Resolution-PC 90-155~~1'~t ` '" . , ' tii;~
R E~~1~~~.~pt3~L ~ .. ~22-1 a.~
A KcSnLUTTON OF THE ANAFIEIM CITX Pi.ANNING COMhiISSION
TlIIt7' Pr1'I'PION FOB CONU17i0P171i., i1SF. PERMIT N0. 37.89 ftE GkANTEU
iiHFR~AS, hhc~ Ar~ahuim City Planning Coinmi;,3ion di~ reCait-A a verifiod
Petitiun for Conair.ional Us a Perm.it for cnrtain real prnparty 3ituatod in Cha
C.ity of Anahetm, Couuty of Orange, 5~~r.a ~t California, d9scribed. ass
PARCFI, 2 I1J T[iG ~~'I.TY OF ANAH~TM, CUiiNT~ OF QRANGE,
STATE OF CALIFqRNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP ['ILED ZN BOOY.
20h, PACGS 45 ANU 46 OF PARCEL MAPS, YN THE OFI'ICE OF
2HF COUNTY RECORDER OF ORA2IGE C~UNTY, CALZFORhIA.
WHER~AS, th~ City Planning Comm.ission di.d hold a pi.blic hearinq at
the Civ.ir_ Cc~ntQr iri the Ci ky of Anatioirn on Juno 18, 1990 nt 1: 3A p.m„ notice
of said public hearing havinq been dul.y qi.vRn as required by law ana in
accordancQ with L-he provisions of the Atia2:eim Muni~ipa.i CodQ, ChaprRr 18.03,
to hoar and consider ev.idonco f~r and againsr_ said propnsed c.oriditional u~o
~c~:mit and to .InvAstigate and makU £-indings and fiecomrnendltions in conn~ction
therewith; an~i
WIIGREAS, sa.id C~:~misszon, aftQr due inspoction, invQS~igAtion and
study ma~;e by ir.self and in i~s b~half, and afkor dtia corisi.deration of all
ev=den~~o and repurt5 offerecl al s.zid i~caring, do~~; find and dstermine the
£ollow.i:,q fac~s:
1. That r.he proposad usa is properly on~ for which a conditio--al
us~, permit• is authorizRd by Anaheim Municipal Code ~ection 18.61.u::Q.6~4 to
permit a synagogue in an existing :nrlustrial building with wa.iver o~ l,hQ
following under ..uthority o£ Code Sectiun 10.06.CtS0:
SF_~TIQ~ 1Q~,..Q_6L4~4.,02t2
~$L2~.9.~Qt~22
14 ~Q~L4_54.LQ?~1
1 Q,_Q6 . 4~.9:~?.~~
?~ 0~.z2;i_9 . S1~2S~Sz
.~,~t.~4Sz,.~''i2,9.~_ L
~ns~ 1Q~1 _Q~.k ~.9~9
2. That the requested waiver is h~reby gr~nted on the b~sis tk~nt
tti~ proposed parking will n~t cau:e an inc:~r3se in trafEic congestion i.n the
immodia~o vicinity r~or adversely ~~Efect any a:ljoinfng laad uses and qranting
of tt~e parking waivQr un~er th~ ccnditions im;~osed, if any, wi11 r.ot be
d~~trimental tn the peace, health, ::afety anr] genoral we:fare of the citiaens
of the Ci.Ly oE Anaheim.
3. Thrat the proposed use i~ hc:reby granL:~d fnr a period o£ thxe.~
(3) year~s, Ca expi.re on ,~une 18, 1~93.
- Minin~~un n1m-z4~`..park.tii~,s..~i~~.°,.
(473 roguired; ~.~Z o:iisl.ir.c~l
9. That ttie praposed ur,c~ will n~t adversely affQCr, the adjoining
1rynil us~a and t„e yrowth and developm~nt oi Ch-+ ares in xbjch it i:; rroposPCl
to be lorater].
1995r
- l. •-
PC90-255
~
,,
5. Th~L• the ~i.zQ nnd ehapQ oL• the ~~te prpposnd for tho u~e is
t~de~ixate ~o ~llow th~ L`ull dov~lopm~nt of ~h~s proposecl u~e in ~ manner not
detrimonkal to the parta.cular area nor to L•ho pet~co, ltealth, safotiy and
ga~.eral w~7.far~ of L•l~.e Citi.zons of the City of An~ihoim.
