Loading...
Resolution-PC 90-264~;~,;;r, ,~~~ ~ ~,.;, ~t;~,i RESQLCI'rTON NO. PC90-264 A RESOLUTION OA' TEiE 2~NAIiEIM C1TY PLANNING COb!MIS5ION THA`I' PET.LTJUN FOR CONDITTONAL USE PERMIT N7. 336L BL~' GRAATTED WEit;REA5, the An~heim City Planniny Commie~~ion did rec:eivQ a vezified Petition for Conditional Use Perm.it fo~r c~rtain zQal. pro~~rty • situatad in the City of Anahei.m, Caunryo uf Or~nge, St~te of Californi~, deRCri.hed ae: THE EAST 420 F.EET OI' THE 30UTHERLY 220 FEET OF THAT PGRTION UF L~T 2 IN C3LOCK K OF TH~ hRAEMER TRAGT, AS YER MAP RECORARU IN BOOK '12, PAGBS Et7 AND SS OF MISCELGANrOUS RECURDS OF LOS ANGI,ES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCR'rgED AS FOLLOWS: AEGINNING AT 'PEIE NOHTHWEST CpRNER t)F S21iD LUT; THENCE EISTFRLY G60.00 kEET AI,ONG TEIE NORTH BOUNDARY 'PEiL:R~OF; THENCE SOUTHERLX E325.00 FRET PARALLEL WITH TH'3 WES'~' BOUNDARY O.F SAID LOT; THENC:E WESTERLY 650.00 FF.ET f~AFtALLEL WI'PH TFIE NORTH BOUNAARY OF SAID LOT TO THE WEST $OUNDARY OF SAIA LOT; NORTHERLY 825.OU f'R~T TO THE POTNT OF B~GINNT:VG. WHE~:c^,AS, the Ci~y Planning Commis~ion did hold a public hoar.ing at the Civic CentAz i.n tlie C3.ty c,f ~naheim on Novembar 19, 1990, at 1: 30 p.m. , notice ~f a.zid • ~:~.lic hea~:ing having be~n duly givon ae requirad by law ancl 'n ~ acco.rdance wtth the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Cha~tpr 18.03, to hear a~td r.onoidez' evidence f.or and againat Raid prapossd c~nditional use ~.armit and to inveatigate and make findings and r~commendation~ in connection ther~w;.th; and WHEREAS, said C~mmi~sion, aft~: ciue in~~ection, ir~vastigati.on and study made by itself and i.n its behalf, and ti.fl:ez duo conaideration o£ zll evidence and reportr~ offered at eaid hearing, does fir.d and detQrmine thp followin~~ facts: 1. That the proposod ~~se ie proper.ly one for which a conditional u~e parmit ia authorizea i~y Anal~eim Municipal Codu Sect.ton 1fi.U3.030.010 to retain a tempo;-ary offLce traiLer. 2. That the propos~d use is hereby grantad ~or a per,i~d af two (2) yoare to expire on Auguot 20, 1992. ' j. That the propos~d uAe, aa granted, will not adversely aff~ct the adjaining land ueos and the g:owth and dQVelopmQnt of the ar~ea in which it i.a propoa~d to be locatQd. CR1043MP -1- PC90-264 (i~~'4~.~ ~~~, ~ . a ~ ~ ~~~ ~ 4. That ~hd sico and ehapo of th~ aite proposed for the uae, as grantoc] i.c~ adeqiiata to a12o~~ tho ful~. dAVelopm~nt of th~ propooad ueo in a mannei• not detri.m~ni:a]. ta tho parti.ciilar area nor. *o ~hc~ peac4, heslth, safetx and qonera:l welfare of tho Citizen~r o.f the City of. .~.nahefm. '; ,, i ~ i 6 ~ ;~„~,.,,.~:~~~:::~~: . , 5. That the granti~•~g of the Conditianal Use Permit under the conditi.on9 imposod wi.ll not be detrim~ntal to the peace, health, sa.fety and general welfare oE the Citizen~ cf the C'it,y of Anaheim. 