Resolution-PC 90-16/''• ,
FtESQL~JTT_QN_~lOL I?4,~Q~t~
A RESOLUTION OF THG I~NAHE.T.M CITY PLANrTING COh4dISSTUN
THAT PETIT70N iQ[t CUt~DiTZJNAL USF PERMiT N0. 3222 HE DENIED
WF~FRBAS, r_r~~ Anaheim Cit.f P1~r-ning Coromi3s3on did re~r~ive a verified
Netit:ian for Conditi.onal Use Pc~rrt:it frc.m f~r certain r~a]. prop~rh,y situatecl .in
t}:e City o~ Anaha.ir~, Cotinty ot Orange, Srate of CaliFornia, desar.ibed as:
l,OTS :l TO :1'1 OF TfiACT N0. 11830, AS SHOWN GN A MAp
Rc:COf2DED T27 T3QOK 5Q0, PAGES 14, Y5, 16 AND 17 OF
M1SCF.LLAPIE~JUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANr,E, COUNTY,
CALIFi)RNTA.
WHEP.EAS, the CiCy planninq Commi.ssian dicl t~old a pubiic hearing
at thQ Czv:c. Cent~r in the City of Anal~eim ur. January 15, 1990 at a:30 p.m.,
notice of. said ~ub'_i~: haaring havi~ng been d+Aly given as requ.ir~3d by 1aw and in
accc:dunce with the provision:~ of the Anaheim M~:nicipal CoBe, Chapter 18.03,
to hear ~ nd consider evi.dei~r_o for and aqainst 3Alc~ proposed cand3.tional use
per•mit arid to inv~st.iyat~ and make fin~lings ancl rNCOmm~ndatlons in ,^onnPCkion
therewith; and
WHFR~AS, said Comm.t~sicn, rsfter du~ inspe•tion, investigatior~
a~id stucly made by iL•sr~lf an~1 in its Lehalt, and a:ter duQ consideration o£ all
~vidt~nce and reports offerad aL- said hearing, does ~ind and ~3etermire the
fu.llcwing tnctsi
I. ihut the pror~ose8 use i~ properly one for whlch a
condicional use permit is zaChcri.r.ad by AnahQim Municipa~ Codg 5r~ctinn
18.61.050.51b to uit: L•o permit auto dismantling, storaqe and r.etail sales
(Pi.ck-Your-Part) in the N,L Zone
(a) S~TIy:i~_~$_~QC~93Q. - R~~uireci i:nprQY_Qm~n~..Q.E Ps~r~i~s'~~03l~.•
an~i _1?, ~i~.~~LG ~9r4 (~~~ _Piv~n.g r9quired: S~QmPs'~~~.St _.~.F~~~~S~C9~k
pr~opo:~ed)
(b) ~~:~'CIQ~_~~.~1.~9641~zQ - P~rm.~:~~.~5~~~4~r4~.~~!-?E~nS ~t1~Q_r.~.q,44?.~@.~.Xs~~?~.
~n.~i 18y~1_iq~f~s_q~Q (Fermitted: mnximum ~ frZp~ hi~~ fence ot wall
lc,cateci minimum 1Q~~~ from Arkcrial highwa,yf
Proposed: $__~Q~t__~ic~h blor_k ~ra.ll along ea~t
and Nest property lines extonded Co Lincoln
Avenue)
Z. That General l~lan A:nendm~nt No. 276 dnd Reclausification
No. 89-90-28 cunsidQrod roncurrenl;Jy wi~h subject use permit, Co ~1~ow
indusCria'1 zoninq ~n subjnr.t pc~perty e~Pre c]enled by the Plnnning Cornmission.