6. '!'h2t tha grantixig of the C~n~itional Use Permit under Lhe
canditions imF~oseu, .~ t any, w.il:l nok be d~trirnon~al to the pebce, 2:enlth,
safety and gener.al walfarv nt *_he Citiz~ns o£ the City c,f. Anahoxm.
7. Th~t thQ trafFic geita~ Tt~~' by t•re proposed use will not impose
an undua burdQn up~n 'the :~trQ~ts and higl,:~~y~ c~esiqnc~d and improved to carry
the traFfic in th~ area.
~. T.hat no onQ inrticated L•heir presRnco at .~i3d publia hearing in
opposition; anc! thaC no corr~,sponc]ence was received zn op~:ositi.on to the
si~bject potition.
~~~,'[FQ~NIA ~tTJIRQN~2EIJTAL~rAL~~' _ ~(;~ I'INDIP7S;: Thdt tho Anaheiui
Ci.ty Planning Cornmissaon hns reviewed the proposal to pQrmit a~ynagogue
(A~lart Ari Synagogue) in an Exis~3.ng inclust:•xal building witti waivs~r of
minimum number o~ parking spacos on an irregularly-shapod pazcel of land
consist:iny of approximaL•ely G.3 acrQa, having a frontag9 of approximatelx 402
feet on the south side oP La Palma Avonue, h~vinc3 a maximum dep~h of
approximately 658 feet, boing located approximately 3,560 faet east of thp
centerline of L,akeviow~ Ave~ntie and Furthly describPd as 5100 East La Palma
Avenuo, Suite~ 104 ar~d 105~ and does herel~y approvE the Negative DeclaraL•ion
upon f~iiding thaC it has r_onsidcxod t}ie Negati~e Declarati.on together with
any carnments received c]uring the public review proces3 ar~d further Finding on
the basis of. tho i.nitial study and a.ny comments received thaL- tk~~re is no
subsCantial evidence that th~ project will havE~ a signiffcanL• effect on tho
onvironment.
NAW, TktER1:FORE, BB 1T ~2ESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
~ommis~ion does ha.reby gran*_ ,ubject. Petir..ion for Condxtional Use Permit,
upon tho fol.lawiTic~ conclitions whir.ti are heroby found to be ~ iiocessary
preroqiiisite to the proposc~d !ise of the subject ~~roporty in order to presarve
ttio satety a~id general welface oC ihe Cit.i2ons of l•he ~ity uf Anaheim:
l. +~ That a tra£fic siqnal a~sessmc~nti fee oqualing the diffecQnc.e betw~an the
industrial ar,d institutional assessmant ~ee~ shall be paid Co the City
of Anahsim in an amount as astablished by C;tj Cour.cil resnlution.
2. * That fire sprin:clers sha11 b~ inst~llecl as required by the City Fire
Uopartrnont .
3. iliaC a ~ocal EirQ alarm system sha.il be ins~alled to l•he satl~f~ction of
the Firu Department.
4. * That trash :storaq~ caas sha11 ao provided and ma.intainod .in a locatiqn
accapl•able to ~ StreeC Mainrenance ~nd Sanftation Uiv.isian ancl in
.zccArdancE with ~pprov~d plans ori tila with :;aid Divi~i~n.
-2- PC9U-155
~•M.r
5, * Thnt all r~ir conclitioninca facilitfe~ anci ~th~r roof bnei ground mounted
equipment shz~l be prop~rly shic~~dc~d from viow.
6. That as roquirdd by Saction 1a.b1.050.614 (pert.aining ro churches in tha
Atiaheim Canyon tiidustrial Area) of the- An~.hoim Mun.icipal Code, subjoct
church f~acility shall bA l.imi.ter~ to ~hree (3) y~ar's durr~~ion; Rnd L-hat
such uso, othor than church of[ice stafE use, s1ia11 not be p~armiCted on
Mondap throug2i Friday prior to 6s00 g.m. Two (2) time axtonsions (up ta
thrce [3] year3 each) may be permitred subject t~ tho ~-ppxoval of the
Planning Comtt~ission ut a noticod public hc~arin.g.
7. ~hat thQ proposal sh_._1 comply w.ith a11 signinc1 r~iquiroment, of tt-e
ML(SCy "Limit~d Industrial - Sconic Carridor Ovarly" Zone, unl~-3s a
variancc~ a1low,ing sign wuivers is approved by t~ie City Council, Planninq
Commission or Zoninq Admi.riisLr .:c: ,
8. * That the oii-site landscaping and irr3gation sy~tam shall be maintainnd
in compliance with City standarcls.
