Resolution-PC 90-244.~i
~
RFSOLU'rION NO. PC90-244
i
~`
~
A R~SOI.UTION Ob' TIi~ ANF1HEiM CI'TY PLANNTNG COMMTSSIG~N
TH?1T P~TITION FOR CONDITT0~IAI, US~ PFRMIT NO. 33~13 F3E GRt1N'~~D
WHEkEAS, the Anahaim City Planning Commissian did recaiva a
verifiad P~titian fc~r C~nditional. Uae P~rmi~. far certain r~al property
aituated in the City of Anaheim, County nf Orange, 5ta~e of California,
deecribed as:
PARCE'L 1 A5 SHOWN UN A MAP FILED IN BOOK ~, PAGP: 44 OF
PARCEL MAPS, IN TFI~ O.FFICE OF THE COi1NTY RECORDER OF
SA2D CnUN'CY.
~. ,
WHEItEAS, the Cit;y .Planning Commisaian did h~ld a public hearing
at the Civic Center in the c:ity ~f Anahein- on October 8, 1990, at 1:30 p.m.,
n~tice of saLd public hearing having been duiy yiven a~ required by law and in
accordance with tho provioiong of the }lnaheim Municipal Code, Chap~er 18.03,
ta hQar and conoider evidence for and againc~t said propofled conditional usE+
k~~:rmit and to invec~~iga~e and make find.inge and reeammendations in conriection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, eaid Coinmi~~iun, after due inspection, investigai:i~n
and study made by ii:self and in its benalf~ and aEter due consideration of all
evidence and repor~a offered at eaid hear.iny, dos~s ~ind and determine the
following facta:
1. ThaL the pro~o~ed use ia properly one .for which d
conditfonal uc~e pc~rmit ia authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section
18.44.050.195 to pezm.it a 5,290 sq.ft. qourm~~ ma.rlcet with take-o~it prepared
foc+d, and with waiver. of t'r,e fo].lu~ving und~r authority or Code Section
18.06.080:
SE:c:TIONS 1~06.050.U212 - Mir.imurt~ number of r~arkir;~epaces,
18.05.~50.022 _{,,7?t~ s~anaard-sized apaces required;
:18.06.050.0225 2:i1 standard-aized and 6F~ r~mall
18l06fp50. ~' 31 car-~eized epace~ exiating)
and 18. 44. Q66. ~~::0
2. 'That thE r~aqueated waiver is hezeby granted on t:~e basls that
the parking waiver w?.11 nut cau~e an fncrease in traffic co.igestion ir. the
immediate vicinity nnr ~xdveroely affect any adjoini.ng land usQS and granting
of the parking waiver under Ch3 cunditions impoeQd, if any, wi.tl not bo
detrimental to the poace, health, saf~ty and genaral wel~are of the citizens
of th~ City of Anaheim.
3. That the proposed use will not adveruuly affect the
adjoining land uaeR ard the qrowth and developrnent of the area i.c~ which it is
prapoa$d to b~ located.
1015ItS -1- PC90-244
~
,A ,
~',
;~i
;
,;
, ~,;r
;s
.. '1~,i';:"p
„r.r
4~'a'' , . . . , . , ~ . .
~ ~
~
~ ~ .
. . .
~ ~
~r"~, f, ~ f ~ ~ri~,4y
~ k, i~w
~~~
~,'
~~'~ ,
,'~:i
~
~'~ 4. ~hat t~he aize ~nd ehn~e of tho ~ite proposed for the
u~e is
aciQqu,ato to allaw the f
ll 1''r
+, u
developmant; of th~
detrimental to ~he particular
zO
u
A
area nor ta L•he
peac~,
health
eafety and
general welfare of tho Ci.tize:ie of the C.tty nf Anahei.m.
5• Ttiai: the gr~nting of i:he rondit~.ianal U~e PQrmit undQr the
conditiona impoaed
if
,
any, will not be detriment3]. to tho paa~e, health,
eafety and genezal welfa.re of the Citize
`
~
na of the City of Anaheim. ~
'~
~~' b. That the traffic generated b the
impo~-e an undue burdetl u
on ~
n
t
p
a
u
r~ ~
~~~ p
:
e ~s
reets an~1 i:ighw~ys des
gned
and
improved
to
carry the traf£i
i
c
n tha .~rea. .
7. That no one inc,icated •ti~~ir preaence at oaid public hoaring
in opposition; and that nn correaponde7ce was rece~.vr~d in opposttion to tha
ouk~~ect petiL•ion.
