Resolution-PC 90-2861 ,'
t~'~i
~,3~I,U~'ION NO,~,~C90_286
WHEREAS, the Ana'zeim City Placining Commiseion did xecRive a
verified Petii:i~n for Variaiice for r.ertair- real proper~y eituated ln the City
oi' Anaheim, County of 4rang~, Stat~ ~f Californla deecri.bQd aa:
A l2~SpI,UT20N ~F THE ANAHEIM GITY PLANIIING COMbiISSTQN
THA'' PETITTON FOR VARTANCE N0. 4102 BE GRANTEq
AROP4SF.D PAitCEL ,1AP 90-367, BE'I.NG A SUF3DIVISIUN OF ~HE
FOLLOWI P7G s
I,OT 6 OF TRACT NO. 13760, AS SFIOWN ON A MAp FILED IN
BOOK 666, PAGF,S 35 A2iD 3Ei QF MISCELLANEOLJS MAF'g,
RECdi..D5 OF pRANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
; WHEREAS, ~he City F~lanning Commiasion did hold a public hearing
~~;
at the C.ivic Conter in che City of Analieim on December 17, 1990, at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of eafd puultc hearing having been duly qivon as required by law and .in
~ .3ccordanc~ with r_h~ pr.ovieione of the Anaheirn Munic.Lpal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and conaider evidence tor and against said proposed variance an~ ~o
investigate and make findi,ngs and rec~muiendationa iri cpnnoction therewitt~j and
WFi~REAS, said ~~ommisei~n, af~er du~ i.neper,ttor., investic~ation
and atudy made by it.~elf and in it~ bahalf, and afL•ar due conetdera~ion of all
evidence a~~d -:eporte offored at eaid h~aring, daes find and determine the
Ecll~winr~ f~cts:
1. PQtitionor requoete waiver of the fol7.owin,y to creatQ two
(7.) ~arcQla:
~
;,
SECTIO,,~V 7.8. 2;~ . Uf 1. 021 -~i~nimum nt widtih.
(20 :faet r.eq~ifr~d for "Plag~' ].ote;
J.S, 5 feet propoaed i'or ear,h lot )
2. Thnt thQ ~bove-mentfon~,d waiver is herebv granted on the
bas~.s t'~at ther4 ar~ apecial circumetancea applicable to t:he prop~+rty
coneistiny of oize, ohape and topogrAphy, which do not apply to oth~r
identically zon~d pro~erty in the bame v±cinity; and that stric't appli.cation
of the 7.oning Code deprive~ the property of privil.eges enjoyed by other
proporties i.n the identical zone and clasai,ficatfon in thA vicinity.
CR107d-pk
-1-
PC90--2 86
~
~rY~
~
3. '~hat there are excr~ption~l or, axtraor.diiiary circum~tanc~e or
conditi.one app].icable to the praporty i.nvalvc~d or. ~o th~ i.ntencied us~ of the
proparty that d~ not apply genera].ly to the proper~y or cla~e oP uae in the
aame vici.n~.ty and zone.
4. 'that the raquostod variance io nACeesary for. tiho
pr~oervation and enjaym~nt of a auba~antial p.roperty right poaeesaed by other
pr~perty in i~ho ~+ame vic.inity and zone, and denied to the property i.n
quoation.
5. 'that the roquESted varianc4 will not bR materially
detrimen~al to the public w~lfare ur injuri.oua to tl~e prnpsrty or improvementa
in such vicinity and r.one in which the praperty is located.
6. Tha~ no one indi.cated their prQeence at eaid public heariny
in opposition; and that na cori:cs~ondence was receiv~d in opposition to
aubje~t petition.
