Resolution-PC 90-285~
~
RESO'-- L~- TI~N T~O.i.PC90•-'l85
,~~,'~;
A R.~SO~,UT.IpN QF THE ANAPIEIM CITY PLANNING COMMTSSTON
1`HAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE pERN;IT NO. 3372 BE GRANT~D
WH~REAS~ the ~naheim City Plannin Co `~~'I
~' veri£ied petition for Condition~l Use pu g ~ission did receiy~ a
~k siL-uated in the Cit ~ Y r~ni~ ~~i certain real .`
Y o~' Anaheim Count ot oran a~ ~rOper~x ~,
~' descrik,ed as:
g-• a~a~~ a~ Cali.fornia,
LOTS 4 7 ~
wOREST ~+~CT ~9' 50 51, 102, 103, 104, 105 AND 106 OI'
~ I1'r THE CITY O.F ANAIi~Itd, CpUNTY O~ p ~~CALYPTUS
' CAL,TF'O.i2NIA, i9S P~n Mp,p RECORDEQ ~~C'r'~ ~2'ATE OF
~! MISC~LLANEOUS MApg~ RECORDS OP SAID~C~OUIVTypAGES 29 ?1ND 30 p~
j ALSO THAT PORTIQN OF THE S~)UTHERLY
OF B:LUE GUM STREET AND ARUTTING THE~aBpyE p~;SCnI~ED~PRpP~~G WESTERLY
NORTH. TX TO THE
WNFREAS, the City Plann.'tng c;o~18~lon did }iold a
~.t the Civ?c Cnnter in the C.ity of Anaheim on AecembPr 17, lgg
noLice c,~ ~~; :~ .,, ~, public hearin~
. lic heazing having been dul n~ ~~ 1:3G g,m,~
aa4ordanre wi~h th;~ ~~rovis.iona of th~ Anahe.+, Y given as required b
to near ;;~d r_onsidei evidence for and against sai.dCppopQ~~de~ ~ law and in
permit at~d ta inves~i ate ? , Chapter Xg.03,
therewit},~ and g and make findin,s and recommendationsdin~connection
WFIER~AS, said Cornmiss;.on ' ~
and s~udy m~de bx itaelf and in its beYialF~er d~:e inapect.~on; investigation ~
evidence and rep~rta otfer~d aL said he~rip and after due coneideration of a11 4
~ollawing facts~ ~~ ~1o~a find and detezmine tho
~
1• Petitioner regueat8 ~ppr.oval of a conclitional uae parmit ~.
u nder auth~rity o:f ~nde ge~~iona 18.61.050.601
18. o].,p5p, 618 to per.mit truck ~arking with mai.ntenanCeOzOd6fuelin y
waiver of the folloiving; ~~'
g, and with ~'.
~..
SECTIONS 18.G1.063.U11 - ~
and Minirtium Front setb~r,k. '!1
(Rc utrad:
1.f3_61_063,p1,3 ~ 5p feEt tr~m Slue Gum S~reet And 5 f~et
from Coronado Stree~;
Existing; 25 feet tr~m glue Gum Str~et and o ~
from Corona;3o Stre~t ) fee~ ,~ ;,,
CR1073~k
-1
PC9Q-28S
- :.,.,; . . ;
--- -- - ~ .,._
A'd'+, ~ 't;.'~
r::r~ ~y
/~#+'A
2. That tt~o prnp~eed uHe will not a~~varaely affec~ the
adjoini.ng land ueee and tho growth and dovelopmanL- of the xrga in which it ie
pranoned to be located.
3. 'Phat the sizo ancl ehage nf tha~ ait~ propoeed for the use ie
adequnte tU allow ~hc~ full dev~lopment. o£ tha prnpoeed uen in ~ mc~nnes: ndt
detri.mental to the particular area ndr to ~he peare, healtti, eafety atid
gen~ral_ welE'are of thE3 Citizans of. the Ciryo uf Anaheim.
4. That the propoaed uoa, a~ granted, will not adversely affect
th~ adjoining land uuee and tt~e growth ar.d devPlopm~r.~: of the area in which it
ia prop~aed tu br~ located.
