Resolution-PC 90-258~ ,~~~, ;`;,
.~
RFSOLU~ION NQ. PC9A-25ti
A RESOLUTION OF THE AN,'~,HETM CITY PLANN:LNG GqMMISSION
7'HAT PETITTON F'OR VARIANCE NO. 4086 BE GRANTED
WHEItEAS, the Anaheim Ci~y F~lanning Comrniesion did receive a
verified Yetition for Varianco for certain real property eituated in the City
of Anaheim, County of Urange, State af California described ae:
THAT PORTTON OF TF1E NORTHFIEST QUAR'P~R OF TFIE NORTHEA~T
QUARTEF OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RXINGE lA WEST, ~N
TH~ RANCHO LOS COYAT~S, AS SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER 1S
INDZCATED ON A MAP OF TRACT NO. 647, RECORDED IN BOOK 20,
PAGE 34 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS UF ORANGE COUN'P,
CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLI,OWS:
EEGTNNING AT A PQINT ON THE NORxH LINE OP' uA:xD SECTiON,
Ei1ST 3~0.00 FEET FROM THE NOFtTE~WEST CORNER OF THE LANp
DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 1 OF THE DEED 'PO TFIE GRECO
CONSTRUCTTUN CURPORIITTON, RFCORDEA OCTUBER 6, 1955 TN
BOpK 3235 PAGE 147 OF OFFICIAL 1tECORDS; TE~ENCE SOUTH
300.00 FEET, PARALLE.~ ~AST 120.80 FEET, MORE OR LF.SS,
PARAT.,LEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION TO TFTE WES
LINE OF THE L'AND DESCRIAED TN DEED TO PATRICK G. O'K~G:FE
' ANIS WIF~, RECORDED NQVEMBER 10, 1955 IN BOOTC 3278 PAGE
385, O'c'I'IC~AL RECORUS; THENGE NOF2TFi 300.00 FEET ALONG THE
WEST LINE QI' SAIC O'KEEFE LAND TQ TNE NORTH LIN~ OF SATD
uECT:JN; THEI3CE WES9' 120.75 FEET, MORE OR LESS TO THE
PUZNT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT THE NdRTH 66.0~ FEET THEREOF.
WHF;RF,AS, the City Planning Commi~sion d.id h~lci a public hearing
at ~he Civic Centor in the C;ity of AnahQim on Oct~bc~r 8, 1990, at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said public he~iinc~ having been auly af.v9n ae required by law and in
accordance ~vith the provi9iona of tho Anaheim Mnnir,ipal Cade, Ct~apter 18.03,
to hoar and conoider evSdence for and againet r~aid propuaed variancs and to
investigate and make findinge ~.nd recom~nendnti~nA in r.onnection therowithj and
that eaid public hearing was c~ntinued to thc Planning Comm.ission mAeting of
Novert~ber 5, ,1990; and
WHEREAS, eaid Com.misai4n, ~f.tc~r due inepection, inveoti.gation
and study a~sde by ii:eelf and in its Lehalf, and aL•ter due consldoratiori of all
evidence and reports offered at sai.~ hearii~g, dose fi.nd and determine the
fqllowing facte:
1• Thdt the petiti~ner propoees waivere of L•he followiny to
con~truct .~ 2,788 sq.ft., 1 a,nd 2 story a~dition ta an exieting modical
building:
S~TIOhfi 18.04.045 ~ ~i,n+snum structural petbacY..
ar. 8.44.U63 (10 fest required; 4 feet 9 inch„g~ existing)
CR1034MP
~.
-1-
PC9Q-258
9. 1'. +.~ i
n
i , . . .
, .
~ ~ '. ~ 1~1
~
~ ,,., ~
^~
.
~
/
r~4
` 1~'
f
`"
,,
baeie that 2. That tha above-mentior~~cY waiver ie
there r~re epeci
l
t
r~
h
~y
v±~
'
$~-z° ~hgPQ~ a
ed on the
circumst;ances applicable tn
~
g
the
topogrnphy, location a
d
'
pr~p~rtY such
•,
s :Ldentically
of the
2o
i n
as
surr~undtnge whi.ch do no
zaned propor.L•y in th~ dame via~
tP
y to other
nit
~ n
propertiee in ~
,
Ys and that atric
ng Code dapriv~e the PPlic~tion
ilegee enjo
th~ identical zo
ed b
i
y
y other
~
ne t~nd claseification pn
he vicinity.
conditions a 3• That i:hero are ex~ePtinn~l or. Qxtraordinary c.trcumetance
ppli4able to tho
r
;
'
p
s
property that d~ or
operty invo.lve~ or to t11n intoncir~d
not apply gc~nerally to th
ean~e
i
;
;
:
v
cinity
and xone.
e propRrty or clase of uee in the
~
pxenervati.~n 4. That th~ rt~ u~ated
~ ~~riance ia necessary f
and enjoyment oF
property in ~
or the
the eame vicin.tt ~ubstani;ial property right posaeseed by other
y an~
quet~tion. zone, an~ dE+nfed to the ~roperty in
s• That the requeeted va.riance wtll nnt be mxi:erially
detrimental to the pubJ.ic walfare or injurioue to th~ prop~rty or impL•ovements
in euch vicinity and zone in whi.ch the property is locatPd.