CALIL'O~CNIA ENVIROtJbIENTAL QUALZZ~Y ACT FtNDING: That the Anaheim
Ci9:y PLanning Commiseion tiae reviewed the proposal for waiver af m3.ni~num lot
width to create two (2) pazcels on an irregularly-shaped pa.rcei of laiid
consxsting af zp~:roximate.Ly 6.1 acrea having a frnntag~ of apprr.~imately 31
feet ~n the aouf.hern terminuo of PoinLe p.r~mier, having a maximum depth of
approximately 1,39h fQQt, being locu~ed approximately 500 feet s~uth of the
centerlii~e c+f Aveni.da De Santiago, and furtriQr deaczibed as T.ot No. 6 0~ Trac~
No. 13'76A, Lot No. 6; and dooe tiereby approve the Negative Declarafiion upon
finciing that it has coneidered the Negativo Declaration t~aether with xny
comrnents re,ceived durinc~ the public r.evi.ec+ proceas and further ftnding on tha
ba~fa that the initia'1 study and any comment~ received that th~re ie no
subs~antial Qv.tdence that the project will tiav~ a aigriificant effoct on the
enviroi~ment .
NOW, THEREFORE, FsE IT RESOLVED thal the Anaheim City Planning
Commis~sion dc~ee here~y granL subj~ct Petition for Varience, upon th~ following
conditiana which are hQreby found to be a neceesary prerequiaite to L-ho
proposed use ~f the aubj~ct property in order to preaervQ the eafety ~nd
general welfa.re of the Citizene of the Cit-y of. Rnaheim:
1. *'rhat th~ appropriate major thoreti~hfare and bridge fe~ shall be paid to
" th~ City of Anaheim i.*- an amount aa ~peci.fied in the Major Thoroughfare
and Bridye Fee Progr.am fcc the Foothill/East~rn Transportation Corridor,
aa oetabliehec] by City Council resolutfon.
2. *'.T'hat L-hp approprfate trat=ic gignal aoesc-e~ne~~t feo shall ba paid t~ the
City of Anah9im in an amount as established b}• c:ity Council reaulution.
3. * That the appropriate fee~ ghall b~ paid ~o the C{.ty o~ AnahQim for SantFi
Rna r..s~n,yon Foad widoning purposee, in an umount an raetabliehad by City
C:~ur.cil Renolution.
a. * That a parcQl map to rec~Ld the division of ~uhject property shall be
suk~mitted ~o and appr~vRd by the City of Anaheim and t.hen be rocordQd in
the Office of the Orange ~ounty Recorder.
CR1074-pk -2- PC90-286
~,5.
..., ,.
, ,
,. ~ , , . . , , . . ~ . . .. .: i' ~ ~ ~ . , ~,'~ l 'i'' ~+~;~ r.t~f~ } ~(G4~~(It`'~r" ,'~`','.
, } ~ ~ l r ~'11,~ S.
r~
~ : ~i r,
~ u,';-'~
5. Thnt i.f ~d~lttional r~radiny is req~~ized to dzve].op building pad areas fcr
eithor of the two (2) parc~la, the grading plan for Tract N~. 13760 aha11
be r~viaQd and a n~w l~utlding pad ce.rtification ahall bo approved by thP
Fiald ~;ngineer of tho Puk~lic Workd/rnyin~aring Department.
6. * Tha~ eubject property~ ahall bc~ eerved by unda.rgraund utilitle~.
7. That the Orange County open space e~sement located on the ~rop~sed Parcel
Noe. 1. and 2 sha11, be clear.ly ehown on the final map. Any atructures
and/or ussc~ within eaid easemsnt bhall be subject tc~ and ccnsi.stent witti
the c~nvRnan~s, conditione and res~.zictions (Ct;&Rs) deacribed in the
Grant of EasemenL- .recorded on April 7, 1981, with tlte Orsnge C,hunty
Racorder and ~ copy of which CC&Rs ar~e contained in the Planni.ng
Department'e Terrtai:ive Trsc~ Map No. 13'~60 file.
8. That subjQCt urp~~Arty ~hall be davQloped substantially i.n accordance with
plans and epecifications submi.tted to the C.ity of Anah~~i.m by the
petitiorier and which plan~ are an file with t:l~e Plan:. ,,~ Depar~me.n~
mar.ked Exhibit N~. 1.