9. That subject property s2ia11 be developed substantially in accordancR
with plans atid specificatior,s submitted to thQ City of l~n~heim by the
petiti~nor and which plans are on fil~ with the Plann~nq De1~artmen-:
marked Exhi.bi~ Nos. 1 through :~
10. Ttia* prior r.o commencement of the activity autharized by this
resolutioii, or prior L-o lssu~.ncc~ of a building permi~, or within a
period of one (1) y~ar fr~m the date af this resolution, whichever
o~~c:urs fir.ot, CondiCion No. 1, above-mantioned, shall be r.omplied with.
Extensions Lo~ :~rrher time to compl~te said conditions may be grantocl
in accordance wi~h Section i~.u~.49~) of the Anaheim Municipa~ Codo.
11, That ~,rior to the rommencoment of thQ ac;tivity authocizati by this
resolution ~r pr.ior to final bu.ildirig and zoning ingpectxons, whichevor
oc~urs first, Con~tiLian Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5 and 9, abovQ-mentiau~cl, shall be
complied rrith.
12. That ;his ~~~nuitional use permit shall. Lec•minate in t.iroe (3) ysaurs on
:lune 18, 1.993.
13. * That aPproval of th.is appli~~t:on constiCutes approval a: the propoaed
reque~t only t.o the extent thaC it complies wit;h tt:o Anuheim Munzcipal
2oning Codn and atiy other applicable Ci.ty, State and Fedoral
regulati~ris. A~proval do~s not include any rction nr finding~ as tQ
co~npli~nce or appr~val of the request tP.~alt~iL:~' any ather applicable
orclinanca, regulatian ur rcguiromQnt. ConditiS~ns markod wi.t:~ an
astcrisk (+~) are Y•equired by e~tablishod 1aws, codes, royulations and
agreemFnts and are not subject to ncgotiat:ion.
_~_ PC9Q-155
~WfY:,..,~ ., . . ~ ~ ~ ~ . . . .. . ,. . ~ , . . . , . . . . .. d t;.:rl~l~ ~
~, c;~ ~~'~;Y
t
• ~ .x~
DE 3T FUR:1'FI~R RESOLV'EA that the Anahoim City Pl~.~nninq ~oimnission does
heroby ~incl and dA~ermiria thaG ac]option of this Resolut3on is expresaly
prad3.catQC1 upon applicant's complianca wz~,h each and a].l of. the condir_ic,ns
borc~inabove set forth. Should any such conditions, or an}~ pa~~t thoreo£, bo
clocl~red invalia or unen~'orceab'le by the fi.nal judgment oE ~ny court of
compotent jurisdiction, then this RQSOlution, and any appruvals her.ein
r.ontained, shall bn deemed nu11 and void.
THE FOR~GOING PESULUTI~N uas adopted at the Plann.ing Commission meeting
,' /J ~ ;
of .]une 18, 1990. ~ / ~
.` .~'/``/~ ^~ ,, ~ '~ ~-~- __
CI~IAIRMAN, ANAH IM CTTY PLANNING CQt~tIC~ION
A:CTEST : .
~;.~~ ~t/~ ~
- ----r~'-~~'~-..~ ~.____. s~c~.~i,~ --
5ECRETARY, APtAHELM CITY PLANNTNG COIrQdISSION
STATE OF CALlFORNIA )
C0~ iTX OF ORAIJGF ) ss.
C11.'1 c~F ANAHEIM )
L, Gd~.th L. Harri:;, Secretary of. the Anahoim City P.lanning Commission,
do hereby cQrtify that the foregoing resolution was passod and adopted at a
mee*iny of the Anaheim City P]anning Com~n~ission held on Juno 18, 199Q, by the
fc~ilowing vota of the member3 rhereof:
AYES: COIrIIdISSI0NER5: 80YDSTUN, BOUAS, FELDiiAUS. HELLXER, I•;FSSE
NOE;i: COMMISS'lONERS: N~~NE
APSEtJT: CODIMISSI02IERS: IICRE35'r, MC HUI{NEY
; N WITNF.SS WFiERE;OF, I hav~ hereunto set my h3nd tliis ~ d~ $ay
of. _ ~ , 1990.
~_~~
--- .~~.,C.~~~:. ~~~.,~_5.~.~-~~ __.~.
SECRF~RY, 11tI1~fiG~1? CITY P:,AiJNING COMMI~SION
-4- PC90-155