5. That ttie aiz~ and ah~ape of thQ gite prapoeod Eo.r tha use, as
granted, is adoquata t~ allow the full devalcpm~r,t of the prapoaed ueR in a
manner• not dotrir~;erital to the particular arez nor. to Che peace, hga2~h, aafety
and genezal welfarr~ of ttie Ci.tizens of the City of Anah~im.
6. That the grantiny of the Condit.tonal Uee PQrmit under the
cond.ttians impoapd, if an.~, will not be detrimental to the peace, hQalth,
esf~ty and g~neral welfare of tiie Citizen~ oF the City Qf Anaheim.
7. That the traffi.c generat.>d by tf~e propoaed u~e will not
impoee an undue burden upor~ the atreets ai~~:i higl~w:.ya designQd and im~~rovad ~o
carry thQ traffic in the area.
8. That no one indicated tt~Qir presence at aaid public hearing
in oppositi~n; and that no corr.eflpondence wae recel.ved in opgoeition ta the
su~je~t petition.
~AT,:[FORNII~ ~NVI~tGNM~:NTAI~QUAL,iTY ACT F~NpING: That the Anahefm
City Planni:~y Commis~ion hae reviewed the propossal to pgrmit: truck park!.ng
with maintanance and fueling, and witf~ waiver of minimum ~ront eeh.back on a
rRCtangularly-shaped ~,arcel ot land cuneisting of approximately 8.37 acree
locatqd at tha nort(~we~t curner of C~~r~nado Stre•_~L• und eluo Cum Straet, having
approximate frontagQS of 615 feet on thQ ncrth side of Coronado Street and 628
feot on the west• gido cf Blue Cum Stzeet, and further deacr.lbed ag 1231-1235
Nort'~ Alue e;um Street; ancl does herc:by a~~piov~ thQ NsgativR Declaration upor.
finding thnt i.r hae consiciered thc heyativQ p~claration togethpr with any
cammonte cQCefved during tho public roview proceaa :~.r,d further finding on the
basi a th~t the initial eL•udy ar.d any c:omr:~ent0 received that there ie no
aubetantfal evi~ence ~hat t!~e project wiil have n significant effoct on the
environmeti~~;.
tJOW, THER3FOR~:, ElE TT Ft~SO'LVED kh,at the Anahetm City F~lanning
Commieoion doee tiRreby grant eub;.~et ~atitfon for Ccnditi~nal Uae Permit, in
part, u~on the f~llowing condit:ort~ whtch ares hEreby found to !~o a nsr,eoaary
prerequit~ite k~ t:ie propoeod uoe of th~ aubject Property in oxder to preeerve
the uefery and gonor.al Nelfar~z ~: the Citizens r~f the City ~f Anahefms
-2-
':.
`1`:
~
PC9G-2d5
~ ~
~. 7.'h~t a Lot Line Adiuatmenti Plat ehr~11 bo eubmitted to tho Subdiviei.on
Sdc~i~n and az~provod Uy the C.ity F:ngin~~r and then r~cardod in ~he Office
of ti~e Orange County Record~r to cambir-e a11 iots c~mpri~ing subject
pro.perty such that no builciLnga croae ~ciy lot linas.
2. * Thut nrior tu .teauance oE u bui.lding permit, th4 appruprit~to CraEf'_c
pi.gnal aes~,eament tye ahall b~ paid to thQ C.ity of Anaheim in an amount
~s netabliaheci by Ci.ty Council rekolutiun.
3. That no dr.iveway on Alue Gum Struet Dhall r~e lac~ated within 100 ~eet of
Caronaclo Straet unleas reviewed and apprareci by th~ rity Traffic
Engineer.
4. ~ Tt~at plans sha11 be eubmitted to the City Tr.affic ~ngineer far his review
and approval ahowing conformar~~:e with the later~t revieioci ~f Englno~ring
Stanc..:rd Plan Noo. 40?, 436, 602 1nd 607 portaining to par;cinQ
sL-andarda. Subject property ohall tt~F~reupo~i be developed dnd mfltnte~ined
in c;onformance with aaid plano.
