 27, ~9au; ~nu
WH~KE~•~, said Commission, af.tPr due in.spection, invesf,ic~ation
and study mad3 b}. ztself ana in i~s bcshalf, and after due cons.ideration of a11
evidenc~r and reports offered at said hearing, does find and :~~rermir.P tr~e
followiny £ucts:
~• That the pe~ition~r rQquests approral of a ConcliCional U~e
Permit under authority of ~ode Sections 18.48.(~50.055 and ~8.87.p23.020 to
permit ~ conven.t~nce market w.ith qasoline sales, f~tst-foocl sorvice and
off-sale beer and wir_e, and with waivar at the following:
~B) 5~~7'I.~N~~A•44._Q>_i%~4Z25 _ --
~ • ~inin~im__n4~m~1€r_.Q.~ L~kina_ sP~?~.~.•
-~L~'-Q~Q (17 requi:eci: l~ propr,seci)
~ r'._1.~.~~$~2G~'L.O~Q
~A) ~~~'1_4Q~_1._~..~7._~?~:.9.?.Q~'~ - Minim~m
~ en~l_~~~c3 r~r.s~i1_~~~ ar:~~:.
Z. Tl~at the proposed use is )iereby denif±d on tnQ basis th~t the site
is locateci in c~oAe proximity ~o treaway on-r~mp~ where tho convenfence of
purchasing bnQr and wino is not desirable and coald b~ hazarclous to L•he
drivinq puhlic.
U745r
-1-
PC89-87
;.r:
h~j~'~~+~1~:i'~~~ t~, ~ ,
~< ~Y4~"~ :~ ~~
`
~
~'~',~~
, ,
~ ~,±,"r~~
~ ~P{~;
~~,
~'I
~~ Th~t the raquestod waiver
potitionor in. connc~etien with t}ie submittal oP revised plans, W~th~~~~Wli ~y thct ~'
4. Thak thQ reguesLtacl waiver (B) is Yiereby deniad on the basis
thxt i;hat the pr~rking waiver will causH an incr~;~Re in tr.aFfic congostion in
the imm~dia~e vici~iftl and advert~Qly aL•fact any adjoin~.ng land usos, and that
granting of ~lic~ parking wP~iv9r. uncler tha condit.inr~s imposed, iP any, will be
dotrimen~al to the peace, healtti, sat•'o~y and ganeral wQlfare of thQ citiizens
of the Cit~~ of Anaheim. ,
land uses and he g owtti~andpdevelopm nt of the~area Qin wh ch `ithis ad~~oini~g
tn be locate~l. P posed
6. That lhQ sizo and sliape of the site proposed for the use is
not adequate to a'llow the L•u11 development of tlie proposed use in a munnar not
detrimen~al to the particular area nor to L•h~ peace, }~ealth, safety and
general welfare ~f the~ ~itizens of the City o~ Anaheim.
7. That the qraii*_ing of: tha Cond:~tional Use ~'ermit will be
cletri~nental to the peace, iiaalth, safel-y ~snd yeno.•.•al we].fare of tho Citizens
of the Ci~y o~ Anahoim.
8. That the traf'fic generated b~ the pr~posed use wiI]. impose
an undua burden upon khe ;;trc~ats and highw~jys designed and improved to carry
the traffic iii ttie ar~a, parti~~ularly ; ince the sabjQC:t r~r~o~rty is locatQd in
c.lose nraxi-nity t•o a f.reeway on-ramos acc:ess and thn conveniQrice of ~urchasing
beeL• and wine c~~~xl~ ba hazard to driving public.
~. That :,~ ~ne indicatad thQir pr~sonce ut said public hearing
in app~siliori; and th«t no correspondence was received in opp~sitiori to the
subject petition.
~Af IEORl7I1~. LNVIRQ I~Ep~TAL__ i Af3.ImX A; T; Itdp~Ns: That ~he Anaheim
~i~y rlanning Conunis~ion has revieweci ~he propo,al Co permifi a convenience
market with aasolin~ sales, fast-fooci sorvic~ and off.-sale eC beer t~nd wino,
and with waivers of minimum oncloshd re~ail ~a1QS area a:id minimum rumUer r~f
parking ~p1ces on. an irregularly-sht~ped pnrcal aZ lan:~ COri4~.Bring of
approximately 0.39 acro lacated al: the norChwest corner ~f Ball boad an8
Harbor Boulevard, and furrher ~QSCribec3 a3 60.1 West Ba11 Road~ ~^nd does
h~sreby ap~~rovu the Neqative Gsclaration upon finding thit i~ has c~onsid9red
th~ Negative Declaration t~qethor ~.+ith any commonts rer_eived ~lurix.; the
public review process ancl LSirthQr tin~9ing on t}~e basis ~.f khe i.niki.~]
a»d an~ c~mments zece.ived tnat *h~re is +.o substantial cvideric~ thak ~the
projPCt will havo a signyf.icai!t effect on t1,~ environment.
NOW, ~F!Ei2EFORE, L~B IT RESOLVED that the Anahc~im City F~lanning
Cammission does tiereby deny s,ibjc,ct c etition for Condi tiorial Use PQrmit, an
the b:-sis oF the aforem~nkioned L•indings.
-2-
Pr,g9-87
4~/s'... . . .
•'}~.i ~I-~~:' .
~
t.',~ ~
~
"' "~
s
; r , a, ~:;y~ .
t ~~+ ~
,~ ~
' p';
~.;~n
, ~ .. ._ ~i5!~1
~"~?l
:'~ 1
THF FOREG0ING l2ESUL~UTION i~ 3ior;ed an~1 approved by me ~h3.s 27~h
da.~ o~' March, 19b9. '';;;
-~
i j;f
" ,
,.1
..t....,.
.._ ~
/ ~~;i,~ .~f,o
C'HATRWO?~fAN
~ANAH~IM CYTy p~
AN' "
,
,
NING COI~fT.SSTON
AT:CEST :
. `~
~
~,
"
~ ~
~~ ~i
SECE2ETARY, AN HEiM CTT PLANN.[NC COMMISSTOc~
~
s.;~
'`~~
y;;
STATE OE' CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIhi )
`
T, I:di.th L. Harris, S~cretary of ~2ie Anaheim Cit:~ Planninq
Commission, do nereby cer~ify thah kh
f ,
e
oregoing rosolution was nassecl ana
adopted at a mQ~ting of i;he Anah~im City Planning Commi~sion h~]
d
.
on ldarch
27• 1989, by the following vote of the members therQOf:
AXES: COMMISSIOrIE12S: ROLiAS, FiqYDSTUN, ~ARUSTLLO, ME:SSE
NOES: COMl6ISSIONBitS: FELDHAUS
ABSt;NT: CQMMISSIC~NF.12S: NONE
ABS'iAikd: CUI~fISSTQNERS: HF.RBST, MC BURNEY
IN WITNESS Y7~IEREOF, I hnva hereunr.o set my hand this 27th day
of Marr.h, 1989.
~
~~~~~! __ 1rL ~ ~vt,c.~
SECRETA Y, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNINU COP~IIrIISSION
Y
~
..3_ P~a9-a~ ;.,~
',a