6. That the traffic: generated by thc~ p.ropos9d uae will not impoae aii unduQ burden upan the atreets and highways desi~ned arid im~~:oved L-o carry ttita traffic ir the ar.ea. 7. That ona p~.reon indicatoc' their predeace at said publir_~ hearing in oppoaition; and that nu coireepondence w~s r.eceived in opposition ~o the subjoct petitlon. CALIFORNIA ENVZRONMENT~IL gtJAI.YTY ACT FINDING: The Planning DirQCtor or hie authoriced repreoa~Ztative hafl detormined that the proposed project falls within the definiti.on af Categorical ~;xempticne, Clase 3, as defined in th~ StaL~ EI~t Guidelines 3nd ie, thexefore, categorically ~xempt from the requilement t;~ prepare an Exk. NOW, THEI2EFORF., BE IT RESOI,V~U that the Anaheim CiL•y P1«nning Commi~~ion daee herel~y grant oubject Fetitian for Con~itional Use Perr,iit, :~pon the follawing conditionc~ which are horebl founc~ to be a neceaaary prezequisite to the proposed uae of the subject property in ordez to preserve the eafety and general welfare of tho Citizena of the City of '~naheim: 1. h That the appropriate traffic eignal aasesgment fee ~sltall be ~aid to ttie City of Anali~im iti an aroount ae establi»hed by City Caunci.l res~olutian. 2, * That p.lans ehall be s~abmi.ttad to the CLtl Traffic Erig.inee1 for his revieor and approval sh~wing con~formancQ wiL•h tha la~egt r~avision of Engineering Stiandard ?Lan Noo. 436 and 602 pert:ai.ning to parking stanr~ards. 5ubjoct propE~r~y enall thEt•eupon be d~veloped an3 maintair~ed in conPormanco witli said plans. 3. That R11 drivewnys on Miller StrEat ahall be reconstructed tU accommodate fif.~een (15) fo~t radfua curb returns in confcrmance with Engineering Depnrtment standardo. Fxisting br~oken or. cre~cked drivewayp ahall be removcd anci replarzd as raquir~d by the City Engin~ac~r. 4. * Th~t within a pertod of. ninety (90) days from the date of thia resolution, fire eprinklera ohall b~ inetial].e~~ for t:he trailer. if eaid trailer ig proposQd to be located on subj~c:t property for more than ni.nety (9G) days as required by the Fire DeparLme~lr. S. K That trash ~toraga areas aha11 be provided and, main*.ained in ~].ocation acceptAbl~+ to the Street Ma.tntenar~ce and Srinitatfo~-~ Aivic~ion and i.n scr,oraance wlth app~~oved plans ~n file w.tth Raid divlRion. -2- PG90-264 `', .. ; :,,.:~^ ,~ .... . . .. , . ,., .. , , , , ,,. _.. ~ , , . ~ y~ r~~,~ ~~' ~ ~rk'~ ~ ~ „ n, ~ ,~ , ~ ,~:ii;~,;q ~ ~+a ~~ 6• * That trash ei:arage aroaa ~shall be ~efurbiohed to ths sat.i,sfactioti of the Street Ma~ntenance and Sanitation Divieion to camply with appruved plans ~n ti1P with said division. • ~ rtlat $ny ~roposoci froeahanding aign on eub'ect monume t n -type noL• excc~eding eight (9) feet in hei ht ta th d~ h g un shall. be sub~ect e rev.tew and approval of the City Traffia Engineer. ''' ~• ;;r, x'h~~ plans shall be eubmitted to tho Building Divi~ion showing compliance wi.th tha minimum etandard A oF the City Buildi.ng Divis.Lon ehowing compliance ~ith the minimum standard s of the City of AnahQim, includinc~ the Ur~ifarm Build.tng, Alumbing, Electricai , Machanical and Fire Cados ae adopted by rtle City of Anatieim. thQ appropriate permits ahali b~ obtained for any n4ce~sary wor.k. . 9• * That the on-~ite landecaping ar~d irr~gation dye,tem ahal]. be r$furbi9had and m~intained in complianc i ' e w t ,i City ntandarda. 