6' ~`h~~ nn one indicated their pre~ence at said publi,c he~ring
in oppo~ition; fln~ thah no r.orrec~pondence was received tn oppoyitior. to
eubj~~t potition.
CALTFORtJIA ENVIRONMEIVTAL~~_L~TY ACT F2NpING:
City Plannin "-"-""'--
g Commi~saion hae reviewed the '----- That the P.naheim
propazty f~om ~he R~-p_43~OA0 Propoeal to reclr~eeify subject
jCommercial~ pfficP ~Re~~-~ential/Agricult~aral) Lone to
foot and Profeer~ional) Zone and to conatruct a 2,788tsquare
' 1 a~~ 2~torY addition to an existi.ng m~dical bu.t.ld.ing wi.th waiver of
minimum arructuzal aotback on a rectangularl
~~ approximately O.ol acre, 1~avic~g a frontage ~fAaed pa.rcel of land cansieting
east sidc~ of E~rookhurst Str.eet PProximatQly 128 .feet qn the
~~e~' bein9 2oC~tad a ~ having a maximum depth oF apFrUxi.matel
and furt:her describQdpagr324~gauth26rcokhurgt~Streothedndndoeelhe °f~Broadway
~hQ Negative Aec;laration upon f.tndin xeb s
I~eclaration toqc~ther with an g that it hao r_onsidered the,Negativ~
proceae and further finding Yon~ then~baaieCethat theiinitial etud
aor~~urents ~acQivod thAt there i.e no sub~rtantial evid~nce that thepuroic revl.eW
have a aignificant eff.e~t nr~ rhe env;.ronment. Y"'nd ~ny
P jeci: wi11
NOW, TH~REFORE, BE IT ktEgpLVED that ~ho Anahe.tm Cit
~0~~°gl°n doe~ hereby grxnt eubject petitton for Variance, u~on tho followin
conditi~na which Y Plana~ing
are h~reb3~ found to bQ r~ neceesarv 9
propoaed u~e of the aubjR~~t proper.ty tn arder ~fl ~rerequi_site to t:he
~eneral welfaro ~f ~he Citlzens of the (:ity of Anaheim: Pr~~erve the safpty a.nd
1• ~ That a fee fnr strRet lightiny purpoxe,~ shall be
Anahoim uased on t;he length of otr~er. frontagN alung Lincoln~Avenueiin a1
amount gs est•ablfehed by Ci.ty Council reeoluti.on.
2. * That pr.tor to i.esuance of ;~
.g.ignai se~esement tee ehall b4 paidd~n~ parmit, L-he apprupriata traffic
ae establ.i.Ahed by City Council resolution,~h~ City of Anaheim in ar. amaunt
-z-
PC90-•25$
~
:;;
~s - ~;,~::
I . . . . . . ~ . ..,, ~: ~. . ,,.. : i` / I ~~,udiN,, ,
~ ~~
~ ;~
~ i }
f ~
~1 ~ ~~ .' ~''
~ `f,
i . . ._' ','~
~ 3. * That sidewalke, curbs and guttars eha11 be romoved and/o.r reconstructed
~~~ along L3.n~oln Avenuo se required by the Gity ~nginoer anci in accordance
with star~dard plane and s~ecification,e on file in the Of~ice of the Cii:y
Lnginaer.
4. ~'Ph~~ pl~ns shall be aubrtiitt~ad L•o the ~ity Txaffic Engineer ~or hi.s revlew '
, and approval ahowing confozmance with the latost revieic~n of Enqineering ~
&tandard Plan Nos. 436 and G02 pertaininc~ tn ~arking stand~rde, and
Standara Detail No. 137 pertaining to eite visibi.lity. subject property
~hall thc~reu~on be developed and maintained in cnnf~rmance with eaid
„ plane.
5. TP~at the drxvaway along Lincoln Avenue, shall be rc~conatructed ta
accommodat~ fif~een ('15} foot radiug curb re~urns in conformance with
Engineerinc~ Department Standardg.
~. *'Phat eubject c~netruction Authorized b}~ thi.~ r~solution ehall be gerved
by underground uti.litie~.
7. *'Phat the lgyal owrier oi suhjoc~ prapQrty aha11 dedicate ~o the City ~f
Anaheim an eaoement five (5) feet in w9.d'ch along the south prop~rty linQ
for public utility pur~oses.
8. * Th~t traah etarage areas c~hall be provir~ed ancl maintained in a location
acceptable to the Stzeet MaintQnar.ce and S~nitai:ion Division and in
accardance 4J~tf'1 approved plana oi~ f.ile witr. said divieion. 5uch
infarmati~n aFall br~ spacific:xlly nhawn on the ~I.ans eubmitte~ for
build~ng permits.
