Resolution-PC 90-136r.
~5,, ._
, ' ~ , l"~ r(^r4?c;}i,¢~"~~f
; . i:
. `~ .: i. ~ ,, A .
RE,CiOLUTIUN _ q P 90^l~~
A RESOLUTTQN OF THB AvAHEIM ~TTY PLAN~IING CpMMIS5I0N
TFiAT PETITION FOR VARIZ.NCE N0. 4052 BG GRANIED
~, ,
WHEREAS, khe ~naheim City Planraing Commissicn did xeceive a
verif3.ed Peti.tion far Variance f.o•r certain r~a.l property si~uated in the Cit~~
of Anaheim, County uf Urange, St~.te of California described as:
TIiAT PUT:TiON GF THE SOUT~H F3ALF OF THE NORTH HALF C;r
THE SOTJ'i:HWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTfiEAST QUARTER QF
S~CTION ].4, TOWNSHIF 1.4, TOYlNSHTP ~ SOLTTH, RANGE :L1
WCST, IN THB RA:NCHO COY.QTES, CITY OF ANAHEIM, l~S SAID
SGCTION I5 SfiOWN UN A MI~P RECOFDED IN BOOK 51, ?AGG
11 OF DfISCELLANE0t1S MAPS, TN THE OFFICL OF THE COUNTY
ItECURDER OI' SAID COiJNTY, DESCRIB~D AS FUGLON~S:
THE NORTH 162.Q0 FEET OF TFIE WE~T 340.00 FEET;
EXCEPTING THEREFR~M AGL T?~AT PORTICN UF SAIB LAND
DESCRTEiED AS EO.LLOWS:
BEGINNTNG AT THE PUINT IN T.HE l:Eiv1'ER OF W~STERN
AVENUE BEING 143.7,8 FE~.T. SOU`PH 0° ].6' 2'i" EAST OF THE
NORTFiWEST CORNE:: UF SAID SOUTH HAL'r'; THENCE NORTEi $9°
37' 14" EAST 45.00 FEk;T Tn THE POTNT OF BEGZNI~ING UF
A TAN~ENT CURVE CUNCAVC SOUTHEItL~, fIAVTNG A. RADIUS OF
222.00 FEE1; THEhCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CtIRVE THROUGH
A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1'1° 35' 54" AND A DI;TANCE OP'
G£3.19 F~~;T TO A POINT OF REVERSE CU~VE; THENCE
LAST~RL`1 ALONG A CURVE CONCAV~ NORTHERLY FIAVING A
RADIUS OF I78 . UO FEET THRUU ~H A CE~ITRAL ~.NGLE OF 17 °
35' S4", A DISTANCF~ OF 54,67 FEE~ TO THE END ~F
CURVE: THENCE ;;OUTH i39° 37' 14" WEST 16~.91 FEET TO
THE CF.NTER OC WESTERN AVENUE; THEI~CE NORTH 0° 16' 25"
WGS'P 18.72 FEET TO TH1; POTNT QF IIEGINNING.
WHEREAS, l:he City Planniny Commissioti did liolc~ a public hearing
at thQ Civic Ceiiter in the Cii:y af A~iaheim on June 4, 1990, at 1:30 p.m. ,
notice of said public hearing hav.iny been duly g.iven as roquired uy law and in
accordance with the pr~vzsions oF the Anaheiin Municipal Code, Chapter 1$.03,
to hear and consicler evidence For an~ aqainst said p~ogosed variance arid te
investig~te and make findings and rec~mmendati~iis irA cannection therewith; and
WF~xEREAS, sai~l C~mmisszon, after due inspection, in~~est-~gakion
and study made by itself ancl in i~s beha~f, 'und aEter. due consideration of all
eviclence and reports oL•fered aL• said hearing, does fi.nd and detPrm.ine t}ie
fol:iuwing facts;
1. That the pELitioiier proposes waivers of the following to
establish a 5-lot F'S-72Q0 sul~division:
1464r
-1-
PC90-135
,.,~n y
S.~_~.xY_Q3~. laa~.§~.~~1..9_~~ ~ Mini~~µm 1~~w.~Sl~r4•
(7.Q~St~rx roquirecl in thr~
1~~--n;i ¢4.__iQ.Q~ proposod
.,.~,`
RS-7200 Zo~to;
Eor t.wo lbts)
2. Th~t L•hQ abovc~-manCioneci waivQr is hereby qrantad oti ttxo
uasis that one ot the lots is a"clzy" 1ok. ~z~d Teranimar Drive ha~ a curved
alignmont alc,ng subj~ct properLi; that hhero ~~ra special c.ircumstanc~,s
applicablo to the propc~rty such as s=ze, shapQ, t~pograptiy, loaation and
surxound~.ngs which do nut apply t~ other ide~i~ically zoned prop~irty in th~
same viri,ni~y1 and t2iat strict application of thc~ Zoning C:ode d~~rivQS thQ
property oE pcivileges onjoyed by othc~s pr~~perties in tha identica.l zons and
classifi:ation in the v3cinity.
