Resolution-PC 89-93~
,~
~
. ~ ,.,
~ ~~
RE,,S LTLTT.Q~~~~.~~r89-•93
A RGSOLUTION OF THE ANaHEIM CT~Y PLA~IN:CNG CQMt~SISSION
THA~ PETTTION FOR CONDITTONAL USE PERMIT Na. 31.31 BE G12ANTLD
WI-IEREAS, tt:e Anaheim City Planni.ng Commission did r~ceive a verified
Pe~ition for Conditional I7se PermiC rrom DOMINIC C. E'.CCHAi~DY AND BETTY ~T.
ETCHaNDY, 57U N. Dwyer, Anaheim, CA 92~3L'1, owners and RUN~.' JAC03S, 1981
"B" Miralom~-, Placentia, CA 9?.670, aq~nt for certain re~~l property si~uated
in the City of. Aiiaheim, County of Orange, State oE Califoriiia~ cIescr:ibed as:
PARCEL ]., IN THF CITY OF ANAHFIM, COUNTY OF OR~NGG,
STATE OF CALIFORNlA, AS SKOWt3 ON A MA~ FT'LED IN BOOK
146, PAGES 1 AND 2 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN TE3E OFFICE pk'
THE COUNTY RLCC1hDER OF SAIll ~RANGE CQUN~Y, CAT..IFORNIA.
WHEREAS, i:he i.ity Plarining C~mmissian di.u hold a~ublic hearing at
t.he i:ivic Center in ~ho City oL• Anaheim an March 27, i989 at 1:30 p,m., not,iae
of said public hearinq ha~ang been duly given as r.equired by law and in
accordance with th:e provi;ions o:E the Anaheirn Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
ta hear and consir.~~r evidence for ancl against said proposed conditional use
permit and to investi~ate and m~ke finciings and recor~mend~tions in connec~ion
therewi.th; and
WHER~:~1S, said ~ommiss~on, a.fiter clue insr~ection, inves~igatiqn and
stuciy made by it•self ar.d in its behal.t•, and atter due considaration of all
evidence and reports otfcred at s~-id hearin~~, does L-ind and deL•ermi.ne th~s
following facts:
1. '"tiat rhe petitioner requ~sts approval of a Conditiqnal UsQ
~ermir under authnrity of Code Sectioxi 18.61.050.GZ1 t~ retain a sandwich sho~
in th~ ML zone witli waiver of the follc~wing under auth~rity of Code Section
18.06.08Q:
~F T:IQN,S 18.06,~~~,4..z~1? - Mznirnum num}~~r_~P~~',.kz.ng~~L.ac~~•
:1~_G.fj.050L023~ (31Q reZuired; 3_.l~ axistin.~)
1fi.06.050.031
an~_1~61LQ66 ~50
2. That rhe rec{uested waiver is hereby grantecl on th~ basis ttiat the
ragu~st is mi.nimal and that the parking w;~.iver wi,11 not cause an increase in
t•raffic congestion .in the immediate vicir,~ t;y nor aclver~ely af£ect 3ny
adjoining land uses and gran~zng of the parking waiver ur.der the condih:ions
imposed, if any, ~ri17. not be det.rimental to the peace, heallli, safety and
gezieral wolf are ~~f the citizens of the City oE Anah~im.
3, That thQ prnpose~ use is bereb}~ granted subjecL• to the restrictiori
tlzat ther.a sha11 no sale ~f b~er or wine or alcahoZic beverra3es of any kind.
4. That the proposed use wi11 not adversely aff.ect the adjoining land
uses and the c~rowth and developrnent o~ the area :n which it is proposed to be
1oc~ted.
