Resolution-PC 90-25F.~t.~,4
RES~LU'rIC)N 270__,_ PC~Q-~?5
A RESGLUTION OF THE ANAHCIM CIT.Y I'LANNING COMMISSTUN
THAT PFTITION P'OR COPIDITIONAL USL 1'EktMIT N0. 3240 BE GRANT~~
WFiEREAS, th~ Anal~~im City Plann.ing Commission did rQCeiv~ a veriFied
PetiLion for Conditional Us~ k~ermit For certain rea7. proper.ty situated in the
Citv aE Anahei~n, Counl•y o£ Urange, State ~~f Cal~.f:~rnia, c~ESCribed as :
PARCEL l, Au SHOWN ~N A PARC~L MAP FILED IN BOO~C 84,
PAG~S 5, ti, 7, ~.NI) 0 OI' PARCEL DiAP5 IN THE OFFICE OF
TEiE COUNTY RECORDER UF URANGE COUNTY', CAI~II'ORNIa.
WHEFEA,S, the Czty 'Planning Commissipn did hold a public he~zing at
', the Civic CenL•er in the City o£ l~naheim on Janitary 29, 1990 at 1: 30 p.m. ,
! notice of said public hsaring having been rluly given as requxred by 1aw and in
accprdance with the prova.sions of, tki~ An~alieim Munic.ipal Code, Ghapter 18.03,
to haar and cor,sider evidence for and against said pr~posed conditiunal use
~ permit arid to investigai:e and make ~indinqs and re~ommendations in connection
• thErnwitki; and
WHEREAS, sa5.d Commission, af:ter due inspe~:tion, investigation and
stu~y made by itself and in its beki~lf', znct after due c~~i:~ideratian o£ all
eviclc~ncF and zepart~~ o~.fei•~d at said hearing, does ~'ind and determi.r~e the
f.olluwing Facts:
x. That the pc~titioner reque;,ts approval of a cond~.tional use
permit ixnder authority of Code Seci:ion 1~t.44.050.130 to permit a ahurch ~-ith
waivor ~f the fo].1c>wing under authori.ty of Code S~ction 18.06.080:
{a) ~ECTI~fI~1$•06.0~~,~25~ - t!Iinimum number_of ~~rk.incx sn~ce~.
1i~~06,050~02G6 (Ot~2 r~quir~cl; ~62 existinq)
an~i 18.44~QfZ610~0
(b) 5,_ECT1~N 1E.OCZ 04Q,~20 - Miciimum dim~nsi~n,~ of~~rkin~c_ ~ac~~.
(8. ~ x 1.E3 ft. r.eguired;
~ x].5 f~. dimensior-a existing for 138 spaces
i. [24.5~ uf er..ist.ing spaces] )
"' 2. That th~ parking variance wili not c~use an increase in traffic
congestion in the irmn~;diate vicinity nur advcrsely aEfect. any adjoining land
uses; and Y.~a~ the grant:iny of the p~rking variar.ce under tYe co~ditions
irnposed, i~ any, wil.1 not bP c~etrimental L-o the peace, he~l*h, safety or
general we]f~re of the citizens of !he City of Anaheirn.
3. That the proposed use is gr~r_~ed for a period of three (3)
years, tu expire on January 24, 1993.
4. That i:he proposed usE wi11 not adversely aL•fect the adjoinxng
land uses anc' the gcowth and development of the are~ iri which it is proposed
ta be located.
1266r PC90-25
r~s .,,
.i
5o That t}ie sizo and shape of ~tie site proposed for the use is
adQquake ~o allcaw t2ie Fu1J. dev~loprnent o~ th~ proposed ixsR in a mannex nt~t
dekrimental to the ~arti.cu].~r area nor ta tl~e pea~e, h~~lth, safety and
general welt'arW of the Ci~izens o.f t~he City o£ Anaheim.
6• lh~it the granting oi tne Conditional Use Permit under the
conditions im~iosed, if any, will not ae detrimental to the peace, Yiealth,
s~.£ety and general welfare of the Cit;izen~ of ~he CitX o[ Anaheim.
7• Th~-t th~ tratfic gener«teU by the prapose~~ use will riot iri~ose
an u,idue burden upon the streets and highways dosigned and improved i:o carry
the trafLic in the area.
8. That no one indic~ted t2ieir presence at said public h~.ara.nq 9,n
oppositio:i; anQ t}ie~t iio cori•es~onci~;nce was rece.ived in oppositioiz to the
subject petition,
~AL,IFp*tNIA ENV'IRONMrNTAL _QUALITYi ~~~ FINDTNG: The L~lanning
nireecor ~.r his ciat}zoria,ed r.epresentative has dolerm~n~cl that the pr.oposed
pro;ecl fall:~; wit!iin th.e defii~ition of Categor.ical Z:xempti~i~s, Class 1, as
defined in ~he Staee EIY. ~uicle'linFS and is, ~herefc~re, cazeaorical?.y sxEmpt
From Ghe requirement to pr.epa~e ~n ExR.
rornmissi~n NOW,
does THEREF012E, B.E
hereby
ra~it TT RESOLVED that the A.iaheam City Plani~ing
3 years,
upon g
the following subject Petition [or C~z,ditiorzal
conditi T)5e Permit f.or
necessary ons which are her.eby
prerequ:;.site to the pronosed usE
f found to be ~
ta preserv
F the
safety and g o
the subject pr
ane~-al wel
far~ oP th operty in order
Anahe irn : .
e Citir.ens of tkie Ciryo u~
1. That the h~ur.s of operaL-i.on Lor subjr~ct church shall not be permitted
iviLk:in oria (1) hour of the ttieater aox of.f9ec~ c+pPning, as requir~d by
the Ci.ty TraCfic k;ngineer.