3. That th~re arc~ exceptiona2 or ox~racrdin~r;f circ-unstances
or conciitions ap~l~cablc: to ehe pro~erty involved or to the intencled use of
tlie proporty thaC r~~ not apuly c~.:neral'.t to ~:Ytp, pr.npQrty or class of ~xse in
the sarr~e vicinity :~ncl zo;~e.
4. Thar. the :c~quesled variance is neccs:;sary fur the
preservation and enjoyment ~f a subctatitial prapc~rty rfght possessed by other
prr,pert}• in the same vicinity and zor.e, and ci~n.iad to the proparty in question.
5. T.t-at tY,~ requested variance will not be materially
detrim~iital to L•he publir. welfare or injurious te tha pro~erty or zr~iprovbments
in such vicini!•y and zone in which the property is locrst.ed.
6. Tha~: one interQSCed nerson indicated his pcesence at said
~~AbIlC hEaring in appositioii; and that no correspondonc.~ was rQCeived in
opposi~ion to subject petition.
~~L~FQR~I~I~_FjJVIRQ23MErlT~4 QjjAL'[~~' T~ _cIh~tN~: Th~t the Anaheim
City Planning CO(iU11~3S~012 has reviewed the proposal for Waiver of minimum lot
widCh t;o e.:•.zbl; sh a 5--lot, RS-720~ subdivi;,idn on a rectflngularly-shaped
L arce.l aE land c:on3isting oE approximatoly ]..05 acrQa iocated at tlie
northea:,t cor.ner of Western Avenue and Teranima: Drive, having frontaqes of
approximately 165 fe~t on L-he ea:~t slcle of Western AvenuQ and 220 feet on k1~e
norrh side of TeranJ.mar nrive, an~ furth~r do~r_ribed as A,28 5ouL-h Westera
Avenue; and does hQreby apprave tho Nagativn ~eclaration upo•r, finding that it
ha~ consideroci lho Negative Dec:laratioii coyst:her with any commeats receivad
durinq the public review process an.~f furthez fii~ding on thQ ba~is of the
fn.ftial 3tudy and any cor~~ments r.ecefved that there is no substantial s:vfdence
that the projec:t• w.ill havR a signific:•nt efCecr. ou the Rnvironment.
tiOW, TliBREFOP.£, I3E IT RESOLVE:D that the Anaheirr, City Pl.annfnq
Conunission does her.eby gran~ g~ibjecr_ Perit.icn for Vari.ai~ce, upon the
Eollowinq conditi~ns which aro hereby iound to bc~ ~ necesaary pr~coqui3ite to
the proposed use of the subject properky i» ordvr tu pre~erve the safety and
gQner~1 s~~~faro of the Citizer.;, oC tn~ Cir1 ot 1~n~heim:
-7-- PC90-135
~"J~'1 P~1':9''~~
]., ~ 2'hat ~ tr~act m~p to xc~cord r.he divisi~n ot ~uvj~cr. praperty shal~, ba
submiL•tec7 to ~nci approvod by thQ City oL• Ant~hni.:n and L•heri be recorded in
t}i~ Uf[ic~ of the Ornnge Co~xnty ltecordor,
2. ~ That priur. t:o i3suance oE a buil~ling permit, the a~prnpri..t~ Lraff:ic
:;ignal ~~ssessmant foe ~ha11 bc~ pa3cl to tha CitX of Anaha.im in un amcunt
~s ostablisheci by City Council. res~l.uti~n.
3. That the c~xisting drivo~iay on Wostern Av~nue shal.l bo removed and
re~lacc~d with st~ndard r_urb, g~ittQC•, sSdewalk and .landscaping.
9. * T}iat a.ll lots w:ithin subjecC ~ubdivision shall be served b~ undergrouncl
utilities. "
5. * That prior t~ i~suance of a buildi.i~g pQrmit, the appropriata fees duo
for primary mains an~', fire protection servic:a shall bo paid to the Watec
~nyineerinq Div+sio:- i.n arcurdan;o witli Rules 15A and 20 of thQ W3ter
UCiliL•y Ratos, Rules and Rarulations.
6. * That qates shall not be .inyL•a11ed across any ~irfve~vay in a mnnner which
may adaorsely sffect vehicular traff.ic in Ctte adjae:ont public stxROt.
Insl•allation of any gatGS sh~ll contorm to Enyineerinq Slandarr3, P2an No.
402 and shal]. bQ subject to tti~ review aiid approval of thQ City Traffic
Engineer prior to issuanr:~ oL a building permit.
