Resolution-PC 90-222~
RE L T1 QN DjQ~~Q= 2 2 2
~
~ ~~~ r~~~~~
: , ,,~~,~
,,
%~
.
~~~
,:.
;,
A RESOLUTI(7N OI".~HF ANAHEIM CITY PLANNINC COMMISSION
'~.HAT P~Z'I'.CION FOR RECT~ASSIFICATTON N0. 90-91-pR IIE GRAN'rED
WHFREAS, the h.naheim City Planning Commission did receive a
verified Peti~ion for Reclassification L•or certain rea]. proporty s~.tua2ed in
thcs City o~ Analieim, County of• Orange, St~te of California, deseribecl as
follows:
THE NOEtTH 40 FEET OF TFIE SUZJTFi 1b0 F~ET OI' THE EAST
135.32 k'EET OF LqT A OF TRACT AIO. 97, IN Z'HE CITY OI'
A2:AHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
S~IOWN ON A MAE' THEREOI' REC012DED IN BOOK 7.1, YAGE 39,
MI:SC~,LLArTE0U5 MAPS, LEMON STRE:ET.
WHrREAS, the CiL•y Plannin~ Commiss3.on did h~lct a pubiic hearing
at the Civic CenCer in tho Cily o[ Anahei-n on August 27, 1990 at 1:30 p.m.,
noCice of. said public hearinq ~x~ving bean duly given as requiLecl by law and in
accordance with the provisions ~f the Ana;zeim Muni~ipa~ Code, Chapter 18.Q3,
lo hear and c~nsidor evidence for and against said proposed reclassificatiox~
and to inves~igatc~ and ma?ce findings and recommQndations in connection
the~ewith; and that said public hearinc~ was continuecl to the Septembor 10, 1990
Planning Cornmission meeY.i.ng; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, a£ter ~1ue inspection, investigation
and study made by iL-self and in its behalF, ancl af.ter due cnnsiaerat•ion of axl ,
evidpnce and reports ofPc~red at said hearinq, does fincl and dQtermine the
[ollowin7 facts:
1. That the petitioner. proposes reclassi£ication oE subject
pro~erty fro-n the RM-12~0 (Re~idontial, Multiple Family) to the CL (Commercial
L~imitec'.) zone.
2. Thal the Anaheim Genoral Plan designates subject property
Cor Generai Commercial land uses.
3. '.fhat thQ proposed rec.lassi~fication of subject property is
nece~sary and/or desirable r.or rha order•ly and proper development of tYie
r,ommunity,
4. 'i'hat the pr~posed reclassificatiozi of sabjecC property does
properly relate to the zoiies and thei.r ~ermitted uses local].y establ3shed in
close proximity t:o subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses
gener~lly e3tablished. throughout t2ie communaty.
5. That no one indicated thoir presence at. ~aid public hearing
in opposition; and that nu corresponderice was receivod in opposition t~~
sub~ect petition,
1638r -1- PC90-222 `'~
~'rs
~~~
1 +.~'.°~ i~4;~";~
Yd1Ytl
~IiA1f145Y
^
,, ;:,,,;~
- i=}
~ALIr RNI~_ED IRQ,N2~ENTAL pUALTTY A T 'I~TDIN~: That the ~naheim
City Planning Commissian has rev.iawed the propc~sal to rec].assi~y subject
proparty ~x•om the RM-1200 (Resi.dential, blulti~lR Family) to tho CL
(Gomrnercial L~miL-E~~) zone to permir a tirF shop with insrallation with waiver
ui minimum buil~ing setback on a rectanc~ul~rly shaped P~rroximato11~40
r.ar.sisting of approx~mately 0.1 acre, having a fronL-age of app Y
Eeet un the west side o£ Leman Stl~~~'rox matel a 400Xfe t north of
~-~~proximately 115 Feet, beixig l.ocatecl app X
centerline of Anah~:im Ao}ilevard and furtY:er described as 1129 Nort,h Leman
Street; anc~ iioes hereby approve the Nc~gative Dec].art~tion upon finding that it
has considered tYie Plegative Declaratz~zi togethQr with any romments received
during L•he publS.c review process and furttiar finding on the bas~•s of the
ir.itial s~udy and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence
that th~ project will have a significant eft•~c~ on th~ Fnvzronmenc..
NOW, THEREFORE, SE 7T RESOLVP:D ~hat 1:he Aziaheim City Planning
Commi.ssiorl dups hereby qr~nt subject Petition for Reclassification and, 1~y' so
doing, thaL• Title 18--T,on.inq of L-he Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to
exclude the abpve-c~escrihod property f.rom the RM-1200 (Residen~ial, idultzple
L'amily! 2one t~nd to incorporate said doscr'~br~cl proporty into ~he tia tihe
CL (Commerci.al 'Limited) Zone u~on the fullowinq conditions wY~icn are hereby
found to be a necoss~ry prerequisite to tlie proposed use o~ subject praperty
in order to preserve ~ho .rafety anc3 gQneral welfare ~f the Citizens of the
City of ~,naheim:
~~;
1, * T~iat the legal owner aP subjeat praperty sha11 dedir.ate r.r tho City of
Anaheim an easemenL• five (5) feet ir~ widt.h along the west pxoperty line
for public uti.lity purposes.