2. That thE fire alarm system sha11 he operational during ace.up~ncy of: the
facility bx the church congregation and employees, as re~quired by tkee
City Fir~ nepartmenC.
3• ThaC the proposal sha11 comply with all signinq requirements of the CL
(SC) "Commarcial, Limited - Scenic ~orridor Overlay" Zone, i.inless a
variance allowing sign wazver.s is approved b~~ the Cxty Council, Ylanninq
C~nunission or 2oning Adminis*_rator,
4. That subject property shall be developed sub~tzntia~ly in accordance
witti plans and specificatir~ns submit~ed ~o the City of Anaheim by the
petitioner arid which plans are on ~i7.e w.ith the Planning Depar.tment
marked ~xhibit t~os, 1 an3 2,
5. That ttlis r.onditional use permit is granted f:or a period of hhree (3)
yaars and ~xpire on January 2~, 1993.
-a-
PC 90-25
w
n
~~ n
~. ,S
.~:r.
-
~• That prior to commea~com~nt nf th~ act;iv.i~y author.iz~d by this .resnlution
or within a period of on~ (1) year fro,ti Cha date }i~r~tn, whichever
occurs f.irat, ConditS.on rios. 3 and q, above-mertionod, 3ha'11 ba comp]it~d
with. Ex~ensiona t'or furthor. ~.ima to completo said r_onditions may ba
grant•ed i n t+ccox•danr_e wi th Section 1Q. U:i . 09U of Ch~ Anahoim Munic iF,al
Code.
7• That approva? af this a~~pl.icaC.ion con3titures ~~ppraval ot L•he propo~Qd
requ~st only ~~ thQ Pxt.enl th~i~, it comp;ies wi~h the Anaheim Munir.ipai
'Loning Codo az~d any okher applicab.le City, Stat~ and F'odert~l
r~9-ilat.ions . Approval doHS nat includo any action or f i nri i,,.,~
comy~li~inco or a~prov~il of the request reyardir.g ,any other applicak~lo
orci.in~nc.e, re~~ulaL•ion or rQquirnr~en; .
8~: IT FURTHE:R R~SOLV£D t}~at the An~hoim i;i~y Planning Commi.ssior.
dues hereby Cind and determina thal ac:opc.ion of this FQaolut:iai~ is expr~ssly
Predi.catec~ upon appliaant's compliance ~i th each nnd all oE ~hQ c.on~'.itions
hc~re.nabovQ s~t forth. Shoul.d any such conclitioris, or any p~rt ~}~~reof, be
~ieclared Snvalid or uner,tOL'Cf'1vIP by tho final judgmNnt of ~ny couzC of
competent jur.isc~icGion, t4Qn this Resolut:ion, ind any approvals herein
contained, shall ~e cleemed null and void.
Tffr ~OR£GOIl7G RF SUI.Ur. iorr
meeting of ~Tanuary 2g, ,~r~~0.
CHi1i Rt~AN,
~as adopked at tn~ I~l~nning Gonvnissio::
/`.
. . ;
.--~1.•
-2~_1___•• L--.- ,+_.._~,,"'_
AP7AtIEIM CI1'Y PLA21N7DiG COhL~tISSION
ATTEST: i' _ ~.
~ ~~
~ ~ ~ 1 .
_--_ _c~-.~~-~=~~-.~ t- -~~-~u..~.
.~'iECKETIIRY. AtdAHEiM C,Iry PI :,r;IN(; rObq,dlSS;n.:
STATG OE' CT~I,IFORNTA )
COUNTY OF OR1.27GE ) S3.
CITX OF ANANEIM )
j. Fdilh L. li~r.ri,^,. ~ecretac• of
Com.mission, du hcr-lby ce.tify that the orf~ ointhe +•Anahoim City Planniny
adopteci at a meetinc~ t~f the AnahF•im City Planninq t;~mmf ion held ons J nuary
29• 19`~~. by the f.~llowinq ~ote of the r~embers l•hr.reUf.:
AYFS; CON1vtISSIONEiFtS; A~SYDST-1lT, E3UUAS,
MC F~URFTF.;Y, I~'iESaE:
NOES: CO?~R~tISS10~tF,t1S; lfGKE
AB~EhT: ~.OMMISSIONERS: N4t7F.
~'~r.~~Z1~US, fiF:i LYER, }iERFi5T,
IL1 WIT2JF.5S W'i{EREOF, Z havr, her~~unr~ s~tt ml' ~dnd th.is
o~ :~~ =~~-u-!~~_ . 1990. ?~~,day
--~ ~ ) ~
~ ~{,/
__ ._ -- . ~-t.~ =-" ._. - 1~ _~~.. ~
_y. ... •-.-. --~Y.~_.-"4~t, _..__.
5ECREThR7, A2IAHETM CTT.Y p[,`~~7;JINC Ca.+?dISSIOtJ
•- 3 -
PC 90-25