7. * That ii.re sprinkler:~ sha11 be installed -is required hy the Cit.y ?ire
Uepartment.
8. * That all air conditioninq facilities a:ld othar roof ancl ground mounted
r,quiprr,ent shall be propet•1}• Shield~d from v.iew ac~d the sound bufEared
from udjacent rosidentiai prapcrties. Such i:ifor.matian shall
specif.ically be shown on the plaus sixbmitted tor bufldinq pormits.
9. + That prior to approv~l of tha final t.r;tct map, n zoninq ordinan;.e shall
1~e ~dopted in connoction with Recla3;.it.ica~ion No. 09-9U-1~, ~~ow QenQing.
10. That siibje~t propc~rCy ;hall be ~e~Telupr.d suUst:antially in accordance
wiCh plans an~i speciCi.cations submi~tc~d to the City of Anah~im by the
petflioner and which plai~s Fire on file wich the Plannin~ Department
marked Exliibit t+c,. I.
11. Tha,: prior to i,su~zncQ oF ~ t,uilding permit or within a poriod of. one
(1) year from t}te dat~ of this r~solution, whf.chever ocr.urs tit•st,
Contiitio~ rros. 2, 5, fi, 0 arid u, abovc~-mentioned, sha11 be complied
with. Exte~is.ious for furthe: kima to complete ~aid cors(litions may be
granted in accordance with Sc~ction 1d.03.09U of the .~naheim Municipa).
Code.
12. That prior to final builcfing and zonJng i.n~pections, Conditi~n Nos. 3,
4, 7 an<i 10, ~~bove -menrioncd, shall bc compli~;cl rlith.
-~- PC90-136
;'%,ly ,r~±~`e~;~1
~' ~
13. * That ~pproval ~f this ~sppl:ication constitutes approval of the pr~posed
request only to ttie oxtent Ghat ft compl.ies wit:h the An~hoim Mu~licipal
7.aning Cad~ and any other ~spplicabld City, State and Fe~ler~l
rc~gulations, l~pproval ci~os not includa any action or findings a3 to
compliance or ~pproval oE tlie requo,L• roga~cling any other ~polic.able
ordinanco, regulation or requiremant. CondiCions marked wilh ~n
aster~.sk (~) are rAguired by establishod laws, codns, rogul~itions and
agreemants and are n~t 3ubject to nr~gotiation,
SE IT FURTIiER RBSOLVED kh~t the AnahQim City Planning Commission does
hereb;~ fi,nd ~nd datermine that adoptiun af thi.s ResnluLio•~ is ~zxpressly
prodir,:~tod upon applicant's c~mpliance with each and all of lha c~:nditions
liereinabove set forth. Should anx such condit.ions, or any par.t th~areof, bQ
declared invalid cr unenfarceable by the fin~l judgmant of any court of
r.ompetenh. jurisdiction, ~~'1Ht1 this kesolution. and any approva:~s herei.n
cont~ined, shzll bQ deemed null. and void.
TI?E FORi?GOING RF:SOL.UTION was ~dopted at thQ , lanning Cottunisg lon meeting
of June 4, 1990. ~ ~
=/ l- .~J,-
---• ~~-2~i~> c ~~G-~~-Q --
ACTING CfiAIRM~'~N ~ ~~i~_--_
1~NAHF.?M CI'1X F'L,ANNING COMI~fISSION
ATTEST: /J ~
- ~~~L~~~~~_.~ ~ ~~/ _
SE RETA ---~~
C RY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COhIIdISSTON
~TATB OF CALIFORIJIA )
C~UNTY OF OkANGE ) s:;.
CIT'l 'vF A?IAFIEIM )
I. ~dith L. Ita~ri;,, ~E~cretary aF rn; ;,r,a}i:~im City Planning Commissiqn,
do hesoby eertiff that the foregoif~~.~ rc:~~larion w~s possed and :sdoptc~d at a
:neeting of the Anaheim Ci~y Planz~inq Commission h~lil on JlAllti 4, 1990, by rh~r
followiiiy vote oE the mombers thereof:
AYFS: COt~fISSTONERS: BOUAS, f:LLLYER, MC DURN~Y, KES5E
NO~,°,: COhIIrfISSIOtiFRS: xorie
AHSENT: COMMISStOPiERS: t30YUSTUN, FELllNAUS, iiERB;T
t
'- ,1 IN WITt3ESS WHEREOF, I have herPanL-o ~et my hanQ th{s _•~ ~~~ ~fay
of y~~4~ ---, 1990. -
~ r .
------.--:__~~_.~.c~~, ~ ~~ -
.. ~___ __ ~ _ ~.
SF.CE2ETARY, AtvAFTi•'.TM !`~'?~•• ; ,,;,;;N} N~ ~01/.b;ISSION
~..
..q.
PC90•136
~?
,;
~
~