CAT TF'QRNTA ENVIRONMEN'PAL OQAI,TTY ACT FINDIDiG: That the Anaheim
City Planning Comm,i.ssion ha:i rQViewed tha propooal to ~~rmit a 5,290 sq.ft.
gour.rnet market with take-out prepsrad food, and with waiver o£ minimum number
of. parki.ng apaceo OIl an irregui~:rly-flhaped parcal ~f land congieting pf
appraximately 2.6 acraa locaterl at the sou~:Yiweat cor~er oE Nohl Ranch Road and
Villa Real Arive, and furthor described ae 505 Sauth Villa Roal Urive; and
does Itereby approve the Negative Dec7.aration upon fiitding that it kias
conc~ider~d the Negative Doclaration together with any commente received during
t•he giiblic review proceai3 and fur.ther finding an the basis th~t thA initial
stuciy an~ any comments receivrd that there is no substantial evidence that the
proj~ct wi.ll have a aignificant e.ffact on the environment.
N~~W, ~'FiEkEF'ORE, BE IT RE~OL4ED thaL- the Anaheim City Planning
Commisaion doe~ hereby grant eubject Petition for Conditionzl Use Permi~, upon
the following conditionb which are hereby found tn be a necec~sar.y prerequioite
tc~ thQ p~apos~d us~ ~f the subjuct property in order ~o praserve the safQty
and general wolfara of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That subject property shall bc: r~eveloped substantially ln accordana~ with
p1~1ns and epecificatio:is r~uLimi~ted to ttie City of Anahelm by thQ petitioner
and wh.ich plans are on file with th~ Planning Depar~men;: mark~d E.xhibit
Nos. .1, 2 and 3.
'•~ 2. Thar pri.or. to final builditiq and zo~ing inspections or within a periad of
Fj one (].) year fro-n th,.~ date of this resolution, whichevPr occur~ fir.at,
'i Condition No. 1, a.boce-mention~d, ehall be complied with.
3. 'I'hat approval oF ~his applicatlon CO[1N~1~11~E8 appro~. 1 of the propo~ed
request on).y to the extent that it compli.es with thQ Anaheim Municipal
Zoning Codc~ and nny othnr. applicable Clty, state and Federal rogulatione.
Approval. doQS not include any ac~i,on or finr,iinga as to compliancQ ~r
appzoval of tha requeat rega.rding any othPr applicable ozdinance;
ragulation ~r raquirement.
~~
M2~ PC90--244
:uMC~
~."""„!
t^'~
... *,.,7~ !y`r~
~I~
;,;{
• 'j
; , "t' ~`;
w.
BE ZT FU~tTHER RESOLVc,D that the Anaheim City nlann,ing Commie~iUn
;~oes herE~y find and det~rmine that adaption of thie Reaoluti~n ie expLe~sly ;~~
predicat:ed upoa applicant'$ compli~nco wi~h oach and all of the conditians
hereinabove set for~h. Shuuld any ouch condition, or any part therROE, bR
declarecl invalid or unenForceable b~ the final judgment of. any caurL• of
compQten~ juriadiction, then thia Reaalution, und anX approvalo hor9ln
containQd, ,oha11 bQ deemed null and void.
THE FOREG,OING RESaLU'1'IUN was adop~ted at the Planniny Commission
meeting af Octobor 8, 199C. .,
~^
~ ~~,~~~~/~~ ~~ ~.~~..~~
a~
HATRW MAN, ANAHEIM CIT~PLANNT.NG COMhYISSTON
ATT~ST:
~ ~ °~ .° ~=~-
SECRETARY, ANAc~EIM CITY PI,HN~IIPiG C,'OMMTSSION
STATE OF CALIFORf1IA )
COUNTY UF ORIINC;F: ) s~.
C:ITY OE' ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Sec.retary of the Anaheim City Planning
ConunisEiot~, do herel~y certify that the f~regoing r.eaoiution was passed and
adopted At a meeting c~f ~he Anar.Qim City Planning Commi.s~ion held on
Oc}obc~r fi, 1990, by th~ foll~wing vote of the members thereof:
AYE5 • COMMISSIONEERS: BUUAS ~ BOYL~STUN, FI~LDIiAUS ~ HELLYER~ HENNIN'GE12e
MESSE, PI:RFIZA
NOE~: COMMTSSIONERS: NONE
AB~ENT: CONPMTSSIONERS: NONE
7N WITNESS WFiEREOF, I huve hereunto aet my k:and this _~ day
o f `~d.P~.. , 19 9 0.
- ----°~~ ~c-^.~-~. -_
SEC:<1's'rARX, ANAHEIM CITY PI~ANfQINC CU2dMIS3iON
-3- PC90-244