5. That all drivowuye on Hluc Gum Street ahall he cone~:riacted with fifteen
(15) foot radius curb returne as required by the City Engineer in
conformance with Enginee~ric~g Sl•andards.
b. That the fenced area ahall rFiuai~ open during bustnese houra as requfred
by the City Traffic Engineer.
'. That the owner/oper3tor stiall obt~.in c.ity Fire Depatment permita for ar_y
new fueling facilitiee.
8. *~:hat etr~~t ligh~ing f~cilitieE along t31up C;um Street dhall be ineta led
ae r.equic•ed by the Utilities General tlanayQr in ~ccordance with
specificationn on file in the Office of the Utilitiee General Managorj ar
that socurity in the f~rrn uf a bon~, certificats of ~~epooit~ letter of
credit, or cuah, ±n an amount and faLm sati~fac};ory to the City of
Anaheir,., shall bo poated with the City to ~uarantee ~l~e oati.sfactvey
aomplption o~ the t-bove-mQntionc~d impr~vemente. Said aecurity oitall be
oosL•ed with the City of An~hFim priar. to iseuance of a buildinq p3rmit.
The above-ro.~uired improvemente 3ha11 b~ ins~alled prior L•o occupancy.
9. * That the propodal et~all c~~mply w.tth all eigniny requiren~nta of Lhe ML
"Induntrial, Lfmited" Zonc~, ur,leaa a varianr.e allawing siyn watvers ie
npproved by L•ho City Council, PJ.anning Commisnion or Zoning
Administrat~r, and except a3 othtrwise epecifiQd in Condition N~,. 12,
herein.
10, * Tliat thQ on-eitu l:,ndecapin7 n:~d irriqatio~ eyet3m shall be refurbinh2d
and main«efned i.n compliance wi'-h City atandar.do, ond thd~ Lhe pxi9ting
lattdncaping alo~ty Cnrona~o Str~~et ahall be impr~ved.
11. That thF p~rleir.g area ad jc~cent t~, E31ue Cvm Street anc! r;oro~a~o Str9~et
ehall be Acreenod from view in c~,nfor.manc~ wi.t•h Zonino Codca Sect.ton
1&. 6.1.066.030 "Requ.trQd Impraverrc~nti of Parking Arc~aa" .
~-3-
PC90-2E5
~.
<
~
~~ ~4~~w~k^ ` 1I~
~~~
12. That any oxioting or ~ropoaed froeat~ndiny diyn on eubjoct property ehall
be a manument-Lype not e~:coeding ~ighr, ~~~ feet in height and ehnll b~
eubyoct t:o the review and nppr,ov~a1 of the City Traffic Enginoer to ver.ify
adequt-te lines-of-•eight.
13. That prior to i~euance of a building perrnit, eatie£actory evidenc~, eh~alL
` be submitt~d ro the [3uildi.ng Divis~.on eh~w.;.ng ti~at tha ~ropoded pro jeat
conforma with Council Pnlicy *7n. S26 "Metal F3uildinge" pertaining to
buildingc~ in i.nduotrial zonee whor~ viai.ble from the puhlic o~roat.
14. That the ownor of eubjact property aha11 oubmit a lettaz rc~quueting
termination o: Conditional U$e Pormit No;~. 1141 (permi~tting expanoion of
an existing truck sorvicc~ sta~ion and ~t~r~qe yard, includ.~ng futurc~
develapment of a reetaurant) an~ 25'71 (p~~rmitti.ng on-sale UoQr and win~
in an Qxieting re~;~aurant) to the Zoning Divisian.
15. * That the r.Qw con~,tr.~:cti~n auth~~rized by ~his re~~luL.ton ahall be er~rved
by und~rground ittili.tie3.
16. That the wator backLiow equfp~nent and ~ny othar large water ayet~m
Qguipment• ehall be install.~d to the uatiafaction of the Water Uhil~.t}•
Division in either (.i) underground :~aultn ~r (f.i) bahind the stixQet
netback area in a manner full.y sr.r~e:ie~i from al.l publf.c str~tetx ai;d
alleys.
17. +~ That all air conditiuning faciliti~s ac~d ~the: roof and gr.ound mounted
equipment ~hall k~e propezly ahf~l~.fed from vi.aw. Such informatLO,. aha11
be specifically ohown on the plana E~ubmittQ3 for b,ilding permi~s.