10. * Ttiat subject propQrty ehall conform to Zan~n 18.61.Ob8.030-.033 p~r~ainin ~~ Code SQCtion t ~ g o site scz~ ML "Induatrial, T.imited" Zone. ~~ning for outdoor uses in th~ ~ 1~• 9'hat sub ect p Y j pro ert st~all be developed eubatantia115• in acrprdance with planrs and specification a aubmitted to the City of A:-aheim by the petiti~ner and wl~ich plana a rQ on file~ with the Planning Department markec~ of ~xhibit N~. ~, 12- xhat within a pe~~iod of ninaty (9~}~ days from the dato ~f tllis resolution, ~utdoor storage and paxking araas ehall be paved with, asphalt to pr.eve~nt aeepage i.nta th~ grour.d. 13. That the property own~r(o~ ~hall enter is~to an agreement with the City of Anxheim Redevelopment Agency pertaini.ng tn o~tc improvpmQnts on aubject Property. 1'~• That Condition Nns, y ~ ~ abov~-mentioned, ehalll~b~2~completed withir~ a7period~ofOninet 129Qt~dda3a ~rom the dat~ of this resolution. Y--~---1--.3~ 15. 'I'hat thie c~nditianal use parmit aha:~l terminate in two (2) yenrs on 7~ugusL• 20, 195i2. 16. * Tnat approv~~l of thie application conn~itutee a requ8st only to the ax~ent that it complies withpthe3AnaheimeMUniaipal Zoninq Corjz and a,~y nther anplicable City, Statc~ and Federal regulatione.. Approval doee not include any actian or fltidings as to compliance ur. approval of the requeet regArdiny any o~her applicable ordinance, reyulation ox re;~uirement. Conditions marked with a~i soteri~k (*) are requir~d by estr:,`.i~hQd laws, c~da~, regu;l.atiana and Agreementa ~nd are, therafore, no~ eubj~ct to negot.tation. '~ ..3._ ~C90-264 ,~''"',, ~ ~ ~ . BE IT FCJRTHER RESOLVED that the An;ahaim City planr~ing Co-nmiadion ,~,;~; d~es horeby find nnd determine th~t adopti.on of thia Raeol.~.i~ion ~c~ expreasly pr~dicated upon s;~plicant~s ~ ''` omplianc~ with oach and all af the conditions horeinabove aet fortk-, Should any ~uch candition, ar an der.larad imvalid or unenfarceab~e by the final judgment pof~an~~oourt b~ ` competent juriediction, then thia Rer~olution Y of contained, eha1J, be deemed nu1]. and void. ~ and anY apProvr~le horein TH~ FOP.EGOING mestiny of Novamber. 19, 1ggp, AT7.'EST : ,~~~~ ' ~:Gt'.~.+~'' `?I~ '~~'~ ~:..y'~ :~~.' .~l ,~.t ri S~ ItETARY PRO TEMPURE ~"-i--'-"' ~ ='~kIdAHEIM CITx.:piAPJNIDTG CO~SMISSIOM ~ _.~ STATE OF C1~ILIFORNIA } CUIINTY 05 ORpNGE ) AD. CITY O~' ANAH~'IM ~ I, Janet L. Jeneen, 56CL•at3ry pro Tem~ore of the Anahoim Ctty Planning Commiasion, do heral~y ~;Qrtif}~ that the foregoing reeolutior. w paea~d And ado~,ted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Ylann,i.ng Commission held ~n November 19, 199U, hy the follawing vute of the caembers theraof: AYGS: COMMISSIpNERS: BOUAS ~ f30YDS'PUC7~ FELDHAUS~ HEI,j,yEj~r HEPININGk;R~ MESSE, PERAZA NOrS: COMMISSTONER3: NONE ABSENT: CONlMISSIONERSt NONE i zN WITNESS WfiERF.OF, T havQ hei-~unto c~n_t ~ of : J ~,z. ~,~-c~~ 1990. mY hand thie ``~~_ da Y ~ r~? ,1 ~__~~'-> ~ h-- ~'^='~~~':. , ~7 !~" ~ . -='~'S~'=", ~ l"}'-';;:ls.~.: - ~ ; S '~CRETARY PRU TEM~QE~E ~ , 2kNAHEIM CITY .PI,APfNI!VG CpMMISS'[UN !• -4- ~:~~ RESOLUTION wae adopted at thc~ Planning Commie6ion ' %~'J / ~ `~i'1 ~ ~ ~r l/ ~'' J~ /~:.:.~~-L ..•G•'~.CK~ ~~ . lC.~~' I t~-'(.iGZiL<_(_~,~/ CHAIRWC7MAN, ANAKEZM CI~T~NNTNG CODSMISSIpN ^ p~90-264