0751r -Y- PCaJ-93
~''.. ~;1
'~"~
5. That the sizo ~nd sYlapa oL- tho sitca ~ropased ~Por tlie use is ~dea,uate :~
to allow khe full develol~ment ot thQ proposed use in a mannQ~: not dQi:r:mQr~tal '~
to the particular area .rior to tho peace, healt h, sa~'ety and genera'1 welfare of ~
the Cit-izens oL- the City of Anahaim. ;;,}
~
6. That the
granting
of t?~~ Cnnclitional
Use Permit under tho
conditions i
:
ii
imposed, if any, wi11 not be datrimenta7. to tlze peace, heal~h, saEety and '
general welfare of rha Citiz ens of the City oi Anaheim. `i~
7. That the traffic generat;ecl hy the I~roposed use wa.ll noi: ir.ipose an
un~tuc b~irden upon the streets and hi~hways desigiied and im~rovod to carry the
traff.ic in the area.
D~ That no one 121C~1Cc'ZL"@CZ their presence at said public hearinr~ i.n
appasi~ion; and th~t no corresponrlence was received in oppositian ta the
subject peL-itipn.
~ALIFORNiA LtiVIRONMEI3_TA~,~TAL'~IT`l ACT FINDING: Tha~ tkz~^ Anaheim
City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to retain a san:3wich shop
in the ML zone with waiv~r ot minimum number oE parking spaces on a.n
irreyularly-shaped parcol oi land consis~ing of approximately ti.27 acres
locaL-ed at the southwest corner of Miraloma Avenue and Lakeview Avenue,
hav3.ng appraximate frontages ~:E 515 feet un ~he south side of Miraloma Avenue
and 460 f:eet on the west side o! Lakeview Avanue, and Eurther dQSCribed as
12~i1 North Lakc~view Avenue, Suite "G" (J.J.'s C~fe); and does hereby apprave
the Pdeg~tiv~ Decl~,rati.on upon finding that it has considerel the Negative
Decl~ral:ion togatY~er with any comments received :3urxng ~:IlP public review
process and further finding on the b~sis of Zhe initial stuc~y and any
commenL•s rPCeiv~d that there is no substantial evi~ence kYxat the project will
Yiive a significant etfect on the environmen~.
1dOW, THFREFORE, BG IT RESOi.V~,D ~ha~ li:e Anaheim City Plai~ning
~nm;~ission does hereby gr~nt subj~ct Petition f.or Con~iGional Use Permit,
upon thc L•ollowznq c~nditions wtiich ~xre hereby found to be a nec~asary
preregui,it-e to the ~~rop~sed use of the subject property in ~rder to ,preserve
the satety ana gener.a]. welfare ot the Ci.~izens oE l:~ie Ci.*.y of Anaheim:
1. That the 'legal owner of subject pr~perty shall irrevocablx oFfr:r to
dRCiicatp to the CiL}• of Anahe~m an ac'iclitianal strip of land along
I,akeview Avenue, meusurnd northerly from ~he u1L-imate right-of-way 'linQ
at ~he corner of the int~rsecCion of La Palma Avc~nue ~nc:i La}:avxew Avenue,
ancl vary.ing ir. width trc-a~ l;welve (12) foet tor the first threa huridred
(~~Q) feet and then transiL•ioning from twelve (12) feet to 0 feat for tha
next thrPe hundrecl (300j reeL•.
2. Tk~a~ prior to issuance oP a building per.mit, a traPfi.c signal assesament
Eee oqualing the fiifLerence betwecn the industri~l and commer•cial
assessmenL• foes shall bE paid ~.a the Czty ot' Anakieim in an amount as
establ:ished by City Council re; olution.
3. Thal- there sYiall be no .;a1e o£ bee:, wine or othor alcoholic beverages nf.
a:~y kir.d an the ~rerr~ise~.
-2-
PC89-93
.;
I'~
-;;:
'r:
~: ,,
':'.`,;;i
.'.i;:r~~~;l
. . ..-r~r;;'rk!~~
:.4~`... ~,~fT~
y
4. '~t~,tit tras}i s~oxaqc~ ~raas 3ha11 be pr~~viilc~d Rnd maintained in a Yocation
acre~~l~bla to thn Streot Maintenance and ;,anitation Divisian and in
accurdance wik.h apprnvea plans on tile with said Division.