9. * Tnat thie Variance id g.r.anted eubject tA th~ adoption of a zaning
ordinance in connectian with Iteclassificai:ion No. 90-91-13, now pen~ing.
10. That any propoeed f.reestanding eign on eubject property shall be a
monument-type no~ er^~oding Hiyht (8) feet in height and ehatl be subject
to the rovi.ew and ag~roval of th~ City TrafEic Engineer.
il. * That thQ on-eitQ landscaping and irrigation eys~em sha11 be refu.rbiehed
ancl maintained in complf~nce with City atz-r:dards.
12. That conetxuction of any on-ei~te free-standing si~~nag~ or block walls or
fence» ahall bQ eubject to the prior review snd approval of the Ci~y
'Pra~fic EnginRer, in accordance with Engineering 5tan~ard Det~il No. 137
pertaining to aite vinibility.
7.3. That dubjsct praperty aha.ll be developed substantially in accordance with
plaris and r3pecif icationo sui~mi.tted to the City of Anaheim by th~
petitioner and which plans are on file with thQ Planning Department
marked Exhibit Noe. 1 through ~.
14. 'That prior to ieeuance ef a building perm±t or withf.n a period of one (1)
year frflm the date of thi~ r~golution, wh.ichevPr occure ~irst, Condi•tion
Noe. 1, 2, 4, 7, 8 and 9, abave-•mentioned, ahail b~ c~mpl.ied with.
Extension.e for further time to complete said conditiane may be grantad in
accurdance with Sactiun 18.03.09Q of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
~~
-3- PC90-2 :8
~'
r
15.
~~"~1
~''~'r~
+ `~~~':: n r -~ $~~~Iy ~
. '.!l,.~S'U~:A~~ ~.,
,_:,/ •. •er;
'~"`r
!v
That prS.or to f.inal building and zanir~g inepecttons, Condition Nora. ;i ~.
6- 10, lI and 13, above-mentianed, shal?, be complted wi~th. ~~~
16. *~hat approva~ of thi.s application conetitutea a
requeet onZy to the ~;~~ent that it comp].iee withp~he~Anaheim4Municipal
7.oning Codo and any othez applieable Cit
rogulatiuns. Anproval doee uat inalude a~y actis~ntar~findazy~eSer~o
compliance or approvAl ~f the request regardin7 any other applicable
ordinance, regulatl.an or requirem~nt. Conditione marked with an aeteziek
(*) are r.Qquirad by e.etabliehed laws, cadee, regulatione and agreemQnts
and are, tharefore, not subject to n~goti.ation,
BE IT FURTHER RE80LVED that i:he Anaheim City Planning Commiseion does
t~ereby iinr3 and determine tha~ adoption of this Resolution ig e~xpreesly
predicated upon ap~licant's complianco with saah and all of the r,onditiona
hereiiiabove set forth, Shruld any such con~3ition~, or an
declared invalid or un~nforceable by the final judgmen~ ~oE~anyerourt of
compatent jurisdir.tian, then this Resolutian, and any a.pprovals herein
contained, ehall be deemed nii].1 ~nd voirl.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted ~~t the Planning Comn;iasion ;'~
meQting of Novem~er 5, 1990.
. -> .
-^=-.::._. f , r' :~~ : ~ ;-.^.,., ;(~ ~~''~`_"
• ~ c.. , . . .:' - ~; c_.K..-''
CHAIRF70MAN, ANAHEIDi' CITY' I'I,ANN DI CI pG' MMj- gS1pN
ATTEST;
~ ~
r~.i ~( ~ . _~_L_
S~CRETARY~ A3VAHFIM CITY FLANNI G CAldMISg:LpN
STRTE OF CALIFORNIp )
COUNT'1 OP' ORANGE ~ qQ,
CTTY OF ANAHEZM ~
T. Edith L. Harris, Secr~tary of tho An~heim Cit
Commieeian, do hQreby certify that th~ foregoing resolution ~~aeY ~l~nr~ing
adopted at a mec~ting of the Anaheim City Planning Gommiesion held onaNov~mber
B, 1990, by the~ following vote o£ the mernbe;:s tl~er.~of:
AYE:S: COMMi3STOIvERSt HOYDSTUN
, BUUAS, FELDHAUS, H~LLYER, ;?ENNIhGE.R,
NOES: MESSE, PERA2A
CO.~IMISSTONERS: NONE
ABSENTi COMMISSTO[JGRSs NON~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I ha~.~e heieUnto oet my hand thia ~~
of -~~,.~e~.~li'-' ~ 1990. _~...._,_.~ da.
Y
~ ~ ~I .
•--=---~ ~ /~.~.t.
uGCRET~~Y, ~NAHEIM CI~`Y PLANNTNG COMMISSTON
-4-
PG90-258