18. :t~at s~ibject ~.roperty nha.ll be dev~loped subntantially tn accordance with
plan3 and spec.it~cations sub;njtt.c~d to th~ City of Ar.ah~im by the
Fetiti~ner and wh.tch plana ai-Q on file with the Planning DQ ~artment
marke~i Exhibit cros. 1 ana 2,
19. That the wzter uaed on-r~it~ shzll be rQCyc),ed co tho greatest ext~nt
por~eihlQ.
?.U. That prior to co~nmencement ~f the activi.ty authorizod by th±s reeolut.~on,
or prior to iesuance of a builcling p~rmtt, or within a per.iod o~ one (~.)
year fLOm the date of thia zeaalutian, whichever occure firot, Condi~i.on
Noo. 1, 2, 4, 8, 13, lh and 17, above-mer~tior.ed, ehall tie compl.i.~d with.
Extene.tvns for furthc:r. time to c.,-nplete said conaitions may be granted in
accoLdance wi.th Snction IE3.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal. Code.
21. That prtur t:o CUiM10t1Cr;tIFt1C oE r.t~e ac:tivity authorized by thiy reaalution
or prior t~ fina.l building and zoni.ny in~spectionrd, whLchever occur.e
f.irer., Condition Nc,e. 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16 and ].9;
~bove-mentioned, ahaZJ. bo complied with.
''~" PC90-2f35
~~'+~
, ~g
22. * Thut approval of thi9 app7.ieation conatituL~n approval of ~he praposed
r~quest oc~.y to th~a oxtent tliat it cnmp.Lis~ with tho Anaheim Municipal
Zoning Codc~ ~nd an,y oth~r appli~ablQ City, State and Fod~ral
regtilations. Appro•~a]. aooa not includo any acti~n oz findinge ae to
compliance ~r appzoval of the i-ec~u~et r~sgarding any other applicab].e
ordinan~e, rogulatian or requixement. Ca~dir.ione maxkad with t~n aeteriak
(*) are required by eatabliahed lawe, codea, rogtilations and agreemente
an~ ure, the.refore, not nub~ect to nngoti.aLion.
BF. IT FURTHER R~SOLVEC that the Anaheim City Plunning Commiaeion
does hareby find and d~termine that uc;o~tion of this k~salution ia expraesl.y
predicatad upon applicant's compliance witt- each arid all o~ ~he conditiionA
hereinabove eQL• forth. Should any o~ach conditior~, or any par~ thereoE, br~
dec,.are~l invaltd or unc~nforceable by the Eina]. ju~g~mont c~f any court of
compc~tent jurisdiction, 'chen this Resolution, and any appr.ovals hRrein
contained, ~shall be de~med null. 3nd void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTInN wau adopted at thH Planning Commissioci
meeting of December 17, 199U.
~,
~~ ~ 1~ ,/ ~ ~ -
CHAIRWOMAN, ANAHEIM CITY~PLANNING COMMISSIUN
ATT4 S'I' : / ~ I
, ;
. ~I.~vti_c~.,
SECP.ETARY, ANAHGIM CITY PI~ NNING COMMIS:iIQN
STAT~ OF CA.LIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) eR.
CITY OF ANAIJEIM )
I, ~dith L. H~3rris, Secret~ry oE the AnahQim City Flaaning
Corc,rnio~ion, do hareby certify that th~ foregoii~g reaalutior w.^.c ~assed and
ado+~tpd aC a meQting of the Anaheim City Planning Commiseion held on December
17, 1990, by ti~o foll.o4ri:.g vote of ~he memberE tltiereof:
AYE:S: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BOYDSTUN, FifLLYEI~, HENN.INGER,
MESSE, PERAZR
NOES: COMl~:rSSION~:RS: NOPIE
ABSENi: COMMISSIONERS: P'ELDHAUS
IN WiTNF:SB WHcREOF', I have her.eunto set ~ry hand t:1is J~ day
of .~.~-~° ~, 199~. " ~ ~
~ ( ~ ~. .~" .
5E;CRC:ARY, AtiRHEIM ~IT't PLA hING COMIdZSS7c~N
-5- PC90-2A5
^ . ;,