Resolution-PC 90-14~
FiE,,~QGUTI t7 N_Q. P~.._~4_14
~ia~1~'~
A RF.SOL TI N OI' xHE ANI~F~LIM
D~'.~!II_~*Sz~.~Et1F:RAL PLAN AMEND -~TY PLANNING GOMMIS~~; ,!_
F~.:~ Nc~ 2_ry~= L~, D 1c ~ ELL~f~~},T
WHEREAS, tlze City Council o£ the City of Anaheim d3d adopt the
Anaheim Ge:iez•a1 Plan by Rosolution No. 69R-.644, ;,howing thF genera.l
descripL•ian and ex~ent aP possit~lP future development witlain the city; and
WHEREAS, pur.suant tn the property owner's request for an ,~men~Ant Lo
the Land Use El.emeizt of the General Plar~, staff' prapared a Ganeral Plan
Amendment for the Study Area i:ons3.stinq of a~proximat~ly 18 acres, having a
frontag~ nf dpproxi.mate.ly 485 feQt on k;he north side of I~incoln Avenue, ha.ving
a maximurn depth af approximately 12gp 1:eet, being loca~ed approxim;..t:ely 3~p
feet east oP !-.he cenke.rline of Beach Boulevard ~-nd fur.ther clescribed as 2925
West Lincoln Avenue; ~illd
WFiEREA5, the Plannixig Aepartmer7~ de~mea i~ anpropriate, pursuant to
Act, that a eizvironmental
~mpact1rQpor~ shauld1~i~~prep1recilandmGr.vaz•on~mental
therefore, been siibmitY.ed, an~ YmPa~t Report No. 295 has,
WIiGRFAS, the City Planazinq Commission did b.aZd a public. hearing ~~
the Civie Contor in the City of Anaheim ori Jnnuar 15
noticc oF sair3 public hearing tiavin Y ' 7'99i~ ~t 1~~0 p.m.,
accoL•clan~e wit2i the provisions oi thebAr.a}ieim~M~nici al Codeirc;d .by ].aw and in
to heaz• and consider eviaencQ for anci agains~ said propose~ GeneralQPlan~03,
Ameixdment and to investigate and make findings and recomrnendatir~ns .in
connecticn t;heraw?th; an~
WHEREAS, said Conunisszon, after due inspection, iuvestigation and
stiady made by itself a.nd .in its behaif, and after dua consideratioi~ of all
Pvidc~nce and reports oEfei•aa a.t said he~ring, dogs find and determirae the
fol~owiny fac~s:
~. That evidence was not submitted t.o substantiate the neAd for an
amendmen~ t.o Che Anaheim General P1an sinco it was deta_mi.ned tha~ the
Pr~Posed General Industr.ial land use designaCion .is not. compatible wikh the
ex1.srxnq ~urrounc(ing uses af Medium Der.sity 12esia tial and General
Commercia,, ~.n~ r,hat the exisL•ing 1aTld dQ~ignahions should not bQ chai:gad aC
this time,
~ALIFQRNI~ k:~I~ ~ENTAL~QUALITY A T FINDI ~
~_~: Whereas, the Planii.ing
Commi~sion nfY.er rcviewfng draft EIR No, 2yg along with eyide,n4g, b~th
and oral, presented to s<<pplem~r.t khis docum~nt~ Writren
there are i;ertain siqnificank unavoidable adverse.di~mpactsd~ontheePUbli~~3that
healrh anci saf.ety, inhersnt in this ~ise, on th.i~ site, which cannol be
mi~igated to ~ 1.eve.1 of znsignifica:~c~ and whict~ are a;;t ncceptable due to
overriding considei•ations.
1255r
-1-
~'~ge 1
~ r ~S. .
,4 +~' ~~ ~~~''~+~"'~
NO'W, THERE~'ORE, RE IT RESOLVFD, tkiat ~ursuant t~ the above Finciings,
the An4heim City Planning Gommissioia doss hex•eby Ueny General ~'lan Amendme~nt
No. 276.
THE FOREGQIPIG RESOLUTTON wa5 adopted at the E'lanning Commigsion
meeting of January 15, 1990. :,
~~-~ . ~ /
. ~ `~~
--_.. L~~u~ ~ /~~\ ~ _/ ~ ? --
~X '
-.CI3AI RMAN,
~ ANAHEIM ~ TX PLANNING COMMTSST0:1
ATTEST:
ACTING SECF2~'rAR'i, ANAH6IM CITY PLANNIIdG CCIMMISSIUN
sr~r.s Or CALIFQRNIA )
COUNTY Ok' 4RANGE ) ss.
CITY 0~ 1~NAFIETM )
7, Janot I~. J~nsen, Actiny SQCretary of the Anaheim Cit-y Ac;ting
Ylanning C~mmissi~n, r7o hereby cextify that the foreqo3ng resalu~i~n was
passed and adopted aL- a meetin,q uf the Anahoxm C:ity Planninc~ Commissior. held
on Janiiary .15, 1990, by the following vnte uf the members th~sreot:
AYES: C:OMMISSIONERS: IIOUAS, BO.YASTUN, FEL'DHAUS, HF.'LLYER, HERBST,
MC BURNEY, MESSk,
NOES: COMM:['SIONERS: NGNE~
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
•__,.- ~, IN WITNESS WEiEREO~, I.hr~vo herQUnCo ;,et n~y hand this _„__~,~' .•~'<l . day
bf-_:~ ~_,_~__,r„ • ~ ~ ~'~ _. 1990 .
_ ~ ~
~;,; ,: ., , , , ,. ,~
AC7~ING uECRETARY, I~.NAHEiM ~CITX PLANNING ~OMMISSION
-2- PC 90-14