1245r `1`
PC 90-16
3. That ~h~ prop~sed uso is herRby d~ni~d on Ch~ bnsis *hat the
pr~P~gdd u~e would be inconsi~tont: with the G~naral ['lazi Land Use designat3on
and it is t1or. a permitt:ed use a.r~ l-.lle unclorlyin~,~ &t~t••1000 (Rosic;ential,
btultiple Fami:y) z~,ne; that proposed use will adverrsely affer.t tl~e adjoininc~
lund uses ancl ~hs growth and dovelapnienL- of tlie ~rRa .i,n which it ir propo~ed
tc be located; ancl furt}~~r, Lhat th9 size and ~hrspe of th~ site proy, ~sed Eor
tho use is not adoquate to si]1~w tbe full devc~lopment of the proposoci us~ in u
manner not detrimental to the part.icul<ir arQa nnr to tt~e peact~, Y~oalth, saf~tp
and gen~ral ;~elfare oi: l;ha Citiz~ns of L-he City ot An~hoim.
4. Tha~ tho granting of the Conciitional Use Pc~rmit:, ~ill be
detrimenlal to the ~~ac~, }iealt}:, safety and general wolfarE of. the f;iY.izons
of. the C.iL•y of Anaheim.
5. That the traffic q~ner3ted by the proposed use will impose
r.n unduo b~trden upon t.he strec;ls and highways designed and improved to carry
the traffic in the arc~a.
6. Thac: approx.irnar.aly ai.xty-five (65) persons inciicatc~d C}~eir
presenc3 at said oublic hoarit~g in oppusition; ancl thz~t correspondence wa~
r.eceived in o~po~ition to tho subject Petitiun.
4AT.,IFQRNI}~__L_NVIR(~NMENTAL ___QjjALIT~Y 11~T__FINDTN
?lanning Comr?QSion afl;er rQV.i~wing dz•aft EIR No. 295 a onq wzthr ov~idencee
bot:i wriCton ani! oral, nrPSenr_ed to ~upplp~nont ~hzs docwnenl:, doQE find and
de~ter.n~ine ~haC thare ara cartain signiPicant unavoidable adverse .impac~s to
the pnblic's hF~alth and safety, inheren~ in this use, on this site, which
cannot be mitioa~ed to a lovel of insiqniEicance and which are not acceptable
diie to overr.idiny considorations.
HCW, _HEREFORE, B~ IT RESOLVED t:hat the Anaheim C.ir_y Planning
Comm3ssion does heroby deny subject Pe~ition Por Conditional Use Permit, on
th~ basis af r_he aPorementioned findinys,
THE t'UREGOING RESOI,UTION was ado~ted at the P1Anning Commission
mooting oE Januzry 15, 1990. ;
,'~" ~ ~
, ,~ ,
.., ~~ , , ~=- .{
_ ..~.%~ ~~ y,~1.r .~,_-----~.
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CI'CX E'LANt3ING COh4ytISSTON
ATTGST:
~ %'=,~..~..:____.__--~-.---
ACTTNG SECRc.Tl-RY, ANAHEIM C7'ry PLANNING C01lMISSIOtd
-2- ~'C 90-IG
~ r r 'r .. , ~ .. , . . ' . • ' ~' . - - . ~ , ~ ~ . :, ~ .. . ., .. ' ~ .. . ;r,w~~~}
i
~l
~r
f. ~i~h
STAT~ OF C1~LIFOItNIA
COUNTY UF O~AtTGL } sa.
CITY UF ANAHE;IM )
I, Janet L. Jensen, Acting Secrot:ary oE tha Anaheim City Acting
Plr~nning Gommisaion, du hereby cortify tk-aC th~ forogo.inq rosolu~ion was
pussed and adopted at a m~,~ting of Lhe Anaheim City Planntng Con~misslon held
on January 1~, 1990, by tt,e following vote of tho members thereofs
AY~S: COt•II~fISSIONFRS: BOUAS, H~YDSTUN, FELUHAUS, H'r'.I.I.XER, HERHST,
MC BURNEY, MESSE
NUES: COMMISSIqNERS: NC1NE
ABSENT: COMMISSIQNF.P.S: NONF
- . It7 WI.TNESS wY.ER~OE~, I have hereunf:o sQt my hand P.hi• __,, ':,'/~ anX
05, ..._._ '~ ~ _. 1990. `
,
' ,.
ACTING~SECRETT.P.Y, ADIAHETN, CI1Y YI.APTNING COh4rlISSION
-3-
PC 90-16