9. That prio~ to final parcel. map approval, Conuiti.on Nos, 7 an~i d,
above-•mentioned, shall be comp.licd rrith.
10. That prior issuar,ce of a building ~rermiL- or within a peziod of one (1)
year from the dat~ of thfe r~oolution, whichgver occure f.iryt, Condition
Nos• 1, 2, 3 and 4, aUove-mantioned, shall bo complied wit'~. Extensir~ns
for fuLt`~er tima to complQte »~zid conditione may be gr.nntec~ in accor~ance
wit'ti Section 13.03.09n of the Anatiezm Municipal Cr~dQ.
11. That prior to final builr,3irig and zoni.nc~ inapecti~ne, Condition Na. 6,
anove-mentioned, shaJ.l bP compliQd wit-h.
12. * That approval of thiy applical:ion conotitutES ~pproval of the propoaed
request only to the gxteat that: a.t compli~a with the Anahei.m Municipal
Zoni-~y Code and any other applica.ble City~, Skate and red~ral
rogulatione. Approv;~l doea no~ include any action flr finding~ ae to
compliance or appr.oval of the requeat rECJarding any other applicable
ordinance, regulation or requiremen~. Condi~ione marked with ar~ asterisk
(*) are L•equired by eata~liehed lawt~, cod~s, regulationn an~i aqreemeni:o
r~nd are, therefc~r.e, not subject ta negotiation.
BE TT FURTHER RESOLV'k;U r.hat the Flnahei-n ~ity Ylanning Commission doee
h~reby f:nd and determino that adoption of thie RQ~olution is ~xpxesaly
predicated upon applicant'd compliaace with each an~9 aIl of the conditionr~
hereinabovo eet forth. St~ould any euct~ conditione, ox any part thpreof, be
declared invalid or unenEorceak+le by the firinl judym~nt of any court of
competent juriDdiction, tl~en thio Rc~solution, and any apgrovale herein
cantained, sha_11 be deema~i null and void.
CR1~74-pk _3_
PC90-2$6
~;
,,
r'~~h
~
THE FOREGOING RES9LUTION ~~~m~ ~dopted at the Planninq Comm:lssinn me9t;iny
of L~ecamber 17, 1990. '`
, ) .' ~
, / t,~.~ 1~ C:, :__. ,~ ~~ ...-'~ -~ -n-- ~r -{ !.~ . (' ~',_..~
GHAIRWJMAN, AN.qHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISS'201N
ATTEST: ,
4 ~
s
~~
SECRET RY, ANAHE~M CITY PLANNING COMMxSSION
STATE Or CALZFORNTA )
COUNTY ~JF ORA.tdGE ) s s .
CTTY OF' ~NAHEIM )
I, Edith I,. Har.ris, Secr.etary of the An3heim City Pianning Commidsion, do
horeby certify that ttie foregoing reeolution wao p~gseci and adopted at a
ti meQting of the Anaheim City Planning Commisaton held on J~cgmber 17, 1990, by
the f.ollowing voL•e o~ the m~mbers th~LeOf.:
; AYE5: COMMT3SIaNEI2S: BOYUSTUN, BC'.U'AS, F~LDHAJS, HELLXLR, Fi~NNINGER,
MESSE, PRRAZA
NOES: COMMT53IONERS: NUNE
AF3SEN'P: COM.~ISSZONER:>:
-~ ZN WITNESS WH~,}REOF, I hav~ hareunto set my hand thf.a l.~_ day
of , 199p.
l/ ~ .. /
`"~ -~ L ~ ~~ --
S~CRETARY, ANAHLIN;t'`ITY P*_,ANNING COMMISSION
^; :
~. .
CR:1074-pk -4- PC30-28
;
f.
~,
; ,
~~ ~~''Y
,~
~ i !'iM
+f ~~ ~
. . .. ... . .... ... . .. .. . .., _ ,.. . . , ~ ,.~... ~. .. .~ . ':d