5. That all air c~nditi~niiig facilitios an1 other rooE and gr4und mounted
er~ui.Pmen~ ~hall be pYO~~~rly shielded from viQw.
G. That thn proposal 3ha1I comply wiCh all signing requirements of the MY~
"Inaustrial, L,imitrcl" 'Lone, ur,l~ss ~ vari~nr.e allowiny sign waiveCa is
tappravecl by the City Council, Planniiig Commission ur 7oning Administrator.
7. 7'hat subjoct property shall ba developed substantially in accordance with
plans ~~nd spQCificatiuns on fila with the CiL•~! oi AziahQim rnarkecl Exhibit
1:Ios. 1 and 2.
8, ThaL• Condit•ion C1os. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 7, above-mentianed, s~i~ll bo completed
wi.*.hin a pariod of sixty (F,Q) da.ys from th~ clat~ of this rosolution.
U. That approval. of tl
request only to C.he
Zoni.ng Code an~9 any
lnclude any ~~c:ti~n
requQSt r~gard;ng
rc~quirc~ment.
iin application cons~itute~: aparoval of the proposed
extenr_ that it complies ~ai~'r. th3 Anatioim Muni.cipal
otiier appJic.lUla City rQgulaCions. Approval does not
or fi.ndings as to ..,ompliance or approval of the
».~y or_her arplicsble or~linance, regulgticn or
BE ;T FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planninq Gommission
does hereby fi,id ar~d d~termin~~ that adogtion ot this Reso7.ution is ~rxpr~ssly
predicated upun aP~licant's compliance wiCh each and a11 af the ~onditiong
hereinal~ove set fort;h. Should an} such conditions, c~r any part rhereof, btt
dcclared invalicl or unenf.orcea~2~ by ~hc Linal judgment oF any court of
coinpetent jurisdiction, ~hen this Resolution, ancl any approvals herein
contained, shzll b~ d.eemed null and voi~3.
THE FOtt~GOING RESOLUTION is siqned aad approved by m~ t:~is 27th day
oE 1dSCC!?r 19l3S.
,
~ ~
. .
,i~~~ •:~ . ~ ;! 'r`l .t~.±_.
CHI~IRWOMAN, ANAf1EIM CITY PI~A27NING COb4dIS5I0N
ATTEST: `
~~~ . ~~~_.___
SECRETIIRY, I~t7AHEIM CITY PLA2Jt1ING COhIIySISSIOCJ
-3-
PC89-93
. . ..f,~',.
,41
~~~
-a~
~~
ti .
STA'.CF~ OF CALTFORNIA
;~
COUNTY OF' O~ANGE 1: s.
CITY OF ANAEIEIM )
'
I, Edith G. fI~rris, Sc~crFtary ot Lhe Anaheim City Planninq
l'ommission, Uo lzoreby certify thut the foregoi,i-g resolv.tion wa~; passod ~nd
~dopted at a me~t:ing of the Anahei-n City Plan:iing Commission held on bf~rch 27, `
1989, by th~ fol.lowing vote oE the mamb~rs t•.hereof: ,
~;
hYES: COMMI~:iIONER.~i: BUUAS, 130YDS'TUN~ CA~2USILLO, FELDHAUS~ HERB5T~
MC AURNEY, MSSSL
NOES: COMMISSIC~NERS: NONR
ABSENT: COh4~t:[SSlONERS: NUNE
IN WITNESS WHER~OF', I have heraanko set my hancl this ?7th d~sy of
M~rch, 1989.
.~~ ~ r ~ ~~'
1.72.-~,- ~!~~r,c_,!~_ -s
~~~~
SECI2E;lAR'Y, ANAHEIM CI:CY PGANNING COMMYSSION
._a_ Pca9~-93