~, That. r,he owner of subjecL• preperty shall submit a letter requesting
termination of V3ria,nce No. 1659 (pErmitL•ing a barbei• shop and a b~auCx
shop) to 'ch~ Zoning Divisic~n.
3, That Prior to introauct.ion of an ordin~nce rpzonirig subject property,
Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall bP completacl. The
provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall bocome null and
void by action oP the Planning Commission un~e~s said condition~ are
cu~nplied with withir. one (1) yQtar f.ram the date of: this resolutioil, or
such further L•ime as th~ Pl~nning Cottunission may qrant.
4. Th~t approval oP this applicar.ion constitutes approval ot the proposed
request only to r.he extont that it complias with' th;La P h`'and MuFed~ral
Z~ning Cocle and any other applic~.ble City
regulations. Approval does not inclucla any acCion or findings~i able
compliance or 3pproval o~ the r.eque~st regarding any o:.her app
urdinance, regulation or requirement. ~onditions markod with an asterisk
(*) are required by established laws, aodes, regu7.ations and agrc~ements
aiid are, therefore, not subjQCt L-o r~egotiution.
r2_ PC90-222
,i
~ ;,;
-, :
~'~
~~R? i~ : f !;~ ~
~ ..~~ ~t ~ i ~ ~~ , ~l , ..
~~ i : . .. ~ , . . .
a~
. . ~, i ~~ ~ ~", ~ ~1 ~ ~r~`rj ~~
r :)t Y
~ , ~,,~~
,
;. .. ~ . . ' 1•~.{
~4 `~ ~
i4~±.
~~~
':~1,
r~
HE IT ~URTHER RESOLVED ~hat the Anaheim City Planning Comm:ission does ;4
hareby find and determine that adoption of ~his Resolution is e~~pressly `'
j;
predic~ted upon applicant's campl3ance ~with each and a11 of the aondit3.ous %
hereinabuvo set forth. Should any such conditions, or, any part rhorQOf, be ~`'''.
declarod inva.lid or unenEorceable by the final judgment of any court o,`.
competen~ jurisdiction, then thxs Resolution, and any appr..~va1s herein '`'"~
contained, shall be deerned nu7.1 and void. i;
TF.(~ FOREGOING RESOLUTION was ad~pted at th~ Plarining Commisszon maeting :-f
of SeptAmber 10, 1990. `'i~'
,;
~,~ ' ~"' ~~ ~~ G ~~tiLX.t,~y+~.~~ (
CHAIR OMAN, ANAHEIM CI PLANNING CAMMI^aSION
ATTEST: :°j
- _L~~ r4 k~~~2%tri-u~ _ -
SECRETARY', ANAHEIbI CITX PLANNING CO:~4+~fI5STON
,,;
+~
'
_; STATE OF CALTFCRNIA )
f
',.`_` COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. '"
`~,
., CITY OF ANAHEIM ~ ` ~`
I, Edith I,. Harris, Secre~ary of the Anaheim Czty Planning Coriunission, do
hereby certiFy that Lhe f:oregoing resoluLion was passed and adopted at a
mse~ing ot tkie Anaheim City Planning Cnmmissian he1~1 on Sep~ernber 10, 199U, by
the ~OXZOW111f' vO~G o:f the members thereof:
`
AYES:
CCNIbfISSxONERS: BOYDSTU~f, BOUaS, F'~LDHAUS, , . , : ,. ~,,'.,'a
H~LL'YEF, HENNINGEFt,
MESS~, PFRAZA
;:+i
NOES: CUA4fISSIONERS: NONC ,:;;:
ABSEt7T: COt~4~fISSIONERS: NONF ;`•`+,
; i
IN WtTNESS WHb~REQF
I h
l ~.~~/ '';:;~
`
'
,
ave
iereunto set my hand this __
.a ~G dax
:°.!~
of ~ .u.~.~ . 1390.
~ ~ ~
_ ~~~ , `'''
.. '~
i,': SECR~TA~tY, A2dAHEIM CZ~ PLANNTNG COI~IIyfISSIQN ;
o.,
-3- PC90-222 ';j",
, ,;,;
;, ~
;~
:a,.
y~y~,~g.,p~ ;~`~i:
. , ~ .. , ;.' . .. ...; , . _,,. . . . .. :~~~: . ~ .,,:,Ht-e,'' ,
t~,47T~- r~~,.~.C~,'c.~,~ . ~t. . , . . . . . .. . .. „ , ~~ .,,, _ , wYk